REVIEW 4 cited by
MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Existing large language model (LLM) evaluation benchmarks primarily focus on English, while current multilingual tasks lack parallel questions that specifically assess cross-linguistic reasoning abilities. This dual limitation makes it challenging to comprehensively assess LLMs' performance in the multilingual setting. To fill this gap, we introduce MMLU-ProX, a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions, enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons. Additionally, to meet efficient evaluation needs, we provide a lite version containing 658 questions per language. To ensure the high quality of MMLU-ProX, we employ a rigorous development process that involves multiple powerful LLMs for translation, followed by expert review to ensure accurate expression, consistent terminology, and cultural relevance. Building on this, we systematically evaluate 36 state-of-the-art LLMs, including reasoning-enhanced and multilingual-optimized LLMs. The results reveal significant disparities in the multilingual capabilities of LLMs: While they perform well in high-resource languages, their performance declines markedly in low-resource languages, with gaps of up to 24.3%. Through MMLU-ProX, we aim to advance the development of more inclusive AI systems and promote equitable access to technology across global contexts.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
MultiNRC: A Challenging and Native Multilingual Reasoning Evaluation Benchmark for LLMs
A native-authored French, Spanish, and Chinese reasoning benchmark shows current LLMs score below 50% and improve by about 10% on math when questions are in English.
-
CapBencher: Give Your LLM Benchmark a Built-in Alarm for Test-Set Overfitting
Capping achievable accuracy with randomized correct answers turns any model that exceeds the cap into a detectable contamination alarm.
-
Disentangling Language Modeling and Boundaries
The paper hypothesizes that next-byte and boundary distributions in byte-level LMs can be disentangled, proposes two experiments to test it, but provides no experimental results.
-
Do LLMs exhibit the same commonsense capabilities across languages?
LLMs produce more commonsensical sentences in English than in Spanish, Dutch, or Valencian, across automatic, LLM-judge, and human evaluations on the new MULTICOM benchmark.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.