Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 127 references

Nonformal deformations of the algebras of holomorphic functions on the polydisk and on the ball in $\mathbb C^n$

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs holomorphic deformations of the polydisk and ball function algebras whose fibers over each nonzero complex number q are exactly the quantum polydisk and quantum ball algebras.

desk verdict Genuinely new holomorphic deformations of polydisk and ball algebras, mostly solid, but one proof step in Theorem 3.19(ii) is a real gap requiring a closure argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2503.10640 v1 pith:43SSYJFT submitted 2025-02-11 math.FA math.CVmath.QAmath.RA

Alexei Yu. Pirkovskii This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.FAmath.CVmath.QAmath.RA MSC 46H9916S8016S3853D5546L6532A3846M10
keywords holomorphicdeformationquantumpolydiskballFréchetalgebrabundlestrictquantizationtopologicalprojectivityfreeArens-Michael
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's aim is to show that the algebra of holomorphic functions on the polydisk and on the ball admits genuine holomorphic deformations, not merely formal ones. The construction produces Fréchet algebras $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)$ and $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb B^n_r)$ over the base algebra $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$ such that the fiber at each nonzero complex number $q$ is exactly the previously studied quantum polydisk algebra $\mathcal O_q(\mathbb D^n_r)$ or quantum ball algebra $\mathcal O_q(\mathbb B^n_r)$. Because the fibers vary holomorphically and the associated bundles are continuous, these are strict deformation quantizations in Rieffel's sense, adapted to the Fréchet algebra setting. A structural consequence is that $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)$ is not topologically projective over $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$ for $n\ge 2$, so the deformation is genuinely nonfree—a new phenomenon compared with earlier free holomorphic deformations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is Taylor's free polydisk algebra $F^T(\mathbb D^n_r)$, the algebra of free power series $\sum_\alpha c_\alpha \zeta^\alpha$ whose coefficients satisfy $\sum_\alpha |c_\alpha|\rho^{|\alpha|}<\infty$ for all $\rho<r$. Its universal property (Proposition 3.16) says that continuous homomorphisms from $F^T(\mathbb D^n_r)$ into an Arens-Michael algebra $A$ correspond exactly to strictly spectrally $r$-contractive $n$-tuples in $A$, i.e., tuples whose joint spectral radius stays below $r$ in every Banach-algebra representation. This property is the bridge used twice: to identify the quantum polydisk $\mathcal O_q(\mathbb D^n_r)$ as a quotient of $F^T(\mathbb D^n_r)$ in Theorem 3.19, and to construct the inverse isomorphism between the two polydisk deformations in Theorem 5.8 via the spectral estimate in Lemma 5.7. For the ball, the analogous role is played by Popescu's free ball algebra $F(\mathbb B^n_r)$, defined here through hilbertian tensor powers. The deformations themselves are the quotients of $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)\hat\otimes F$ by the closed two-sided ideal generated by $\zeta_i\zeta_j - t\,\zeta_j\zeta_i$, and the nonprojectivity proof uses the explicit power-series model $\mathcal D_{n,r}$ with weight function $\omega(k,p)$ on $\mathbb Z^n_+\times\mathbb Z$.

