Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Foundation Models for Remote Sensing: An Analysis of MLLMs for Object Localization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.10727 v1 pith:S6DKCVVQ submitted 2025-04-14 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords mllmslocalizationtasksmodelsobjectworkfine-grainedreasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have altered the landscape of computer vision, obtaining impressive results across a wide range of tasks, especially in zero-shot settings. Unfortunately, their strong performance does not always transfer to out-of-distribution domains, such as earth observation (EO) imagery. Prior work has demonstrated that MLLMs excel at some EO tasks, such as image captioning and scene understanding, while failing at tasks that require more fine-grained spatial reasoning, such as object localization. However, MLLMs are advancing rapidly and insights quickly become out-dated. In this work, we analyze more recent MLLMs that have been explicitly trained to include fine-grained spatial reasoning capabilities, benchmarking them on EO object localization tasks. We demonstrate that these models are performant in certain settings, making them well suited for zero-shot scenarios. Additionally, we provide a detailed discussion focused on prompt selection, ground sample distance (GSD) optimization, and analyzing failure cases. We hope that this work will prove valuable as others evaluate whether an MLLM is well suited for a given EO localization task and how to optimize it.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VERITAS: Verification and Explanation of Realness in Images for Transparency in AI Systems

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A five-stage pipeline is proposed to detect and explain AI-generated 32x32 images by localizing and describing visual artifacts, with only qualitative examples as evidence.

Pith tools