Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 44 references

SupResDiffGAN a new approach for the Super-Resolution task

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A hybrid latent-space GAN-diffusion model performs super-resolution in as few as 10 diffusion steps, reaching inference speeds comparable to ESRGAN while beating the diffusion baselines SR3, I2SB, and ResShift on LPIPS.

desk verdict Plausible latent-space diffusion-GAN for super-resolution, honestly described but the central outperformance claim over diffusion baselines is undermined by the paper's own admission that its constrained protocol handicaps those baselines. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.13622 v1 pith:FGYAZSIJ submitted 2025-04-18 eess.IV cs.CV

Dawid Kopeć , Wojciech Koz{l}owski , Maciej Wizerkaniuk , Dawid Krutul , Jan Kocoń , Maciej Zięba This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords super-resolutiondiffusionmodelsgenerativeadversarialnetworkslatentspaceadaptivenoisecorruptioninferencespeedLPIPStraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SupResDiffGAN is a hybrid architecture for single-image super-resolution that combines a diffusion generator with an adversarial discriminator inside the latent space of a pretrained autoencoder. The paper aims to show that this combination removes the main barrier to practical diffusion-based super-resolution: the hundreds or thousands of denoising steps normally required. It reports that the model generates high-quality outputs in as few as 10 diffusion steps (3 for faces), runs at speeds comparable to the GAN-based ESRGAN, and achieves better LPIPS perceptual scores than the diffusion baselines SR3, I2SB, and ResShift under a shared training protocol. If true, this would let diffusion models be used in real-time super-resolution applications while retaining their detail-preserving advantages. A secondary contribution is adaptive noise corruption, which adjusts the noise level fed to the discriminator according to its recent accuracy and is said to prevent discriminator overfitting.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is adaptive noise corruption in latent space. After the generator produces $\hat{z}_0$ from the noised latent $z_t$ and the low-resolution guide $z_{\mathrm{low}}$, both the real latent $z_0$ and the fake $\hat{z}_0$ are further diffused to a common timestep $s$ before being decoded and shown to the discriminator. The step is set by $s = \max(2T(\mathrm{acc}_{\mathrm{ema}} - \tfrac{1}{2}),0)$, where $\mathrm{acc}_{\mathrm{ema}}$ is an exponential moving average of discriminator accuracy; this keeps the discriminator's task neither too easy nor too hard. Operating inside the latent space of a pretrained variational autoencoder reduces the dimensionality the U-Net must process, and the adversarial loss lets the generator produce realistic textures with very few reverse steps. The combination of these two components carries the claimed speed and quality results.

