Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Uncertainty in the era of machine learning for atomistic modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.09196 v1 pith:IPACUU2I submitted 2025-03-12 physics.chem-ph

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords atomisticlearningmachinemodelinguncertaintymodelmodelsaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The widespread adoption of machine learning surrogate models has significantly improved the scale and complexity of systems and processes that can be explored accurately and efficiently using atomistic modeling. However, the inherently data-driven nature of machine learning models introduces uncertainties that must be quantified, understood, and effectively managed to ensure reliable predictions and conclusions. Building upon these premises, in this Perspective, we first overview state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation methods, from Bayesian frameworks to ensembling techniques, and discuss their application in atomistic modeling. We then examine the interplay between model accuracy, uncertainty, training dataset composition, data acquisition strategies, model transferability, and robustness. In doing so, we synthesize insights from the existing literature and highlight areas of ongoing debate.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools