Supporting Urban Low-Altitude Economy: Channel Gain Map Inference Based on 3D Conditional GAN

Di Wu; Jiaqi Chen; Ruoguang Li; Yonghao Wang; Yong Zeng

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 17 references

Supporting Urban Low-Altitude Economy: Channel Gain Map Inference Based on 3D Conditional GAN

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A trained GAN can infer a base station's full 3D channel gain map from its coordinates alone, without new measurements.

desk verdict A clean, narrow 3D-CGAN for channel gain map inference that works in one simulated urban layout; the general 'no measurement' claim is untested across environments. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12794 v1 pith:UTDD25DF submitted 2025-04-17 eess.SP

Yonghao Wang , Ruoguang Li , Di Wu , Jiaqi Chen , Yong Zeng This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.SP

keywords channelknowledgemap3Dgainconditionalgenerativeadversarialnetworklow-altitudeeconomyurbanairmobilityradiopropagationCGMinferenceraytracingsimulation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that, in a fixed urban low-altitude environment, the full three-dimensional channel gain map of a base station is a learnable function of the base station's coordinates alone. The proposed 3D conditional GAN is trained on existing maps, here ray-traced channel gain volumes from 900 base station locations in one simulated standardized urban environment, and then generates a $32\times32\times32$ voxel map for a new base station from its coordinates without any new measurements. On a 50-map test set the inferred maps reach an average mean square error of $143.79\ \mathrm{dB}^2$, a $34.75\ \mathrm{dB}^2$ improvement over inverse-distance weighting at $K=9$, and the model needs only about one fifth of the storage. If this holds, drones and eVTOL aircraft could obtain site-specific channel predictions instantly as base stations move, instead of re-measuring each new location.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 3D-CGAN, a conditional generative adversarial network whose generator is built from five 3D transposed-convolution layers and whose discriminator is built from five 3D convolution layers. A 3-channel coordinate vector is progressively upsampled to a $32\times32\times32$ single-channel channel gain volume, while the discriminator sees the map concatenated with the coordinate and outputs a real-or-fake scalar; the training objective is the least-squares adversarial loss plus a reconstruction term $\lambda_{\mathrm{re}} L_{\mathrm{re}}$ that penalizes the mean squared difference between generated and existing maps. This 3D-CGAN instantiates the learned function $f$ from coordinates to maps, so at inference only the generator runs and no measurement data enters the pipeline.

What would settle it

Take the trained generator to a different urban geometry, for example the same grid and ray tracer but a new random arrangement of 20 buildings, and measure AMSE on maps of that new layout; if the error is close to the inverse-distance baseline or no better than using an average map, the coordinate-only mapping is environment-specific rather than general. A direct transfer test would train on layout A and generate maps for layout B without any layout-B training data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the mapping $f$ from a base station coordinate $\boldsymbol{o}$ to the channel gain map $C(\boldsymbol{o})$ is captured by the generator of a 3D conditional GAN. Conditioned only on the coordinate, the generator emits the complete 3D volume of channel gains, including building-blocked voxels set to $\gamma_{\min}^{\mathrm{dB}} = -250$ dB, after training on existing maps. This is demonstrated in one simulated urban environment: 950 ray-traced channel gain maps for a $256\ \mathrm{m} \times 256\ \mathrm{m} \times 128\ \mathrm{m}$ region with 20 buildings, discretized into a $32\times32\times32$ grid, split into 900 training and 50 test maps. The reported average mean square error is $143.79\ \mathrm{dB}^2$, versus $178.54\ \mathrm{dB}^2$ for inverse-distance weighting with $K=9$, and the authors note that, unlike IDW, the trained model does not need to retain the map library once training is complete.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the simulated city used to generate the 950 training and test maps is representative enough of real low-altitude urban environments; all maps come from one standardized urban layout with a single set of 20 buildings, so if real building geometry and radio propagation differ from this simulation, the coordinate-to-map function learned here will not transfer without retraining.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