What would settle it

Run SR3, I2SB, and ResShift with their original architectures and recommended step counts on the same ImageNet-trained setup and test sets; if any of them reaches an LPIPS at or below SupResDiffGAN's at an acceptable runtime, the paper's central claim of outperforming diffusion-based super-resolution methods is refuted. A cheaper check is to rerun the paper's own protocol but give each diffusion baseline its native U-Net width while keeping 10 steps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that super-resolution can be performed by a diffusion model that is trained adversarially and runs in latent space, yielding GAN-like inference speed without giving up diffusion-level perceptual quality. The generator is a U-Net that takes a noised latent code $z_t$, the timestep $t$, and a low-resolution latent $z_{\mathrm{low}}$ and predicts the clean high-resolution latent $\hat{z}_0$; the prediction is decoded and shown to a discriminator alongside the ground truth. To stop the discriminator from overfitting, both real and fake latents are passed through the diffusion forward process to a timestep $s$ that is increased or decreased based on an exponential moving average of discriminator accuracy. Across ImageNet, CelebA-HQ, Div2K, Urban100, RealSR, and Set14, the model reports the best LPIPS among the tested diffusion methods under the shared protocol, with inference times per batch that are an order of magnitude faster than SR3 and ResShift and comparable to ESRGAN, and with quality maintained down to 10 denoising steps. The paper is explicit that it does not surpass the best GAN methods on LPIPS and that its PSNR and SSIM are lower, which it attributes to those metrics favoring smooth outputs.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that SupResDiffGAN beats the other diffusion methods assumes that training SR3, I2SB, and ResShift with the same small U-Net and 10-step budget is a fair comparison, rather than a handicap imposed on them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Diffusion-based super-resolution no longer needs hundreds of sampling steps: the paper shows usable quality at 10 steps, and even 3 steps for faces, cutting inference time by up to roughly a factor of 200 relative to a 1000-step process.
  • Under the paper's training protocol, a hybrid adversarial diffusion model beats the pure diffusion baselines SR3, I2SB, and ResShift on LPIPS on every tested dataset.
  • The ablation results indicate that the adversarial term and the adaptive noise schedule each contribute to the final LPIPS, with the full model giving the best balance of perceptual quality and fidelity.
  • Latent-space processing plus a reduced step count makes diffusion super-resolution fast enough for real-time or near-real-time applications, with batch inference times comparable to ESRGAN.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Our inference: the fair-comparison protocol is also the main threat to the result; if SR3, I2SB, and ResShift were run at their native parameter counts and step schedules, their LPIPS gap relative to SupResDiffGAN would likely shrink, and the efficiency comparison would need to account for the extra training cost of the discriminator.
  • Our inference: adaptive noise corruption is not specific to super-resolution; the same accuracy-based noise schedule could stabilize adversarial training in other image-to-image diffusion tasks such as deblurring, inpainting, or medical image reconstruction.
  • Our inference: because the model relies on a fixed pretrained VAE, its ceiling is partly set by that autoencoder's reconstruction fidelity; improving the VAE should directly improve the super-resolved outputs, which is a testable prediction.
  • Our inference: a direct extension would be to train the same generator-discriminator pair in pixel space with matched parameters and steps to isolate the contribution of latent-space operation, which the paper does not do.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes SupResDiffGAN, a hybrid generative model for single-image super-resolution that combines a latent-space diffusion generator with an adversarially trained discriminator. The generator is a U-Net that denoises latent encodings of the high-resolution image conditioned on the low-resolution input in the frozen latent space of a Stable Diffusion VAE. To stabilize training, the discriminator receives noisy decoded pairs whose corruption level is dynamically adjusted through an EMA of discriminator accuracy. The model is trained on ImageNet and evaluated on ImageNet, CelebA-HQ, DIV2K, Urban100, RealSR, and Set14 using PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, and per-batch inference time. The headline claims are that SupResDiffGAN outperforms diffusion-based methods SR3, I2SB, and ResShift in LPIPS and inference speed, achieves inference speeds comparable to ESRGAN, and generates high-quality images in as few as 10 diffusion steps. The paper also acknowledges that GAN baselines achieve better LPIPS and that PSNR/SSIM are lower.

