Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Group Relative Policy Optimization for Image Captioning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.01333 v1 pith:J47MNN3M submitted 2025-03-03 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords grpooptimizationimagemodelscstpolicyresultdecoding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Image captioning tasks usually use two-stage training to complete model optimization. The first stage uses cross-entropy as the loss function for optimization, and the second stage uses self-critical sequence training (SCST) for reinforcement learning optimization. However, the SCST algorithm has certain defects. SCST relies only on a single greedy decoding result as a baseline. If the model itself is not stable enough, the greedy decoding result may be relatively worst, which will lead to a high variance of advantage estimation, further leading to unstable policy updates. In addition, SCST only compares one sampling result with the greedy decoding result, and the generation diversity is limited, which may fall into a local optimum. In this paper, we propose using the latest Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) reinforcement learning algorithm as an optimization solution for the second stage. GRPO generates multiple candidate captions for the input image and then continuously optimizes the model through intragroup comparison. By constraining the amplitude of policy updates and KL divergence, the stability of the model during training is greatly guaranteed. In addition, compared to SCST, which only samples one answer, GRPO samples and generates multiple answers. Multiple candidate answers in the group cover a wider solution space. Combined with KL divergence constraints, GRPO can improve diversity while ensuring model stability. The code for this article is available at https://github.com/liangxu-one/ms-models/tree/image_caption_grpo/research/arxiv_papers/Image_Caption_GRPO.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RePaCA, a Qwen2.5-Coder 3B model fine-tuned with GRPO, classifies Java patches as correct or overfitting with 83.1% accuracy and 84.8% F1 on a Defects4J-derived benchmark.

  2. CogniSQL-R1-Zero: Lightweight Reinforced Reasoning for Efficient SQL Generation

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A 7B model trained with GRPO and a sparse execution-correctness reward reaches 59.97% execution accuracy on BIRD dev, though the evaluation protocol and baseline numbers contain inconsistencies.

Pith tools