An operator with existing CGMs for current base stations can generate a CGM for a candidate base station position as a single generator pass, removing per-position measurement flights.
Storage drops to a trained generator plus coordinate conditioning: the paper reports 20% of the map-library storage required by IDW.
Because the inferred maps assign the minimum gain value to building voxels, the network implicitly learns building blockage from coordinates alone, not just smooth path loss.
Larger training sets reduce AMSE for both methods, and the 3D-CGAN stays below IDW at every training size tested, suggesting fewer measured maps are needed to reach a target accuracy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper does not test whether the learned mapping transfers to a different building layout or to measured channels; if transfer fails, the practical use is limited to environments whose geometry matches the training simulation.
A natural extension is to condition the generator on environment descriptors such as building heights, footprint ratio, or a 3D building mask alongside the BS coordinate, which would let one model serve many urban sites.
The comparison with IDW isolates the value of the learned representation, but not the value of adversarial training; an ablation against a plain 3D regression network with the same reconstruction loss would reveal how much the discriminator adds.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, this is a competent incremental contribution: coordinate-conditioned 3D GAN for channel gain map inference, evaluated on ray-traced urban data. Second, the evidence base is thinner than the abstract's general wording implies—success is only shown inside one fixed building layout, and that fixed building mask likely does much of the work.

The genuinely new bit is the 3D conditioning: the generator takes a BS coordinate as input and outputs a 32×32×32 channel gain map, trained on paired (coordinate, CGM) samples from a Wireless InSite simulation. The train/test split is proper, the test BSs are held out, and the IDW comparison is honest. The storage argument (the trained generator replaces the stored CGM library) is a real plus. Credit is also due for giving enough detail about the building generation (ITU-R P.1410) that the dataset could be regenerated.

The soft spots are in the evaluation rather than the formulation. One simulated environment, one building layout; every CGM shares the same building mask. So the generator can treat the mask as a constant and learn a smooth shading for free space conditioned on the BS position. That means the 34.75 dB² AMSE improvement over IDW is partly an artifact of the fixed environment, not evidence that the method generalizes across urban sites. The paper should either show a second layout or at least temper the 'without additional measurement' claim. I also want to see error bars or multiple seeds, an ablation of the reconstruction weight λre (which is never stated), and a stronger baseline than IDW—Kriging or a UNet would be more convincing. The reported 143.79 dB² AMSE corresponds to roughly 12 dB RMSE; that deserves a sentence explaining why that is acceptable.

The paper is a decent start. For a CKM/radio-map reader it is worth a look, but I would not cite it as evidence that the method works in real deployments. I would send it to review: it is clearly written, reproducible enough, and the flaw is fixable by broadening the evaluation. A serious referee could push for the additional experiments, or the authors could reframe the claim to be explicitly per-environment.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 3D conditional generative adversarial network (3D-CGAN) for channel gain map (CGM) inference in urban low-altitude environments. The region is discretized into a 32x32x32 voxel grid, and a dataset of 950 CGMs is generated by ray tracing (Remcom Wireless InSite) for a single ITU-R P.1410 urban layout with 20 buildings. The generator takes a base station coordinate as input and outputs the full 3D CGM; the discriminator distinguishes real from generated maps. Training uses 900 maps and testing uses 50 held-out maps. The reported AMSE is 143.79 dB^2, versus 178.54 dB^2 for the IDW baseline at K=9, and the authors claim that the trained generator can infer a CGM for a new BS coordinate without additional measurement. The paper also notes a storage reduction relative to retaining all CGMs.

Significance. If the approach generalizes beyond the single simulated environment, it would be a useful step toward low-overhead 3D channel knowledge map construction for aerial communications. The paper has a clear problem formulation, a reasonable architecture, and a proper held-out test split, and the comparison with IDW is an honest baseline. However, the evidence is thin: only one building layout, one ray-tracing environment, no repeated-seed statistics, and no ablation of the only free parameter (the reconstruction loss weight). The reported AMSE corresponds to an RMSE of about 12 dB, which is not negligible for channel gain prediction, so the practical significance is not yet established.

major comments (3)

