pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.16146 · v3 · submitted 2025-03-20 · 💻 cs.NI

Distributed Split Computing Using Diffusive Metrics for UAV Swarms

Talip Tolga Sar{\i} , G\"okhan Se\c{c}inti , Angelo Trotta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 23:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI
keywords UAV swarmssplit computingdistributed computingdiffusive metricsmachine learning inferenceaggregated gigaflopsearly-exit mechanism
0
0 comments X

The pith

A local diffusive metric called aggregated gigaflops lets UAV swarms split machine learning inferences across nodes without central coordination.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that UAV swarms can execute split machine learning tasks in a fully distributed fashion by propagating an iterative local measure of computing capacity. This aggregated gigaflops value lets each node estimate its own resources plus those of nearby nodes through diffusion, so partial inferences can be forwarded to underutilized neighbors without any global network view. An early-exit mechanism further adapts paths when workloads surge or nodes change. Simulations show gains in throughput, latency, and energy over baselines. A reader would care because centralized orchestration fails as swarms scale or topologies shift rapidly.

Core claim

The central claim is that an iterative local metric termed aggregated gigaflops, which combines a node's computing capacity with that of its neighbors through diffusive propagation, enables intelligent forwarding of partial inferences to underutilized nodes, delivering higher task throughput, lower latency, and better energy efficiency in volatile UAV swarms without requiring global knowledge or centralized control.

What carries the argument

Aggregated gigaflops, an iterative local measure capturing a node's own computing capacity along with its neighbors.

Load-bearing premise

The diffusive propagation of the aggregated gigaflops metric stays accurate and stable enough to guide forwarding decisions under rapid topology changes and heterogeneous node failures without global view or centralized coordination.

What would settle it

A simulation run with frequent node failures and topology shifts where measured latency and energy use show no improvement over baselines, or where forwarding decisions based on the metric perform worse, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.16146 by Angelo Trotta, G\"okhan Se\c{c}inti, Talip Tolga Sar{\i}.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Proposed distributed Split-Learning that uses di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Proposed early-exit mechanism neighbor-recursive update for the aggregated computation ca￾pability ϕi,t+1 of node vi at time t + 1: 1 ϕi,t+1 = 1 |Mi(t)| + 1 1 Fi + max k∈Mi(t) {d tx i,k + 1 ϕk,t }  (8) where Mi(t) is the neighbor set of node i, Fi is computation capability of node i, d tx i,k (t) is the transmission delay between nodes i and k, and ϕi,t is the aggregated computation capability of node i a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Simulation results as a function of the number of workers. (a) shows average latency, (b) depicts remaining GFLOPs, (c) illustrates average transfer time, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Performance metrics under varying task arrival rates for 30 workers. Figure (a) shows average latency, (b) displays remaining GFLOPs, and (c) presents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Performance metrics under varying mission area sizes. Figure (a) shows average latency, (b) depicts remaining GFLOPs, and (c) presents the overall figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Early-exit mechanism performance as a function of the number of workers. Figure (a) shows average accuracy, (b) depicts average latency, (c) illustrates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In large-scale UAV swarms, dynamically executing machine learning tasks can pose significant challenges due to network volatility and the heterogeneous resource constraints of each UAV. Traditional approaches often rely on centralized orchestration to partition tasks among nodes. However, these methods struggle with communication bottlenecks, latency, and reliability when the swarm grows or the topology shifts rapidly. To overcome these limitations, we propose a fully distributed, diffusive metric-based approach for split computing in UAV swarms. Our solution introduces a new iterative measure, termed the aggregated gigaflops, capturing each node's own computing capacity along with that of its neighbors without requiring global network knowledge. By forwarding partial inferences intelligently to underutilized nodes, we achieve improved task throughput, lower latency, and enhanced energy efficiency. Further, to handle sudden workload surges and rapidly changing node conditions, we incorporate an early-exit mechanism that can adapt the inference pathway on-the-fly. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms baseline strategies across multiple performance indices, including latency, fairness, and energy consumption. These results highlight the feasibility of large-scale distributed intelligence in UAV swarms and provide a blueprint for deploying robust, scalable ML services in diverse aerial networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a fully distributed diffusive approach to split computing for ML inference tasks in large-scale UAV swarms. It defines an iterative 'aggregated gigaflops' metric that propagates local compute capacities via neighbor exchanges (without global knowledge), uses this to forward partial inferences to underutilized nodes, and adds an early-exit mechanism for workload adaptation. Simulations are claimed to show gains over baselines in task throughput, latency, fairness, and energy efficiency.

