Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00797 v1 pith:CKO7NVIM submitted 2025-04-01 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords researchenvironmentimpactsmodelspracticeenvironmentalethicsfail
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As the possibilities for Artificial Intelligence (AI) have grown, so have concerns regarding its impacts on society and the environment. However, these issues are often raised separately; i.e. carbon footprint analyses of AI models typically do not consider how the pursuit of scale has contributed towards building models that are both inaccessible to most researchers in terms of cost and disproportionately harmful to the environment. On the other hand, model audits that aim to evaluate model performance and disparate impacts mostly fail to engage with the environmental ramifications of AI models and how these fit into their auditing approaches. In this separation, both research directions fail to capture the depth of analysis that can be explored by considering the two in parallel and the potential solutions for making informed choices that can be developed at their convergence. In this essay, we build upon work carried out in AI and in sister communities, such as philosophy and sustainable development, to make more deliberate connections around topics such as generalizability, transparency, evaluation and equity across AI research and practice. We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment, and we conclude with a proposal of best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ELASTIC: Event-Tracking Data Synchronization in Soccer Without Annotated Event Locations

    cs.DB 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The abstract claims ELASTIC outperforms prior soccer event-tracking synchronizers on 2,134 annotated events, but the submitted full text is a different manuscript, leaving the central claim unverifiable.

Pith tools