What would settle it

One concrete check is the fiber over $q=1$: the paper claims $\mathcal O_1(\mathbb D^n_r)\cong\mathcal O(\mathbb D^n_r)$ with the quotient norm on $F^T(\mathbb D^n_r)/\ker\pi^T$ equal to the standard coefficient norm; an element whose two norms differ would disprove the fiber identification. A second check targets nonprojectivity: attempt to construct a continuous $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$-linear splitting of the multiplication map $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)\hat\otimes\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)\to\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)$ for $n=2$—Theorem 6.4 says none exists, so any such splitting would refute the central nonprojectivity claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the commutation relations $x_ix_j = q x_jx_i$ can be analytified: replacing the formal parameter with the holomorphic coordinate on $\mathbb C^\times$ and the free algebra with a suitable algebra of free holomorphic functions yields Fréchet $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$-algebras whose fibers over every $q\in\mathbb C^\times$ are the quantum polydisk and quantum ball algebras. The two candidate free-polydisk algebras—Taylor's $F^T(\mathbb D^n_r)$ and the universal free polydisk $F(\mathbb D^n_r)$—lead to isomorphic deformations even though the free algebras themselves are not isomorphic. For the ball, Popescu's free ball algebra $F(\mathbb B^n_r)$ serves the same role. The paper also proves that $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)$ is not topologically projective over $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$ when $n\ge2$, by writing it as an explicit noncommutative power series algebra with a weight function $\omega(k,p)$ and deriving a coefficient growth contradiction. Finally, the formal deformation obtained by setting $q=e^{ih}$ is shown to coincide with the holomorphic deformation after extension of scalars to $\mathbb C[[h]]$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the universal property of Taylor's free polydisk algebra—continuous homomorphisms out of $F^T(\mathbb D^n_r)$ are exactly determined by tuples whose joint spectral radius is strictly below $r$ in every Banach-algebra representation—and on the companion spectral estimate in Lemma 5.7; if either failed, the identifications of $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)$ with its alternative construction and with the quantum polydisk fibers would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $q\in\mathbb C^\times$, the fiber of $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)$ over $q$ is topologically isomorphic to the quantum polydisk algebra $\mathcal O_q(\mathbb D^n_r)$, and similarly for the ball, so the family interpolates between all previously studied quantizations at nonzero deformation parameters.
  • The associated Fréchet algebra bundles $\mathcal E(\mathbb D^n_r)$ and $\mathcal E(\mathbb B^n_r)$ are continuous, and together with the dense subalgebras $\mathcal O^{\mathrm{reg}}_{e^{ih}}(\mathbb C^n)$ they satisfy the strict deformation quantization condition $(a_h b_h - b_h a_h)/h \to i\{a,b\}$ as $h\to 0$.
  • For $n\ge2$, $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)$ is not topologically projective and a fortiori not topologically free over $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$, so the holomorphic deformation cannot arise from a topologically free module, unlike the free holomorphic deformations of Pflaum and Schottenloher.
  • The formal deformation $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{fdef}}(U)$ built from the star product with $q=e^{ih}$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb C[[h]]\hat\otimes_{\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)}\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(U)$ for $U=\mathbb D^n_r$ or $\mathbb B^n_r$, recovering the formal deformations by extension of scalars.
  • Because $F(\mathbb D^n_r)$ and $F^T(\mathbb D^n_r)$ are not isomorphic for $n\ge2$ and $r<\infty$ yet produce isomorphic deformations, the deformation construction is insensitive to the choice of free holomorphic function algebra.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The nonprojectivity of $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n_r)$ suggests that holomorphic deformations of Stein algebras will generically fail to be topologically free; the bundle-theoretic criterion of Theorem 7.1 may give a way to detect such failures without an explicit power-series model.
  • The same quotient construction should apply to other quadratic quantum affine varieties, replacing the free algebra by a suitable free holomorphic function algebra; the main obstacle is finding a universal property like Proposition 3.16 for the relevant free algebra.
  • Since the strict deformation quantization is proven for the full Fréchet algebra of holomorphic functions in the compact-open topology, one can test whether the continuity of the bundle survives passage to operator-algebraic completions of the quantum polydisk and quantum ball algebras; the paper does not address these completions.
  • Remark 6.6 conjectures that $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb B^n_r)$ is also non-projective over $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$; if a power-series model analogous to $\mathcal D_{n,r}$ can be written for the ball, the same coefficient-growth argument used for the polydisk should apply.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. Starting from the quantum polydisk and quantum ball algebras O_q(D^n_r) and O_q(B^n_r) studied in the author's earlier work, the paper constructs Fréchet O(C^×)-algebras O_def(D^n_r), O^T_def(D^n_r), and O_def(B^n_r) as quotients of O(C^×)⊗̂F by the closed ideal generated by ζ_iζ_j − zζ_jζ_i (i<j), where F is Taylor's free polydisk algebra F^T(D^n_r), the free product F(D^n_r), or Popescu's free ball algebra F(B^n_r), respectively. It proves that the fiber over q∈C^× is topologically isomorphic to O_q(D^n_r) (resp., O_q(B^n_r)), that O_def(D^n_r) and O^T_def(D^n_r) are isomorphic (Theorem 5.8), and that the associated Fréchet algebra bundles over C^× are continuous (Corollary 7.4) and yield strict deformation quantizations of the polydisk and ball in Rieffel's sense adapted to Fréchet algebras (Theorem 8.4). A power-series model D_{n,r} for O_def(D^n_r) (Theorem 6.3) is used to show that O_def(D^n_r) is not topologically projective over O(C^×) for n≥2 (Theorem 6.4). Finally, the paper constructs a formal deformation O_fdef(U) for every open U⊂C^n and shows that for the polydisk and ball it is obtained from O_def by extension of scalars C[[h]]⊗̂_{O(C^×)}.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial contribution to nonformal deformation theory. The conceptual novelty is the construction of holomorphic deformations that are not topologically free over the base, bypassing the obstruction (recalled from [86, Rem. 3.12]) to free holomorphic deformations of O(D^n_r). Proposition 3.16 (the universal property of F^T(D^n_r) via strictly spectrally r-contractive n-tuples) is a useful new tool; Theorems 3.19(iv) and 4.10(iv) give sharp quotient-norm identities; Theorem 6.3 provides an explicit power-series model; and Theorem 6.4's non-projectivity argument, with its 2^{m^2} growth contradiction, is a striking result. Theorem 9.8 cleanly connects the holomorphic and formal deformations. The paper is carefully written with detailed norm estimates, and the author is explicit about which parts rely on earlier papers. However, I do not share the reader's accept verdict: the proof of Theorem 3.19(ii) contains a load-bearing gap (see major comments). Since the repair is local and the statement is true, the paper is likely acceptable after revision.

major comments (1)
  1. [3, proof of Theorem 3.19(ii)] The displayed chain in the proof of Theorem 3.19, 'Ker π^T = Im(1−κ^Tπ^T) = Im((1−κ^Tπ^T)ν) = Im(ν(1−κπ)) = ν(Ker π)', contains an unjustified equality. For the continuous projection p = κ^Tπ^T, density of Im ν in F^T(D^n_r) implies only that (1−p)(Im ν) is dense in (1−p)(F^T) = Ker π^T, not that the two sets are equal. The asserted equality is in fact false: for n=2, r=1, q=1, the element w = Σ_{k≥1} (k+1)^{-2} 2^{-k}(ζ_1ζ_2−ζ_2ζ_1)^k lies in F^T(D^2_1) (its ℓ^1-norm is finite for every ρ<1), but w∉F(D^2_1) because the word (1,2,1,2,...,1,2) contributes (k+1)^{-2}(ρτ)^{2k}2^{-k} to ‖w‖_{ρ,τ}, which diverges for ρτ>√2; w belongs to Ker π^T (as a limit of elements of the relation ideal) but cannot belong to ν(Ker π)⊆F(D^2_1). This gap is load-bearing: Theorem 3.19(ii) is used in Theorem 5.3(5.6) for the fiber identification of O^T_def(D^n_r) and in Corollary 7.4 for the continuity of E(D^n_r). The statement of Theorem 3.19(ii) is nevertheless correct and can be repaired by a closure argument: Ker π^T = cl(ν(Ker π)), and ν(Ker π) = ν(J) is dense in the closed relation ideal J^T of F^T because F(D^n_r) is dense in F^T(D^n_r); hence Ker π^T = J^T. This repair must be written out, and the current proof overstates what the density argument gives.
minor comments (4)
  1. [9, Lemma 9.1] The proof of Lemma 9.1 is omitted as 'elementary'; the assertion is true, via separate continuity of (a,b,x,y)↦ab β(x,y) and the universal property of the projective tensor product, but a short proof or a precise reference would be helpful in a paper whose main results depend on this extension step.
  2. [3, proof of Theorem 3.19] The density of Im ν in F^T(D^n_r) is used without comment; it follows from the fact that the free algebra F_n is dense in both F(D^n_r) and F^T(D^n_r), and this should be stated explicitly.
  3. [7, proof of Corollary 7.4] The proof applies Theorem 7.1 to A = O^T_def(D^n_r) and concludes continuity of E(D^n_r); the implicit step that E(D^n_r) and E^T(D^n_r) are isomorphic bundles (Corollary 5.9) should be stated.
  4. [9, Remark 9.6] The claim that O_fdef(D^n_r) and O_fdef(B^n_r) are Arens-Michael algebras is 'immediate from Theorem 9.8' only if one knows that the completed projective tensor product of Arens-Michael algebras and its quotients are Arens-Michael; this standard fact should be mentioned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the deformation construction is independent of its own fiber algebras; a proof gap in Theorem 3.19(ii) is a correctness issue, not a circularity.

