Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DiffGED: Computing Graph Edit Distance via Diffusion-based Graph Matching

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.18245 v1 pith:L4H2YC6Q submitted 2025-03-24 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords editgraphdiffgedmatchingpathapproachesgeneratemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Graph Edit Distance (GED) problem, which aims to compute the minimum number of edit operations required to transform one graph into another, is a fundamental challenge in graph analysis with wide-ranging applications. However, due to its NP-hard nature, traditional A* approaches often suffer from scalability issue, making them computationally intractable for large graphs. Many recent deep learning frameworks address GED by formulating it as a regression task, which, while efficient, fails to recover the edit path -- a central interest in GED. Furthermore, recent hybrid approaches that combine deep learning with traditional methods to recover the edit path often yield poor solution quality. These methods also struggle to generate candidate solutions in parallel, resulting in increased running times.In this paper, we present a novel approach, DiffGED, that leverages generative diffusion model to solve GED and recover the corresponding edit path. Specifically, we first generate multiple diverse node matching matrices in parallel through a diffusion-based graph matching model. Next, node mappings are extracted from each generated matching matrices in parallel, and each extracted node mapping can be simply transformed into an edit path. Benefiting from the generative diversity provided by the diffusion model, DiffGED is less likely to fall into local sub-optimal solutions, thereby achieving superior overall solution quality close to the exact solution. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate that DiffGED can generate multiple diverse edit paths with exceptionally high accuracy comparable to exact solutions while maintaining a running time shorter than most of hybrid approaches.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GCCM: Enhancing Generative Graph Prediction via Contrastive Consistency Model

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GCCM prevents shortcut collapse in consistency models for graph prediction by using contrastive negative pairs and input feature perturbation, leading to better performance than deterministic baselines.

  2. Discrete Diffusion Models: A Unified Framework from Tokenization to Generation

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Discrete diffusion models are re-framed as instances of a tokenization-centric, four-component design space (corruption, denoiser, objective, sampler) in a broad survey with no new experimental or theoretical results.

Pith tools