Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 119 references

Machine Learning Methods for Gene Regulatory Network Inference

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A review maps 23 machine-learning methods for gene regulatory networks

desk verdict A useful, well-structured survey of GRN inference methods whose central promise—an accurate method-to-citation map—is undercut by several concrete citation errors that are localized and fixable. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12610 v1 pith:A7AWV32Q submitted 2025-04-17 cs.LG q-bio.MN

Akshata Hegde , Tom Nguyen , Jianlin Cheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGq-bio.MN
keywords generegulatorynetworksGRNinferencemachinelearningsurveydeepsingle-cellRNA-seqbenchmarkdatasetsevaluationmetricscontrastive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a survey that aims to give researchers a current, organized map of machine-learning methods for gene regulatory network inference. It argues that the field has moved from clustering and classic machine learning to deep learning—transformers, graph neural networks, variational autoencoders, and contrastive learning—and that no existing review covers this full landscape across data modalities. The practical payoff, if the survey is accurate, is a structured resource for choosing methods and benchmarks and for positioning new algorithmic work.

What carries the argument

The organizational framework itself carries the review: four learning-paradigm categories tied to representative algorithms, a data-type taxonomy covering transcriptomic, genomic, epigenetic, proteomic, single-cell multi-omics, and expression-plus-protein-interaction inputs, a set of gold-standard datasets and databases, and an evaluation-metric section centered on AUROC, AUPRC, precision, recall, F1, and the BEELINE benchmark. This framework is what gives the survey its claim of being comprehensive and distinguishes it from earlier reviews that were limited to specific approaches or single data types.

What would settle it

A targeted check settles it: read the papers behind a sample of the review's central citations and verify that each supports the specific claim attached to it. For example, check whether reference [56], the original attention paper, actually contains GRN inference experiments, and whether the DREAM benchmark citations point to DREAM materials rather than unrelated method papers. If several load-bearing citations fail such checks, the survey's promise of an accurate synthesis is weakened; widespread mismatches would falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a genuinely up-to-date synthesis of GRN inference methods must be organized simultaneously by machine-learning paradigm and by data modality, and that this organization reveals deep learning as the dominant force in the field. It supports the claim with a tabulated survey of 23 representative methods, 14 of them deep learning, categorized as supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, or contrastive learning. It also catalogues the types of input data used, lists gold-standard training and testing datasets, explains common evaluation metrics, and identifies four open challenges: generalization across cells and species, multi-omics integration, scarce ground truth, and inference of dynamic networks.

Load-bearing premise

The review's usefulness depends on its summaries of the cited methods and datasets being faithful; if a cited paper is mischaracterized, such as a general machine-learning paper being cited as evidence of GRN-specific success, readers following the review could be misled despite the clear organization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A researcher facing a new scRNA-seq dataset can use the four-way taxonomy to shortlist candidate methods by whether labeled regulatory interactions are available.
  • New deep learning GRN methods can position themselves against the 14 deep learning baselines listed here, rather than only against older methods such as GENIE3 and ARACNE.
  • The assembled dataset list gives a common ground-truth pool for comparing methods, spanning DREAM4 and DREAM5, the Zeisel scRNA-seq data, GTEx, ChIP-seq, and pathway resources.
  • If the review's framing is correct, progress will come from methods that integrate multiple omics modalities and adopt transformer or foundation-model architectures, not from further tuning of single-modality classifiers.
  • The stated lack of a generally accurate GRN inference method points toward the need for community benchmarks that cover diverse cell types and conditions, not just single datasets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the same four-way taxonomy could be turned into a live benchmark where every listed method is re-run on identical DREAM and BEELINE data under one evaluation script; the paper's scattered performance numbers would then become directly comparable.
  • My inference: the review's own observation that no method generalizes across conditions suggests consensus or ensemble inference, combining complementary method families, may outperform any single architecture; this is a testable hypothesis the paper does not press.
  • My inference: if ground-truth scarcity is the binding constraint, then the paper's proposal to extract GRNs from literature with large language models and build a PDB-like central GRN database could matter more for progress than any individual new model architecture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript surveys machine learning methods for gene regulatory network (GRN) inference. It categorizes methods by learning paradigm (supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, contrastive), covers recent deep learning techniques, and provides sections on the types of inputs and outputs, gold-standard datasets, evaluation metrics, and future challenges. The paper positions itself as filling a gap by integrating recent deep learning approaches across multiple data modalities.

