Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Red Supergiant problem viewed from the nebular phase spectroscopy of type II supernovae

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.14502 v1 pith:IGBHLT7Q submitted 2025-04-20 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords problemmassprogenitorsdistributionluminosityodotpre-snsigma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The red supergiant (RSG) problem refers to the observed dearth of luminous RSGs identified as progenitors of Type II supernovae (SNe II) in pre-SN imaging. Understanding this phenomenon is essential for studying pre-SN mass loss and the explodability of core-collapse SNe. In this work, we re-assess the RSG problem using late-phase spectroscopy of a sample of 50 SNe II. The [O I] $\lambda\lambda$6300,6363 emission in the spectra is employed to infer the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) mass distribution of the progenitors, which is then transformed into a luminosity distribution via an observation-calibrated mass-luminosity relation. The resulting luminosity distribution reveals an upper cutoff at log $L/L_{\odot} = 5.21^{+0.09}_{-0.07}$ dex, and the RSG problem is statistically significant at the 2$\sigma$ to 3$\sigma$ level. Assuming single RSG progenitors that follow the mass-luminosity relation of KEPLER models, this luminosity cutoff corresponds to an upper ZAMS mass limit of $20.63^{+2.42}_{-1.64}$ $M_{\odot}$. Comparisons with independent measurements, including pre-SN imaging and plateau-phase light curve modeling, consistently yield an upper ZAMS mass limit below about 25 $M_{\odot}$, with a significance level of 1-3$\sigma$. While each individual method provides only marginal significance, the consistency across multiple methodologies suggests that the lack of luminous RSG progenitors may reflect a genuine physical problem. Finally, we discuss several scenarios to account for this issue should it be confirmed as a true manifestation of stellar physics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SN 2022acko and the Properties of its Red Supergiant Progenitor: Direct Detection, Light Curves, and Nebular Spectroscopy

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The progenitor mass of SN 2022acko inferred from pre-explosion images (7.5 Msun) disagrees with masses from light-curve and spectral modeling (9-15 Msun), with the tension likely caused by model and calibration systematics.

  2. SN 2022xus: bridging the gap between Type IIP and IIL supernovae

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SN 2022xus is a transitional Type II supernova with a 94.8-day plateau, a decline rate of 1.23 mag per 100 days, mixed IIP/IIL spectral features, and a likely 12-15 solar-mass progenitor.

Pith tools