Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimizing Library Usage and Browser Experience: Application to the New York Public Library

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.23118 v1 pith:XGNJ5CVS submitted 2025-03-29 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords browserusageexperiencelibrarybookbranchesholdspolicy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We tackle the challenge brought to urban library systems by the {holds system} -- which allows users to request books available at other branches to be transferred for local pickup. The holds system increases usage of the entire collection, at the expense of an in-person browser's experience at the source branch. We study the optimization of usage and browser experience, where the library has two levers: where a book should come from when a hold request is placed, and how many book copies at each branch should be available through the holds system versus reserved for browsers. We first show that the problem of maximizing usage can be viewed through the lens of revenue management, for which near-optimal fulfillment policies exist. We then develop a simulation framework that further optimizes for browser experience, through book reservations. We empirically apply our methods to data from the New York Public Library to design implementable policies. We find that though a substantial trade-off exists between these two desiderata, a balanced policy can improve browser experience over the historical policy without significantly sacrificing usage. Because browser usage is more prevalent among branches in low-income areas, this policy further increases system-wide equity: notably, for branches in the 25% lowest-income neighborhoods, it improves both usage and browser experience by about 15%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Heterogeneous participation and allocation skews: when is choice "worth it"?

    cs.CY 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Participatory mechanisms such as budgeting, 311 requests, and school choice tend to skew public resources toward advantaged participants, so the paper argues designers should pair preference use with strong default al...

Pith tools