full rationale

I find no circular derivation. The algebras O_def(D^n_r) and O_def(B^n_r) are defined directly as quotients of O(C^×)ˆ⊗F by the relations ζ_iζ_j = z ζ_j ζ_i, and the fiber identifications with the previously defined O_q algebras are obtained by applying Lemma 5.2 and the quotient theorems 3.18, 3.19, and 4.10, whose proofs compute kernels and quotient norms rather than assuming the fiber isomorphisms. The O_q algebras are defined independently by weighted power series; the norm equalities such as (3.13) and Theorem 4.10(iv) are derived, not imposed. Bundle continuity in Corollary 7.4 is checked via the continuity of q ↦ ||a_q||, and the Rieffel quantization condition (8.1) is verified by an explicit commutator computation. The formal deformation in Section 9 is built from an explicit star product and then identified with the extension of scalars by explicit maps. Self-citations to [82,85,86] supply definitions and prior theorems, but those are independent published results whose assumptions do not include the deformation claims, so they do not make the argument circular. The one point that should be flagged as a correctness (not circularity) concern is the proof of Theorem 3.19(ii), where the paper writes: "Using the density of Im ν in F^T(D^n_r), we obtain Kerπ^T = Im(1−κ^Tπ^T) = Im((1−κ^Tπ^T)ν) = Im(ν(1−κπ)) = ν(Kerπ)." Density of Im ν does not by itself justify replacing Im((1−κ^Tπ^T)ν) by ν(Kerπ); a closure argument is needed. This gap is load-bearing for (5.6) and Corollary 7.4, but it is a proof gap, not a case of the paper's conclusion being equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 3 invented entities

No data-fitting free parameters appear; q and r are variables of the construction, not constants adjusted to make results true. The central claim rests on previously published theorems in Arens-Michael algebra theory and on the author's own quantum polydisk and quantum ball papers. These are standard mathematical tools, not ad hoc postulates. New objects are constructed rather than postulated, and their external anchors are the independently defined O_q algebras.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Aizenberg-Mityagin power series characterizations (2.4)-(2.5) of O(D^n_r) and O(B^n_r) as weighted l^1 sequence spaces.
    Used in Section 2 to define O(D^n_r), O(B^n_r), and the quantum algebra norms; foundational for all subsequent norm identities.
  • standard math Arens-Michael free product exists and has the universal property for homomorphisms from O(D_r) factors, as in Proposition 3.5 from [85].
    Defines F(D^n_r) and is used in Theorems 5.8 and 6.3 to construct homomorphisms into the deformation algebras.
  • standard math Popescu's theorems [89, Theorems 1.1, 1.4, 5.6] that Hol(B(H)^n_r) is a subalgebra of free power series and a Fréchet algebra under row-operator seminorms.
    Used in Proposition 4.3 to identify F(B^n_r) with Popescu's free ball algebra; needed for the ball quotient theorem 4.10.
  • standard math Norm maximality of the norm ||·||_{D,rho} on O_q(D^n_r), from [82, Lemma 5.10].
    Used in Theorem 3.19(iv) to conclude that the quotient norms from the free polydisk algebras equal the defining quantum norms.
  • standard math Helemskii's projective module criterion: a Fréchet A-module P is topologically projective iff there is an A-module retraction P to A tensor P, from [48, Chapter III, Theorem 1.27].
    Essential in Theorem 6.4 to turn topological projectivity into the existence of the morphism nu and the subsequent coefficient equations.
  • standard math The projective tensor product of the Kothe sequence spaces O(C^×) and O_def(D^n_r) is again a Kothe sequence space with product weights, per [62, 41.7].
    Used in the proof of Theorem 6.4 to represent O(C^×) tensor O_def(D^n_r) with the explicit norms needed for the growth contradiction.
  • standard math Associativity of the universal deformation twist from Giaquinto and Zhang [42, Theorem 2.1].
    Used in Proposition 9.2 to show that the exponential-of-derivatives star product on O(U) is associative.
  • standard math Gierz bundle construction and the section-density criterion for locally convex bundles, as in [43] and Appendix A.
    Provides the formal basis for the bundle functor E and for proving continuity of E(D^n_r) and E(B^n_r) in Section 7.
invented entities (3)
  • O_def(D^n_r) and its isomorphic variant O^T_def(D^n_r) independent evidence
    purpose: Holomorphic deformation of O(D^n_r) whose fibers over q are the quantum polydisk algebras O_q(D^n_r).
    Fibers are identified with independently defined O_q(D^n_r) from [83, 85, 86]; additional structural handles are the power series model, nonprojectivity, and bundle continuity.
  • O_def(B^n_r) independent evidence
    purpose: Holomorphic deformation of O(B^n_r) whose fibers over q are the quantum ball algebras O_q(B^n_r).
    Fibers are previously introduced quantum ball algebras; strict deformation quantization and continuity are proved in Sections 7 and 8.
  • D_{n,r} power series model independent evidence
    purpose: Concrete representation of O_def(D^n_r) used to prove nonprojectivity and to compute norms.
    Theorem 6.3 proves a topological isomorphism with O_def(D^n_r); the explicit norms and growth contradiction give an independent internal check.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonformal deformations of the algebras of holomorphic functions on the polydisk and on the ball in $\mathbb C^n$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/43SSYJFT

