REVIEW 6 cited by
Heimdall: test-time scaling on the generative verification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
An AI system can create and maintain knowledge only to the extent that it can verify that knowledge itself. Recent work on long Chain-of-Thought reasoning has demonstrated great potential of LLMs on solving competitive problems, but their verification ability remains to be weak and not sufficiently investigated. In this paper, we propose Heimdall, the long CoT verification LLM that can accurately judge the correctness of solutions. With pure reinforcement learning, we boost the verification accuracy from 62.5% to 94.5% on competitive math problems. By scaling with repeated sampling, the accuracy further increases to 97.5%. Through human evaluation, Heimdall demonstrates impressive generalization capabilities, successfully detecting most issues in challenging math proofs, the type of which is not included during training. Furthermore, we propose Pessimistic Verification to extend the functionality of Heimdall to scaling up the problem solving. It calls Heimdall to judge the solutions from a solver model and based on the pessimistic principle, selects the most likely correct solution with the least uncertainty. Taking DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B as the solver model, Pessimistic Verification improves the solution accuracy on AIME2025 from 54.2% to 70.0% with 16x compute budget and to 83.3% with more compute budget. With the stronger solver Gemini 2.5 Pro, the score reaches 93.0%. Finally, we prototype an automatic knowledge discovery system, a ternary system where one poses questions, another provides solutions, and the third verifies the solutions. Using the data synthesis work NuminaMath for the first two components, Heimdall effectively identifies problematic records within the dataset and reveals that nearly half of the data is flawed, which interestingly aligns with the recent ablation studies from NuminaMath.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
RefCritic: Training Long Chain-of-Thought Critic Models with Refinement Feedback
RefCritic uses reinforcement learning with two rule-based rewards, judgment accuracy and refinement accuracy, to train long-chain-of-thought critic models that improve LLM math reasoning and detect erroneous steps.
-
RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models
RewardAnything follows natural-language reward principles at inference time and, with the new RABench benchmark, demonstrates that principle-conditioned listwise training beats fixed-preference reward models on held-o...
-
GenSelect: A Generative Approach to Best-of-N
Asking a reasoning LLM to compare and select the best among N math solutions at once beats pointwise scoring and majority voting on competition math benchmarks.
-
Faster and Better LLMs via Latency-Aware Test-Time Scaling
Test-time scaling should be tuned for wall-clock latency rather than token count; branches plus speculative decoding win under time budgets.
-
From Trial-and-Error to Improvement: A Systematic Analysis of LLM Exploration Mechanisms in RLVR
A systematic analysis of LLM exploration in RLVR, introducing capability-boundary metrics and examining entropy-performance exchange across training stages and token levels.
-
Scaling over Scaling: Exploring Test-Time Scaling Plateau in Large Reasoning Models
A probabilistic saturation model for test-time scaling is proposed and fitted to reasoning benchmarks, but the plateau 'prediction' is computed from the same per-problem data used to measure it.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.