Generating CKM Using Others' Data: Cross-AP CKM Inference with Deep Learning

Di Wu; Xiaoli Xu; Yong Zeng; Zhuoyin Dai

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Generating CKM Using Others' Data: Cross-AP CKM Inference with Deep Learning

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper aims to show that a deep network can generate a new access point's channel knowledge map purely from the channel knowledge maps of neighboring access points and the new AP's location, without any physical environment map or new…

desk verdict Genuinely new task (full cross-AP CKM generation) with a real result on RadioMapSeer, but the validation never tests a truly new AP location, so the central deployment claim rests on an untested extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17716 v1 pith:DXST3M7M submitted 2024-11-20 eess.SP cs.SYeess.IVeess.SY

Zhuoyin Dai , Di Wu , Xiaoli Xu , Yong Zeng This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.SPcs.SYeess.IVeess.SY

keywords channelknowledgemapcross-APCKMinferenceUNetdeeplearningcell-freenetworksgainRadioSeerenvironment-awarecommunication

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a channel knowledge map (CKM), a location-specific database of channel properties, for a newly introduced access point can be generated from the CKMs of existing access points in the same region plus the new AP's location, without measuring or ray-tracing the new AP. The enabling premise is that APs sharing one physical environment have correlated, location-dependent radio behavior, because buildings and terrain shape every AP's signal field in related ways. If this works, dense networks such as cell-free systems can build CKMs for many APs from measurements at only a few, update CKMs cheaply, and evaluate candidate AP locations without site surveys. The paper reports that a UNet trained on simulated city environments infers the target AP's CKM with an RMSE of 2.38 dB, on par with the map-based RadioUNet benchmark (2.03 dB) even though the proposed method never sees the physical environment map.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a UNet whose input has $N+1$ channels: one channel is the target AP's location map, pre-convolved with a $3 \times 3$ all-ones kernel to widen the sparse location peak, and the other $N$ channels are per-AP feature maps formed by a weighted sum of each existing AP's channel gain map and its one-hot location map, $M_n = (1-\omega)G_n + \omega \mathcal{M}_{\mathrm{AP},n}$. During training each AP in turn acts as the target and the remaining APs become inputs, with mean squared error between the inferred and ground-truth channel gain maps as the loss. The network uses $5 \times 5$ convolutions to capture building-edge features and dimensionality-reduction convolutions to handle the 80-channel input efficiently. At inference, the new AP's location and the existing APs' CKMs produce the complete target CKM, with no environment map and no onsite measurements.

What would settle it

Take a real or ray-traced dense deployment, construct CKMs for a handful of APs by measurement or simulation, infer the CKM of a held-out AP with the trained UNet, and compare against the measured CKM. If the RMSE on data outside RadioMapSeer-style synthetic cities is substantially worse than 2.38 dB, or no better than the distance-weighted baseline, the central claim of learnable, transferable cross-AP correlation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the implicit cross-AP correlation in channel knowledge can be learned end-to-end by a supervised UNet, and the learned mapping transfers to held-out simulated environments. On 100 validation environments disjoint from the 500 training environments, the inferred CKMs achieve 2.38 dB RMSE. Compared with a distance-weighted average of the other APs' CKMs (5.30 dB) and with the 3GPP TR 38.901 urban-microcell path-loss model (35.72 dB), the proposed inference is about 3 dB and 33 dB more accurate, respectively. The inferred maps preserve the target AP's location peak and reproduce attenuation and sharp shadowing at building edges, despite never receiving the environment map as input.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the implicit correlation between CKMs of different APs in the same physical environment is strong and stable enough to be learned from 500 simulated environments and then to hold for real, unseen deployments, a transfer that the paper does not quantify with measured data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A dense network can build CKMs for only a subset of APs by measurement or ray tracing and synthesize CKMs for the rest, cutting the initial CKM construction overhead.
Candidate locations for new APs can be scored by their inferred CKMs before deployment, enabling environment-aware AP placement in cell-free networks.
Adding or moving an AP no longer requires remeasuring the whole region: the new CKM can be inferred from the unchanged neighboring APs, making updates cost-effective.
The accuracy gap between map-free and map-based CKM generation nearly closes, so environment-aware communication becomes feasible where physical environment maps are unavailable or outdated.
With channel-count adjustments, the same input construction and UNet design apply to other CKM datasets (e.g., CKMImageNet) and to other channel quantities stored in CKMs, such as time of arrival or angle of arrival.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the learnable cross-AP correlation is as strong as the simulated results suggest, the same input structure could transfer CKMs across carrier frequencies, because the shared physical layout should imprint similar structure on channel maps at different bands; this is not tested in the paper.
The multi-AP CKM input behaves as an implicit, learned surrogate for the physical environment, so the UNet's internal features could plausibly support other environment-aware tasks such as localization or coverage planning.
The likely failure mode is spatial decorrelation: with widely spaced APs or heterogeneous terrain, the CKMs may share too little usable information; a stress test with sparse AP deployment would show whether accuracy degrades toward the weighted-average baseline.
Because RadioMapSeer supplies simulated data only, the 2.38 dB accuracy should be read as a simulation-level result; a measurement campaign comparing inferred and measured CKMs in an urban microcell would settle the real-world claim.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, the paper does something genuinely new: it generates the full channel gain map for a target AP from the maps of other APs plus the target location, using a U-Net. Previous cross-AP work inferred channel state at a single location, not a whole map. Second, the validation has a blind spot that matters: the test always chooses target APs from the same 80 pre-existing AP positions used to build the dataset, so a truly new AP placement is never tried. The 2.38 dB number is real for the tested setting, but the paper's stated use case—arbitrary new APs—is an extrapolation.

