Lightweight Road Environment Segmentation using Vector Quantization

Alper Yilmaz; Charles Toth; Jiyong Kwag

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 30 references

Lightweight Road Environment Segmentation using Vector Quantization

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding a vector-quantization layer to MobileUNETR lifts its Cityscapes mIoU by 2.9 points while adding no parameters.

desk verdict A clean, plausible VQ plug-in for lightweight road segmentation, but the headline 2.9% gain is not shown to exceed seed noise and a 13-point sky regression goes unaddressed. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14113 v1 pith:XQ7U7XPJ submitted 2025-04-19 cs.CV

Jiyong Kwag , Alper Yilmaz , Charles Toth This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CV

keywords semanticsegmentationvectorquantizationlightweightdeeplearningroadenvironmentautonomousdrivingCityscapesdiscreterepresentationMobileUNETR

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that vector quantization, a discrete-representation technique from generative models, is a cheap and effective addition to lightweight road-environment segmentation. It inserts a quantization layer between the MobileUNETR encoder and decoder, replacing each continuous feature with the nearest entry in a 19-vector codebook while keeping parameter count and FLOPs unchanged. On the Cityscapes validation set, the reported mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) rises from 74.1% for the baseline to 77.0%, and the model also edges out a stronger transformer baseline with fewer parameters. If the improvement holds, discrete features become a practical plug-in for efficient autonomous-driving perception.

What carries the argument

Vector quantization: a learnable codebook of $K$ vectors in which each encoder output $X$ is replaced by the nearest codebook entry $e_k = \arg\min_j \|X-e_j\|$, with gradients carried through the hard assignment by a straight-through estimator. The paper inserts this layer at the end of the MobileUNETR encoder and trains with total loss $L = L_{\text{CE}} + L_{\text{VQ}}$, where the quantization loss combines a codebook term and a commitment term. The codebook has 19 vectors, matching the 19 Cityscapes classes, and every entry is reported as used. This layer is the mechanism that converts continuous encoder features into discrete, compressed, clustered representations for the decoder.

What would settle it

Train both models with the paper's exact 160K-iteration schedule across at least ten random seeds and compare the distributions of Cityscapes validation mIoU; if the 95% confidence interval for the difference covers zero, the claimed 2.9-point gain is within run-to-run variance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that mapping the encoder's continuous features to discrete codebook vectors improves semantic segmentation of road scenes without enlarging the model. Specifically, the paper reports 77.0% mIoU on Cityscapes for MobileUNETR augmented with vector quantization, versus 74.1% for the same model at the same 160K-iteration schedule with cross-entropy loss, and 75.9% for the baseline only after 320K iterations with Dice loss. Per category, the quantized model beats both baselines in 14 of 19 classes, with the largest gain in person segmentation. The authors attribute the gain to three properties of discrete features: distinct patterns are easier for the decoder to discover, discrete codes compress away noise and outliers, and quantization forces the latent space into coarse clusters.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the reported 2.9-point mIoU advantage reflects the vector-quantization layer rather than run-to-run variation, since every reported number comes from a single training run and the paper itself treats about 0.5-point differences as within random-initialization noise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Road segmentation can gain accuracy from discrete features at no added inference cost, keeping the model suitable for real-time driving applications.
Under the reported protocol, the quantized model reaches 77.0% mIoU in 160K iterations, while the baseline needs 320K iterations and an extra Dice loss to approach 75.9%, so quantization appears to accelerate convergence.
A 19-vector codebook is enough for the 19-class task; five- and ten-fold larger codebooks do not improve mIoU and remain fully utilized.
The quantized model surpasses SegFormer B0 with fewer parameters and FLOPs, indicating that discrete representations can compensate for a lighter decoder.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct transfer test the paper does not run is whether the same quantization layer improves other lightweight encoders; if it does, the gain is a general regularization or structuring effect rather than a MobileUNETR-specific fix.
The paper does not measure its three proposed mechanisms separately, so a probing study of codebook entropy, cluster purity, and feature noise before and after quantization could assign credit among denoising, clustering, and discrete pattern discovery.
Because the chosen codebook size equals the Cityscapes class count, transferring the method to datasets with different semantic taxonomies may require re-tuning $K$ rather than keeping the same default.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear —,

The thing to know: this is a tidy empirical extension, not a new mechanism. The authors put a vector quantization layer between the MobileUNETR encoder and decoder and get 77.0% mIoU on Cityscapes val against 74.1% for the baseline trained with the same 160K cross-entropy budget. The codebook ablation (19 vs 95 vs 190 vectors) shows flat mIoU and 100% usage, which is a nice piece of evidence that the compact codebook is doing something structured rather than just adding capacity.