Significance. If the method-to-citation mapping were reliable, this review would be a useful entry point for practitioners seeking to choose or benchmark GRN inference tools. The organizational structure is clear, the inclusion of recent deep learning methods (transformers, GNNs, VAEs, contrastive learning) is timely, and the lists of datasets and metrics are practical. However, the review's core value depends on accurately signaling which method is which, and several citation-content mismatches currently undermine that value. These errors are localized and correctable, so they do not invalidate the manuscript's overall purpose, but they do require substantive revision before the paper can be considered reliable.

major comments (4)
  1. [1. Introduction] In Section 1, the sentence 'techniques such as DNA footprinting[11] and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)[13] were developed...' cites reference [13], Schena et al. (1995), which is a cDNA microarray paper, not an EMSA methods paper. This misattributes a key experimental technique and contradicts the paper's promise of an accurate overview. Please replace [13] with an appropriate EMSA reference (e.g., Hellman and Fried, Nature Protocols 2007, which is already reference [14] in the manuscript) or reallocate citations consistently.
  2. [2.1 Supervised Learning methods for GRN Inference] The claim that 'research has applied transformer-based models to gene expression data, demonstrating that these models outperform traditional methods...' is supported by reference [56], Vaswani et al., 'Attention is all you need,' which is the original NLP transformer paper and contains no gene expression experiments. This is a direct mismatch between the claim and the cited source. The authors should cite actual transformer-based GRN inference papers (e.g., STGRNS/STERNS [57] or DeepMAPS [58]) or remove the unsupported general assertion.
  3. [2.2 Unsupervised Learning for GRN Inference] Two method descriptions in Section 2.2 have incorrect citations. GRN-VAE is cited as [71], Zhou and Troyanskaya (2015), which is a deep learning paper on predicting noncoding variant effects, not GRN-VAE. DeepSEM is cited as [72], Friedman et al. (2000), which is a Bayesian network method for expression data, not deep structural equation modeling. These mismatches defeat the purpose of a review, which is to help readers trace methods to their sources; they need to be corrected to the actual GRN-VAE and DeepSEM publications.
  4. [2.4 Contrastive Learning for GRN Inference] In the final paragraph of Section 2.4, the text says 'Together, these contrastive learning frameworks—DGCRL and GCLink—demonstrate...' but DGCRL is never introduced, described, or referenced anywhere in the manuscript. The reader cannot use this review to identify what DGCRL is. Please either add a description and citation for DGCRL, or remove it from the list of reviewed frameworks.
minor comments (4)
  1. [2.1 Supervised Learning methods for GRN Inference] The tool is called dynGENIE3 in reference [32], but the text writes 'dynGENIE [32]' without the trailing '3'. Please correct the name for consistency with the literature.
  2. [2.1 Supervised Learning methods for GRN Inference] The transformer tool is called STGRNs in the text, but reference [57] is titled 'STERNS: an interpretable transformer-based method...'. Please clarify whether these are the same method and make the name consistent.
  3. [5.1 Common evaluation metrics] The F1 score is defined as the geometric mean of precision and recall, but it is actually the harmonic mean: F1 = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall). The formula in the manuscript matches the harmonic mean, so only the wording is wrong and should be corrected.
  4. [References] Several references have formatting issues or typos: reference [61] spells the method 'GRNFomer' rather than 'GRNFormer'; reference [64] has a garbled author string ('I;, S.-O. A.-N. J.-M. J.-D.'); and reference [77] is marked as an unpublished manuscript without a clear citation venue. These should be cleaned up for a camera-ready version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's claims are descriptive and not derived from fitted parameters or self-citation chains.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, not a derivation. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no prediction whose value is determined by construction from an input. The central claim is that the paper provides a comprehensive review of machine-learning GRN inference methods, datasets, and metrics; that claim rests on the organization and coverage of the cited literature rather than on any reduction of an output to an input. The only self-referential element is the presentation of GRNFormer (reference 61), the authors' own preprint, in Section 2.1. It is explicitly disclosed as "One of our latest works, GRNFormer[61]" and it is described with reported AUPRC/AUROC values. This is a self-citation that is not load-bearing: the review does not derive any methodological conclusion from those numbers, and the survey's organizational value does not depend on GRNFormer's performance claim. Citation-content mismatches, such as citing reference 13 (a microarray paper) for EMSA, citing reference 56 (the original NLP Transformer paper) for GRN-specific success, and naming DGCRL in Section 2.4 without defining or referencing it, are accuracy and correctness concerns about the review's fidelity to sources, not circularity: none of these makes a derived quantity equal to an input or forces a conclusion by definition. No circular step can be exhibited with a specific reduction, so the honest finding is a non-finding: circularity score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper introduces no free parameters, no axioms beyond standard domain assumptions about gene regulation data, and no invented entities. The only nonstandard reliance is on the accuracy of its literature summaries, which is partially compromised by the noted citation errors.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Gene regulatory interactions are recoverable from high-throughput gene expression data.
    The entire review relies on this premise to discuss approaches that infer GRNs from omics data; stated in Section 1 and assumed throughout Sections 2 and 4.
  • domain assumption The cited primary papers are accurately summarized in the review.
    The survey's value depends on faithful representation. This assumption is partly violated by the citation mismatches documented in Section 1, Section 2.1, and Section 2.4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Machine Learning Methods for Gene Regulatory Network Inference." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A7AWV32Q