What's solid: the task is well motivated for cell-free networks, the formulation in Eq. (2) is clean, and the benchmarks are appropriate. Beating distance-weighted inference by ~3 dB and a 3GPP path-loss model by ~33 dB is a real result. Using 500/700 RadioMapSeer environments for training and 100 disjoint ones for validation is a reasonable split. The U-Net design is standard, but the pre-convolution for the sparse target location map is a sensible tweak.

Soft spots, in order of severity. The biggest is the held-out-location gap; it should be easy to fix: hold out some AP positions entirely (say, 10 of the 80) and only test on those. Second, omega in Eq. (4) is not reported anywhere; the input representation literally depends on a chosen weight and the reader cannot reproduce the numbers without it. Third, there is a single training run and no error bars; with a deep model and 40k training samples, run-to-run variance could be a couple tenths of a dB. Fourth, no ablation separates what the target location map contributes versus the other APs' CGMs; the model could be leaning heavily on the location prior. The comparison to RadioUNet is fair only as a rough benchmark since RadioUNet solves a different task (radio map from environment), not the same cross-AP problem. Minor: no code.

Who it's for: people building CKM construction pipelines and anyone interested in environment-aware 6G. The central idea is plausible and worth engaging with, but the paper as written is a feasibility study that needs a tighter validation before the cross-AP generation claim should be taken at face value.

Recommendation: yes, send to review, but expect the reviewers to ask for the held-out-location test, the omega value, and error bars. It's a useful advance, not a breakthrough.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper addresses the problem of generating a channel knowledge map (CKM) for a potentially new access point (AP) in a dense network, using only the CKMs of existing APs and the new AP's location. The authors propose a UNet-based deep learning method: the input is a stack of feature maps formed by combining each existing AP's channel gain map (CGM) with a one-hot AP location map, plus a pre-convolved target AP location map; the output is the target AP's CGM. The model is trained and evaluated on the RadioMapSeer dataset (500 simulated environments for training, 100 for validation, 80 APs per environment, each AP in turn as target). The reported RMSE is 2.38 dB, which the authors compare to RadioUNet's 2.03 dB and to two simpler baselines (weighted CKM inference: 5.30 dB; 3GPP path-loss model: 35.72 dB). The central claim is that cross-AP CKM inference is feasible and effective without requiring the physical environment map.