What’s genuinely new is narrow: VQ has been used for segmentation robustness in medical imaging (Santhirasekaram 2022, Gorade 2024), and applying it to road scene parsing with a lightweight hybrid CNN-transformer is a reasonable, clearly motivated step. The writing is clear, the loss is standard, and the comparison to MobileUNETR at identical iterations is fair.

The soft spots are real but not disqualifying. The headline 2.9-point gain rests on single runs for both models. The paper itself attributes ~0.5% mIoU differences among codebook sizes to random initialization, so the gap may or may not exceed run-to-run noise; no seeds, error bars, or significance test are given. That is fixable but necessary. Second, the per-class table shows sky IoU dropping from 94.1 to 81.1 with VQ, a 13-point regression that the text does not mention. Claiming superiority in 14 categories while ignoring a large drop elsewhere is the kind of selective reporting a referee should catch. The parameter-count claim is technically overstated because the codebook parameters are omitted from Table 1, though they are tiny (19 times the encoder embedding dimension), so this is minor.

Overall the central idea is plausible and the paper is honest enough about its own uncertainty in the ablation section. It deserves referee time rather than desk rejection. I would ask for repeated runs and a discussion of per-class tradeoffs, plus code release. If the 2.9% survives seed averaging, it is a nice cheap plug-in result; if not, the paper still documents a clean application.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes inserting a vector quantization (VQ) layer between the encoder and decoder of MobileUNETR for road environment segmentation. Each encoder output feature is mapped to its nearest codebook vector, with a VQ loss composed of codebook and commitment terms added to the standard cross-entropy loss. On the Cityscapes validation set, the authors report 77.0% mIoU for the proposed model versus 74.1% for MobileUNETR at the same 160K training iterations and versus 76.2% for SegFormer B0. An ablation varies the codebook size (19, 95, 190) and reports that mIoU changes by only about 0.5% while codebook utilization stays at 100%. The central claim is that adding a lightweight VQ layer improves segmentation accuracy without increasing the model's size or complexity.

Significance. If the reported gain is robust, the paper demonstrates a simple and practical way to improve a lightweight segmentation model by replacing continuous encoder features with discrete codebook features. The authors provide a clear training setup, a public benchmark, an ablation of codebook size, and a per-class IoU breakdown, which are useful for reproducibility. The main value of the result is empirical rather than methodological, since the VQ mechanism follows standard VQ-VAE practice. However, the headline comparison rests on single training runs, and there is an unexplained large per-class regression for sky; these issues must be addressed before the conclusions can be considered reliable.

major comments (4)

[Section 4.3 (Table 1) and Section 4.4 (Table 3)] The central claim that VQ improves mIoU by 2.9 points (77.0 versus 74.1) is based on one training run per configuration. Section 4.4 states that ~0.5% mIoU differences are "likely falls within the expected range due to random model initialization," so run-to-run noise is acknowledged but not measured. Please run MobileUNETR (160K CE) and the proposed model with at least three different seeds, report mean and standard deviation, and state whether the 2.9-point gap is significant relative to that noise. If repeated runs are not feasible, the abstract and conclusion should be scaled back from a causal claim to an observed improvement in a single run.
[Table 1 and abstract] The paper claims the method adds VQ "without increasing the model's initial size or complexity" while Table 1 lists identical total parameters (3.0M) and FLOPs (1.3G) for MobileUNETR and Ours. A codebook of K=19 vectors in R^d adds K times d trainable parameters and a small lookup cost, so the two models cannot have exactly identical counts unless the codebook parameters or the quantization operation are omitted from the accounting. Please report exact parameter counts and FLOPs with and without the codebook, and adjust the wording of the claim accordingly.
[Table 2 and Section 4.3] The sky class IoU drops from 94.14 (MobileUNETR) and 94.29 (SegFormer B0) to 81.09 (Ours), a 13-point regression that is not mentioned anywhere in the results or conclusion. This is a large per-class failure mode for a model motivated by noise compression and structured discrete representations. Please provide an explanation for this regression, report the per-class variance over seeds, and discuss the trade-off rather than only emphasizing the categories where the proposed model wins.
[Section 4.4 (Table 3)] The ablation supports only the claim that codebook size has limited effect across 19, 95, and 190, and the differences are within the acknowledged seed noise. The sentence that "a compact codebook can be sufficient" is not established without repeated runs, and the premise that K=19 is closely aligned with the 19 classes is not justified because the codebook operates in encoder feature space, not class space. Please provide seed-averaged mIoU for these codebook sizes, state the number of runs, and soften the conclusion that K=19 is the appropriate compact choice.

