Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

InformGen: An AI Copilot for Accurate and Compliant Clinical Research Consent Document Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00934 v1 pith:TWALS5VI submitted 2025-04-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords informgenfactualaccuracyaccurateclinicalcompliancecompliantconsent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Leveraging large language models (LLMs) to generate high-stakes documents, such as informed consent forms (ICFs), remains a significant challenge due to the extreme need for regulatory compliance and factual accuracy. Here, we present InformGen, an LLM-driven copilot for accurate and compliant ICF drafting by optimized knowledge document parsing and content generation, with humans in the loop. We further construct a benchmark dataset comprising protocols and ICFs from 900 clinical trials. Experimental results demonstrate that InformGen achieves near 100% compliance with 18 core regulatory rules derived from FDA guidelines, outperforming a vanilla GPT-4o model by up to 30%. Additionally, a user study with five annotators shows that InformGen, when integrated with manual intervention, attains over 90% factual accuracy, significantly surpassing the vanilla GPT-4o model's 57%-82%. Crucially, InformGen ensures traceability by providing inline citations to source protocols, enabling easy verification and maintaining the highest standards of factual integrity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedGUIDE: Benchmarking Clinical Decision-Making in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MedGUIDE tests whether LLMs follow structured NCCN cancer-care decision trees and finds that even medical LLMs often lag general models on this task.

Pith tools