pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.14019 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Hybrid micromagnetic and atomistic modeling of magnetization dynamics induced by engineered defects

Nastaran Salehi , Olle Eriksson , Johan Hellsvik , Manuel Pereiro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 18:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hybrid simulationsmicromagnetic modelingatomistic modelingmagnetization dynamicsdomain wallsskyrmionsspin wavesengineered defects
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hybrid 3D simulation model shows how engineered defects create spin wave interference and influence skyrmions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a three-dimensional hybrid micromagnetic and atomistic simulation method to study how specific engineered defects affect magnetization dynamics. It introduces a double-slit structure to explore domain wall and spin wave interference, and a tetrahedron-shaped atom cluster with adjustable anisotropy to examine pinning and stability effects. The work demonstrates that these defects can produce interference patterns similar to those in light or electron waves. Such findings suggest ways to use magnetic waves for information processing. The simulations also highlight how local changes in anisotropy can deform domain walls, alter skyrmion shapes, or cause their annihilation.

Core claim

The paper establishes that in fully three-dimensional hybrid simulations, a double-slit defect enables the observation of magnonic interference patterns analogous to electronic wave phenomena, while a tunable anisotropy tetrahedron cluster induces distinct transformations including domain wall deformations, tubular and spherical structures, skyrmion annihilation, and breathing modes, thereby demonstrating the role of defect-induced anisotropic interactions in controlling domain wall motion, skyrmion topology, and spin wave propagation.

What carries the argument

The 3D hybrid micromagnetic-atomistic simulation approach applied to engineered discontinuities such as the double-slit structure and the tetrahedron shaped cluster with tunable anisotropy.

If this is right

  • Spin waves exhibit interference patterns in the magnonic double-slit setup, similar to classical wave interference.
  • Local anisotropic perturbations from defects lead to domain wall pinning and deformations.
  • 3D skyrmions can undergo annihilation or exhibit breathing modes due to the defects.
  • These effects point to potential applications in wave-based computing using magnons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such hybrid models could guide the design of future magnonic logic devices that manipulate information via spin waves.
  • Testing different cluster shapes or anisotropy values might uncover additional ways to stabilize or destroy skyrmions on demand.
  • Connecting these simulations to real materials could help develop defect-engineered magnetic sensors or memory elements.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid multiscale model in three dimensions accurately represents the real magnetization dynamics induced by the engineered defects without direct experimental validation.

What would settle it

An experiment fabricating a double-slit defect in a thin magnetic film and measuring whether spin wave interference patterns appear as predicted by the simulation would confirm or refute the claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14019 by Johan Hellsvik, Manuel Pereiro, Nastaran Salehi, Olle Eriksson.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Micromagnetic interference pattern (right figure) in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Spin wave propagation through a 3D double-slit. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of micromagnetic simulation data and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. a) Top-view of the structure of the system consisting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. 3D Domain wall motion driven by applying a mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. 3D domain wall motion by applying a magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. 3D domain wall motion by applying a magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The magnetic texture of a 3D skyrmion. From pan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. 3D Skyrmion motion by applying a STT of 30 m/s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. 3D Skyrmion motion by applying a STT of 30 m/s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. 3D Skyrmion motion by applying STT of 30 m/s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. 3D Skyrmion motion by applying a STT of 30 m/s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study presents a 3D version of multiscale approach for investigating magnetization dynamics in multiscale, hybrid micromagnetic-atomistic simulations. The present work introduces engineered discontinuities (i) a double-slit structure, which enables the study of domain wall and spin wave interference, and (ii) a tetrahedron shaped cluster of atoms with tunable anisotropy, which provides insights into how localized anisotropic perturbations influence domain wall pinning and skyrmion stability in fully three-dimensional (3D) hybrid simulations. We considered the dynamics of spin waves, domain walls, as well as 3D skyrmions, in the presence of these defects. The magnonic double-slit experiment demonstrates interference patterns analogous to electronic wave phenomena, offering potential applications in wave-based computing. Additionally, the results reveal the impact of the local anisotropy that leads to distinct transformations, including domain wall deformations, tubular and spherical structures, skyrmion annihilation, and breathing mode. The findings underscore the critical role of defect-induced anisotropic interactions in controlling domain wall motion, skyrmion topology, and spin wave propagation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a three-dimensional hybrid micromagnetic-atomistic simulation framework for studying magnetization dynamics induced by engineered defects. It examines spin-wave propagation and interference in a magnonic double-slit geometry and the influence of a tetrahedron-shaped atomic cluster with tunable anisotropy on domain-wall pinning, deformations, and skyrmion stability, reporting qualitative observations of interference patterns, tubular/spherical structures, annihilation events, and breathing modes.