minor comments (6)

[Section 3.1 and figure captions] The figure references are inconsistent: Section 3.1 says "As shown in Figure 2" for the MobileUNETR encoder structure, but Figure 2 shows the proposed architecture, and Section 3.1 also refers to "Figure 1" as a representation of MobileUNETR, while Figure 1 is the per-category IoU bar chart. Please renumber or correct these citations.
[Table 2] The header of Table 2 misspells "MobileUNETR" as "MobielUNETR"; please correct the spelling.
[Equation (1)] Equation (1) should specify that X denotes a single d-dimensional feature vector at one spatial location and that quantization is applied independently to each of the H times W positions.
[Section 5] The sentence "Future work could explore further optimizations in codebook design on skip connection" is grammatically incomplete; revise it to something like "in skip connections".
[References] The bibliography mixes inconsistent formats (some entries include DOIs and page ranges, others only arXiv identifiers), and the Zobar et al. entry renders "Ö" as "¨O"; please normalize the reference style.
[Section 4.2] The choices of the commitment-loss weight beta = 0.25 and the codebook initialization range [-1/K, 1/K] are stated but not justified; adding one sentence explaining each choice would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the mIoU improvement is an empirical benchmark measurement with standard VQ losses, and the self-citations are baseline/related work rather than load-bearing evidence.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical comparison: adding a vector-quantization layer to MobileUNETR raises Cityscapes validation mIoU from 74.1% to 77.0% under the same 160K-iteration training schedule (Table 1). No fitted parameter is later reported as a prediction: the codebook size K is an architectural choice with a sensitivity ablation (Section 4.4), and beta = 0.25 is a hand-set weight in the standard VQ loss of Eq. (2). The VQ loss and straight-through estimator are taken from external VQ-VAE work, not from the authors' prior papers. The self-citations (MobileUNETR [12], SegFormer3D [13], and earlier OSU navigation papers) serve as baseline/related work; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as authority that VQ must improve segmentation. The ablation's statement that about 0.5% mIoU differences are likely due to random initialization is a statistical-evidence concern, not circularity, because the baseline and proposed numbers are independent training runs rather than quantities derived from each other by construction. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained and no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result depends on standard VQ-VAE training machinery and transfer learning, plus a single-layer VQ design choice. No invented entities are introduced. The only hand-set numbers that matter are the commitment weight beta and codebook size; the ablation shows the result is not sensitive to codebook size.

free parameters (2)

Commitment loss weight beta = 0.25
Chosen by hand in Section 4.2. It scales the commitment term in Eq. (2) and is part of the final objective Eq. (3), so it affects the reported training behavior.
Codebook size K = 19
Set equal to the 19 Cityscapes classes. The ablation in Table 3 shows mIoU is stable across 19, 95, and 190 entries, so the headline result does not appear to be sensitive to this choice.

assumptions (3)

standard math Mapping continuous encoder features to the nearest codebook vector and copying gradients with the straight-through estimator is a valid way to train the full segmentation model.
This is the standard VQ-VAE training mechanism from Ref. [20], used without modification in Eqs. (1) and (2).
domain assumption ImageNet-1K pretrained MobileViT provides a useful initialization for Cityscapes segmentation.
Section 4.2 states the encoder is pretrained on ImageNet-1K; the comparison inherits all benefits and biases of transfer learning from a classification dataset.
ad hoc to paper A single vector quantization layer before the decoder is sufficient to capture task-relevant discrete structure, with no VQ in skip connections or decoder.
Section 5 lists hierarchical VQ in decoder blocks as future work, acknowledging that the single-layer placement is a heuristic design choice rather than a derived one.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lightweight Road Environment Segmentation using Vector Quantization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XQ7U7XPJ

