Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Overview of Variable Rate Coding in JPEG AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.16288 v1 pith:GHFMJXZM submitted 2025-03-20 eess.IV

Overview of Variable Rate Coding in JPEG AI

classification eess.IV
keywords ratejpegvariablebd-ratecompressionhighimageobjective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Empirical evidence has demonstrated that learning-based image compression can outperform classical compression frameworks. This has led to the ongoing standardization of learned-based image codecs, namely Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) AI. The objective of JPEG AI is to enhance compression efficiency and provide a software and hardwarefriendly solution. Based on our research, JPEG AI represents the first standardization that can facilitate the implementation of a learned image codec on a mobile device. This article presents an overview of the variable rate coding functionality in JPEG AI, which includes three variable rate adaptations: a threedimensional quality map, a fast bit rate matching algorithm, and a training strategy. The variable rate adaptations offer a continuous rate function up to 2.0 bpp, exhibiting a high level of performance, a flexible bit allocation between different color components, and a region of interest function for the specified use case. The evaluation of performance encompasses both objective and subjective results. With regard to the objective bit rate matching, the main profile with low complexity yielded a 13.1% BD-rate gain over VVC intra, while the high profile with high complexity achieved a 19.2% BD-rate gain over VVC intra. The BD-rate result is calculated as the mean of the seven perceptual metrics defined in the JPEG AI common test conditions. With respect to subjective results, the example of improving the quality of the region of interest is illustrated.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.