Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ProBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Competitive Programming

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.20868 v1 pith:UQXNQCHG submitted 2025-02-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsprogrammingreasoningcompetitivellmsprobenchevaluationlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With reasoning language models such as OpenAI-o3 and DeepSeek-R1 emerging, large language models (LLMs) have entered a new phase of development. However, existing benchmarks for coding evaluation are gradually inadequate to assess the capability of advanced LLMs in code reasoning. To bridge the gap for high-level code reasoning assessment, we propose ProBench to benchmark LLMs in competitive programming, drawing inspiration from the International Collegiate Programming Contest. ProBench collects a comprehensive set of competitive programming problems from Codeforces, Luogu, and Nowcoder platforms during the period from July to December 2024, obtaining real test results through online submissions to ensure the fairness and accuracy of the evaluation. We establish a unified problem attribute system, including difficulty grading and algorithm tagging. With carefully collected and annotated data in ProBench, we systematically assess 9 latest LLMs in competitive programming across multiple dimensions, including thought chain analysis, error type diagnosis, and reasoning depth evaluation. Experimental results show that QwQ-32B-Preview achieves the best score of 20.93 followed by DeepSeek-V3 with a score of 16.38, suggesting that models trained with specialized reasoning tasks significantly outperform general-purpose models (even larger than reasoning-oriented models) in programming. Further analysis also reveals key areas for programming capability enhancement, e.g., algorithm adaptability and reasoning sufficiency, providing important insights for the future development of reasoning models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CMAX-CAMEL: A Coarse-to-Fine Adaptive, Memory-Efficient, and Low-Power Edge Processor for Contrast Maximization

    cs.AR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    CMAX-CAMEL is a runtime-adaptive, memory-centric FPGA processor for contrast maximization that reports up to 19% accuracy gain and 52% energy reduction versus fixed schedules.

  2. Evaluating and Improving Large Language Models for Competitive Program Generation

    cs.SI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    DeepSeek-R1 solves only 5 of 80 recent ICPC/CCPC competitive programming problems with a basic prompt, and 46 of 80 after a taxonomy-guided repair and regeneration pipeline.

Pith tools