Significance. If the hybrid coupling is shown to faithfully reproduce atomistic dynamics, the work could advance multiscale modeling of defect-engineered magnetic textures with relevance to magnonic computing and topological spintronics. The explicit demonstration of wave-interference analogies and anisotropy-driven topological changes is a strength, but the absence of quantitative benchmarks or validation currently limits the evidential weight of these observations.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and Simulation Setup: the central claim that the 3D hybrid scheme accurately captures defect-induced spin-wave interference, domain-wall pinning, and skyrmion stability rests on unverified interface coupling; no benchmarking against equivalent full-atomistic runs or experimental data is described, leaving quantitative features such as fringe spacing and critical anisotropy thresholds unconfirmed.
  2. Results section on double-slit and tetrahedron defects: only qualitative observations are supplied; the absence of quantitative metrics (e.g., measured interference fringe periods, pinning energy values, or error estimates on skyrmion annihilation thresholds) undermines evaluation of the reported transformations and their claimed analogy to electronic wave phenomena.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and methods: add explicit statements of the numerical time-step, damping parameters, and the precise spatial extent of the micromagnetic-atomistic interface region to improve reproducibility.
  2. Notation: define the tunable anisotropy strength parameter with its units and range of variation in a dedicated methods subsection rather than only in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we intend to implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and Simulation Setup: the central claim that the 3D hybrid scheme accurately captures defect-induced spin-wave interference, domain-wall pinning, and skyrmion stability rests on unverified interface coupling; no benchmarking against equivalent full-atomistic runs or experimental data is described, leaving quantitative features such as fringe spacing and critical anisotropy thresholds unconfirmed.

    Authors: We recognize that the absence of explicit benchmarking against full-atomistic simulations limits the quantitative validation of the hybrid coupling in this 3D context. While the interface coupling follows established protocols from our prior 2D work, we agree this should be demonstrated for the current setups. In the revised manuscript, we will add a validation subsection in the methods or results, presenting direct comparisons for a simplified 3D defect scenario. This will include quantitative measures such as spin-wave fringe spacing to confirm fidelity. Regarding experimental data, this computational study does not include new experiments, but we will expand the discussion on how the simulated phenomena could be tested experimentally. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results section on double-slit and tetrahedron defects: only qualitative observations are supplied; the absence of quantitative metrics (e.g., measured interference fringe periods, pinning energy values, or error estimates on skyrmion annihilation thresholds) undermines evaluation of the reported transformations and their claimed analogy to electronic wave phenomena.

    Authors: We agree that incorporating quantitative metrics will improve the rigor and allow better evaluation of the results. For the revised version, we plan to extract and report specific quantitative data from the existing simulations, such as the interference fringe periods in the double-slit geometry and their comparison to expected values based on the spin-wave wavelength. For the tetrahedron-shaped cluster, we will calculate and include pinning energy barriers and critical anisotropy thresholds for the observed domain wall and skyrmion behaviors, along with any variability from simulation parameters. These additions will strengthen the analogy to electronic wave interference and provide clearer evidence for the topological changes. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct experimental validation or comparison with measured data from physical samples, as the present work is a theoretical and computational investigation focused on simulation methodology and qualitative dynamics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in forward hybrid simulations of defect-induced magnetization dynamics.