[Section III-A and Section IV-B] The load-bearing generalization claim is not tested. All 950 CGMs come from a single ITU-R P.1410 urban realization: one fixed set of 20 buildings in a 256m x 256m x 128m region. The building mask (voxels set to -250 dB) is identical across all maps, so the generator can learn a constant building layout and only modulate the free-space shading as a function of BS coordinate. The paper demonstrates interpolation for new BS coordinates inside this one environment, but it does not test a second building layout, a different city geometry, or any real measurement. The claim in the abstract that the trained model infers the CGM 'without additional measurement' for urban low-altitude economy generally is therefore not supported by the evidence. Please add cross-environment validation or an explicit, justified scope limitation.
[Section IV-B, Eq. (10), Fig. 6] The evaluation lacks statistical grounding. No multiple training seeds, no error bars, and no confidence intervals are reported. Training data are randomly selected, but the paper reports a single AMSE value of 143.79 dB^2. Given that this corresponds to an RMSE of roughly 11.99 dB, the result should be contextualized (e.g., error distribution, per-voxel RMSE, or error maps) and repeated over several random splits. In addition, the reconstruction loss weight lambda_re is the only free parameter in the generator loss and is never varied; an ablation is needed to show that the reported performance is not sensitive to this choice.
[Section IV-B, Eq. (11)] The baseline comparison is too narrow to support the claim that the proposed scheme 'outperforms those of the benchmark schemes' (plural). Only inverse-distance weighting is used, and the power exponent p in Eq. (11) is never specified. IDW is known to be a weak baseline for structured 3D radio maps because it smears building boundaries. At minimum, please compare with a stronger interpolation method (e.g., Kriging) or a learning-based CKM inference approach such as the UNet-based cross-AP method of [14], and specify p. The storage claim ('reduce storage size to 20%') also needs a clearer accounting: the comparison should state the storage of the trained generator and the storage of the retained CGMs in the IDW baseline, including the dependence on K.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (4)] There is an unmatched closing parenthesis in the last term of Eq. (4); the expression should be corrected.
[Fig. 6 and Fig. 7] The axis labels in Figures 6 and 7 are corrupted (they contain strings such as '/uni0000002e'), so the figures cannot be read as intended by the reader. Please regenerate the figures with proper font embedding.
[Section III-A] The text says the dataset is 'generated by actual environment' but then states that 'data simulated through the ray tracing method' are used as a proxy. This wording is contradictory; please revise to make clear that the dataset is simulated, not measured.
[Reference [16]] Section III-A cites ITU-R Rec. P.1410 as reference [16], but the bibliography entry [16] is a different paper by Yang et al. Please add the correct ITU-R reference and renumber accordingly.
[Section IV-A] The batch size is said to 'vary depending on the amount of training data', but no values are given. Please report the batch size, number of epochs, and early-stopping criterion used for each training run.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 3D-CGAN is trained and tested on held-out ray-traced CGMs, and the reported AMSE is an honest generalization measure within the simulated environment.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation is: define a CGM as a function of BS coordinate (Eqs. 3-7); collect 950 ray-traced CGMs for one ITU-R P.1410 urban layout; train a 3D-CGAN to map coordinates to CGMs; evaluate on 50 held-out coordinates by comparing to independently ray-traced ground truth via AMSE (Eq. 10). None of these steps defines the target quantity in terms of the model's own outputs or fits the model to the test set. The building-mask shortcut (all CGMs share the same layout, with building voxels fixed at -250 dB) is a dataset-representativeness limitation that affects transfer to other environments; it does not make the held-out-coordinate inference tautological. The paper's self-citations (e.g., [4], [8], [14]) introduce the CKM concept and prior CGM work, but the 3D-CGAN architecture, loss functions, and AMSE comparisons stand on their own training/test split. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the method depends on the ray-tracing simulation being a faithful proxy for real channels, on the channel model decomposition in Eq. (3), and on the learnability of the coordinate-to-CGM mapping from about 900 samples in a fixed environment. The reconstruction loss weight λre is a hand-set hyperparameter whose value is not reported.

free parameters (1)

Reconstruction loss weight λre
Used in the generator loss L = E[(D(G(o)|o)-1)^2] + λre * Lre, but its value is not reported in the paper. The reconstruction term controls fidelity to the ground-truth CGM and directly affects output quality.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Ray tracing with Remcom Wireless InSite on the ITU-R P.1410 model produces channel gains representative of real urban low-altitude propagation.
Invoked in Section III-A to generate the whole dataset; no real measurements are collected, so any divergence between the simulator and reality directly invalidates the inference claim.
domain assumption The channel gain factorizes as γ = γPL * γSH * γMP (Eq. 3) and is a deterministic function of transmitter and receiver locations.
Standard model in Section II-A; the CGM representation and the training targets both rely on this decomposition.
domain assumption Building-occupied grid points are assigned a constant minimum channel gain of -250 dB (Eq. 5), and building geometry is fixed across all training and test maps.
Used in the map representation and lets the generator learn occlusion; in real environments building occupancy is not a constant dB cutoff.
domain assumption An 8-meter grid discretization (256m/32) preserves the spatial channel variation needed for low-altitude applications.
The 32x32x32 grid in Section III-A defines the output resolution; if the true channel varies on a finer scale, the inferred map cannot reflect it.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supporting Urban Low-Altitude Economy: Channel Gain Map Inference Based on 3D Conditional GAN." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UTDD25DF

