Pith. sign in

REVIEW

HybridGen: VLM-Guided Hybrid Planning for Scalable Data Generation of Imitation Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.13171 v1 pith:H7H7ONWX submitted 2025-03-17 cs.RO cs.AI

classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords datahybridgenimitationlearningplanningacrossalgorithmschallenging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The acquisition of large-scale and diverse demonstration data are essential for improving robotic imitation learning generalization. However, generating such data for complex manipulations is challenging in real-world settings. We introduce HybridGen, an automated framework that integrates Vision-Language Model (VLM) and hybrid planning. HybridGen uses a two-stage pipeline: first, VLM to parse expert demonstrations, decomposing tasks into expert-dependent (object-centric pose transformations for precise control) and plannable segments (synthesizing diverse trajectories via path planning); second, pose transformations substantially expand the first-stage data. Crucially, HybridGen generates a large volume of training data without requiring specific data formats, making it broadly applicable to a wide range of imitation learning algorithms, a characteristic which we also demonstrate empirically across multiple algorithms. Evaluations across seven tasks and their variants demonstrate that agents trained with HybridGen achieve substantial performance and generalization gains, averaging a 5% improvement over state-of-the-art methods. Notably, in the most challenging task variants, HybridGen achieves significant improvement, reaching a 59.7% average success rate, significantly outperforming Mimicgen's 49.5%. These results demonstrating its effectiveness and practicality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools