REVIEW 2 cited by
IFIR: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Instruction-Following in Expert-Domain Information Retrieval
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We introduce IFIR, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate instruction-following information retrieval (IR) in expert domains. IFIR includes 2,426 high-quality examples and covers eight subsets across four specialized domains: finance, law, healthcare, and science literature. Each subset addresses one or more domain-specific retrieval tasks, replicating real-world scenarios where customized instructions are critical. IFIR enables a detailed analysis of instruction-following retrieval capabilities by incorporating instructions at different levels of complexity. We also propose a novel LLM-based evaluation method to provide a more precise and reliable assessment of model performance in following instructions. Through extensive experiments on 15 frontier retrieval models, including those based on LLMs, our results reveal that current models face significant challenges in effectively following complex, domain-specific instructions. We further provide in-depth analyses to highlight these limitations, offering valuable insights to guide future advancements in retriever development.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Diffusion vs. Autoregressive Language Models: A Text Embedding Perspective
Diffusion-language-model embeddings beat LLM embeddings on long-document and reasoning retrieval benchmarks, but the paper overstates some gains and releases no code or data.
-
LLMs are Also Effective Embedding Models: An In-depth Overview
A structured survey of using decoder-only LLMs as text embedding models, covering prompting, fine-tuning, data construction, benchmarks, and open problems.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.