@misc{pith2026250412610,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Machine Learning Methods for Gene Regulatory Network Inference},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A7AWV32Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12610}
}
read the original abstract

Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) are intricate biological systems that control gene expression and regulation in response to environmental and developmental cues. Advances in computational biology, coupled with high throughput sequencing technologies, have significantly improved the accuracy of GRN inference and modeling. Modern approaches increasingly leverage artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning techniques including supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, and contrastive learning to analyze large scale omics data and uncover regulatory gene interactions. To support both the application of GRN inference in studying gene regulation and the development of novel machine learning methods, we present a comprehensive review of machine learning based GRN inference methodologies, along with the datasets and evaluation metrics commonly used. Special emphasis is placed on the emerging role of cutting edge deep learning techniques in enhancing inference performance. The potential future directions for improving GRN inference are also discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12610 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. The process of training and testing supervised learning methods to infer GRNs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The architecture of GRNFormer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    M., & Fried, M

    Hellman, L. M., & Fried, M. G. (2007). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for detecting protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nature Protocols, 2(8), 1849 –1861. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.249

    doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.249 2007

  2. [11]

    Green, P.J., Kay, S.A., Lam, E., Chua, NH. (1989). In vitro DNA footprinting. In: Gelvin, S.B., Schilperoort, R.A., Verma, D.P.S. (eds) Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0951-9_21

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0951-9_21 1989

  3. [13]

    W., & Brown, P

    Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W., & Brown, P. O. (1995). Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science (New York, N.Y.), 270(5235), 467 –

    1995

  4. [56]

    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30

    2017

  5. [57]

    Xu, J., Zhang, A., Liu, F., & Zhang, X. (2023). STERNS: an interpretable transformer-based method for inferring gene regulatory networks from single -cell transcriptomic data. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/39/4/btad165/7099621

    2023

  6. [58]

    Ma, A., Wang, X., Li, J., Wang, C., Xiao, T., Liu, Y., … Ma, Q. (2023). Single-cell biological network inference using a heterogeneous graph transformer. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36559-0

    2023

  7. [71]

    Zhou, J., & Troyanskaya, O. G. (2015). Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning 72.Friedman, N., Linial, M., Nachman, I., & Pe'er, D. (2000). Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. Journal of computational biology, 7(3 -4), 601 -620. https://doi.org/10.1089/106652700750050961

    work page doi:10.1089/106652700750050961 2015

  8. [1]

    Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2002). Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Science

    2002

Show all 119 references
  1. [2]

    PLoS Genet 12(1): e1005616

    Vonesch SC, Lamparter D, Mackay TFC, Bergmann S, Hafen E (2016) Genome-Wide Analysis Reveals Novel Regulators of Growth in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 12(1): e1005616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005616

    2016 doi

  2. [3]

    A., Jolma, A., Campitelli, L

    Lambert, S. A., Jolma, A., Campitelli, L. F., Das, P. K., Yin, Y., Albu, M., ... & Weirauch, M. T. (2018). The human transcription factors. Cell, 172(4), 650-665

    2018

  3. [4]

    H., & Levin, M

    Davidson, E. H., & Levin, M. (2005). Gene regulatory networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(14), 4935-4938

    2005

  4. [5]

    Levine, M. (2010). Transcriptional enhancers in animal development and evolution. Current Biology, 20(15), R754-R763

    2010

  5. [6]

    Spitz, F., & Furlong, E. E. (2012). Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13(9), 613-626

    2012

  6. [7]

    L., & Oltvai, Z

    Barabasi, A. L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2), 101-113

    2004

  7. [8]

    Aalto, A., Viitasaari, L., Ilmonen, P. et al. Gene regulatory network inference from sparsely sampled noisy data. Nat Commun 11, 3493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17217-1