@misc{pith2026250414113,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lightweight Road Environment Segmentation using Vector Quantization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XQ7U7XPJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14113}
}

read the original abstract

Road environment segmentation plays a significant role in autonomous driving. Numerous works based on Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) and Transformer architectures have been proposed to leverage local and global contextual learning for efficient and accurate semantic segmentation. In both architectures, the encoder often relies heavily on extracting continuous representations from the image, which limits the ability to represent meaningful discrete information. To address this limitation, we propose segmentation of the autonomous driving environment using vector quantization. Vector quantization offers three primary advantages for road environment segmentation. (1) Each continuous feature from the encoder is mapped to a discrete vector from the codebook, helping the model discover distinct features more easily than with complex continuous features. (2) Since a discrete feature acts as compressed versions of the encoder's continuous features, they also compress noise or outliers, enhancing the image segmentation task. (3) Vector quantization encourages the latent space to form coarse clusters of continuous features, forcing the model to group similar features, making the learned representations more structured for the decoding process. In this work, we combined vector quantization with the lightweight image segmentation model MobileUNETR and used it as a baseline model for comparison to demonstrate its efficiency. Through experiments, we achieved 77.0 % mIoU on Cityscapes, outperforming the baseline by 2.9 % without increasing the model's initial size or complexity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14113 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Per-category segmentation IoU results on the Cityscapes validation set. The graph displays the IoU evaluation for each category among SegFormer B0, MobileUNETR, and our proposed model. The results indicate that our architecture achieves better performance than the baseline models across 14 categories. Transformer architectures, the encoder is still focused primarily on extracting continuous features from the image.… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** (Top) The MobileUNETR encoder utilizes a pretrained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Simplified representation of the vector quantization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Visualization results on Cityscapes. Compared to the baseline model MobileUNETR (Right), our model (Center) predicts segmentation with more precise object edges. We also provide a comparison with SegFormer B0 (Left), showing that, despite a smaller size and lower FLOPs…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

[1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION list.label.output make.list.label ", " * write FUNCTION article output.bibitem list.label.output list.year output new.block title output new.block journal emphasize output format.volume.number output pages output new.block url output new.block note output fin.entry FUNCTION book output.bibitem list.l...
[2]

Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation

Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., Cipolla, R., 2017. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 39(12), 2481--2495

work page 2017
[3]

L., Zhou, Y., 2021

Chen, J., Lu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, X., Adeli, E., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Yuille, A. L., Zhou, Y., 2021. Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306

arXiv 2021
[4]

L., 2017

Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., Yuille, A. L., 2017. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 40(4), 834--848

work page 2017
[5]

An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale

Dosovitskiy, A., 2020. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929

arXiv 2020
[6]

Synergynet: Bridging the gap between discrete and continuous representations for precise medical image segmentation

Gorade, V., Mittal, S., Jha, D., Bagci, U., 2024. Synergynet: Bridging the gap between discrete and continuous representations for precise medical image segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 7768--7777

work page 2024
[7]

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models

Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P., 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems , 33, 6840--6851

work page 2020
[8]

Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation

Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T., 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

work page 2015

Show all 30 references

[9]

Mobilevit: light-weight, general-purpose, and mobile-friendly vision transformer

Mehta, S., Rastegari, M., 2021. Mobilevit: light-weight, general-purpose, and mobile-friendly vision transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02178

2021 arXiv
[10]

Finite scalar quantization: Vq-vae made simple

Mentzer, F., Minnen, D., Agustsson, E., Tschannen, M., 2023. Finite scalar quantization: Vq-vae made simple. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15505

2023 arXiv
[11]

K., Zhou, M., Chao, W.-L., Yilmaz, A., Ramnath, R., 2024

Navard, P., Monsefi, A. K., Zhou, M., Chao, W.-L., Yilmaz, A., Ramnath, R., 2024. KnobGen: Controlling the Sophistication of Artwork in Sketch-Based Diffusion Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01595

2024 arXiv
[12]

A Probabilistic-based Drift Correction Module for Visual Inertial SLAMs

Navard, P., Yilmaz, A., 2024. A Probabilistic-based Drift Correction Module for Visual Inertial SLAMs. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , XLVIII-2-2024, 297--300. https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XL...

2024
[13]

MobileUNETR: A Lightweight End-To-End Hybrid Vision Transformer For Efficient Medical Image Segmentation

Perera, S., Erzurumlu, Y., Gulati, D., Yilmaz, A., 2024a. MobileUNETR: A Lightweight End-To-End Hybrid Vision Transformer For Efficient Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03062

arXiv
[14]

Segformer3d: An efficient transformer for 3d medical image segmentation

Perera, S., Navard, P., Yilmaz, A., 2024b. Segformer3d: An efficient transformer for 3d medical image segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, 4981--4988
[15]

High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B., 2022. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 10684--10695

2022
[16]

U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation

Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T., 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention--MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18, ...