@misc{pith2026250310640,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonformal deformations of the algebras of holomorphic functions on the polydisk and on the ball in $\mathbb C^n$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/43SSYJFT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2503.10640}
}
abstract

We construct Fr\'echet $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$-algebras $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n)$ and $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb B^n)$ which may be interpreted as nonformal (or, more exactly, holomorphic) deformations of the algebras $\mathcal O(\mathbb D^n)$ and $\mathcal O(\mathbb B^n)$ of holomorphic functions on the polydisk $\mathbb D^n\subset\mathbb C^n$ and on the ball $\mathbb B^n\subset\mathbb C^n$, respectively. The fibers of our algebras over $q\in\mathbb C^\times$ are isomorphic to the previously introduced ``quantum polydisk'' and ``quantum ball'' algebras, $\mathcal O_q(\mathbb D^n)$ and $\mathcal O_q(\mathbb B^n)$. We show that the algebras $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n)$ and $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb B^n)$ yield continuous Fr\'echet algebra bundles over $\mathbb C^\times$ which are strict deformation quantizations (in Rieffel's sense) of $\mathbb D^n$ and $\mathbb B^n$. We also give a noncommutative power series interpretation of $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n)$ and apply it to showing that $\mathcal O_{\mathrm{def}}(\mathbb D^n)$ is not topologically projective (and a fortiori is not topologically free) over $\mathcal O(\mathbb C^\times)$. Finally, we consider respective formal deformations of $\mathcal O(\mathbb D^n)$ and $\mathcal O(\mathbb B^n)$, and we show that they can be obtained from the holomorphic deformations by extension of scalars.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agler, J

    J. Agler, J. E. McCarthy, and N. Young, Operator analysis. Hilbert space methods in complex analysis. Cambridge Tracts in Math., 219. Cambridge University Press, Camb ridge, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    L. A. Aizenberg and B. S. Mityagin, Spaces of analytic functions in polycircular domains (Russian). Sib. Mat. Zh. 1 (1960), 153–170

    1960

  3. [3]

    G. E. Andrews, The theory of partitions . Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-London- Amsterdam, 1976

    1976

  4. [4]

    Ara and M

    P. Ara and M. Mathieu, Sheaves of C∗-algebras. Math. Nachr. 283 (2010), no. 1, 21–39

    2010

  5. [5]

    Arias and F

    A. Arias and F. Latr´ emoli` ere,Isomorphisms of non-commutative domain algebras . J. Operator Theory 66 (2011), no. 2, 425–450

    2011

  6. [6]

    Arias and F

    A. Arias and F. Latr´ emoli` ere,Classification of noncommutative domain algebras. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 350 (2012), no. 11–12, 609–611

    2012

  7. [7]

    Arias and F

    A. Arias and F. Latr´ emoli` ere,Isomorphisms of noncommutative domain algebras. II . J. Operator Theory 70 (2013), no. 1, 273–290

    2013

  8. [8]

    Bayen, M

    F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Frønsdal, A. Lichnerowicz, and D. Sternh eimer, Deformation theory and quantization. I. Deformations of symplectic structures. Ann. Physics 111 (1978), no. 1, 61–110

    1978

Show all 127 references
  1. [9]

    Beiser, H

    S. Beiser, H. R¨ omer, and S. Waldmann,Convergence of the Wick star product. Comm. Math. Phys. 272 (2007), no. 1, 25–52

    2007

  2. [10]

    Beiser and S

    S. Beiser and S. Waldmann, Fr´ echet algebraic deformation quantization of the Poinca r´ e disk. J. Reine Angew. Math. 688 (2014), 147–207

    2014

  3. [11]

    Bieliavsky and M

    P. Bieliavsky and M. Massar, Strict deformation quantization for actions of a class of sy mplectic Lie groups. Noncommutative geometry and string theory (Yokohama, 2001). Progr. Theoret. Phys. Suppl. No. 144 (2001), 1–21

    2001

  4. [12]

    Bieliavsky and Y

    P. Bieliavsky and Y. Maeda, Convergent star product algebras on “ ax + b”. Lett. Math. Phys. 62 (2002), no. 3, 233–243

    2002

  5. [13]

    Bieliavsky, Strict quantization of solvable symmetric spaces

    P. Bieliavsky, Strict quantization of solvable symmetric spaces. J. Symplectic Geom. 1 (2002), no. 2, 269–320

    2002

  6. [14]

    Bieliavsky, S

    P. Bieliavsky, S. Detournay, and Ph. Spindel,The deformation quantizations of the hyperbolic plane. Comm. Math. Phys. 289 (2009), no. 2, 529–559

    2009

  7. [15]

    Bieliavsky, A

    P. Bieliavsky, A. de Goursac, and G. Tuynman, Deformation quantization for Heisenberg super- group. J. Funct. Anal. 263 (2012), no. 3, 549–603

