pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.10315 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-13 · ✦ hep-ph

Mass and width of T_(cbar c)(4020) in the developed Bethe-Salpeter theory

Xiaozhao Chen , Xiaofu L\"u , Xiurong Guo , Zonghua Shi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords exotic resonanceBethe-Salpeter equationmolecular stateT_ccbar(4020)D* Dbar*unstable statemeson width
0
0 comments X

The pith

T_ccbar(4020) is modeled as an unstable D* Dbar* molecular state above the threshold

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses the puzzle that the observed exotic resonance T_ccbar(4020) sits above the D* Dbar* threshold, which prevents interpreting it as a conventional bound state. The authors apply a developed form of the Bethe-Salpeter equation tailored to unstable states in relativistic quantum field theory to treat the D* Dbar* system as an unstable molecular configuration. Their calculation produces a mass and width for this state that lies above the threshold and aligns with the experimental values reported for T_ccbar(4020). This matters to a sympathetic reader because it supplies a field-theoretic route to describe exotic hadrons as molecular states without forcing their masses below the relevant thresholds. The work shows that the instability allows the resonance to appear in the observed position.

Core claim

Exotic resonance T_ccbar(4020) is considered as an unstable meson-meson molecular state D* Dbar*, and the developed Bethe-Salpeter theory for dealing with unstable state is applied to investigate resonance T_ccbar(4020). We calculate the mass and width of unstable meson-meson molecular state D* Dbar* in the framework of relativistic quantum field theory and find that this unstable meson-meson molecular state lies above the D* Dbar* threshold, which is consistent with experimental values of resonance T_ccbar(4020).

What carries the argument

Developed Bethe-Salpeter theory for unstable states, applied to compute the mass and width of the D* Dbar* molecular system

If this is right

  • The D* Dbar* system produces a resonance above threshold whose mass and width match those of T_ccbar(4020).
  • Unstable molecular states can be treated consistently within relativistic quantum field theory even when they lie above the two-meson threshold.
  • This framework resolves the apparent prohibition on bound-state interpretations for resonances observed above threshold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same approach may be tested on other exotic states such as T_cc(3875) to check whether they also arise as unstable molecular configurations.
  • Deriving the interaction kernel from a more fundamental theory could make the mass and width predictions less dependent on model choices.
  • Similar unstable molecular states could appear in bottom-meson systems and produce resonances above their respective thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The developed Bethe-Salpeter formalism for unstable states correctly captures the dynamics of the D* anti-D* system without additional fitted cutoffs or unverified interaction kernels.

What would settle it

An independent calculation or new measurement that places no resonance with the predicted mass near 4020 MeV and corresponding width above the D* Dbar* threshold would show the result does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.10315 by Xiaofu L\"u, Xiaozhao Chen, Xiurong Guo, Zonghua Shi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: One meson exchange between two quarks in two heavy vec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Matrix element with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Matrix element for channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Heavy meson form factor with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Reduced matrix element for channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Heavy meson form factor coupling to light meson. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In experiments exotic meson resonance $T_{c\bar c}(4020)$ lies above the $D^{*}\bar{D}^{*}$ threshold, and in principle one can not explain $T_{c\bar c}(4020)$ as a meson-meson bound state because meson-meson bound state must lie below the $D^{*}\bar{D}^{*}$ threshold. In this work, exotic resonance $T_{c\bar c}(4020)$ is considered as an unstable meson-meson molecular state $D^{*}\bar{D}^{*}$, and the developed Bethe-Salpeter theory for dealing with unstable state is applied to investigate resonance $T_{c\bar c}(4020)$. We calculate the mass and width of unstable meson-meson molecular state $D^{*}\bar{D}^{*}$ in the framework of relativistic quantum field theory and find that this unstable meson-meson molecular state lies above the $D^{*}\bar{D}^{*}$ threshold, which is consistent with experimental values of resonance $T_{c\bar c}(4020)$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript interprets the exotic resonance T_{c cbar}(4020) as an unstable D^* Dbar^* molecular state and applies a developed Bethe-Salpeter formalism within relativistic quantum field theory to compute its mass and width, claiming that the resulting pole lies above the D^* Dbar^* threshold in agreement with experimental values.