2015
[17]

Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks

Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., Chen, L.-C., 2018. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 4510--4520

2018
[18]

Vector quantisation for robust segmentation

Santhirasekaram, A., Kori, A., Winkler, M., Rockall, A., Glocker, B., 2022. Vector quantisation for robust segmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, 663--672

2022
[19]

Spatial-aware feature aggregation for image based cross-view geo-localization

Shi, Y., Liu, L., Yu, X., Li, H., 2019. Spatial-aware feature aggregation for image based cross-view geo-localization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 32

2019
[20]

Segmenter: Transformer for semantic segmentation

Strudel, R., Garcia, R., Laptev, I., Schmid, C., 2021. Segmenter: Transformer for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 7262--7272

2021
[21]

et al., 2017

Van Den Oord, A., Vinyals, O. et al., 2017. Neural discrete representation learning. Advances in neural information processing systems , 30

2017
[22]

Attention is all you need

Vaswani, A., 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

2017
[23]

Transbts: Multimodal brain tumor segmentation using transformer

Wenxuan, W., Chen, C., Meng, D., Hong, Y., Sen, Z., Jiangyun, L., 2021. Transbts: Multimodal brain tumor segmentation using transformer. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, 109--119

2021
[24]

M., Luo, P., 2021

Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J. M., Luo, P., 2021. SegFormer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. Advances in neural information processing systems , 34, 12077--12090

2021
[25]

Hifi-codec: Group-residual vector quantization for high fidelity audio codec

Yang, D., Liu, S., Huang, R., Tian, J., Weng, C., Zou, Y., 2023. Hifi-codec: Group-residual vector quantization for high fidelity audio codec. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02765

2023 arXiv
[26]

Y., Zhang, H., Pang, R., Qin, J., Ku, A., Xu, Y., Baldridge, J., Wu, Y., 2021

Yu, J., Li, X., Koh, J. Y., Zhang, H., Pang, R., Qin, J., Ku, A., Xu, Y., Baldridge, J., Wu, Y., 2021. Vector-quantized image modeling with improved vqgan. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04627

2021 arXiv
[27]

Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec

Zeghidour, N., Luebs, A., Omran, A., Skoglund, J., Tagliasacchi, M., 2021. Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 30, 495--507

2021
[28]

Transfuse: Fusing transformers and cnns for medical image segmentation

Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Hu, Q., 2021. Transfuse: Fusing transformers and cnns for medical image segmentation. Medical image computing and computer assisted intervention--MICCAI 2021: 24th international conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27--October 1, 2021, proceedings, Par...

2021
[29]

Vigor: Cross-view image geo-localization beyond one-to-one retrieval

Zhu, S., Yang, T., Chen, C., 2021. Vigor: Cross-view image geo-localization beyond one-to-one retrieval. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3640--3649

2021
[30]

K., Yilmaz, A., 2024

Zobar, S., Ciydem, M., Salor, \"O ., Kwag, J., Toth, C. K., Yilmaz, A., 2024. Design of a 2D/3D Positioning System and Its Real-Time Application With Low-Cost Sensors. IEEE Access , 12, 84537--84547

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION list.label.output make.list.label ", " * write FUNCTION article output.bibitem list.label.output list.year output new.block title output new.block journal emphasize output format.volume.number output pages output new.block url output new.block note output fin.entry FUNCTION book output.bibitem list.l...

[2] [2]

Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation

Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., Cipolla, R., 2017. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 39(12), 2481--2495

work page 2017

[3] [3]

L., Zhou, Y., 2021

Chen, J., Lu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, X., Adeli, E., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Yuille, A. L., Zhou, Y., 2021. Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306

arXiv 2021

[4] [4]

L., 2017

Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., Yuille, A. L., 2017. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 40(4), 834--848

work page 2017

[5] [5]

An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale

Dosovitskiy, A., 2020. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929

arXiv 2020

[6] [6]

Synergynet: Bridging the gap between discrete and continuous representations for precise medical image segmentation

Gorade, V., Mittal, S., Jha, D., Bagci, U., 2024. Synergynet: Bridging the gap between discrete and continuous representations for precise medical image segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 7768--7777

work page 2024

[7] [7]

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models

Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P., 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems , 33, 6840--6851

work page 2020

[8] [8]

Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation

Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T., 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

work page 2015