@misc{pith2026250412794,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supporting Urban Low-Altitude Economy: Channel Gain Map Inference Based on 3D Conditional GAN},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UTDD25DF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12794}
}

read the original abstract

The advancement of advanced air mobility (AAM) in recent years has given rise to the concept of low-altitude economy (LAE). However, the diverse flight activities associated with the emerging LAE applications in urban scenarios confront complex physical environments, which urgently necessitates ubiquitous and reliable communication to guarantee the operation safety of the low-altitude aircraft. As one of promising technologies for the sixth generation (6G) mobile networks, channel knowledge map (CKM) enables the environment-aware communication by constructing a site-specific dataset, thereby providing a priori on-site information for the aircraft to obtain the channel state information (CSI) at arbitrary locations with much reduced online overhead. Diverse base station (BS) deployments in the three-dimensional (3D) urban low-altitude environment require efficient 3D CKM construction to capture spatial channel characteristics with less overhead. Towards this end, this paper proposes a 3D channel gain map (CGM) inference method based on a 3D conditional generative adversarial network (3D-CGAN). Specifically, we first analyze the potential deployment types of BSs in urban low-altitude scenario, and investigate the CGM representation with the corresponding 3D channel gain model. The framework of the proposed 3D-CGAN is then discussed, which is trained by a dataset consisting of existing CGMs. Consequently, the trained 3D-CGAN is capable of inferring the corresponding CGM only based on the BS coordinate without additional measurement. The simulation results demonstrate that the CGMs inferred by the proposed 3D-CGAN outperform those of the benchmark schemes, which can accurately reflect the radio propagation condition in 3D environment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12794 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** 3D grid discretization of R [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The CGM training and inference phases of the proposed 3D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The block diagram of the 3D-CGAN for CGM inference. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: 3D visualization comparison between ground-truth CGM and inferred CGM. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The AMSE comparison of the proposed 3D-CGAN and IDW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

[14]

Generating CKM using others’ data: Cross-AP CKM inference with deep learning,

Z. Dai, D. Wu, X. Xu, and Y . Zeng, “Generating CKM using others’ data: Cross-AP CKM inference with deep learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17716, 2024

arXiv 2024
[1]

eVTOL communication and trajectory optimization in low-altitude economy,

K. Xiong, J. Xie, and S. Leng, “eVTOL communication and trajectory optimization in low-altitude economy,” in Proc. IEEE/CIC ICCC Work- shops, Hangzhou, China, 2024, pp. 845-850. 300 500 700 900 /uni00000037/uni0000004b/uni00000048/uni00000003/uni00000056/uni0000004c/uni0000005d/uni00000048/uni00000003/uni00000052/uni00000049/uni00000003/uni00000057/uni000...

work page 2024
[2]

6G non-terrestrial networks enabled low-altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges,

Y . Jiang, X. Li, G. Zhu, H. Li, J. Deng, and Q. Shi, “6G non-terrestrial networks enabled low-altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09047 , 2023

arXiv 2023
[3]

Accessing from the sky: A tutorial on UA V communications for 5G and beyond,

Y . Zeng, Q. Wu, and R. Zhang, “Accessing from the sky: A tutorial on UA V communications for 5G and beyond,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 2327–2375, Dec. 2019

work page 2019
[4]

Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,

Y . Zeng and X. Xu, “Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 84-91, Jun. 2021

work page 2021
[5]

A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,

Y . Zeng et al., “A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts , vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1478-1519, 3rd Quart. 2024

work page 2024
[6]

Channel knowledge map for environment-aware communications: EM algorithm for map construc- tion,

K. Li, P. Li, Y . Zeng, and J. Xu, “Channel knowledge map for environment-aware communications: EM algorithm for map construc- tion,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC , Austin, TX, USA, 2022, pp. 1659-1664

work page 2022
[7]

3D radio map re- construction based on generative adversarial networks under constrained aircraft trajectories,

T. Hu, Y . Huang, J. Chen, Q. Wu, and Z. Gong, “3D radio map re- construction based on generative adversarial networks under constrained aircraft trajectories,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 8250– 8255, Jun. 2023

work page 2023

Show all 17 references

[8]

How much data is needed for channel knowledge map construction?,

X. Xu and Y . Zeng, “How much data is needed for channel knowledge map construction?,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 13011-13021, Oct. 2024

2024
[9]

Aerial video streaming over 3D cellular networks: An environment and channel knowledge map approach,

C. Zhan, H. Hu, Z. Liu, J. Wang, N. Cheng, and S. Mao, “Aerial video streaming over 3D cellular networks: An environment and channel knowledge map approach,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1432–1446, Feb. 2024

