Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

L4: Diagnosing Large-scale LLM Training Failures via Automated Log Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.20263 v1 pith:5DIHQLLE submitted 2025-03-26 cs.SE cs.DC

classification cs.SEcs.DC
keywords trainingfailurelogsdiagnosisfailuresefficientexistingextensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) show their capabilities across various applications, training customized LLMs has become essential for modern enterprises. However, due to the complexity of LLM training, which requires massive computational resources and extensive training time, failures are inevitable during the training process. These failures result in considerable waste of resource and time, highlighting the critical need for effective and efficient failure diagnosis to reduce the cost of LLM training. In this paper, we present the first empirical study on the failure reports of 428 LLM training failures in our production Platform-X between May 2023 and April 2024. Our study reveals that hardware and user faults are the predominant root causes, and current diagnosis processes rely heavily on training logs. Unfortunately, existing log-based diagnostic methods fall short in handling LLM training logs. Considering the unique features of LLM training, we identify three distinct patterns of LLM training logs: cross-job, spatial, and temporal patterns. We then introduce our Log-based Large-scale LLM training failure diagnosis framework, L4, which can automatically extract failure-indicating information (i.e., log events, nodes, stages, and iterations) from extensive training logs, thereby reducing manual effort and facilitating failure recovery. Experimental results on real-world datasets show that L4 outperforms existing approaches in identifying failure-indicating logs and localizing faulty nodes. Furthermore, L4 has been applied in Platform-X and demonstrated its effectiveness in enabling accurate and efficient failure diagnosis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The AI Layoff Trap

    econ.TH 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A demand externality traps rational firms in an AI automation arms race that displaces workers beyond the collective optimum; only a Pigouvian automation tax corrects it.

  2. Larger Is Not Always Better: Exploring Small Open-source Language Models in Logging Statement Generation

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned 14B small open-source model with LoRA and RAG outperforms larger proprietary LLMs on automated Java logging statement generation in AL-Bench point estimates.

Pith tools