Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large language models in finance : what is financial sentiment?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.03612 v4 pith:MAOP3WN7 submitted 2025-03-05 q-fin.ST q-fin.CPq-fin.GN

classification q-fin.STq-fin.CPq-fin.GN
keywords sentimentfinancialanalysisfinancemodelslanguagellmswhat
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Financial sentiment has become a crucial yet complex concept in finance, increasingly used in market forecasting and investment strategies. Despite its growing importance, there remains a need to define and understand what financial sentiment truly represents and how it can be effectively measured. We explore the nature of financial sentiment and investigate how large language models (LLMs) contribute to its estimation. We trace the evolution of sentiment measurement in finance, from market-based and lexicon-based methods to advanced natural language processing techniques. The emergence of LLMs has significantly enhanced sentiment analysis, providing deeper contextual understanding and greater accuracy in extracting sentiment from financial text. We examine how BERT-based models, such as RoBERTa and FinBERT, are optimized for structured sentiment classification, while GPT-based models, including GPT-4, OPT, and LLaMA, excel in financial text generation and real-time sentiment interpretation. A comparative analysis of bidirectional and autoregressive transformer architectures highlights their respective roles in investor sentiment analysis, algorithmic trading, and financial decision-making. By exploring what financial sentiment is and how it is estimated within LLMs, we provide insights into the growing role of AI-driven sentiment analysis in finance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantitative Analysis of Media Bias and Stock Price Dynamics: The 2020 Shock

    cs.CE 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Media stance and stock returns show no market-wide level shift or Granger-causal link around 2020; significant links appear only for individual firms after their own structural breaks.

Pith tools