Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Using Vision Language Models for Safety Hazard Identification in Construction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.09083 v1 pith:7EZ6JULN submitted 2025-04-12 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords constructionsafetyhazardshazardframeworkidentificationidentifysite
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Safety hazard identification and prevention are the key elements of proactive safety management. Previous research has extensively explored the applications of computer vision to automatically identify hazards from image clips collected from construction sites. However, these methods struggle to identify context-specific hazards, as they focus on detecting predefined individual entities without understanding their spatial relationships and interactions. Furthermore, their limited adaptability to varying construction site guidelines and conditions hinders their generalization across different projects. These limitations reduce their ability to assess hazards in complex construction environments and adaptability to unseen risks, leading to potential safety gaps. To address these challenges, we proposed and experimentally validated a Vision Language Model (VLM)-based framework for the identification of construction hazards. The framework incorporates a prompt engineering module that structures safety guidelines into contextual queries, allowing VLM to process visual information and generate hazard assessments aligned with the regulation guide. Within this framework, we evaluated state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama 3.2, and InternVL2, using a custom dataset of 1100 construction site images. Experimental results show that GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro outperformed alternatives and displayed promising BERTScore of 0.906 and 0.888 respectively, highlighting their ability to identify both general and context-specific hazards. However, processing times remain a significant challenge, impacting real-time feasibility. These findings offer insights into the practical deployment of VLMs for construction site hazard detection, thereby contributing to the enhancement of proactive safety management.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SafeBuild-Bench: A Temporal-Robust Construction Safety Benchmark with Graph-Enhanced Data Mining

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A temporal-aware construction-safety benchmark built from real inspection archives shows current multimodal models remain far from reliable, with best overall scores near 60.

  2. Building Safer Sites: A Large-Scale Multi-Level Dataset for Construction Safety Research

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CSDataset links 50,000+ OSHA construction incidents with 100,000+ inspections and violations, and reports that complaint-driven inspections coincide with a 17.3% lower rate of subsequent incidents.

Pith tools