Significance. If the reported result holds, the proposed method could reduce the overhead of CKM construction and update in dense networks such as cell-free systems, and the problem formulation (cross-AP inference from other APs' CKMs) is a useful extension of existing CKM literature. The paper contributes a concrete UNet architecture, a training procedure on a public dataset, and a comparison against baselines. It also explicitly avoids using the physical environment map as input, which is a meaningful difference from RadioUNet. However, the significance is conditional on addressing the evaluation gaps described below; as it stands, the central feasibility claim is not yet convincingly established for the stated problem of arbitrary new AP locations. The work is an incremental but potentially useful contribution if the validation is strengthened.

major comments (5)

[Section IV.A, Algorithm 1] The evaluation protocol never tests a genuinely new AP location: both training and validation always choose the target AP from the 80 pre-existing AP positions defined in each RadioMapSeer environment. The problem formulation in Eq. (2) explicitly considers a potentially new AP at an arbitrary location c0, but the reported 2.38 dB RMSE in Table I is measured only for target positions drawn from the same discrete set used to generate the dataset. The model could succeed by exploiting the strong similarity between the target CGM and CGMs of nearby existing APs, or by memorizing target coordinate patterns, without learning a generalizable cross-AP mapping. A proper evaluation should hold out a set of AP coordinates (or generate new transmitter positions) and test the trained model on those locations in unseen environments.
[Section III.A, Eq. (4)] The blend weight ω in Eq. (4) is a free parameter that controls the relative contribution of the AP location map and the channel gain map in the input feature representation, but its value is never reported anywhere in the paper. Since the input to the network depends directly on ω, the experimental results are not reproducible without this value. Please report the chosen ω and, ideally, an ablation showing the sensitivity of the results to this parameter.
[Section IV.A] The model is selected on the validation set ("the model that minimized the MSE loss in the validation set over the 15 epochs is saved"), and the same validation set is then used to produce the results in Table I. This selection procedure can bias the reported performance upward because the validation set has been used for model choice. A separate test set, or a nested validation approach, should be used to report the final numbers.
[Section IV.B, Table I] The results are from a single training run with no error bars, seed variation, or confidence intervals. Deep-learning training is stochastic, and the reported improvement of the proposed method (2.38 dB) over the weighted baseline (5.30 dB) could be affected by training variance. Please report the mean and standard deviation over multiple runs, or at least a bootstrap over environments.
[Section III.B, Section IV] No ablation is provided to separate the contribution of the target AP location channel from the contribution of the other APs' CGMs in the input. The input contains both the pre-convolved target location map and the 80 other-AP feature maps, so it is unclear whether the model is actually exploiting the cross-AP correlation or simply learning a location-to-CGM mapping from the target location channel alone (or from a trivial average of the other CGMs). A baseline that uses only the target location (e.g., predicting the mean CGM over the training set) or only the other APs' CGMs without the target location would clarify what the model learns and would directly test the paper's core hypothesis.

minor comments (5)

[Section III.A] The notation "M_input ∈ R^{W^2×(n+1)}" uses a lowercase n that is not defined; it should be N, the number of existing APs.
[Section III.A] There is a typo: "c is any poss coordinate in the CKM" should read "c is any possible coordinate in the CKM."
[Section IV.B, Table I] The comparison with RadioUNet is not a like-for-like baseline: RadioUNet takes the physical environment map as input and addresses a different task (radio map estimation from the environment and transmitter location). The statement that the proposed method is "on the same level" as RadioUNet should be qualified to avoid implying a direct algorithmic comparison.
[Section IV.B, Benchmark 2] The 3GPP TR 38.901 path-loss baseline is not fully specified (carrier frequency, antenna heights, LOS/NLOS assumptions, etc.), which makes the reported 35.72 dB RMSE difficult to interpret or reproduce.
[Section III.B] The paper notes that for other datasets the number of input channels must be adjusted, but it does not discuss how the method scales to a variable number of existing APs, which is a natural requirement in dense networks. A brief discussion or a small experiment with a different N would strengthen the generality claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the reported cross-AP CKM inference is an empirical held-out evaluation, not a restatement of its training inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central mapping is f({M_n}; c0) -> G0, where the CKMs of existing APs and the target AP location are inputs, and the target CKM G0 appears only as supervised ground truth through the MSE loss in Eq. (6). Thus the predicted CKM is not constructed from the target CKM itself; the target CKM is not fed into the model during inference. Validation is carried out on 100 RadioMapSeer environments that are disjoint from the 500 training environments, so the reported 2.38 dB RMSE is a held-out empirical quantity rather than a fitted value renamed as a prediction. The comparisons to RadioUNet and to the weighted and model-based baselines are external benchmarks, not self-referential definitions. The paper's citations to the authors' prior CKM work establish background and terminology, but the load-bearing learning pipeline depends on the external RadioMapSeer dataset and the external RadioUNet result, so these self-citations are not load-bearing. The skeptical concern that validation targets are always drawn from the 80 pre-defined AP positions in each RadioMapSeer environment is a genuine generalization and internal-validity caveat for arbitrary new AP placements, but it is not circularity: the target location is an input, the target CGM is not used to form the prediction, and the evaluation is still out-of-sample with respect to environments. No equation reduces to its own input, and no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the learnability and generalizability of cross-AP correlations, plus an unreported blend weight and a hand-picked benchmark weight. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