full rationale

The paper presents results from forward numerical simulations of a 3D hybrid micromagnetic-atomistic model applied to engineered defects (double-slit and tetrahedron cluster). Central claims about spin-wave interference patterns, domain-wall pinning, and skyrmion stability are direct simulation outputs under the chosen model parameters and geometry, not quantities derived by fitting to the target observables or by self-referential definitions. No equations reduce the reported interference fringes or annihilation thresholds to the input coupling assumptions by construction, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked to close the argument. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a modeling study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of combining micromagnetic and atomistic scales in 3D and on the assumption that the chosen defect geometries produce representative physical effects.

free parameters (1)
  • tunable anisotropy strength
    The tetrahedron cluster anisotropy is described as tunable and directly influences the reported domain wall and skyrmion behaviors.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard micromagnetic and atomistic equations remain accurate when coupled across scales in three dimensions for the chosen defect configurations.
    Invoked implicitly by the choice of hybrid multiscale method for magnetization dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1297 out tokens · 108698 ms · 2026-05-22T18:29:26.416101+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Spin Wave interference The primary objective of this analysis is to examine the interference pattern of spin waves as they propagate through the slits, drawing an analogy to the classical elec- tronic double-slit experiment in optics and quantum me- chanics. In conventional electronic systems, the double- slit experiment demonstrates the wave-particle dua...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The 3D domain wall under investigation is a N´ eel-type wall with a width of approximately 3 ˚A(∆ = q Ae Ku ) (see e.g

    Domain Wall scattering and acceleration Double-slit configuration enables a focused analysis on how the domain wall structure and dynamics are in- fluenced when passing through or interacting with ge- ometrically confined defects of comparable scale. The 3D domain wall under investigation is a N´ eel-type wall with a width of approximately 3 ˚A(∆ = q Ae K...

    work page

  3. [3]

    By application of an external magnetic field in the negative z-direction, the domain wall starts to move from the left to the right side of the simula- tion box

    Domain Wall Pinning and Transformation The 3D domain wall under investigation here has a width of ∼ 3 ˚A. By application of an external magnetic field in the negative z-direction, the domain wall starts to move from the left to the right side of the simula- tion box. In this study, we systematically tuned the uniaxial anisotropy of a smaller volume in the...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Skyrmion-Defect Interactions A 3D skyrmion is generated in the micromagnetic re- gion, by applying a local magnetic field in the negative z-direction as an external excitation. We used a 300 T local field to tilt the direction of the local magnetic mo- ments in the opposite direction of the neighboring atoms with the aim to generate the 3D skyrmion quickl...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Furthermore, 3D skyrmion dynam- ics under spin-transfer torque exhibited sensitivity to defect-induced anisotropy

    was observed, illustrating how local anisotropy gra- dients can be utilized to create magnetic textures with non-trivial shape. Furthermore, 3D skyrmion dynam- ics under spin-transfer torque exhibited sensitivity to defect-induced anisotropy. Soft easy-axis anisotropic re- gions ( K easy u ≈ 0.11 mRy) permitted smooth skyrmion motion (Fig. 13), while stro...

    work page

  6. [6]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. D. Sarma, Spintronics: Funda- mentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Fert, Nobel lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics, Rev

    A. Fert, Nobel lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1517 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    S. S. P. Parkin and S.-H. Yang, Memory on the racetrack, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 195 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Dup´ e, G

    B. Dup´ e, G. Bihlmayer, M. B¨ ottcher, S. Bl¨ ugel, and S. Heinze, Engineering skyrmions in transition-metal mul- tilayers for spintronics, Nat. Commun. 7, 11779 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    G. S. D. Beach, M. Tsoi, and J. L. Erskine, Current- induced domain wall motion, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1272 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Sampaio, V

    J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, and A. Fert, Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of iso- lated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures, Nat. Nan- otechnol. 8, 839 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nanotechnol.8, 899 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Wiesendanger, Nanoscale magnetic skyrmions in metal- 17 lic films and multilayers: A new twist for spintronics, Nat

    R. Wiesendanger, Nanoscale magnetic skyrmions in metal- 17 lic films and multilayers: A new twist for spintronics, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16044 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, and Y. Zhou, Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: Conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions, Sci. Rep. 5, 9400 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: Advances in physics and potential applications, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17031 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Kr¨ uger, The interaction of transverse domain walls, J

    B. Kr¨ uger, The interaction of transverse domain walls, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 024209 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Hillebrands and A