    2020 doi

  8. [9]

    Huynh-Thu, V.A., Sanguinetti, G. (2019). Gene Regulatory Network Inference: An Introductory Survey. In: Sanguinetti, G., Huynh -Thu, V. (eds) Gene Regulatory Networks. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1883. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8882-2_1

    2019 doi

  9. [10]

    H., & Levine, M

    Davidson, E. H., & Levine, M. S. (2008). Properties of developmental gene regulatory networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(51), 20063–20066. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806007105

    2008 doi

  10. [12]

    Hager, G.L., Elbi, C., Johnson, T.A., Voss, T.C., Nagaich, A.K., Schiltz, R.L., Qiu, Y., & John, S. (2006). Chromatin dynamics and the evolution of alternate promoter states. Chromosome Research, 14, 107-116

    2006

  11. [15]

    A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L., & Wold, B

    Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L., & Wold, B. (2008). Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA -Seq. Nature methods, 5(7), 621 -628. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1226

    2008 doi

  12. [16]

    Karlebach, G., & Shamir, R. (2008). Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology, 9(10), 770-780. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2503

    2008 doi

  13. [17]

    Chen, G., Ning, B., & Shi, T. (2019). Single -Cell RNA-Seq Technologies and Related Computational Data Analysis. Frontiers in genetics, 10, 317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00317

    2019

  14. [18]

    Trapnell C. (2015). Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome research, 25(10), 1491–1498. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.190595.115

    2015 doi

  15. [19]

    T., Pott, S., & Huss, M

    Liu, E. T., Pott, S., & Huss, M. (2010). Q&A: ChIP -seq technologies and the study of gene regulation. BMC biology, 8, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-56

    2010 doi

  16. [20]

    D., Wu, B., Chang, H

    Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Chang, H. Y., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2015). ATAC-seq: A Method for Assaying Chromatin Accessibility Genome -Wide. Current protocols in molecular biology, 109, 21.29.1 –21.29.9. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109

    2015 doi

  17. [21]

    Angelini, C., & Costa, V. (2014). Understanding gene regulatory mechanisms by integrating ChIP-seq and RNA -seq data: statistical solutions to biological problems. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2, 51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2014.00051

    2014

  18. [22]

    J., Lee, H

    Clark, S. J., Lee, H. J., Smallwood, S. A., Kelsey, G., & Reik, W. (2016). Single -cell epigenomics: powerful new methods for understanding gene regulation and cell identity. Genome biology, 17, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0944-x

    2016 doi

  19. [23]

    Michael, B., Eisen., Paul, T., Spellman., Patrick, O., Brown., David, Botstein. (1998). Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(25):14863-14868. https://doi.org/10.1073...

    1998 doi

  20. [24]

    E., Loh, S

    Chai, L. E., Loh, S. K., Low, S. T., Mohamad, M. S., Deris, S., & Zakaria, Z. (2014). A review on the computational approaches for gene regulatory network construction. Computers in biology and medicine, 48, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.02.011

    2014 doi

  21. [25]

    Mochida, K., Koda, S., Inoue, K., & Nishii, R. (2018). Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Gene Regulatory Networks From Transcriptome Datasets. Frontiers in plant science, 9, 1770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01770

    2018

  22. [26]

    Zhu, X., Huang, Q., Luo, J., Kong, D., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Mini-review: Gene regulatory network benefits from three -dimensional chromatin conformation and structural biology. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

    2023

  23. [27]

    L., & Rosellini, A

    Jiang, T., Gradus, J. L., & Rosellini, A. J. (2020). Supervised Machine Learning: A Brief Primer. Behavior therapy, 51(5), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2020.05.002

    2020 doi

  24. [28]

    Zahra, Razaghi-Moghadam., Zoran, Nikoloski., Zoran, Nikoloski. (2020). Supervised learning of gene regulatory networks. 5(2) https://doi.org/10.1002/CPPB.20106

    2020 doi

  25. [29]

    R., Madhamshettiwar, P

    Maetschke, S. R., Madhamshettiwar, P. B., Davis, M. J., & Ragan, M. A. (2014). Supervised, semi - supervised and unsupervised inference of gene regulatory networks. Briefings in bioinformatics, 15(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbt034

    2014 doi

  26. [30]

    Yang, B., Bao, W., Chen, B., & Song, D. (2022). Single_cell_GRN: gene regulatory network identification based on supervised learning method and Single-cell RNA-seq data. BioData Mining, 15(1), 13

    2022

  27. [31]