omega
Blend weight in Eq. (4) between the channel gain map and the AP location map. The paper never states its value, yet it controls the input features and likely affects accuracy.
beta = 0.1
Distance weight in the weighted benchmark, Eq. (7). It is hand-picked and not tuned, so the benchmark may be weaker than necessary.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption CKMs of different APs in the same region are correlated because they share the same physical environment.
Stated in Section I and used to justify mining other APs' CKMs; no quantitative validation of the degree of correlation.
domain assumption RadioMapSeer simulated radio maps are representative enough to train a model that generalizes to real deployment.
The only dataset used; the paper does not test on measured data.
domain assumption A U-Net with 79 input CKM channels plus target location can learn the cross-AP mapping that generalizes across environments.
The architecture is taken from prior work and trained on 500 of 700 maps; no proof that this capacity is sufficient.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generating CKM Using Others' Data: Cross-AP CKM Inference with Deep Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DXST3M7M

@misc{pith2026241117716,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generating CKM Using Others' Data: Cross-AP CKM Inference with Deep Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DXST3M7M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17716}
}

read the original abstract

Channel knowledge map (CKM) is a promising paradigm shift towards environment-aware communication and sensing by providing location-specific prior channel knowledge before real-time communication. Although CKM is particularly appealing for dense networks such as cell-free networks, it remains a challenge to efficiently generate CKMs in dense networks. For a dense network with CKMs of existing access points (APs), it will be useful to efficiently generate CKMs of potentially new APs with only AP location information. The generation of inferred CKMs across APs can help dense networks achieve convenient initial CKM generation, environment-aware AP deployment, and cost-effective CKM updates. Considering that different APs in the same region share the same physical environment, there exists a natural correlation between the channel knowledge of different APs. Therefore, by mining the implicit correlation between location-specific channel knowledge, cross-AP CKM inference can be realized using data from other APs. This paper proposes a cross-AP inference method to generate CKMs of potentially new APs with deep learning. The location of the target AP is fed into the UNet model in combination with the channel knowledge of other existing APs, and supervised learning is performed based on the channel knowledge of the target AP. Based on the trained UNet and the channel knowledge of the existing APs, the CKM inference of the potentially new AP can be generated across APs. The generation results of the inferred CKM validate the feasibility and effectiveness of cross-AP CKM inference with other APs' channel knowledge.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17716 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** Input Structure Design. CGMs. Therefore, the input data of the UNet for crossAP inference is a high-dimensional matrix with 80 channels. According to the process of input data generation, the first channel dimension consists of the target AP location map M∗ AP,target after mask operation. All the other channels are feature maps composed of the weighted sums of CGMs and AP location maps of other APs in the same phys… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Structure of the UNet for Cross-AP CKM Inference. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Comparison of the Cross-AP CKM Inference and the Benchmarks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

BS-1-to-N: Diffusion-Based Environment-Aware Cross-BS Channel Knowledge Map Generation for Cell-Free Networks
eess.SP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

BS-1-to-N uses a diffusion model with location-aware attention to generate a target base station's channel knowledge map from source base station maps and locations.
Supporting Urban Low-Altitude Economy: Channel Gain Map Inference Based on 3D Conditional GAN
eess.SP 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A 3D conditional GAN infers channel gain maps for new base station locations in a simulated urban environment, lowering mean squared error by about 35 dB² versus inverse distance weighting.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,

Y . Zeng and X. Xu, “Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 84–91, Jun. 2021

2021
[2]

A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,

Y . Zeng, J. Chen, J. Xu, D. Wu, X. Xu, S. Jin, X. Gao, D. Gesbert, S. Cui, and R. Zhang, “A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor . , pp. 1–1, Feb. 2024

2024
[3]

Environment-aware hybrid beamforming by leveraging channel knowledge map,

D. Wu, Y . Zeng, S. Jin, and R. Zhang, “Environment-aware hybrid beamforming by leveraging channel knowledge map,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 4990–5005, 2024

2024
[4]

Site-specific propagation prediction for wireless in-building personal communication system design,

S. Y . Seidel and T. S. Rappaport, “Site-specific propagation prediction for wireless in-building personal communication system design,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 879–891, Nov. 1994

work page 1994
[5]

RadioUNet: Fast radio map estimation with convolutional neural networks,

R. Levie, C. Yapar, G. Kutyniok, and G. Caire, “RadioUNet: Fast radio map estimation with convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4001–4015, Jun. 2021

2021
[6]

How much data is needed for channel knowledge map construction?

