REVIEW 4 cited by
REALM-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Agent Systems on Real-world, Dynamic Planning and Scheduling Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This benchmark suite provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing both individual LLMs and multi-agent systems in Real-world planning and scheduling scenarios. The suite encompasses 14 designed planning and scheduling problems that progress from basic to highly complex, incorporating key aspects such as multi-agent coordination, inter-agent dependencies, and dynamic environmental disruptions. Each problem can be scaled along three dimensions: the number of parallel planning threads, the complexity of inter-dependencies, and the frequency of unexpected disruptions requiring Real-time adaptation. The benchmark includes 14 detailed problem specifications, 15 comparison methods including Random, LPT, SPT, STPT, MPSR, DRL-Liu, GP, GEP, LSO, SPT/TWKR, DRL-Chen, DRL-Zhang, 2+ evaluation metrics, and baseline implementations using 3+ LLMs including GPT-4o, Claude-3.7, DeepSeek-R1, and 4 contemporary frameworks including LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, and Swarm, enabling rigorous testing of both single-agent and multi-agent planning capabilities. Through standardized evaluation criteria and scalable complexity, this benchmark aims to be opened to public, and drive progress in developing more adaptable, robust, and scalable AI planning systems for Real-world applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
MCPEval: Automatic MCP-based Deep Evaluation for AI Agent Models
MCPEval is an automated MCP-based framework that generates, verifies, and scores LLM agent tool-use tasks; its experiments reveal a consistent gap between how well agents execute tool calls and how well they synthesiz...
-
Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities
A survey that groups graph-empowered AI agent research into planning, execution, memory, and multi-agent coordination, plus agents-for-graphs and applications.
-
AGI Requires a Coordination Layer on Top of Pattern Repositories
The paper claims AGI requires a System-2 coordination layer on top of LLM pattern repositories, formalized by an anchoring score S = ρd − dr − γ log k.
-
Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.