2024
[10]

Channel knowledge map (CKM)-assisted multi-UA V wireless network: CKM construction and UA V placement,

H. Li, P. Li, G. Cheng, J. Xu, J. Chen, and Y . Zeng, “Channel knowledge map (CKM)-assisted multi-UA V wireless network: CKM construction and UA V placement,”J. Commun. Inf. Netw. , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 256-270, Sep. 2023

2023
[11]

On the construction of channel gain map: Model-based or model-free approach?,

W. Xie, X. Xu, Z. Dai, and Y . Zeng, “On the construction of channel gain map: Model-based or model-free approach?,” in Proc. IEEE VTC- Spring, Singapore, 2024, pp. 1-5

2024
[12]

An I2I inpainting approach for efficient channel knowledge map construction,

Z. Jin, L. You, J. Wang, X.-G. Xia, and X. Gao, “An I2I inpainting approach for efficient channel knowledge map construction,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1415-1429, Feb. 2025

2025
[13]

IMNet: Interference-aware channel knowledge map construction and localiza- tion,

L. Zhao, Z. Fei, X. Wang, J. Huang, Y . Li, and Y . Zhang, “IMNet: Interference-aware channel knowledge map construction and localiza- tion,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 856–860, Mar. 2025

2025
[15]

Channel knowledge map construction based on a UA V-assisted channel measurement system,

Y . Qiu, X. Chen, K. Mao, X. Ye, H. Li, F. Ali, Y . Huang, and Q. Zhu, “Channel knowledge map construction based on a UA V-assisted channel measurement system,” Drones, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 191, 2024

2024
[16]

Integrating air and ground: Crafting a universal 3D channel knowledge map for AIM,

X. Yang, W. Yue, J. Li, Z. Sha, D. Zhang, and C. Li, “Integrating air and ground: Crafting a universal 3D channel knowledge map for AIM,” in Proc. IEEE/CIC ICCC , Hangzhou, China, 2024, pp. 2125-2130

2024
[17]

Masked 3D conditional generative adversarial network for rock mesh generation,

P. Kuang, D. Luo, and H. Wang, “Masked 3D conditional generative adversarial network for rock mesh generation,” Cluster Computing, vol. 22, no. S6, pp. 15471–15481, 2019

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [14]

Generating CKM using others’ data: Cross-AP CKM inference with deep learning,

Z. Dai, D. Wu, X. Xu, and Y . Zeng, “Generating CKM using others’ data: Cross-AP CKM inference with deep learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17716, 2024

arXiv 2024

[2] [1]

eVTOL communication and trajectory optimization in low-altitude economy,

K. Xiong, J. Xie, and S. Leng, “eVTOL communication and trajectory optimization in low-altitude economy,” in Proc. IEEE/CIC ICCC Work- shops, Hangzhou, China, 2024, pp. 845-850. 300 500 700 900 /uni00000037/uni0000004b/uni00000048/uni00000003/uni00000056/uni0000004c/uni0000005d/uni00000048/uni00000003/uni00000052/uni00000049/uni00000003/uni00000057/uni000...

work page 2024

[3] [2]

6G non-terrestrial networks enabled low-altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges,

Y . Jiang, X. Li, G. Zhu, H. Li, J. Deng, and Q. Shi, “6G non-terrestrial networks enabled low-altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09047 , 2023

arXiv 2023

[4] [3]

Accessing from the sky: A tutorial on UA V communications for 5G and beyond,

Y . Zeng, Q. Wu, and R. Zhang, “Accessing from the sky: A tutorial on UA V communications for 5G and beyond,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 2327–2375, Dec. 2019

work page 2019

[5] [4]

Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,

Y . Zeng and X. Xu, “Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 84-91, Jun. 2021

work page 2021

[6] [5]

A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,

Y . Zeng et al., “A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts , vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1478-1519, 3rd Quart. 2024

work page 2024

[7] [6]

Channel knowledge map for environment-aware communications: EM algorithm for map construc- tion,

K. Li, P. Li, Y . Zeng, and J. Xu, “Channel knowledge map for environment-aware communications: EM algorithm for map construc- tion,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC , Austin, TX, USA, 2022, pp. 1659-1664

work page 2022

[8] [7]

3D radio map re- construction based on generative adversarial networks under constrained aircraft trajectories,

T. Hu, Y . Huang, J. Chen, Q. Wu, and Z. Gong, “3D radio map re- construction based on generative adversarial networks under constrained aircraft trajectories,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 8250– 8255, Jun. 2023

work page 2023