Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MHTS: Multi-Hop Tree Structure Framework for Generating Difficulty-Controllable QA Datasets for RAG Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.08756 v2 pith:SGRHEJRN submitted 2025-03-29 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords multi-hopdifficultystructuretreecapabilitiescomplexitydatasetevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing RAG benchmarks often overlook query difficulty, leading to inflated performance on simpler questions and unreliable evaluations. A robust benchmark dataset must satisfy three key criteria: quality, diversity, and difficulty, which capturing the complexity of reasoning based on hops and the distribution of supporting evidence. In this paper, we propose MHTS (Multi-Hop Tree Structure), a novel dataset synthesis framework that systematically controls multi-hop reasoning complexity by leveraging a multi-hop tree structure to generate logically connected, multi-chunk queries. Our fine-grained difficulty estimation formula exhibits a strong correlation with the overall performance metrics of a RAG system, validating its effectiveness in assessing both retrieval and answer generation capabilities. By ensuring high-quality, diverse, and difficulty-controlled queries, our approach enhances RAG evaluation and benchmarking capabilities.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Data

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HERB is a new heterogeneous enterprise RAG benchmark where even the best agentic RAG system reaches only a 32.96 average score, pointing to retrieval as the limiting factor.

Pith tools