Significance. If the diffusive metric can be shown to converge and remain accurate under realistic UAV mobility and failures, the work would offer a concrete blueprint for scalable decentralized intelligence in volatile aerial networks, directly addressing the communication and reliability limits of centralized orchestration. The emphasis on local-only decisions is a conceptual strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [metric definition and propagation] § on diffusive metric definition and propagation: no convergence bound, iteration count, or stability analysis is supplied for the aggregated gigaflops diffusion under the UAV mobility model or node-failure scenarios; this is load-bearing for the central claim that local forwarding decisions remain accurate without global knowledge when topology changes rapidly.
  2. [simulation evaluation] Simulation evaluation section: the abstract and results claim statistically significant outperformance in latency, throughput, and energy, yet supply no mobility model parameters, simulation duration, baseline implementations, number of runs, or error bars; without these the reported gains cannot be assessed or reproduced.
minor comments (2)
  1. [metric definition] Notation for the aggregated gigaflops update rule is introduced without an explicit equation or pseudocode listing the local exchange and aggregation steps.
  2. [early-exit mechanism] The early-exit mechanism is described at a high level but lacks a decision threshold or pseudocode showing how it interacts with the diffusive metric.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which identify key areas for improving the rigor and reproducibility of the manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [metric definition and propagation] § on diffusive metric definition and propagation: no convergence bound, iteration count, or stability analysis is supplied for the aggregated gigaflops diffusion under the UAV mobility model or node-failure scenarios; this is load-bearing for the central claim that local forwarding decisions remain accurate without global knowledge when topology changes rapidly.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not currently supply a formal convergence bound, iteration count, or stability analysis for the aggregated gigaflops diffusion. This analysis would strengthen the central claim under dynamic conditions. In the revised version we will add a new subsection deriving convergence bounds and stability properties for the iterative diffusion process, explicitly considering the UAV mobility model and node-failure scenarios. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [simulation evaluation] Simulation evaluation section: the abstract and results claim statistically significant outperformance in latency, throughput, and energy, yet supply no mobility model parameters, simulation duration, baseline implementations, number of runs, or error bars; without these the reported gains cannot be assessed or reproduced.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the simulation section omits the requested details. The revised manuscript will include the full mobility model parameters, simulation duration, descriptions of all baseline implementations, the number of independent runs, and error bars (with statistical tests) on every reported metric to enable assessment and reproduction of the claimed gains. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new metric defined from local exchanges with independent simulation validation

full rationale

The paper defines the aggregated gigaflops metric directly as an iterative local-neighbor computation without equations that reduce to fitted parameters, self-citations, or prior ansatzes from the same authors. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to its own input by construction, and the performance claims rest on external simulation comparisons rather than any closed derivation loop. This is the normal case of a self-contained proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unverified assumption that local diffusive updates of aggregated gigaflops produce forwarding decisions that improve global performance metrics; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the new metric itself are stated in the abstract.

invented entities (1)
  • aggregated gigaflops no independent evidence
    purpose: Iterative local measure of node and neighbor computing capacity for guiding split inference forwarding
    Newly introduced term in the abstract; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction outside the paper is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5742 in / 1202 out tokens · 50844 ms · 2026-05-22T23:23:11.511437+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lahmeri, M

    M.-A. Lahmeri, M. A. Kishk, M.-S. Alouini, Artificial intelligence for uav-enabled wireless networks: A survey, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society 2 (2021) 1015–1040. doi:10.1109/OJCOMS. 2021.3075201

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms 2021

  2. [2]

    Islam, A

    A. Islam, A. Debnath, M. Ghose, S. Chakraborty, A survey on task of- floading in multi-access edge computing, Journal of Systems Architecture 118 (2021) 102225

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Y . Ding, Z. Yang, Q.-V . Pham, Y . Hu, Z. Zhang, M. Shikh-Bahaei, Dis- tributed machine learning for uav swarms: Computing, sensing, and semantics, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 11 (2024) 7447–7473. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2023.3341307

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3341307 2024

  4. [4]