    A., Irrthum, A., Wehenkel, L., & Geurts, P

    Huynh-Thu, V. A., Irrthum, A., Wehenkel, L., & Geurts, P. (2010). Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree-based methods. PloS one, 5(9), e12776

    2010

  28. [32]

    A., & Geurts, P

    Huynh-Thu, V. A., & Geurts, P. (2018). dynGENIE3: dynamical GENIE3 for the inference of gene networks from time series expression data. Scientific reports, 8(1), 3384

    2018

  29. [33]

    Wu, J., Zhao, X., Lin, Z., & Shao, Z. (2016). Large scale gene regulatory network inference with a multi-level strategy. Molecular Biosystems, 12(2), 588-597

    2016

  30. [34]

    M., Shin, W., Han, S

    Park, S., Kim, J. M., Shin, W., Han, S. W., Jeon, M., Jang, H. J., ... & Kang, J. (2018). BTNET: boosted tree based gene regulatory network inference algorithm using time-course measurement data. BMC Systems Biology, 12, 69-77

    2018

  31. [35]

    Machine learning -based feature ranking: statistical interpretation and gene network inference

    Huynh-Thu VA. Machine learning -based feature ranking: statistical interpretation and gene network inference. PhD thesis, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium. 2012

    2012

  32. [36]

    Petralia, F., Wang, P., Yang, J., & Tu, Z. (2015). Integrative random forest for gene regulatory network inference. Bioinformatics, 31(12), i197-i205

    2015

  33. [37]

    Saremi, M., & Amirmazlaghani, M. (2021). Reconstruction of gene regulatory networks using multiple datasets. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics, 19(3), 1827-1839

    2021

  34. [38]

    (2020, December)

    Zhang, Y., Chen, Q., Gao, D., & Zou, Q. (2020, December). GRRFNet: Guided regularized random forest-based gene regulatory network inference using data integration. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) (pp. 132-139). IEEE

    2020

  35. [39]

    C., Mordelet, F., Vera-Licona, P., & Vert, J

    Haury, A. C., Mordelet, F., Vera-Licona, P., & Vert, J. P. (2012). TIGRESS: trustful inference of gene regulation using stability selection. BMC systems biology, 6, 1-17

    2012

  36. [40]

    Awad, M., & Khan, L. (2008). Support vector machines. In Intelligent Information Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1138-1146). IGI Global

    2008

  37. [41]

    Pavlidis, P., Weston, J., Cai, J., & Grundy, W. N. (2001, April). Gene functional classification from heterogeneous data. In Proceedings of the fifth annual international conference on Computational biology (pp. 249-255)

    2001

  38. [42]

    Mordelet, F., & Vert, J. P. (2008). SIRENE: supervised inference of regulatory networks. Bioinformatics, 24(16), i76-i82

    2008

  39. [43]

    Gillani, Z., Akash, M. S. H., Rahaman, M. M., & Chen, M. (2014). CompareSVM: supervised, Support Vector Machine (SVM) inference of gene regularity networks. BMC bioinformatics, 15, 1-7

    2014

  40. [44]

    Razaghi-Moghadam, Z., & Nikoloski, Z. (2020). Supervised learning of gene -regulatory networks based on graph distance profiles of transcriptomics data. NPJ systems biology and applications , 6(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-020-0140-1

    2020 doi

  41. [45]

    Ni, Y., Aghamirzaie, D., Elmarakeby, H., Collakova, E., Li, S., Grene, R., & Heath, L. S. (2016). A machine learning approach to predict gene regulatory networks in seed development in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in plant science, 7, 1936

    2016

  42. [46]

    P., Shivakumar, S., & Aluru, S

    Aluru, M., Shrivastava, H., Chockalingam, S. P., Shivakumar, S., & Aluru, S. (2022). EnGRaiN: a supervised ensemble learning method for recovery of large -scale gene regulatory networks. Bioinformatics, 38(5), 1312-1319

    2022

  43. [47]

    Jiang, X., & Zhang, X. (2022). RSNET: inferring gene regulatory networks by a redundancy silencing and network enhancement technique. BMC bioinformatics, 23(1), 165

    2022

  44. [48]

    C., Studham, M., Nordling, T

    Tjärnberg, A., Morgan, D. C., Studham, M., Nordling, T. E., & Sonnhammer, E. L. (2017). GeneSPIDER–gene regulatory network inference benchmarking with controlled network and data properties. Molecular BioSystems, 13(7), 1304-1312

    2017

  45. [49]