    2012

  8. [16]

    Bieliavsky and V

    P. Bieliavsky and V. Gayral, Deformation quantization for actions of K¨ ahlerian Lie groups, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 236 (2015), no.1115

    2015

  9. [17]

    Bieliavsky, A

    P. Bieliavsky, A. de Goursac, Y. Maeda, and F. Spinnler, Non-formal star-exponential on contracted one-sheeted hyperboloids. Adv. Math. 291 (2016), 362–402

    2016

  10. [18]

    Bieliavsky, V

    P. Bieliavsky, V. Gayral, S. Neshveyev, and L. Tuset, On deformations of C∗-algebras by actions of K¨ ahlerian Lie groups. Internat. J. Math. 27 (2016), no. 3, 1650023

    2016

  11. [19]

    Bieliavsky, V

    P. Bieliavsky, V. Gayral, S. Neshveyev, and L. Tuset, Quantization of subgroups of the affine group. J. Funct. Anal. 280 (2021), no. 4, Paper No. 108844

    2021

  12. [20]

    Bonneau, M

    P. Bonneau, M. Flato, M. Gerstenhaber, and G. Pinczon, The hidden group structure of quantum groups: strong duality, rigidity and preferred deformatio ns, Comm. Math. Phys. 161 (1994), 125– 156

    1994

  13. [21]

    K. A. Brown and K. R. Goodearl, Lectures on algebraic quantum groups . Advanced Courses in Mathematics. CRM Barcelona. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 2002

    2002

  14. [22]

    Cuntz, Bivariante K-Theorie f¨ ur lokalkonvexe Algebren und der Chern-Connes-Charakter

    J. Cuntz, Bivariante K-Theorie f¨ ur lokalkonvexe Algebren und der Chern-Connes-Charakter. Doc. Math. 2 (1997), 139–182. 52 ALEXEI YU. PIRKOVSKII

    1997

  15. [23]

    Dauns and K

    J. Dauns and K. H. Hofmann, Representation of rings by sections. Memoirs of the American Math- ematical Society, No. 83, American Mathematical Society, Provide nce, R.I., 1968

    1968

  16. [24]

    K. R. Davidson and D. R. Pitts, The algebraic structure of non-commutative analytic Toepl itz algebras. Math. Ann. 311 (1998), no. 2, 275–303

    1998

  17. [25]

    K. R. Davidson and G. Popescu, Noncommutative disc algebras for semigroups . Canad. J. Math. 50 (1998), no. 2, 290–311

    1998

  18. [26]

    K. R. Davidson, E. Katsoulis, and D. R. Pitts, The structure of free semigroup algebras . J. Reine Angew. Math. 533 (2001), 99–125

    2001

  19. [27]

    K. R. Davidson and E. Katsoulis, Biholomorphisms of the unit ball of Cn and semicrossed products. Operator theory live, 69–80, Theta Ser. Adv. Math., 12, Theta, B ucharest, 2010

    2010

  20. [28]

    K. R. Davidson, C. Ramsey, and O. M. Shalit,The isomorphism problem for some universal operator algebras. Adv. Math. 228 (2011), no. 1, 167–218

    2011

  21. [29]

    A. A. Dosiev, Algebras of power series of elements of a Lie algebra, and S/suppress lodkowski spectra(Russian). Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (PO MI) 290 (2002), Issled. po Linein. Oper. i Teor. Funkts. 30, 72–121, 179; translation in J. Math. Sc i...

    2002

  22. [30]

    M. J. Dupr´ e,The classification and structure of C∗-algebra bundles. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (1979), no. 222, i–ix, 1–77

    1979

  23. [31]

    Engelking, General topology

    R. Engelking, General topology. Monografie Matematyczne, Tom 60. [Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 60] PWN—Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1977

    1977

  24. [32]

    Esposito, Formality theory

    C. Esposito, Formality theory. From Poisson structures to deformation quantization. SpringerBriefs Math. Phys., 2. Springer, Cham, 2015

    2015

  25. [33]

    Esposito, P

    C. Esposito, P. Stapor, and S. Waldmann, Convergence of the Gutt star product. J. Lie Theory 27 (2017), no. 2, 579–622

    2017

  26. [34]

    J. M. G. Fell, An extension of Mackey’s method to Banach ∗-algebraic bundles . Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, No. 90, American Mathematical So ciety, Providence, R.I., 1969

    1969

  27. [35]

    J. M. G. Fell and R. S. Doran, Representations of∗–algebras, locally compact groups, and Banach ∗-algebraic bundles. Vol. 1. Basic representation theory of groups and algebras . Pure and Applied Mathematics, 125. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988

    1988

  28. [36]

    Gasper and M

    G. Gasper and M. Rahman, Basic hypergeometric series. Second edition. Encyclopedia of Mathe- matics and its Applications, 96. Cambridge University Press, Cambrid ge, 2004

    2004

  29. [37]

    Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras

    M. Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras . Ann. of Math. (2) 79 (1964), 59–103

    1964

  30. [38]

    Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras

    M. Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras. II . Ann. of Math. (2) 84 (1966), 1–19

    1966

  31. [39]

    Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras

    M. Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras. III . Ann. of Math. (2) 88 (1968), 1–34

    1968

  32. [40]

    Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras

    M. Gerstenhaber, On the deformation of rings and algebras. IV . Ann. of Math. (2) 99 (1974), 257–276

    1974

  33. [41]

    Gerstenhaber and S

    M. Gerstenhaber and S. D. Schack, Algebraic cohomology and deformation theory . Deformation theory of algebras and structures and applications (Il Ciocco, 19 86), 11–264. NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci., 247. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Do rdrecht, 1988

    1988

  34. [42]