Significance. The paper addresses an important practical problem: reducing the inference cost of diffusion-based super-resolution while retaining perceptual quality. The proposed architecture is reasonable, combining a frozen VAE, a U-Net generator, and a discriminator with adaptive noise corruption, and the empirical study is conducted on standard benchmarks. The paper is transparent about several weaknesses, including the lower PSNR/SSIM relative to SR3 and the fact that all diffusion baselines were retrained with a shared 50M U-Net and 10 (or 3) diffusion steps. If the comparison were run at the baselines' native configurations, the method might or might not retain its advantage; as it stands, the central claim of outperforming SR3 and I2SB is not yet established. The adaptive noise corruption mechanism is a plausible contribution, but its value is demonstrated only by a small ablation on a single dataset.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.1, Tables 1–3] The protocol used for the diffusion baselines does not represent SR3, I2SB, or ResShift as published. All three are retrained with a 50M shared U-Net and 10 inference steps (3 on CelebA-HQ), and the paper concedes in §5.1 that their lower performance is due to the shared model sizes. Since the headline claim of the paper is that SupResDiffGAN outperforms these methods in LPIPS and speed, the comparison must be re-run either with official checkpoints at native step counts or with baselines re-trained under their own architectures and schedules. Without this, Tables 1-3 cannot distinguish an architectural advantage from a handicapping protocol.
  2. [Table 2, Urban100 column] The claim in §5.1 that SupResDiffGAN 'significantly improves upon other diffusion-based models, achieving the best results—including SR3' is contradicted by the Urban100 column of Table 2, where SR3 achieves LPIPS 0.2428 and SupResDiffGAN achieves 0.2570. The claim should be restricted to the datasets for which it holds, or new evidence should be provided that resolves this discrepancy.
  3. [Table 3] The statement that SupResDiffGAN 'achieves inference speeds comparable to ESRGAN' is not supported by the table: on ImageNet the proposed method is 0.2954 s/batch versus 0.2188 s for ESRGAN, and on CelebA-HQ it is 0.1832 s versus 0.0870 s. In addition, the speed comparison is distorted by forcing SR3, I2SB, and ResShift to use 10 or 3 steps; these methods should be compared at their native step counts or at step counts chosen by a stated protocol, with end-to-end latency including VAE encode/decode.
  4. [Abstract and §5.1] The abstract says SupResDiffGAN 'outperforms traditional diffusion models such as SR3 and I2SB in efficiency and image quality,' but Table 1 on CelebA-HQ shows PSNR 26.11 and SSIM 0.7485 for SupResDiffGAN versus 28.08 and 0.8149 for SR3. The advantage is limited to LPIPS, a perceptual metric, and the wording 'image quality' is therefore too strong. This should be corrected or explicitly qualified as perceptual quality measured by LPIPS.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4, Training] The phrase 'variational autocoder' should be 'variational autoencoder'.
  2. [Section 5.1] The method is referred to as both 'SupResDiff' and 'SupResDiffGAN'; use one name consistently throughout the paper.
  3. [Section 5.2, Figure 5] The claim of 'up to ×200' speed-up with 3 steps versus 1000 steps should state whether this is measured end-to-end and on which hardware, and should be reconciled with the 10-step configuration used in Tables 1-3.
  4. [Section 5.1] The batch size used for the timing measurements is not reported; specify it, because per-batch time depends on batch size.
  5. [Section 5.1] The paper does not state whether the same bicubic downsampling procedure is used to create LR inputs for all datasets and methods; clarify the common evaluation pipeline.
  6. [General] No link to code or pretrained checkpoints is provided; a reproducibility artifact would make the empirical claims verifiable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SupResDiffGAN's claims are empirical benchmark results, not derivations from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's core claims—LPIPS improvement over diffusion baselines and GAN-like inference speed—are supported by Tables 1-3 and the ablation study. The method is defined by Equations (6)-(15): the generator predicts z0 from zt, t, and zlow, with losses consisting of MSE plus adversarial BCE. No target metric (LPIPS, PSNR, SSIM, or inference time) appears as a training input or as a fitted parameter, and no 'prediction' is constructed from the value it is said to predict. The cited DiffusionGAN and latent DDGAN works supply architectural inspiration, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem; the authors do not import a prior result to forbid alternatives. The evaluation protocol—all diffusion models retrained with a shared 50M U-Net and 10 steps, with final checkpoints selected by validation LPIPS—is a fairness and external-validity concern: forcing SR3, I2SB, and ResShift into a small shared architecture and short sampling schedule may depress their scores, and the paper itself concedes that similar model sizes constrain diffusion performance in Section 5.1. That is a critique of experimental comparison, not circularity: the comparison tables are externally measured outputs, not identities derived from the paper's own equations. The central derivation is self-contained, and no self-citation chain is load-bearing. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard DDPM mathematics, a frozen pretrained VAE, and two hand-chosen hyperparameters plus the inference step count. The main unstated load-bearing assumption is that the Stable Diffusion VAE's latent space is an adequate representation for SR, and that the few-step sampling trajectory preserves quality.

free parameters (3)
  • lambda_adv = 1e-3
    Weight of the adversarial loss in the generator loss (Eq. 15), chosen by hand without any reported sensitivity analysis.
  • lambda_ema = 0.05
    EMA weight for discriminator accuracy in Eq. (9), chosen by hand; no ablation of this value is reported.
  • Inference diffusion steps = 10 (3 for CelebA-HQ)
    Step count selected for all diffusion baselines and the proposed model; directly controls both inference time and LPIPS, and no principled selection is given.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The pretrained Stable Diffusion VAE provides a latent space that preserves information needed for high-quality super-resolution.
    Invoked in Section 4: all HR/LR pairs are encoded with the frozen VAE, so the method's quality ceiling depends on this representation.
  • domain assumption Adaptive noise corruption via discriminator accuracy EMA stabilizes adversarial training without biasing the generator.
    Section 4, Eqs. (9)-(10): the dynamic timestep s is set from discriminator accuracy; no theoretical guarantee or sensitivity analysis of the EMA schedule is provided.
  • domain assumption DDPM/DDIM sampling with 3 to 10 steps in latent space approximates the full reverse process well enough for SR.
    Section 5.2: the claim that quality is preserved with few steps relies on adversarial training having shortened the effective sampling trajectory.
  • standard math The DDPM forward/reverse equations (Eqs. 1-3) and loss (Eq. 4) from Ho et al. are correct.
    Section 3 restates standard DDPM results without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SupResDiffGAN a new approach for the Super-Resolution task." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FGYAZSIJ