X. Xu and Y . Zeng, “How much data is needed for channel knowledge map construction?” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , pp. 1–1, May. 2024

2024
[7]

Learning-based remote channel inference: Feasibility analysis and case study,

S. Chen, Z. Jiang, S. Zhou, Z. Niu, Z. He, A. Marinescu, and L. A. DaSilva, “Learning-based remote channel inference: Feasibility analysis and case study,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 3554– 3568, July. 2019

2019
[8]

Deep learning for TDD and FDD massive MIMO: Mapping channels in space and frequency,

M. Alrabeiah and A. Alkhateeb, “Deep learning for TDD and FDD massive MIMO: Mapping channels in space and frequency,” in 2019 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers , Nov. 2019, pp. 1465–1470

2019

Show all 12 references

[9]

U-Net: Convolutional net- works for biomedical image segmentation,

O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-Net: Convolutional net- works for biomedical image segmentation,” in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015 . Springer, 2015, pp. 234–241

2015
[10]

Dataset of pathloss and ToA radio maps with localization application,

C ¸ . Yapar, R. Levie, G. Kutyniok, and G. Caire, “Dataset of pathloss and ToA radio maps with localization application,” arXiv preprint:2212.11777, 2022

2022 arXiv
[11]

CKMImagenet: A comprehensive dataset to enable channel knowledge map construction via computer vision,

D. Wu, Z. Wu, Y . Qiu, S. Fu, and Y . Zeng, “CKMImagenet: A comprehensive dataset to enable channel knowledge map construction via computer vision,” in 2024 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops) , Aug. 2024, pp. 114–119

2024
[12]

Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,

3GPP, “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical report (TR) 38.901, Apr. 2024, version 18.0.0

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,

Y . Zeng and X. Xu, “Toward environment-aware 6G communications via channel knowledge map,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 84–91, Jun. 2021

2021

[2] [2]

A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,

Y . Zeng, J. Chen, J. Xu, D. Wu, X. Xu, S. Jin, X. Gao, D. Gesbert, S. Cui, and R. Zhang, “A tutorial on environment-aware communications via channel knowledge map for 6G,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor . , pp. 1–1, Feb. 2024

2024

[3] [3]

Environment-aware hybrid beamforming by leveraging channel knowledge map,

D. Wu, Y . Zeng, S. Jin, and R. Zhang, “Environment-aware hybrid beamforming by leveraging channel knowledge map,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 4990–5005, 2024

2024

[4] [4]

Site-specific propagation prediction for wireless in-building personal communication system design,

S. Y . Seidel and T. S. Rappaport, “Site-specific propagation prediction for wireless in-building personal communication system design,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 879–891, Nov. 1994

work page 1994

[5] [5]

RadioUNet: Fast radio map estimation with convolutional neural networks,

R. Levie, C. Yapar, G. Kutyniok, and G. Caire, “RadioUNet: Fast radio map estimation with convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4001–4015, Jun. 2021

2021

[6] [6]

How much data is needed for channel knowledge map construction?

X. Xu and Y . Zeng, “How much data is needed for channel knowledge map construction?” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , pp. 1–1, May. 2024

2024

[7] [7]

Learning-based remote channel inference: Feasibility analysis and case study,

S. Chen, Z. Jiang, S. Zhou, Z. Niu, Z. He, A. Marinescu, and L. A. DaSilva, “Learning-based remote channel inference: Feasibility analysis and case study,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 3554– 3568, July. 2019

2019

[8] [8]

Deep learning for TDD and FDD massive MIMO: Mapping channels in space and frequency,

M. Alrabeiah and A. Alkhateeb, “Deep learning for TDD and FDD massive MIMO: Mapping channels in space and frequency,” in 2019 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers , Nov. 2019, pp. 1465–1470

2019