    Giaquinto and J

    A. Giaquinto and J. J. Zhang, Bialgebra actions, twists, and universal deformation form ulas. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 128 (1998), no. 2, 133–151

    1998

  35. [43]

    Gierz, Bundles of topological vector spaces and their duality

    G. Gierz, Bundles of topological vector spaces and their duality. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 955. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1982

    1982

  36. [44]

    K. R. Goodearl, Semiclassical limits of quantized coordinate rings. Advances in ring theory, 165–204, Trends Math., Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 2010

    2010

  37. [45]

    Grauert and R

    H. Grauert and R. Remmert, Theory of Stein spaces . Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wis- senschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 2 36. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1979

    1979

  38. [46]

    Grothendieck, Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucl´ eaires, Mem

    A. Grothendieck, Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucl´ eaires, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 1955, no. 16, 140 pp

    1955

  39. [47]

    Heins, O

    M. Heins, O. Roth, and S. Waldmann, Convergent star products on cotangent bundles of Lie groups. Math. Ann. 386 (2023), no. 1–2, 151–206

    2023

  40. [48]

    A. Ya. Helemskii, The homology of Banach and topological algebras . Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1989. NONFORMAL DEFORMATIONS OF THE POLYDISK AND OF THE BALL 53

    1989

  41. [49]

    A. Ya. Helemskii, Banach and locally convex algebras. Oxford Science Publications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993

    1993

  42. [50]

    K. H. Hofmann and K. Keimel, Sheaf-theoretical concepts in analysis: bundles and sheav es of Banach spaces, Banach C(X)-modules. Applications of sheaves (Proc. Res. Sympos. Appl. Sheaf Theory to Logic, Algebra and Anal., Univ. Durham, Durham, 1977), p p. 415–441, Lecture Notes...

    1977

  43. [51]

    Husemoller, Fibre bundles

    D. Husemoller, Fibre bundles. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York-London-Sydney, 1966

    1966

  44. [52]

    Kac and P

    V. Kac and P. Cheung, Quantum calculus. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002

    2002

  45. [53]

    D. S. Kaliuzhnyi-Verbovetskyi and V. Vinnikov, Foundations of free noncommutative function the- ory. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 199. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014

    2014

  46. [54]

    Kashiwara and P

    M. Kashiwara and P. Schapira, Deformation quantization modules . Asterisque No. 345 (2012), xii+147 pp

    2012

  47. [55]

    Kasprzak, Rieffel deformation of group coactions

    P. Kasprzak, Rieffel deformation of group coactions. Comm. Math. Phys. 300 (2010), no. 3, 741– 763

    2010

  48. [56]

    Kasprzak, Rieffel deformation via crossed products

    P. Kasprzak, Rieffel deformation via crossed products. J. Funct. Anal. 257 (2009), no. 5, 1288–1332

    2009

  49. [57]

    Kasprzak, Rieffel deformation of homogeneous spaces

    P. Kasprzak, Rieffel deformation of homogeneous spaces. J. Funct. Anal.260 (2011), no. 1, 146–163

    2011

  50. [58]

    Kasprzak, Rieffel deformation of tensor functor and braided quantum gr oups

    P. Kasprzak, Rieffel deformation of tensor functor and braided quantum gr oups. Comm. Math. Phys. 337 (2015), no. 2, 1035–1051

    2015

  51. [59]

    Kassel, Quantum groups

    C. Kassel, Quantum groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 155. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995

    1995

  52. [60]

    Kontsevich, Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds

    M. Kontsevich, Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. Lett. Math. Phys. 66 (2003), no. 3, 157–216; arXiv preprint arXiv:q-alg/9709040

    2003 arXiv

  53. [61]

    K¨ othe,Topological vector spaces I

    G. K¨ othe,Topological vector spaces I . Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Funda- mental Principles of Mathematical Science], 159. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1969

    1969

  54. [62]

    K¨ othe,Topological vector spaces II

    G. K¨ othe,Topological vector spaces II. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Funda- mental Principles of Mathematical Science], 237. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1979

    1979

  55. [63]

    Kraus, O

    D. Kraus, O. Roth, M. Sch¨ otz, and S. Waldmann,A convergent star product on the Poincar´ e disc. J. Funct. Anal. 277 (2019), no. 8, 2734–2771

    2019

  56. [64]

    N. P. Landsman, Mathematical topics between classical and quantum mechani cs. Springer Mono- graphs in Mathematics. New York, Springer, 1999

    1999

  57. [65]

    Landsman, Foundations of quantum theory

    K. Landsman, Foundations of quantum theory. From classical concepts to o perator algebras. Fun- damental Theories of Physics 188. Cham, Springer Open, 2017

    2017

  58. [66]

    Laurent-Gengoux, A

    C. Laurent-Gengoux, A. Pichereau, and P. Vanhaecke, Poisson structures. Grundlehren der Math- ematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 347. Springer, Hei- delberg, 2013

    2013

  59. [67]

    Lechner and S

    G. Lechner and S. Waldmann, Strict deformation quantization of locally convex algebra s and mod- ules, J. Geom. Phys. 99 (2016), 111–144

    2016

  60. [68]

    Luminet, A functional calculus for Banach PI-algebras

    D. Luminet, A functional calculus for Banach PI-algebras . Pacific J. Math. 125 (1986), no. 1, 127–160

    1986

  61. [69]

    Markl, Deformation theory of algebras and their diagrams

    M. Markl, Deformation theory of algebras and their diagrams. CBMS Reg. Conf. Ser. Math., 116. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012

    2012

  62. [70]

    Meise, D

    R. Meise, D. Vogt, Introduction to functional analysis , Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 2. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997

    1997

  63. [71]

    E. A. Michael, Locally multiplicatively-convex topological algebras. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., no. 11 (1952)

    1952

  64. [72]

