REVIEW 1 cited by
Convergence Analysis of EXTRA in Non-convex Distributed Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Optimization problems involving the minimization of a finite sum of smooth, possibly non-convex functions arise in numerous applications. To achieve a consensus solution over a network, distributed optimization algorithms, such as \textbf{EXTRA} (decentralized exact first-order algorithm), have been proposed to address these challenges. In this paper, we analyze the convergence properties of \textbf{EXTRA} in the context of smooth, non-convex optimization. By interpreting its updates as a nonlinear dynamical system, we show novel insights into its convergence properties. Specifically, i) \textbf{EXTRA} converges to a consensual first-order stationary point of the global objective with a sublinear rate; and ii) \textbf{EXTRA} avoids convergence to consensual strict saddle points, offering second-order guarantees that ensure robustness. These findings provide a deeper understanding of \textbf{EXTRA} in a non-convex context.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Riemannian EXTRA: Communication-efficient decentralized optimization over compact submanifolds with data heterogeneity
REXTRA claims O(1/k) convergence for decentralized manifold optimization with single-round iterate communication and constant step size, but the key contraction lemma is false as stated.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.