Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Auxiliary-Variable Adaptive Control Barrier Functions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.15026 v2 pith:2NTYGGAM submitted 2025-02-20 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords controlsafetyadaptivefeasibilityfunctionsbarrierconstraintsauxiliary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of ensuring safety and feasibility in control systems using Control Barrier Functions (CBFs). Existing CBF-based Quadratic Programs (CBF-QPs) often encounter feasibility issues due to mixed relative degree constraints, input nullification problems, and the presence of tight or time-varying control bounds, which can lead to infeasible solutions and compromised safety. To address these challenges, we propose Auxiliary-Variable Adaptive Control Barrier Functions (AVCBFs), a novel framework that introduces auxiliary variables in auxiliary functions to dynamically adjust CBF constraints without the need of excessive additional constraints. The AVCBF method ensures that all components of the control input explicitly appear in the desired-order safety constraint, thereby improving feasibility while maintaining safety guarantees. Additionally, we introduce an automatic tuning method that iteratively adjusts AVCBF hyperparameters to ensure feasibility and safety with less conservatism. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in adaptive cruise control and obstacle avoidance scenarios, showing that AVCBFs outperform existing CBF methods by reducing infeasibility and enhancing adaptive safety control under tight or time-varying control bounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Evolution Factor Risk Ellipse Framework for Reliable and Safe Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An adaptive risk-field-plus-MPC controller with a sigmoid evolution factor and TTC/TWH-based risk ellipses is claimed to achieve collision-free overtaking and lane changes in simulation.

  2. Perception Graph for Cognitive Attack Reasoning in Augmented Reality

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The Perception Graph paper proposes detecting cognitive attacks in AR by measuring cosine distance between vision-language descriptions of scenes, demonstrated on three attacks in one scene.

Pith tools