Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Active Robot Curriculum Learning from Online Human Demonstrations

Robotics · Submitted 4 Mar 2025

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our results show that our method significantly improves learning performance compared to three other LfD baselines in terms of the final success rate of the converged policy and sample efficiency.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2503.02277 (version 1)
Pith IDDQNSKQUX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA.E. Eiben, Kim Baraka, Koen Hindriks, Muhan Hou. "Active Robot Curriculum Learning from Online Human Demonstrations." arXiv:2503.02277 (2025). https://pith.science/paper/DQNSKQUX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,114 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.96 · controlled comparison 0.97 · randomized assignment 0.03 · states quantitative result 0.85 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Learning from Demonstrations (LfD) allows robots to learn skills from human users, but its effectiveness can suffer due to sub-optimal teaching, especially from untrained demonstrators. Active LfD aims to improve this by letting robots actively request demonstrations to enhance learning. However, this may lead to frequent context switches between various task situations, increasing the human cognitive load and introducing errors to demonstrations. Moreover, few prior studies in active LfD have examined how these active query strategies may impact human teaching in aspects beyond user experience, which can be crucial for developing algorithms that benefit both robot learning and human teaching. To tackle these challenges, we propose an active LfD method that optimizes the query sequence of online human demonstrations via Curriculum Learning (CL), where demonstrators are guided to provide demonstrations in situations of gradually increasing difficulty. We evaluate our method across four simulated robotic tasks with sparse rewards and conduct a user study (N=26) to investigate the influence of active LfD methods on human teaching regarding teaching performance, post-guidance teaching adaptivity, and teaching transferability. Our results show that our method significantly improves learning performance compared to three other LfD baselines in terms of the final success rate of the converged policy and sample efficiency. Additionally, results from our user study indicate that our method significantly reduces the time required from human demonstrators and decreases failed demonstration attempts. It also enhances post-guidance human teaching in both seen and unseen scenarios compared to another active LfD baseline, indicating enhanced teaching performance, greater post-guidance teaching adaptivity, and better teaching transferability achieved by our method.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Learning from Demonstrations (LfD) allows robots to learn skills from human users, but its effectiveness can suffer due to sub-optimal teaching, especially from untrained demonstrators. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.50
s1 Active LfD aims to improve this by letting robots actively request demonstrations to enhance learning. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.95
s2 However, this may lead to frequent context switches between various task situations, increasing the human cognitive load and introducing errors to demonstrations. background 0.90 0.06 0.02 hedged possibility 0.99
s3 Moreover, few prior studies in active LfD have examined how these active query strategies may impact human teaching in aspects beyond user experience, which can be crucial for developing algorithms that benefit both robot learning and human teaching. gap 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.72
s4 To tackle these challenges, we propose an active LfD method that optimizes the query sequence of online human demonstrations via Curriculum Learning (CL), where demonstrators are guided to provide demonstrations in situations of gradually increasing difficulty. method 0.66 0.62 0.05 asserted 0.99
s5 We evaluate our method across four simulated robotic tasks with sparse rewards and conduct a user study (N=26) to investigate the influence of active LfD methods on human teaching regarding teaching performance, post-guidance teaching adaptivity, and teaching transferability. method 0.80 0.97 0.04 asserted 0.82
s6 Our results show that our method significantly improves learning performance compared to three other LfD baselines in terms of the final success rate of the converged policy and sample efficiency. result 1.00 0.97 0.38 asserted 1.00
s7 Additionally, results from our user study indicate that our method significantly reduces the time required from human demonstrators and decreases failed demonstration attempts. result 1.00 0.96 0.15 asserted 1.00
s8 It also enhances post-guidance human teaching in both seen and unseen scenarios compared to another active LfD baseline, indicating enhanced teaching performance, greater post-guidance teaching adaptivity, and better teaching transferability achieved by our method. result 0.65 0.96 0.37 asserted 0.55

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Learning from Demonstrations (LfD) allows robots to learn skills from human users, but its effectiveness can suffer due to sub-optimal teaching, especially from untrained demonstrators. Active LfD aims to improve this by letting robots actively request demonstrations to enhance learning. However, this may lead to frequent context switches between various task situations, increasing the human cognitive load and introducing errors to demonstrations. Moreover, few prior studies in active LfD have examined how these active query strategies may impact human teaching in aspects beyond user experience, which can be crucial for developing algorithms that benefit both robot learning and human teaching. To tackle these challenges, we propose an active LfD method that optimizes the query sequence of online human demonstrations via Curriculum Learning (CL), where demonstrators are guided to provide demonstrations in situations of gradually increasing difficulty. We evaluate our method across four simulated robotic tasks with sparse rewards and conduct a user study (N=26) to investigate the influence of active LfD methods on human teaching regarding teaching performance, post-guidance teaching adaptivity, and teaching transferability. Our results show that our method significantly improves learning performance compared to three other LfD baselines in terms of the final success rate of the converged policy and sample efficiency. Additionally, results from our user study indicate that our method significantly reduces the time required from human demonstrators and decreases failed demonstration attempts. It also enhances post-guidance human teaching in both seen and unseen scenarios compared to another active LfD baseline, indicating enhanced teaching performance, greater post-guidance teaching adaptivity, and better teaching transferability achieved by our method.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 4 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
  • While [ref] also aims to influence human teachers to select demonstrations that better support robot learning, their approach relies on visual feedback from AR devices and has only been tested on simple 2D navigation tasks.

    How Can Everyday Users Efficiently Teach Robots by Demonstrations? · Active Learning from Demonstrations · 0.90

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.