    E., Studham, M., Nelander, S., & Sonnhammer, E

    Tjärnberg, A., Nordling, T. E., Studham, M., Nelander, S., & Sonnhammer, E. L. (2015). Avoiding pitfalls in L 1-regularised inference of gene networks. Molecular Biosystems, 11(1), 287-296

    2015

  46. [50]

    E., Studham, M., & Sonnhammer, E

    Tjärnberg, A., Nordling, T. E., Studham, M., & Sonnhammer, E. L. (2013). Optimal sparsity criteria for network inference. Journal of Computational Biology, 20(5), 398-408

    2013

  47. [51]

    Hillerton, T., Seçilmiş, D., Nelander, S., & Sonnhammer, E. L. (2022). Fast and accurate gene regulatory network inference by normalized least squares regression. Bioinformatics, 38(8), 2263-2268

    2022

  48. [52]

    Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2009). glmnet: Lasso and elastic-net regularized generalized linear models. R Package. 53 LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G., 2015. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), pp.436-444

    2009

  49. [54]

    Zhou, X., Pan, J., Chen, L., Zhang, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). DeepIMAGER: Deeply Analyzing Gene Regulatory Networks from scRNA-seq Data. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/14/7/766

    2024

  50. [55]

    Wu, Z., & Sinha, S. (2023). SPREd: A simulation -supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10680606/

    2023

  51. [59]

    Bank, D., Koenigstein, N., & Giryes, R. (2023). Machine Learning for Data Science Handbook, 353 –

    2023

  52. [60]

    Ma, A. et al. IRIS3: integrated cell -type-specific regulon inference server from single -cell RNA-Seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, W275–W286 (2020). 61.Hegde, A., & Cheng, J. (2025). GRNFomer: Accurate Gene Regulatory Network Inference Using Graph Transformer [Preprint]. bioRxiv. ...

    2020 doi

  53. [62]

    Zhou, Z., Wei, J., Liu, M., Zhuo, L., Fu, X., & Zou, Q. (2025). BMC Biology, 23(1). doi:10.1186/s12915-025-02177-z

    2025 doi

  54. [63]

    Fogel, D. B. (2005). Evolutionary Computation: Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471749214

    2005 doi

  55. [64]

    I;, S. -O. A.-N. J.-M. J.-D. (n.d.). GENECI: A novel evolutionary machine learning consensus -based approach for the inference of gene regulatory networks. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36803795/

  56. [65]

    Zheng, L., & Tian, C. (2023). Information Theory and Machine Learning [Printed edition of the Special Issue published in Entropy]. Entropy

    2023

  57. [66]

    A., Nemenman, I., Basso, K., Wiggins, C., Stolovitzky, G., Dalla Favera, R., & Califano, A

    Margolin, A. A., Nemenman, I., Basso, K., Wiggins, C., Stolovitzky, G., Dalla Favera, R., & Califano, A. (2006). ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC bioinformatics, 7(1), S7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-...

    2006 doi

  58. [67]

    J., Hayete, B., Thaden, J

    Faith, J. J., Hayete, B., Thaden, J. T., Mogno, I., Wierzbowski, J., Cottarel, G., ... & Collins, J. J. (2007). Large-scale mapping and validation of Escherichia coli transcriptional regulation from a compendium of expression profiles. PLoS biology, 5(1), e8. https://doi.org/1...

    2007 doi

  59. [68]

    Gan, Y., Hu, X., Zou, G., Yan, C., & Xu, G. (2022). Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks From Single- Cell Transcriptomic Data Using Bidirectional RNN. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178250/

    2022

  60. [69]

    Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks From Single -Cell Transcriptomic Data Using Bidirectional RNN

    Gan Y;Hu X;Zou G;Yan C;Xu G; (n.d.). Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks From Single -Cell Transcriptomic Data Using Bidirectional RNN. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35692809/

  61. [70]

    P., & Welling, M

    Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2019). An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02691

    2019 arXiv

  62. [73]

    Zhou, J., Cui, G., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., & Sun, M. (2020). Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. AI Open, 1, 57-81

    2020

  63. [74]

    J;, L. W. Z. Z. (n.d.). CVGAE: A Self -Supervised Generative Method for Gene Regulatory Network Inference Using Single -Cell RNA Sequencing Data. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38778003/

  64. [75]

    Bansal, M., Belcastro, V., Ambesi -Impiombato, A., & Di Bernardo, D. (2006). How to infer gene networks from expression profiles. Molecular systems biology, 2(1), 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100074

    2006 doi

  65. [76]

    M., Murga, R

    Larranaga, P., Kuijpers, C. M., Murga, R. H., Inza, I., & Dizdarevic, S. (1999). Genetic algorithms for the traveling salesman problem: A review of representations and operators. Artificial Intelligence Review, 13(2), 129-170. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006529012972

    1999 doi

  66. [77]

    Daoudi, M., Meshoul, S., & Boucherkha, S. (n.d.). A semi-supervised approach to GRN inference using learning and optimization [Unpublished manuscript]. MISC Laboratory, Computer Science Department, Abdelhamid Mehri Constantine 2 University, Algeria; IT Department, Nourah Bint ...

