Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Power of Personality: A Human Simulation Perspective to Investigate Large Language Model Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.20859 v2 pith:KZ7GKEST submitted 2025-02-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords taskstraitsclosedhumanintelligencemulti-agentopenpersonality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) excel in both closed tasks (including problem-solving, and code generation) and open tasks (including creative writing), yet existing explanations for their capabilities lack connections to real-world human intelligence. To fill this gap, this paper systematically investigates LLM intelligence through the lens of ``human simulation'', addressing three core questions: (1) \textit{How do personality traits affect problem-solving in closed tasks?} (2) \textit{How do traits shape creativity in open tasks?} (3) \textit{How does single-agent performance influence multi-agent collaboration?} By assigning Big Five personality traits to LLM agents and evaluating their performance in single- and multi-agent settings, we reveal that specific traits significantly influence reasoning accuracy (closed tasks) and creative output (open tasks). Furthermore, multi-agent systems exhibit collective intelligence distinct from individual capabilities, driven by distinguishing combinations of personalities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Agents with Feelings? Personality and Emotion in Multi-Agent Software Teams

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Personality and emotion profiles substantially change multi-agent LLM team pass rates, review scores, revision behavior, and token cost on code generation and code review, with mixed profiles often beating shared ones.

  2. When Does Personality Composition Matter for Multi-Agent LLM Teams?

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Low agreeableness massively shifts multi-agent LLM communication yet barely hurts coding milestones, while the same prompt sharply degrades research milestones and collapses bargaining agreements.

  3. The Alignment Floor: How Persona Customization Breaks Safety in Weakly-Aligned LLMs

    cs.HC 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sycophancy is persona-conditional: a strongly-aligned model stays within 5pp across personas while a lightly-aligned one spans 45pp, so persona safety requires per-model auditing.

Pith tools