@misc{pith2026250413622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SupResDiffGAN a new approach for the Super-Resolution task},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FGYAZSIJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.13622}
}
abstract

In this work, we present SupResDiffGAN, a novel hybrid architecture that combines the strengths of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion models for super-resolution tasks. By leveraging latent space representations and reducing the number of diffusion steps, SupResDiffGAN achieves significantly faster inference times than other diffusion-based super-resolution models while maintaining competitive perceptual quality. To prevent discriminator overfitting, we propose adaptive noise corruption, ensuring a stable balance between the generator and the discriminator during training. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets show that our approach outperforms traditional diffusion models such as SR3 and I$^2$SB in efficiency and image quality. This work bridges the performance gap between diffusion- and GAN-based methods, laying the foundation for real-time applications of diffusion models in high-resolution image generation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.13622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two representative SupResDiffGAN outputs: (top) 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The training process of our proposed model. Ground truth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The sampling process of our model. We first embed the input [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison of visual performance on two example images from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Impact of diffusion step size and sampling method on SupResDiffGAN per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [36]

    Scientific Reports 14(1), 4272 (2024)

    Xiao, H., Wang, X., Wang, J., Cai, J.Y ., Deng, J.H., Yan, J.K., Tang, Y .D.: Single image super-resolution with denoising diffusion gans. Scientific Reports 14(1), 4272 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops

    Agustsson, E., Timofte, R.: Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. pp. 126–135 (2017)

    2017

  3. [2]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., Bottou, L.: Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 214–223. PMLR (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Cai, J., Zeng, H., Yong, H., Cao, Z., Zhang, L.: Toward real-world single image super- resolution: A new benchmark and a new model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 3086–3095 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L.: Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 248–255. Ieee (2009)

    2009

  6. [5]

    Advances in neural information processing systems 34, 8780–8794 (2021)

    Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A.: Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Advances in neural information processing systems 34, 8780–8794 (2021)

    2021

  7. [6]

    (No Title) (2014) 14 D

    Diederik, P.K.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. (No Title) (2014) 14 D. Kope ´c et al

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38(2), 295–307 (2015)

    Dong, C., Loy, C.C., He, K., Tang, X.: Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38(2), 295–307 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 44 references
  1. [8]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Gao, S., Liu, X., Zeng, B., Xu, S., Li, Y ., Luo, X., Liu, J., Zhen, X., Zhang, B.: Implicit diffu- sion models for continuous super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 10021–10030 (2023)

    2023

  2. [9]

    Advances in neural information processing systems 33, 6840–6851 (2020)

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems 33, 6840–6851 (2020)

    2020

  3. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Huang, J.B., Singh, A., Ahuja, N.: Single image super-resolution from transformed self- exemplars. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 5197–5206 (2015)

    2015

  4. [11]

    In: proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops

    Ji, X., Cao, Y ., Tai, Y ., Wang, C., Li, J., Huang, F.: Real-world super-resolution via kernel estimation and noise injection. In: proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. pp. 466–467 (2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10196 (2017)

    Karras, T.: Progressive growing of gans for improved quality, stability, and variation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10196 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  6. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Kim, J., Lee, J.K., Lee, K.M.: Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 1646–1654 (2016)

    2016

  7. [14]

    Kuznedelev, D., Startsev, V ., Shlenskii, D., Kastryulin, S.: Does diffusion beat gan in image super resolution? arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17261 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszár, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z., et al.: Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and ...