  67. [78]

    Inductive inference of gene regulatory network using supervised and semi -supervised graph neural networks

    Wang J;Ma A;Ma Q;Xu D;Joshi T; (n.d.). Inductive inference of gene regulatory network using supervised and semi -supervised graph neural networks. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33294129/

  68. [79]

    van den Oord, A., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O. (2018). Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.03748

    2018 arXiv

  69. [80]

    Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020). A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.05709

    2020 arXiv

  70. [81]

    Khosla, P., Teterwak, P., Wang, C., Sarna, A., Tian, Y., Isola, P., Maschinot, A., Liu, C., & Krishnan, D. (2020). Supervised Contrastive Learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11362

    2020 arXiv

  71. [82]

    Lin, Z., & Ou‐Yang, L. (2023). Inferring gene regulatory networks from single‐cell gene expression data via deep multi‐view contrastive learning . Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24(1), bbac586. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbac586

    2023 doi

  72. [83]

    Yu, M., Zhang, H., & Xu, L. (2025). GCLink: A Graph Contrastive Link Prediction Framework for Gene Regulatory Network Inference. BMC Bioinformatics, 26(1), 45

    2025

  73. [84]

    Bonneau, R., et al. (2006). The Inferelator: an algorithm for learning parsimonious regulatory networks from systems-biology data sets de novo. Genome Biology, 7(5), R36

    2006

  74. [85]

    E., Kontos, K., Lafitte, F., & Bontempi, G

    Meyer, P. E., Kontos, K., Lafitte, F., & Bontempi, G. (2007). Information -theoretic inference of large transcriptional regulatory networks. EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, 2007, 79879

    2007

  75. [86]

    A., Irrthum, A., Wehenkel, L., & Geurts, P

    Huynh-Thu, V. A., Irrthum, A., Wehenkel, L., & Geurts, P. (2010). Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree-based methods. PLoS ONE, 5(9), e12776

    2010

  76. [88]

    Genome Research 2003 Nov; 13(11):2498-504

    Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T.Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research 2003 Nov; 13(11):2498-504

    2003

  77. [89]

    ENCODE Project Consortium. (2012). An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature, 489(7414), 57–74

    2012

  78. [90]

    A., et al

    Margolin, A. A., et al. (2006). ARACNE: An algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(Suppl 1), S7

    2006

  79. [91]

    A., et al

    Huynh-Thu, V. A., et al. (2010). Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree -based methods. PLoS ONE, 5(9), e12776

    2010

  80. [92]

    Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, et al. (2015). Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature, 518(7539), 317–330

    2015

  81. [93]

    Wilhelm, M., et al. (2014). Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature, 509(7502), 582–587

    2014

  82. [94]

    Stuart, T., et al. (2019). Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell, 177(7), 1888–1902.e21. 95.Argelaguet, R., et al. (2020). MOFA+: a statistical framework for comprehensive integration of multi - modal single-cell data. Genome Biology, 21(1), 111

    2019

  83. [96]

    Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018). Integrating single -cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nature Biotechnology, 36(5), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4096

    2018 doi

  84. [97]

    Argelaguet, R., Velten, B., Arnol, D., et al. (2018). Multi‐Omics Factor Analysis —a framework for unsupervised integration of multi‐omics data. Molecular Systems Biology, 14(6), e8124. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20178124

    2018 doi

  85. [99]

    A., et al

    Margolin, A. A., et al. (2006). ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(Suppl 1), S7

    2006

  86. [100]

    A., et al

    Huynh-Thu, V. A., et al. (2010). Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree-based methods. PLoS ONE, 5(9), e12776

    2010

  87. [101]

    Aibar, S., et al. (2017). SCENIC: single -cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nature Methods, 14(11), 1083–1086

    2017

  88. [102]

    E., et al

    Chan, T. E., et al. (2017). Gene regulatory network inference from single-cell data using multivariate information measures. Cell Systems, 5(3), 251–267.e3