    B. Hillebrands and A. Thiaville, eds., Spin dynamics in confined magnetic structures III, 1st ed., Topics in Applied Physics (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006) pp. XIV, 345

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    B¨ uttner, I

    F. B¨ uttner, I. Lemesh, and G. S. D. Beach, Field-free deterministic ultrafast creation of magnetic skyrmions by spin-orbit torques, Nat. Phys. 14, 465 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Bauer, S

    U. Bauer, S. Emori, and G. S. D. Beach, Pinning of do- main walls in thin ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 217201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Gross and R

    L. Gross and R. Atomically, Atomic-scale spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy of spin textures, Science 357, 655 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    A. D. Lucia, B. Kr¨ uger, O. A. Tretiakov, and M. Kl¨ aui, Multiscale model approach for magnetization dynamics simulations, Phys. Rev. B 94, 184415 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Skubic, J

    B. Skubic, J. Hellsvik, L. Nordstr¨ om, and O. Eriksson, A method for atomistic spin dynamics simulations: Imple- mentation and examples, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 315203 (2008)

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    Heinze, K

    S. Heinze, K. von Bergmann, M. Menzel, J. Brede, A. Ku- betzka, R. Wiesendanger, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions, Nat. Phys. 7, 713 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    M´ endez, M

    E. M´ endez, M. Poluektov, G. Kreiss, O. Eriksson, and M. Pereiro, A multiscale approach for magnetization dy- namics: Unraveling exotic magnetic states of matter, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013092 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing, Nat. Commun. 5, 4700 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    V. V. Kruglyak, S. O. Demokritov, and D. Grundler, Magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    D. M. Crum, M. Bouhassoune, J. Bouaziz, B. Schwe- flinghaus, S. Bl¨ ugel, and S. Lounis, Perpendicular reading of single confined magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Commun. 6, 8541 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Poluektov, O

    M. Poluektov, O. Eriksson, and G. Kreiss, Coupling atomistic and continuum modelling of magnetism, Com- put. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 329, 219 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    J. W. Gibbs and E. B. Wilson, Vector Analysis: A Text- Book for the Use of Students of Mathematics and Physics (C. Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1901)

    work page 1901

  30. [30]

    Borisov, N

    V. Borisov, N. Salehi, M. Pereiro, et al., Dzyaloshinskii- moriya interactions, n´ eel skyrmions and V4 magnetic clus- ters in multiferroic lacunar spinel GaV 4S8, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 53 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, M. Bousmina, and O. Fassi- Fehri, Magnetic skyrmions: Theory and applications, in Magnetic Skyrmions , edited by D. R. Sahu (IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2021) Chap. 1

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    M¨ uller, A

    J. M¨ uller, A. Rosch, and M. Garst, Edge instabilities and skyrmion creation in magnetic layers, New J. Phys.s 18, 065006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    F. N. Rybakov, A. B. Borisov, and A. N. Bogdanov, Three-dimensional skyrmion states in thin films of cubic helimagnets, Phys. Rev. B 87, 094424 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    V. D. Stavrou, D. Kourounis, K. Dimakopoulos, I. Pana- giotopoulos, and L. N. Gergidis, Magnetic skyrmions in fept nanoparticles having reuleaux 3d geometry: a micro- magnetic simulation study, Nanoscale 11, 20102 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    M. Lee, W. Kang, Y. Onose, Y. Tokura, and N. P. Ong, Unusual hall effect anomaly in MnSi under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Taniguchi, D

    T. Taniguchi, D. Saida, Y. Nakatani, and H. Kubota, Magnetization switching by current and microwaves, Phys. Rev. B 93, 014430 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Zakeri, Probing of the interfacial heisenberg and dzyaloshinskii–moriya exchange interaction by magnon spectroscopy, J

    K. Zakeri, Probing of the interfacial heisenberg and dzyaloshinskii–moriya exchange interaction by magnon spectroscopy, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 29, 013001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Additionally, this re- source includes videos illustrating the dynamics presented in Figs