Significance. If the developed Bethe-Salpeter treatment for states above threshold can be independently validated, the work would supply a relativistic QFT framework for describing resonances as molecular states without requiring them to lie below threshold, which is relevant to exotic hadron spectroscopy. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are evident from the provided description.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the unstable D^* Dbar^* state lies above threshold is presented without any equations, kernel definition, regularization scheme, or numerical values; this prevents assessment of whether the pole position is a dynamical outcome or an artifact of the chosen interaction.
  2. [Abstract / Method] The developed Bethe-Salpeter formalism for unstable states (mentioned in the abstract) must introduce a specific modification (e.g., complex contour or width insertion) relative to standard treatments that place poles below threshold; no independent verification against other observables or limits is indicated, rendering the numerical agreement with T_{c cbar}(4020) potentially model-dependent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the unstable D^* Dbar^* state lies above threshold is presented without any equations, kernel definition, regularization scheme, or numerical values; this prevents assessment of whether the pole position is a dynamical outcome or an artifact of the chosen interaction.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary and necessarily omits technical details. The full Bethe-Salpeter equation, one-boson-exchange kernel, cutoff regularization, and numerical pole position are derived and presented in Sections 2 and 3 of the manuscript. The pole location above threshold is obtained by solving the homogeneous integral equation with the complex two-meson propagator. revision: no

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Method] The developed Bethe-Salpeter formalism for unstable states (mentioned in the abstract) must introduce a specific modification (e.g., complex contour or width insertion) relative to standard treatments that place poles below threshold; no independent verification against other observables or limits is indicated, rendering the numerical agreement with T_{c cbar}(4020) potentially model-dependent.

    Authors: The developed formalism extends the standard BS equation by analytic continuation of the propagators into the complex plane, permitting a pole above the D^* Dbar^* threshold; the contour deformation that avoids the branch cuts is specified in Section 2. While the present work does not contain explicit tests on additional systems, the approach is a direct extension of our earlier BS calculations for bound states below threshold, and the computed mass and width reproduce the experimental values of T_{c cbar}(4020) for physically reasonable cutoff parameters. Model dependence is inherent to all effective-theory treatments of molecular states. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

full rationale

The abstract describes applying a developed Bethe-Salpeter formalism to compute the mass and width of the D* Dbar* unstable molecular state as a dynamical outcome in relativistic QFT, with the result lying above threshold and matching experimental T_ccbar(4020) values. No equations, self-citations, or parameter-fitting steps are quoted that would reduce the pole position to an input by construction. The central claim rests on the numerical solution of the BS equation for the unstable state rather than on renaming, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chains. This is the normal case of an independent calculation whose validity can be checked against other observables or limits outside the present work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full manuscript needed to audit the interaction kernel, cutoff scheme, or any fitted couplings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1110 out tokens · 68013 ms · 2026-05-23T00:32:49.166940+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    for this bound state with momentum P = ( P,i √ P2 +M 2 0 ), where x′ 1 = ( x′ 1,it 1) and x′ 2 = ( x′ 2,it 2). Setting t1 = 0 and t2 = 0 in the ground-state BS wave function, we obtain a description for th e prepared state (ps) X ps a =χP (x′ 1,t 1 = 0, x′ 2,t 2 = 0) = 1 (2π)3/ 2 1√ 2E(P ) eiP·(η1x′ 1+η2x′ 2)χP (x′ 1 − x′ 2), (1) where E(p) = √ p2 +m2 and...

    work page

  2. [2]

    = ⟨0|TAλ (x′ 1)A† τ(x′ 2)|P,j ⟩ = 1 (2π)3/ 2 1√ 2E(P ) eiP ·Xχj P (λτ )(X ′), (12) where P is the momentum of the bound state, X = η1x′ 1 +η2x′ 2, X ′ = x′ 1 − x′ 2 and η1, 2 = M1, 2/ (M1 +M2). Making the Fourier transformation, we obtain BS wave function in the momentum representation χj P (p′ 1,p ′ 2)λτ = 1 (2π)3/ 2 1√ 2E(P ) (2π)4δ(4)(P − p′ 1 +p′ 2)χj...

    work page

  3. [3]

    are the propagators for the spin 1 fields, ∆ Fλθ (p′

    work page

  4. [4]

    = ( δλθ + p′ 1λp′ 1θ M 2 1 ) −i p′2 1 +M 2 1 −iε, ∆ Fκτ (p′

    work page

  5. [5]

    We emphasize that the kernel V is defined in two-body channel so V is not complete interaction

    = ( δκτ + p′ 2κp′ 2τ M 2 2 ) −i p′2 2 +M 2 2 −iε, M1 = MD∗ + and M2 = M ¯D∗ 0. We emphasize that the kernel V is defined in two-body channel so V is not complete interaction. The kernel in homogeneous BS equation (17) plays a central role fo r making two-body system to be a stable bound state, and the solution of homogeneous BS equ ation (17) should only d...

    work page

  6. [6]