    2017

  89. [103]

    Zeisel, A. et al. Science 347, 1138–1142 (2015)

    2015

  90. [104]

    The GTEx Consortium. (2015). The Genotype -Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science, 348(6235), 648–660

    2015

  91. [105]

    Glass, K., et al. (2013). Passing messages between biological networks to refine predicted interactions. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64832

    2013

  92. [106]

    G., Siahpirani, A

    Zhang, S., Pyne, S., Pietrzak, S., Halberg, S., McCalla, S. G., Siahpirani, A. F., … Roy, S. (2023). Inference of cell type -specific gene regulatory networks on cell lineages from single cell omic datasets. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-38637-9

    2023

  93. [107]

    Paytuvi-Gallart, A., et al. (2020). A gene regulatory network atlas for Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Genetics, 11, 468

    2020

  94. [108]

    Fabregat, A., et al. (2018). The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1), D649–D655

    2018

  95. [109]

    L., et al

    Tarca, A. L., et al. (2009). A novel signaling pathway impact analysis. Bioinformatics, 25(1), 75–82

    2009

  96. [110]

    Garcia-Alonso, L., et al. (2019). Benchmark and integration of resources for the estimation of human transcription factor activities. Genome Research, 29(8), 1363–1375

    2019

  97. [111]

    Han, H., et al. (2018). TRUST v2: an expanded reference database of human and mouse transcriptional regulatory interactions. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1), D380–D386

    2018

  98. [112]

    Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M., Morishima, K., & Tanabe, M. (2019). New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D590–D595

    2019

  99. [113]

    N., Kutmon, M., Hanspers, K., Riutta, A., Windsor, J., Nunes, N

    Slenter, D. N., Kutmon, M., Hanspers, K., Riutta, A., Windsor, J., Nunes, N. E., ... & Evelo, C. T. (2018). WikiPathways: a multifaceted pathway database bridging metabolomics to other omics research. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1), D661–D667

    2018

  100. [114]

    & Collado -Vides, J

    Santos-Zavaleta, A., Salgado, H., Gama-Castro, S., Sánchez-Pérez, M., Gómez-Romero, L., Ledezma- Tejeida, D., ... & Collado -Vides, J. (2019). RegulonDB v 10.5: Tackling challenges to unify classic and high throughput knowledge of gene regulation in Escherichia coli. Nucleic A...

    2019

  101. [115]

    Schaffter, T., Marbach, D., & Floreano, D. (2011). GeneNetWeaver: in silico benchmark generation and performance profiling of network inference methods. Bioinformatics, 27(16), 2263–2270

    2011

  102. [116]

    P., Law, J

    Pratapa, A., Jalihal, A. P., Law, J. N., Bharadwaj, A., & Murali, T. M. (2020). Benchmarking algorithms for gene regulatory network inference from single -cell transcriptomic data. Nature methods, 17(2), 147-154

    2020

  103. [117]

    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

    Jumper, J. et al. “Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold.” Nature, 596, pages 583–589 (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

    2021 doi

  104. [118]

    P., Law, J

    Pratapa, A., Jalihal, A. P., Law, J. N., Bharadwaj, A., & Murali, T. M. (2020). Benchmarking algorithms for gene regulatory network inference from single -cell transcriptomic data. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-019-0690-6

    2020

  105. [119]

    Guo, Z., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Chen, M., Wang, D., Xu, D., & Cheng, J. (2024). Diffusion models in bioinformatics and computational biology. Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 2(2), 136-154

    2024

  106. [120]

    A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S.,

    Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., ... & Liang, P. (2021). On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258

    2021 arXiv

  107. [121]

    J., Lin, Y., Yang, J

    Kim, D., Tran, A., Kim, H. J., Lin, Y., Yang, J. Y. H., & Yang, P. (2023). Gene regulatory network reconstruction: harnessing the power of single -cell multi -omic data. NPJ Systems Biology and Applications, 9(1), 51

    2023

  108. [122]

    Ventre, E., Herbach, U., Espinasse, T., Benoit, G., & Gandrillon, O. (2023). One model fits all: combining inference and simulation of gene regulatory networks. PLoS Computational Biology , 19(3), e1010962

    2023

  109. [123]

    H., & Lobo, D

    Mousavi, R., Konuru, S. H., & Lobo, D. (2021). Inference of dynamic spatial GRN models with multi- GPU evolutionary computation. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(5), bbab104

    2021

  110. [374]

    doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24628-9_16

    doi

  111. [470]

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5235.467

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.