Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards AI-assisted Academic Writing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.13771 v1 pith:DACF2HHD submitted 2025-03-17 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords writingai-assistedacademiccitationscomponentsresearchsystemcitation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present components of an AI-assisted academic writing system including citation recommendation and introduction writing. The system recommends citations by considering the user's current document context to provide relevant suggestions. It generates introductions in a structured fashion, situating the contributions of the research relative to prior work. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the components through quantitative evaluations. Finally, the paper presents qualitative research exploring how researchers incorporate citations into their writing workflows. Our findings indicate that there is demand for precise AI-assisted writing systems and simple, effective methods for meeting those needs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI-Facilitated Analysis of Abstracts and Conclusions: Flagging Unsubstantiated Claims and Ambiguous Pronouns

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Structured prompts can steer LLMs to flag certain unsupported claims and ambiguous pronouns, but performance varies sharply by model, context, and the syntactic role of the target, and the single test case was also th...

Pith tools