Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Q-Eval-100K: Evaluating Visual Quality and Alignment Level for Text-to-Vision Content

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.02357 v3 pith:AE3GI6RD submitted 2025-03-04 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords alignmentqualityvisualdatasetmodelsq-eval-100kcontentevaluating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluating text-to-vision content hinges on two crucial aspects: visual quality and alignment. While significant progress has been made in developing objective models to assess these dimensions, the performance of such models heavily relies on the scale and quality of human annotations. According to Scaling Law, increasing the number of human-labeled instances follows a predictable pattern that enhances the performance of evaluation models. Therefore, we introduce a comprehensive dataset designed to Evaluate Visual quality and Alignment Level for text-to-vision content (Q-EVAL-100K), featuring the largest collection of human-labeled Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) for the mentioned two aspects. The Q-EVAL-100K dataset encompasses both text-to-image and text-to-video models, with 960K human annotations specifically focused on visual quality and alignment for 100K instances (60K images and 40K videos). Leveraging this dataset with context prompt, we propose Q-Eval-Score, a unified model capable of evaluating both visual quality and alignment with special improvements for handling long-text prompt alignment. Experimental results indicate that the proposed Q-Eval-Score achieves superior performance on both visual quality and alignment, with strong generalization capabilities across other benchmarks. These findings highlight the significant value of the Q-EVAL-100K dataset. Data and codes will be available at https://github.com/zzc-1998/Q-Eval.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Flow reorganization and transport enhancement in two-dimensional horizontal convection near a density extremum

    physics.flu-dyn 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Horizontal convection with a water-like density maximum reorganizes into a single roll with full-depth plumes, and heat transport scales as Nu ~ Ra^{1/4} to Ra^{1/3}, faster than the classical Ra^{1/5} law.

  2. RadarQA: Multi-modal Quality Analysis of Weather Radar Forecasts

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RadarQA introduces a specialized MLLM and a 70,000-example dataset for descriptive weather radar forecast quality analysis, outperforming general-purpose MLLMs on its own benchmark.

  3. MMIG-Bench: Towards Comprehensive and Explainable Evaluation of Multi-Modal Image Generation Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMIG-Bench is a unified benchmark of 4,850 prompts and 1,750 reference images with a three-level evaluation suite, including the VQA-based Aspect Matching Score that correlates with human ratings.

  4. Towards Holistic Visual Quality Assessment of AI-Generated Videos: A LLM-Based Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Model

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AIGVEval combines BLIP, 3D Swin Transformer, and SlowFast features with a LoRA-tuned LLM to predict AI-generated video quality, hitting second place on the NTIRE 2025 Track 2 leaderboard.

  5. NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Results

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    All 19 valid entries in the NTIRE 2025 XGC quality assessment challenge outperformed their track baselines at predicting human quality scores for user-generated video, AI-generated video, and talking heads.

Pith tools