Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

POPEN: Preference-Based Optimization and Ensemble for LVLM-Based Reasoning Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00640 v1 pith:3UL4PA47 submitted 2025-04-01 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords segmentationpopenlvlmmethodoptimizationpreference-basedreasoningresponses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing LVLM-based reasoning segmentation methods often suffer from imprecise segmentation results and hallucinations in their text responses. This paper introduces POPEN, a novel framework designed to address these issues and achieve improved results. POPEN includes a preference-based optimization method to finetune the LVLM, aligning it more closely with human preferences and thereby generating better text responses and segmentation results. Additionally, POPEN introduces a preference-based ensemble method for inference, which integrates multiple outputs from the LVLM using a preference-score-based attention mechanism for refinement. To better adapt to the segmentation task, we incorporate several task-specific designs in our POPEN framework, including a new approach for collecting segmentation preference data with a curriculum learning mechanism, and a novel preference optimization loss to refine the segmentation capability of the LVLM. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in reasoning segmentation, exhibiting minimal hallucination in text responses and the highest segmentation accuracy compared to previous advanced methods like LISA and PixelLM. Project page is https://lanyunzhu.site/POPEN/

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A soft token-budget penalty driven by task difficulty and model confidence roughly halves the reasoning tokens used by segmentation MLLMs while slightly improving mask accuracy on ReasonSeg-derived benchmarks.

  2. Reasoning Segmentation for Images and Videos: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper organizes the field of reasoning segmentation into image and video tracks, cataloging 26 methods, 12 metrics, and 29 datasets.

Pith tools