    2017

  9. [16]

    IEEE Access 7, 136496–136510 (2019)

    Lee, O.Y ., Shin, Y .H., Kim, J.O.: Multi-perspective discriminators-based generative adversar- ial network for image super resolution. IEEE Access 7, 136496–136510 (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    Neurocomputing 479, 47–59 (2022)

    Li, H., Yang, Y ., Chang, M., Chen, S., Feng, H., Xu, Z., Li, Q., Chen, Y .: Srdiff: Single image super-resolution with diffusion probabilistic models. Neurocomputing 479, 47–59 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10312 (2024)

    Li, R., Sheng, X., Li, W., Zhang, J.: Omnissr: Zero-shot omnidirectional image super- resolution using stable diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10312 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops

    Lim, B., Son, S., Kim, H., Nah, S., Mu Lee, K.: Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. pp. 136–144 (2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    Liu, G.H., Vahdat, A., Huang, D.A., Theodorou, E.A., Nie, W., Anandkumar, A.: I 2SB: Image-to-Image Schrödinger Bridge (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05872

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Liu, X., Zeng, B., Gao, S., Li, S., Feng, Y ., Li, H., Liu, B., Liu, J., Zhang, B.: Ladiffgan: Training gans with diffusion supervision in latent spaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 1115–1125 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18508 (2023)

    Niu, A., Zhang, K., Tee, J.T.J., Pham, T.X., Sun, J., Yoo, C.D., Kweon, I.S., Zhang, Y .: Difauggan: A practical diffusion-style data augmentation for gan-based single image super- resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18508 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  16. [23]

    In: ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

    Rakotonirina, N.C., Rasoanaivo, A.: Esrgan+: Further improving enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial network. In: ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). pp. 3637–3641. IEEE (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 10684–10695 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07864 (2023) SupResDiffGAN a new approach for the Super-Resolution task 15

    Sahak, H., Watson, D., Saharia, C., Fleet, D.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models for robust image super-resolution in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07864 (2023) SupResDiffGAN a new approach for the Super-Resolution task 15

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 45(4), 4713–4726 (2022)

    Saharia, C., Ho, J., Chan, W., Salimans, T., Fleet, D.J., Norouzi, M.: Image super-resolution via iterative refinement. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 45(4), 4713–4726 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502 (2020)

    Song, J., Meng, C., Ermon, S.: Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  21. [28]

    IEEE Access (2024)

    Trinh, L.T., Hamagami, T.: Latent denoising diffusion gan: Faster sampling, higher image quality. IEEE Access (2024)

    2024

  22. [29]

    International Journal of Computer Vision pp

    Wang, J., Yue, Z., Zhou, S., Chan, K.C., Loy, C.C.: Exploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution. International Journal of Computer Vision pp. 1–21 (2024)

    2024

  23. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Wang, X., Xie, L., Dong, C., Shan, Y .: Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 1905–1914 (2021)

    2021

  24. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops

    Wang, X., Yu, K., Wu, S., Gu, J., Liu, Y ., Dong, C., Qiao, Y ., Change Loy, C.: Esrgan: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops. pp. 0–0 (2018)

    2018

  25. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Wang, Y ., Yang, W., Chen, X., Wang, Y ., Guo, L., Chau, L.P., Liu, Z., Qiao, Y ., Kot, A.C., Wen, B.: Sinsr: diffusion-based image super-resolution in a single step. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 25796–25805 (2024)

    2024

  26. [33]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02262 (2022)

    Wang, Z., Zheng, H., He, P., Chen, W., Zhou, M.: Diffusion-gan: Training gans with diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02262 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  27. [34]

    IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    2004

  28. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18082 (2023)

    Wolters, P., Bastani, F., Kembhavi, A.: Zooming out on zooming in: Advancing super- resolution for remote sensing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18082 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07804 (2021)

    Xiao, Z., Kreis, K., Vahdat, A.: Tackling the generative learning trilemma with denoising diffusion gans. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07804 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Xu, Y ., Zhao, Y ., Xiao, Z., Hou, T.: Ufogen: You forward once large scale text-to-image generation via diffusion gans. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 8196–8206 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Yang, L., Qian, H., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Cui, B.: Structure-guided adversarial training of diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 7256–7266 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14469 (2023)

    Yang, T., Wu, R., Ren, P., Xie, X., Zhang, L.: Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super-resolution and personalized stylization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14469 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    Yue, Z., Wang, J., Loy, C.C.: Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super-resolution by residual shifting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    In: Curves and Surfaces: 7th International Conference, Avignon, France, June 24-30, 2010, Revised Selected Papers 7

    Zeyde, R., Elad, M., Protter, M.: On single image scale-up using sparse-representations. In: Curves and Surfaces: 7th International Conference, Avignon, France, June 24-30, 2010, Revised Selected Papers 7. pp. 711–730. Springer (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Zhang, K., Liang, J., Van Gool, L., Timofte, R.: Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 4791–4800 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A.A., Shechtman, E., Wang, O.: The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 586–595 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.