Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Computational Law: Datasets, Benchmarks, and Ontologies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04305 v2 pith:GQTHEL3N submitted 2025-03-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords computationallegalontologiessystemsbenchmarksdatasetsdomainrecent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent developments in computer science and artificial intelligence have also contributed to the legal domain, as revealed by the number and range of related publications and applications. Machine and deep learning models require considerable amount of domain-specific data for training and comparison purposes, in order to attain high-performance in the legal domain. Additionally, semantic resources such as ontologies are valuable for building large-scale computational legal systems, in addition to ensuring interoperability of such systems. Considering these aspects, we present an up-to-date review of the literature on datasets, benchmarks, and ontologies proposed for computational law. We believe that this comprehensive and recent review will help researchers and practitioners when developing and testing approaches and systems for computational law.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LegalPincite: Multi-level Legal Information Retrieval Dataset

    cs.IR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-level legal IR dataset from CJEU judgments with masked queries, full paragraph corpora, and case/paragraph citation labels.

  2. Modeling the Diachronic Evolution of Legal Norms: An LRMoo-Based, Component-Level, Event-Centric Approach to Legal Knowledge Graphs

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Proposes a component-level, event-centric LRMoo-based model for versioning legal norms, but provides no implementation to verify the claimed exact reconstruction.

  3. Adaptive Sentencing Prediction with Guaranteed Accuracy and Legal Interpretability

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A sentence-prediction model grounded in Chinese sentencing rules, updated online with a momentum LMS algorithm, reaches accuracy near a noise-limited theoretical bound on a new intentional-injury dataset.

Pith tools