    P. S. Muhly and B. Solel, Hardy algebras, W ∗-correspondences and interpolation theory. Math. Ann. 330 (2004), no. 2, 353–415

    2004

  65. [73]

    P. S. Muhly and B. Solel, Progress in noncommutative function theory. Sci. China Math. 54 (2011), no. 11, 2275–2294

    2011

  66. [74]

    P. S. Muhly and B. Solel, Tensorial function theory: from Berezin transforms to Tayl or’s Taylor series and back . Integral Equations Operator Theory 76 (2013), no. 4, 463–508

    2013

  67. [75]

    P. S. Muhly and B. Solel, Function theory from tensor algebras. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 16 (2022), no. 6, Paper No. 92, 34 pp. 54 ALEXEI YU. PIRKOVSKII

    2022

  68. [76]

    M¨ uller,Spectral theory of linear operators and spectral systems in Banach algebras

    V. M¨ uller,Spectral theory of linear operators and spectral systems in Banach algebras. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 2003

    2003

  69. [77]

    Neshveyev, Smooth crossed products of Rieffel’s deformations

    S. Neshveyev, Smooth crossed products of Rieffel’s deformations . Lett. Math. Phys. 104 (2014), no. 3, 361–371

    2014

  70. [78]

    Neshveyev and L

    S. Neshveyev and L. Tuset, Deformation of C∗-algebras by cocycles on locally compact quantum groups. Adv. Math. 254 (2014), 454–496

    2014

  71. [79]

    Omori, Y

    H. Omori, Y. Maeda, N. Miyazaki, and A. Yoshioka, Deformation quantization of Fr´ echet-Poisson algebras: convergence of the Moyal product. Conf´ erence Mosh´ e Flato 1999, Vol. II (Dijon), 233–245, Math. Phys. Stud., 22, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2000

    1999

  72. [80]

    Omori, Y

    H. Omori, Y. Maeda, N. Miyazaki, and A. Yoshioka, Orderings and non-formal deformation quan- tization. Lett. Math. Phys. 82 (2007), no. 2-3, 153–175

    2007

  73. [81]

    M. J. Pflaum and M. Schottenloher, Holomorphic deformation of Hopf algebras and applications to quantum groups. J. Geom. Phys. 28 (1998), no. 1–2, 31–44

    1998

  74. [82]

    A. Yu. Pirkovskii, Arens-Michael envelopes, homological epimorphisms, and r elatively quasi-free algebras (Russian), Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obs. 69 (2008), 34–125; English transl.: Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 2008, 27–104

    2008

  75. [83]

    A. Yu. Pirkovskii, Quantum polydisk, quantum ball, and a q-analog of Poincar´ e’s theorem. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 474 (2013) 012026, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/474/1/012026

    2013 doi

  76. [84]

    A. Yu. Pirkovskii, Noncommutative analogues of Stein spaces of finite embeddin g dimension. Alge- braic methods in functional analysis, 135–153, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 233, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2014

    2014

  77. [85]

    A. Yu. Pirkovskii, Holomorphically finitely generated algebras . J. Noncommut. Geom. 9 (2015), no. 1, 215–264

    2015

  78. [86]

    A. Yu. Pirkovskii, Holomorphic functions on the quantum polydisk and on the qua ntum ball . J. Noncommut. Geom. 13 (2019), no. 3, 857–886

    2019

  79. [87]

    Popescu, Von Neumann inequality for (B(H )n)1

    G. Popescu, Von Neumann inequality for (B(H )n)1. Math. Scand. 68 (1991), no. 2, 292–304

    1991

  80. [88]

    Popescu, Non-commutative disc algebras and their representations

    G. Popescu, Non-commutative disc algebras and their representations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124 (1996), no. 7, 2137–2148

    1996

  81. [89]

    Popescu, Free holomorphic functions on the unit ball of B(H)n

    G. Popescu, Free holomorphic functions on the unit ball of B(H)n. J. Funct. Anal. 241 (2006), no. 1, 268–333

    2006

  82. [90]

    Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative varieties

    G. Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative varieties. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 55 (2006), no. 2, 389–442

    2006

  83. [91]

    Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative varieties

    G. Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative varieties. II . Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007), no. 7, 2151–2164

    2007

  84. [92]

    Popescu, Free holomorphic functions and interpolation

    G. Popescu, Free holomorphic functions and interpolation . Math. Ann. 342 (2008), no. 1, 1–30

    2008

  85. [93]

    Popescu, Free holomorphic functions on the unit ball of B(H)n

    G. Popescu, Free holomorphic functions on the unit ball of B(H)n. II. J. Funct. Anal. 258 (2010), no. 5, 1513–1578

    2010

  86. [94]

    Popescu, Free holomorphic automorphisms of the unit ball of B(H)n

    G. Popescu, Free holomorphic automorphisms of the unit ball of B(H)n. J. Reine Angew. Math. 638 (2010), 119–168

    2010

  87. [95]

    Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative domains

    G. Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative domains . Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 205 (2010), no. 964, vi+124 pp

    2010

  88. [96]

    Popescu, Free biholomorphic classification of noncommutative domai ns

    G. Popescu, Free biholomorphic classification of noncommutative domai ns. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2011, no. 4, 784–850

    2011

  89. [97]

    Popescu, Free biholomorphic functions and operator model theory

    G. Popescu, Free biholomorphic functions and operator model theory . J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), no. 7, 3240–3308

    2012

  90. [98]

    Popescu, Free biholomorphic functions and operator model theory, II

    G. Popescu, Free biholomorphic functions and operator model theory, II. J. Funct. Anal.265 (2013), no. 5, 786–836

    2013

  91. [99]

    Popescu, Curvature invariant on noncommutative polyballs

    G. Popescu, Curvature invariant on noncommutative polyballs. Adv. Math. 279 (2015), 104–158

    2015

  92. [100]

