Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Video SimpleQA: Towards Factuality Evaluation in Large Video Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.18923 v2 pith:EXR4ZEJH submitted 2025-03-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords videolvlmsevaluationfactualfactualitygroundingsimpleqaanswers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in Large Video Language Models (LVLMs) have highlighted their potential for multi-modal understanding, yet evaluating their factual grounding in videos remains a critical unsolved challenge. To address this gap, we introduce Video SimpleQA, the first comprehensive benchmark tailored for factuality evaluation in video contexts. Our work differs from existing video benchmarks through the following key features: 1) Knowledge required: demanding integration of external knowledge beyond the video's explicit narrative; 2) Multi-hop fact-seeking question: Each question involves multiple explicit facts and requires strict factual grounding without hypothetical or subjective inferences. We also include per-hop single-fact-based sub-QAs alongside final QAs to enable fine-grained, stepby-step evaluation; 3) Short-form definitive answer: Answers are crafted as unambiguous and definitively correct in a short format with minimal scoring variance; 4) Temporal grounded required: Requiring answers to rely on one or more temporal segments in videos, rather than single frames. We extensively evaluate 33 state-of-the-art LVLMs and summarize key findings as follows: 1) Current LVLMs exhibit notable deficiencies in factual adherence, with the best-performing model o3 merely achieving an F-score of 66.3%; 2) Most LVLMs are overconfident in what they generate, with self-stated confidence exceeding actual accuracy; 3) Retrieval-augmented generation demonstrates consistent improvements at the cost of additional inference time overhead; 4) Multi-hop QA demonstrates substantially degraded performance compared to single-hop sub-QAs, with first-hop object or event recognition emerging as the primary bottleneck. We position Video SimpleQA as the cornerstone benchmark for video factuality assessment, aiming to steer LVLM development toward verifiable grounding in real-world contexts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HumanPCR: Probing MLLM Capabilities in Diverse Human-Centric Scenes

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical benchmark for multimodal models on human-centric visual understanding finds frontier models average under 60% and miss question-uncued visual evidence, with test-time scaling helping only marginally.

  2. BYO-Eval: Build Your Own Dataset for Fine-Grained Visual Assessment of Multimodal Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Blender-based diagnostic toolkit that tests VLMs on fine-grained visual skills by varying one visual attribute at a time, exposing failure modes that coarse benchmarks miss.

  3. VideoEval-Pro: Robust and Realistic Long Video Understanding Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An open-ended short-answer long-video benchmark, built by converting MCQ questions from four existing tests, shows large accuracy drops and different model rankings versus multiple-choice evaluation.

  4. RAMA: Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Agent Framework for Misinformation Detection in Multimodal Fact-Checking

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    RAMA, a retrieval-augmented multi-agent detector, reports 0.910 accuracy and F1 on the ICMR 2024 public test set, placing it behind the top published method on the same benchmark.

Pith tools