    ·(−p′ 2 − q′ 2)δθθ′δκ ′κ +h(lv) 1 (w2)¯h(lv) 2 (w2)δθθ′[(p′ 1 +q′ 1)κ ′q′ 2κ +p′ 2κ ′(p′ 1 +q′ 1)κ ] +h(lv) 2 (w2)¯h(lv) 1 (w2)[q′ 1θ(p′ 2 +q′ 2)θ′ + (p′ 2 +q′ 2)θp′ 1θ′]δκ ′κ − h(lv) 2 (w2)¯h(lv) 2 (w2)[q′ 1θδθ′κ ′q′ 2κ +q′ 1θδθ′κp′ 2κ ′ +δθκ ′p′ 1θ′q′ 2κ +δθκp′ 1θ′p′ 2κ ′]} + −i w2 +M 2 J/ψ {h(hv) 1 (w2)¯h(hv) 1 (w2) × (p′ 1 +q′

    work page

  7. [7]

    ·(−p′ 2 − q′ 2)δθθ′δκ ′κ +h(hv) 1 (w2)¯h(hv) 2 (w2)δθθ′[(p′ 1 +q′ 1)κ ′q′ 2κ +p′ 2κ ′(p′ 1 +q′ 1)κ ] +h(hv) 2 (w2)¯h(hv) 1 (w2)[q′ 1θ(p′ 2 +q′ 2)θ′ + (p′ 2 +q′ 2)θp′ 1θ′]δκ ′κ − h(hv) 2 (w2)¯h(hv) 2 (w2)[q′ 1θδθ′κ ′q′ 2κ +q′ 1θδθ′κp′ 2κ ′ +δθκ ′p′ 1θ′q′ 2κ +δθκp′ 1θ′p′ 2κ ′]}, (18) where g represents the corresponding meson-quark coupling constant, gπ = 3...

    work page

  8. [8]

    We emphatically introduce the T -matrix elements T(c′ 1;b)a(ǫ′) and T(c′ 2;b)a(ǫ′) in this section. A. Channel hc(1P )π + In our approach, the heavy vector meson D∗ is a bound state consisting of a quark and an antiquark and the initial meson-meson bound state is actually com posed of four quarks. Here, we consider that in the final state the light pseudos...

    work page

  9. [9]

    These momenta in Fig

    ·(Q2 − p′ 2)δνλδτν ′ − h(lv) 1 (w2)¯h(lv) 2 (w2)δνλ [− (Q1 +p′ 1)τp′ 2ν ′ +Q2τ (Q1 +p′ 1)ν ′] − h(lv) 2 (w2)¯h(lv) 1 (w2)[p′ 1ν(Q2 − p′ 2)λ + (Q2 − p′ 2)νQ1λ ]δτν ′ +h(lv) 2 (k2)¯h(lv) 2 (k2)[−p′ 1νδλτp′ 2ν ′ +p′ 1νδλν ′Q2τ − δντQ1λp′ 2ν ′ +δνν ′Q1λQ2τ ]}, (31) wherew =p − (Q1 − Q2)/ 2 is the momentum of light meson, h(w2) and ¯h(w2) are the heavy 17 meso...

    work page

  10. [10]

    ·εϑ (q′ 1)]h(s) 1 (w2) − h(s) 2 (w2) 1 M 2 1 [ε̺(p′

    work page

  11. [11]

    ·p′ 1] } , (B1c) ⟨ VM ′̺′ (−p′ 2)|J(0)| VM ′ϑ ′ (−q′ 2)⟩ = 1 2 √ E ¯D∗ 0(−p′ 2)E ¯D∗ 0(−q′ 2) × { [ε̺′ (−p′

    work page

  12. [12]

    ·εϑ ′ (−q′ 2)]¯h(s) 1 (w2) − ¯h(s) 2 (w2) 1 M 2 2 [ε̺′ (−p′

    work page

  13. [13]

    ·(−p′ 2)] } , (B1d) ⟨VM ̺(p′ 1)|Jα (0)|VM ϑ (q′ 1)⟩ = 1 2 √ ED∗ +(p′ 1)ED∗ +(q′ 1) × { [ε̺(p′

    work page

  14. [14]

    ·εϑ (q′ 1)]h(lv) 1 (w2)(p′ 1 +q′ 1)α − h(lv) 2 (w2){[ε̺(p′

    work page

  15. [15]

    ·q′ 1]εϑ α (q′ 1) + [εϑ (q′

    work page

  16. [16]

    ·p′ 1]ε̺ α (p′ 1)} − h(lv) 3 (w2) 1 M 2 1 [ε̺(p′

    work page

  17. [17]

    ·p′ 1](p′ 1 +q′ 1)α } , (B1e) ⟨ VM ′̺′ (−p′ 2)|Jβ (0)| VM ′ϑ ′ (−q′ 2)⟩ = 1 2 √ E ¯D∗ 0(−p′ 2)E ¯D∗ 0(−q′ 2) × { [ε̺′ (−p′

    work page

  18. [18]

    ·εϑ ′ (−q′ 2)]¯h(lv) 1 (w2)(−p′ 2 − q′ 2)β − ¯h(lv) 2 (w2){[ε̺′ (−p′

    work page

  19. [19]

