Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey on Personalized and Pluralistic Preference Alignment in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.07070 v1 pith:YZ4FGP6Q submitted 2025-04-09 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords alignmentllmspersonalizedpreferenceanalysislanguagelargemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Personalized preference alignment for large language models (LLMs), the process of tailoring LLMs to individual users' preferences, is an emerging research direction spanning the area of NLP and personalization. In this survey, we present an analysis of works on personalized alignment and modeling for LLMs. We introduce a taxonomy of preference alignment techniques, including training time, inference time, and additionally, user-modeling based methods. We provide analysis and discussion on the strengths and limitations of each group of techniques and then cover evaluation, benchmarks, as well as open problems in the field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewards

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAHALO aligns LLMs to multiple objectives in one model via per-objective action heads and PRM-guided decoding, improving math, value, and tutoring metrics jointly.

  2. Procedural Fairness Failures in RLHF from Preference Averaging

    cs.LG 2026-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    In a synthetic preference-learning setup, PA-RLHF is reported to beat a single averaged reward model on group-level alignment, but the experiment appears to use ground-truth group labels to select the reward model, un...

Pith tools