    Popescu, Euler characteristic on noncommutative polyballs

    G. Popescu, Euler characteristic on noncommutative polyballs. J. Reine Angew. Math. 728 (2017), 195–236

    2017

  93. [101]

    Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative polydomains, I

    G. Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative polydomains, I. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 16 (2022), no. 4, Paper No. 50, 101 pp

    2022

  94. [102]

    Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative polydomains, II

    G. Popescu, Operator theory on noncommutative polydomains, II. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 517 (2023), no. 1, Paper No. 126577, 46 pp. NONFORMAL DEFORMATIONS OF THE POLYDISK AND OF THE BALL 55

    2023

  95. [103]

    Popescu, Noncommutative varieties, universal operator models, and operator algebras

    G. Popescu, Noncommutative varieties, universal operator models, and operator algebras. J. Oper- ator Theory 90 (2023), no. 1, 91–170

    2023

  96. [104]

    Rota and G

    G.-C. Rota and G. Strang, A note on the joint spectral radius . Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 63, Indag. Math. 22 (1960), 379–381

    1960

  97. [105]

    M. A. Rieffel, Continuous fields of C∗-algebras coming from group cocycles and actions. Math. Ann. 283 (1989), no. 4, 631–643

    1989

  98. [106]

    M. A. Rieffel, Deformation quantization of Heisenberg manifolds . Comm. Math. Phys. 122 (1989), no. 4, 531–562

    1989

  99. [107]

    M. A. Rieffel, Deformation quantization and operator algebras . Operator theory: operator algebras and applications, Part 1 (Durham, NH, 1988), 411–423, Proc. Sym pos. Pure Math., 51, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1990

    1988

  100. [108]

    M. A. Rieffel, Lie group convolution algebras as deformation quantizatio ns of linear Poisson struc- tures. Amer. J. Math. 112 (1990), no. 4, 657–685

    1990

  101. [109]

    M. A. Rieffel, Deformation quantization for actions of Rd. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 106 (1993), no. 506, x+93 pp

    1993

  102. [110]

    M. A. Rieffel, Quantization and C∗-algebras. C∗-algebras: 1943-1993 (San Antonio, TX, 1993), 66–97, Contemp. Math., 167, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1 994

    1943

  103. [111]

    M. A. Rieffel, Questions on quantization . Operator algebras and operator theory (Shanghai, 1997), 315–326, Contemp. Math., 228, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI , 1998

    1997

  104. [112]

    A. P. Robertson and W. J. Robertson, Topological vector spaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, No. 53, Cambridge University Press, Ne w York, 1964

    1964

  105. [113]

    Rolewicz, On spaces of holomorphic functions

    S. Rolewicz, On spaces of holomorphic functions . Studia Math. 21 (1961/1962), 135–160

    1961

  106. [114]

    Salomon, O

    G. Salomon, O. M. Shalit, and E. Shamovich, Algebras of bounded noncommutative analytic func- tions on subvarieties of the noncommutative unit ball. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), no. 12, 8639–8690

    2018

  107. [115]

    Salomon, O

    G. Salomon, O. M. Shalit, and E. Shamovich, Algebras of noncommutative functions on subvarieties of the noncommutative ball: the bounded and completely boun ded isomorphism problem . J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no. 7, 108427, 54 pp

    2020

  108. [116]

    Sch¨ otz and S

    M. Sch¨ otz and S. Waldmann, Convergent star products for projective limits of Hilbert s paces. J. Funct. Anal. 274 (2018), no. 5, 1381–1423

    2018

  109. [117]

    So/suppress ltysiak,On joint spectral radii in locally convex algebras

    A. So/suppress ltysiak,On joint spectral radii in locally convex algebras . Studia Math. 175 (2006), no. 1, 73–82

    2006

  110. [118]

    J. L. Taylor, A general framework for a multi-operator functional calcul us, Adv. Math. 9 (1972), 183–252

    1972

  111. [119]

    J. L. Taylor, Functions of several noncommuting variables. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79 (1973), 1–34

    1973

  112. [120]

    Varela, Existence of uniform bundles

    J. Varela, Existence of uniform bundles . Rev. Colombiana Mat. 18 (1984), no. 1-2, 1–8

    1984

  113. [121]

    Varela, On the existence of uniform bundles

    J. Varela, On the existence of uniform bundles . Rev. Colombiana Mat. 29 (1995), no. 2, 95–101

    1995

  114. [122]

    Vogt, The tensor algebra of the space s

    D. Vogt, The tensor algebra of the space s. Hommage ` a Pascal Laubin. Bull. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege 70 (2001), no. 4–6, 435–440

    2001

  115. [123]

    Vogt, The tensor algebra of power series spaces

    D. Vogt, The tensor algebra of power series spaces . Studia Math. 193 (2009), no. 2, 189–202

    2009

  116. [124]

    Waldmann, Poisson-Geometrie und Deformationsquantisierung

    S. Waldmann, Poisson-Geometrie und Deformationsquantisierung. Eine E inf¨ uhrung.Berlin, Springer, 2007

    2007

  117. [125]

    Waldmann, A nuclear Weyl algebra

    S. Waldmann, A nuclear Weyl algebra . J. Geom. Phys. 81 (2014), 10–46

    2014

  118. [126]

    Waldmann, Convergence of star products: from examples to a general fra mework

    S. Waldmann, Convergence of star products: from examples to a general fra mework. EMS Surv. Math. Sci. 6 (2019), no. 1–2, 1–31

    2019

  119. [127]

    D. P. Williams, Crossed products of C∗-algebras. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 134. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007. F aculty of Mathematics, HSE University, 6 Usacheva, 119048 Moscow, Russia Email address: aupirkovskii@hse.ru

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.