    See Supplementary Material at http://example.com/ supplementary for detailed technical aspects of the multi- scale model and the material parameters used in the sim- ulations discussed in the main text. Additionally, this re- source includes videos illustrating the dynamics presented in Figs. 1, 3, 4–6, and 8–11, videos included

    work page

  39. [39]

    Andersson, Investigations of domain-wall motion us- ing atomistic spin dynamics, Master’s thesis, Uppsala Uni- versity (2015), master’s thesis, available at DiVA Portal

    M. Andersson, Investigations of domain-wall motion us- ing atomistic spin dynamics, Master’s thesis, Uppsala Uni- versity (2015), master’s thesis, available at DiVA Portal

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Ohnuma, K

    M. Ohnuma, K. Hono, T. Yanai, M. Nakano, H. Fuku- naga, and Y. Yoshizawa, Origin of the magnetic anisotropy induced by stress annealing in fe-based nanocrystalline al- loy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 152513 (2005)

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    Klyukin, G

    K. Klyukin, G. Beach, and B. Yildiz, Hydrogen tunes magnetic anisotropy by affecting local hybridization at the interface of a ferromagnet with nonmagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 104416 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    I. A. Kibalin and A. Gukasov, Local magnetic anisotropy by polarized neutron powder diffraction: Application of magnetically induced preferred crystallite orientation, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033100 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Garst, J

    M. Garst, J. Waizner, and D. Grundler, Collective spin excitations of helices and magnetic skyrmions: Review and perspectives of magnonics in non-centrosymmetric mag- nets, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 293002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Khitun and K

    A. Khitun and K. L. Wang, Nano-scale computational ar- chitectures with spin wave bus, Superlattices Microstruct. 47, 464 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    A. A. Serga, A. V. Chumak, and B. Hillebrands, Yig magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Krawczyk and D

    M. Krawczyk and D. Grundler, Review and prospects of magnonic crystals and devices with reprogrammable band structure, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 26, 123202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Streubel, P

    R. Streubel, P. Fischer, F. Kronast, V. P. Kravchuk, D. D. Sheka, Y. Gaididei, O. G. Schmidt, and D. Makarov, Magnetism in curved geometries, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 363001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Schieback, M

    C. Schieback, M. Kl¨ aui, U. Nowak, U. R¨ udiger, and P. Nielaba, Numerical investigation of spin-torque using the heisenberg model, Eur. Phys. J. B 59, 429 (2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    Zhang and Z

    S. Zhang and Z. Li, Roles of nonequilibrium conduction electrons on the magnetization dynamics of ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    Makhfudz, B

    I. Makhfudz, B. Kr¨ uger, and O. Tchernyshyov, Inertia and chiral edge modes of a skyrmion magnetic bubble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 217201 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    J. V. Kim, F. Garcia-Sanchez, J. Sampaio, C. Moreau- Luchaire, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Breathing modes of con- 18 fined skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic dots, Phys. Rev. B 90, 064410 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Onose, Y

    Y. Onose, Y. Okamura, S. Seki, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Observation of magnetic excitations of skyrmion crystal in a helimagnetic insulator Cu 2OSeO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 037603 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Mochizuki, Spin-wave modes and their intense exci- tation effects in skyrmion crystals, Phys

    M. Mochizuki, Spin-wave modes and their intense exci- tation effects in skyrmion crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017601 (2012). Micromagnetic-atomistic hybrid modeling of defect-induced magnetization dynamics —Supplemental Material— Nastaran Salehi1, Olle Eriksson 1,2, Johan Hellsvik 3, and Manuel Pereiro 1 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala Un...

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    Thiaville and Y

    A. Thiaville and Y. Nakatani, Spin dynamics in confined magnetic structures iii, in Spin Dynamics in Confined Magnetic Structures III , edited by B. Hillebrands and K. Ounadjela (Springer, Berlin, 2006) pp. 161–205

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Additionally, this resource includes videos illustrating the dynamics presented in Figs

    See Supplementary Material at http://example.com/supplementary for detailed technical aspects of the multiscale model and the material parameters used in the simulations discussed in the main text. Additionally, this resource includes videos illustrating the dynamics presented in Figs. 1, 3, 4–6, and 8–11, videos included

    work page