Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

VLRMBench: A Comprehensive and Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Reward Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.07478 v1 pith:2KZDX5K4 submitted 2025-03-10 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords reasoningvlrmbenchmodelsprocessvlrmsbenchmarkcomprehensiveunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Although large visual-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in multimodal tasks, errors may occasionally arise due to biases during the reasoning process. Recently, reward models (RMs) have become increasingly pivotal in the reasoning process. Specifically, process RMs evaluate each reasoning step, outcome RMs focus on the assessment of reasoning results, and critique RMs perform error analysis on the entire reasoning process, followed by corrections. However, existing benchmarks for vision-language RMs (VLRMs) typically assess only a single aspect of their capabilities (e.g., distinguishing between two answers), thus limiting the all-round evaluation and restricting the development of RMs in the visual-language domain. To address this gap, we propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark, dubbed as VLRMBench, encompassing 12,634 questions. VLRMBench is constructed based on three distinct types of datasets, covering mathematical reasoning, hallucination understanding, and multi-image understanding. We design 12 tasks across three major categories, focusing on evaluating VLRMs in the aspects of process understanding, outcome judgment, and critique generation. Extensive experiments are conducted on 21 open-source models and 5 advanced closed-source models, highlighting the challenges posed by VLRMBench. For instance, in the `Forecasting Future', a binary classification task, the advanced GPT-4o achieves only a 76.0% accuracy. Additionally, we perform comprehensive analytical studies, offering valuable insights for the future development of VLRMs. We anticipate that VLRMBench will serve as a pivotal benchmark in advancing VLRMs. Code and datasets will be available at https://github.com/JCruan519/VLRMBench.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning What Matters: Dynamic Dimension Selection and Aggregation for Interpretable Vision-Language Reward Modeling

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    VL-MDR dynamically selects and aggregates fine-grained dimensions for interpretable vision-language reward modeling using a visual-aware gate, backed by a 321k annotated preference dataset, and improves DPO alignment ...

  2. Med-RewardBench: Benchmarking Reward Models and Judges for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors construct a 1,026-case medical benchmark with doctor preference labels across six quality dimensions and show current multimodal LLMs, including medical-specific ones, are only moderately aligned with expe...

  3. RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RewardBench 2 is a new benchmark that supplies challenging fresh human prompts for reward model evaluation, yielding lower average scores but higher correlation with downstream best-of-N sampling and RLHF training per...

  4. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

    cs.LG 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The book introduces the origins, mathematical setup, and optimization stages of RLHF including reward modeling, reinforcement learning, rejection sampling, and direct alignment algorithms.

Pith tools