    Tahir, J

    A. Tahir, J. M. B ¨oling, M. H. Haghbayan, H. T. Toivonen, J. Plosila, Swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles - a survey, J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 16 (2019) 100106

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Matsubara, M

    Y . Matsubara, M. Levorato, F. Restuccia, Split computing and early exiting for deep learning applications: Survey and research challenges, ACM Comput. Surv. 55 (2022). URL:https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3527155. doi:10.1145/3527155

    work page doi:10.1145/3527155 2022

  6. [6]

    J. Mao, X. Chen, K. W. Nixon, C. Krieger, Y . Chen, Modnn: Local distributed mobile computing system for deep neural network, in: Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 2017, 2017, pp. 1396–1401. doi:10.23919/DATE.2017.7927211

    work page doi:10.23919/date.2017.7927211 2017

  7. [7]

    Samikwa, A

    E. Samikwa, A. D. Maio, T. Braun, Disnet: Distributed micro-split deep learning in heterogeneous dynamic iot, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 11 (2024) 6199–6216. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2023.3313514

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3313514 2024

  8. [8]

    Cao, S.-Y

    Y . Cao, S.-Y . Lien, C.-H. Yeh, D.-J. Deng, Y .-C. Liang, D. Niyato, Learning-based multitier split computing for efficient convergence of communication and computation, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 11 (2024) 33077–33096. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2024.3426531

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3426531 2024

  9. [9]

    L. Zeng, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, L. Yang, J. Zhang, Coedge: Cooperative dnn inference with adaptive workload partitioning over heterogeneous edge devices, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 29 (2021) 595–608. doi:10.1109/TNET.2020.3042320

    work page doi:10.1109/tnet.2020.3042320 2021

  10. [10]

    Q. Lin, R. Zhao, K. Liu, J. Wang, Efficient parallel split learning over resource-constrained wireless edge networks, IEEE Transactions on Mo- bile Computing (2024). Early access

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    J. Kim, S. Park, H. Lee, Edge-msl: Split learning on the mobile edge via multi-armed bandits, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2024, 2024, pp. 1–5. To appear

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    X. Liu, Y . Deng, T. Mahmoodi, Wireless distributed learning: A new hy- brid split and federated learning approach, IEEE Transactions on Wire- less Communications 22 (2023) 2650–2665. doi:10.1109/TWC.2022. 3213411

    work page doi:10.1109/twc.2022 2023

  13. [13]

    A. Wu, B. Zhang, Y . Li, H. Chen, Split learning over wireless networks: Parallel design and resource management, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 22 (2023) 4567–4578

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    S. Yeom, D. Choi, J. Han, K. Park, Uav-assisted split computing system: Design and performance optimization, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 11 (2024) 30808–30816

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    T. T. Sari, S. Ahmad, A. Aral, G. Sec ¸inti, Collaborative smart environ- mental monitoring using flying edge intelligence, in: GLOBECOM 2023 - 2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2023, pp. 5336–5341. doi:10.1109/GLOBECOM54140.2023.10436927

    work page doi:10.1109/globecom54140.2023.10436927 2023

  16. [16]

    Huang, W

    M. Huang, W. Liu, T. Wang, A. Liu, S. Zhang, A cloud–mec collab- orative task offloading scheme with service orchestration, IEEE Inter- net of Things Journal 7 (2020) 5792–5805. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2019. 2952767

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2019 2020

  17. [17]

    X. Zhou, S. Ge, P. Liu, T. Qiu, Dag-based dependent tasks offloading in mec-enabled iot with soft cooperation, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Zheng, K

    C. Zheng, K. Pan, J. Dong, L. Chen, Q. Guo, S. Wu, H. Luo, X. Zhang, Multi-agent collaborative optimization of uav trajectory and latency- aware dag task offloading in uav-assisted mec, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 42521–42534

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Secinti, A

    G. Secinti, A. Trotta, S. Mohanti, M. Di Felice, K. R. Chowdhury, Fo- cus: Fog computing in uas software-defined mesh networks, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21 (2020) 2664–2674. doi:10.1109/TITS.2019.2960305

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2960305 2020

  20. [20]

    Agarwal, S

    N. Agarwal, S. Joshi, Federated learning-based task offloading in a uav-aided cloud computing mobile network, IEEE Transactions on Ve- hicular Technology 73 (2024) 15751–15756. doi:10.1109/TVT.2024. 3404223. 10

    work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2024 2024