Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Challenges and Advancements in Modeling Shock Fronts with Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Review and Benchmarking Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17379 v1 pith:Y66B2CRW submitted 2025-03-14 physics.flu-dyn cs.LG

classification physics.flu-dyncs.LG
keywords shockpdespinnscomplexdiscontinuitiesproblemssolutionssolving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Solving partial differential equations (PDEs) with discontinuous solutions , such as shock waves in multiphase viscous flow in porous media , is critical for a wide range of scientific and engineering applications, as they represent sudden changes in physical quantities. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), an approach proposed for solving PDEs, encounter significant challenges when applied to such systems. Accurately solving PDEs with discontinuities using PINNs requires specialized techniques to ensure effective solution accuracy and numerical stability. A benchmarking study was conducted on two multiphase flow problems in porous media: the classic Buckley-Leverett (BL) problem and a fully coupled system of equations involving shock waves but with varying levels of solution complexity. The findings show that PM and LM approaches can provide accurate solutions for the BL problem by effectively addressing the infinite gradients associated with shock occurrences. In contrast, AM methods failed to effectively resolve the shock waves. When applied to fully coupled PDEs (with more complex loss landscape), the generalization error in the solutions quickly increased, highlighting the need for ongoing innovation. This study provides a comprehensive review of existing techniques for managing PDE discontinuities using PINNs, offering information on their strengths and limitations. The results underscore the necessity for further research to improve PINNs ability to handle complex discontinuities, particularly in more challenging problems with complex loss landscapes. This includes problems involving higher dimensions or multiphysics systems, where current methods often struggle to maintain accuracy and efficiency.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spatio-temporal, multi-field deep learning of shock propagation in meso-structured media

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A CNN-LSTM surrogate autoregressively predicts seven coupled shock fields in meso-structured materials with 1.4-3.2% RMSE, 94% better than single-field models.

  2. Discontinuity-aware KAN-based physics-informed neural networks

    physics.comp-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A discontinuity-aware PINN with adaptive Fourier features, DyT-plus-spline KAN activations, and learned local viscosity captures shocks with errors between 0.9% and 5% on benchmark PDEs and airfoil flows.

  3. CLINN: Conservation Law Informed Neural Network for Approximating Discontinuous Solutions

    math.NA 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CLINN combines implicit-form, boundedness, and Rankine-Hugoniot loss terms with adaptive refinement, cutting MSE by up to 99.2% on scalar conservation law benchmarks.

Pith tools