REVIEW 3 cited by
Image Quality Assessment: From Human to Machine Preference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Image Quality Assessment (IQA) based on human subjective preferences has undergone extensive research in the past decades. However, with the development of communication protocols, the visual data consumption volume of machines has gradually surpassed that of humans. For machines, the preference depends on downstream tasks such as segmentation and detection, rather than visual appeal. Considering the huge gap between human and machine visual systems, this paper proposes the topic: Image Quality Assessment for Machine Vision for the first time. Specifically, we (1) defined the subjective preferences of machines, including downstream tasks, test models, and evaluation metrics; (2) established the Machine Preference Database (MPD), which contains 2.25M fine-grained annotations and 30k reference/distorted image pair instances; (3) verified the performance of mainstream IQA algorithms on MPD. Experiments show that current IQA metrics are human-centric and cannot accurately characterize machine preferences. We sincerely hope that MPD can promote the evolution of IQA from human to machine preferences. Project page is on: https://github.com/lcysyzxdxc/MPD.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Image Quality Assessment for Machines: Paradigm, Large-scale Database, and Models
A 2.5-million-image machine-centric quality database and a region-aware model show that human-perception metrics poorly predict machine vision performance under degradations.
-
RGC-VQA: An Exploration Database for Robotic-Generated Video Quality Assessment
A 2,100-video database with human opinions shows that current video quality models underperform on robot-generated content, motivating a new VQA subfield.
-
NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Results
All 19 valid entries in the NTIRE 2025 XGC quality assessment challenge outperformed their track baselines at predicting human quality scores for user-generated video, AI-generated video, and talking heads.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.