    ·(−q′ 2)]εϑ ′ β (−q′

    work page

  20. [20]

    ·(−p′ 2)]ε̺′ β (−p′ 2)} − ¯h(lv) 3 (w2) 1 M 2 2 [ε̺′ (−p′

    work page

  21. [21]

    ·(−p′ 2)](−p′ 2 − q′ 2)β } , (B1f) where VM represents the vector meson D∗+, VM ′ represents the anti-particle of vector mesonD∗0,p′ 1 = (p,ip ′ 10),p′ 2 = (p,ip ′ 20),q′ 1 = (p′,iq ′ 10),q′ 2 = (p′,iq ′ 20),w =q′ 1−p′ 1 =q′ 2−p′ 2 is the momentum of the exchanged meson and w = p′− p;h(w2) and ¯h(w2) are scalar functions, the four-vector ε(p) is the polar...

    work page

  22. [22]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Let t. 112, 132001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Let t. 111, 242001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Let t. 113, 212002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Vinokurova et al

    A. Vinokurova et al. (Belle Collaboration), JHEP 06, 132 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Let t. 119, 072001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, and M. Pav´ on Val derrama, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054007 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Phys. Rev. D 88, 014030 (2013). 30

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    J. He, X. Liu, Z.-F. Sun, and S.-L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2635 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 84, 1232 (1951)

    work page 1951

  31. [31]

    Chen and X

    X. Chen and X. L¨ u, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 499 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Williams, Phys

    R. Williams, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134943 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Eichmann, P

    G. Eichmann, P. Duarte, M. T. Pe˜ na, and A. Stadler, Phys . Rev. D 100, 094001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Santowsky, G

    N. Santowsky, G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, P. C. Wallbott , and R. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 102, 056014 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Santowsky and C

    N. Santowsky and C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034025 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Heupel, G

    W. Heupel, G. Eichmann, and C. S. Fischer, Phys. Lett. B 718, 545 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    A. N. Kvinikhidze and B. Blankleider, Phys. Rev. D 107, 094014 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Hoffer, G

    J. Hoffer, G. Eichmann, and C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D 109, 074025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    X. Chen, X. L¨ u, X. Guo, Z. Shi, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    M. L. Goldberger and K. M. Watson, Collision Theory (Wiley, New York, 1964)

    work page 1964

  41. [41]

    Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , vol

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Chen and X

    X. Chen and X. L¨ u, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    X. Chen, R. Liu, R. Shi, and X. L¨ u, Phys. Rev. D 87, 065013 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Chen and X

    X. Chen and X. L¨ u, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 98 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    X. Chen, X. L¨ u, R. Shi, and X. Guo, Nucl. Phys. B 909, 243 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    X. L¨ u, Y. Liu, and E. Zhao, Chinese Physics Letters 13, 652 (1996)

    work page 1996

  47. [47]

    X. L¨ u, Y. Liu, and E. Zhao, Science in China Series A-Mat hematics (in Chinese) 27, 361 (1997)

    work page 1997

  48. [48]

    Reinders, H

    L. Reinders, H. Rubinstein, and S. Yazaki, Phys. Rep. 127, 1 (1985)

    work page 1985

  49. [49]

    X. Chen, X. L¨ u, R. Shi, X. Guo, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014009 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Luri´ e, Particles and Fields (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1968)

    D. Luri´ e, Particles and Fields (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1968)

    work page 1968

  51. [51]

    C. J. Burden, L. Qian, C. D. Roberts, P. C. Tandy, and M. J. Thomson, Phys. Rev. C 55, 2649 (1997)

    work page 1997

  52. [52]

    Maris, C

    P. Maris, C. D. Roberts, and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Lett. B 420, 267 (1998)

    work page 1998

  53. [53]

    M. A. Ivanov, Y. L. Kalinovsky, and C. D. Roberts, Phys. R ev. D 60, 034018 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    M. A. Ivanov, J. G. K¨ orner, S. G. Kovalenko, and C. D. Rob erts, Phys. Rev. D 76, 034018 (2007)

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    Neubert, Phys

    M. Neubert, Phys. Rep. 245, 259 (1994). 31

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    Huang, H.-Y

    C.-S. Huang, H.-Y. Jin, and Y.-B. Dai, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2347 (1995)

    work page 1995

  57. [57]

    Krassnigg, Phys

    A. Krassnigg, Phys. Rev. D 80, 114010 (2009)

    work page 2009

  58. [58]

    Ebert, R

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Lett. B 634, 214 (2006)

    work page 2006

  59. [59]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Ph ys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Ding, Phys

    G.-J. Ding, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    Zhao, Z.-Y

    M.-J. Zhao, Z.-Y. Wang, C. Wang, and X.-H. Guo, Phys. Rev . D 105, 096016 (2022). 32

    work page 2022