Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 53 references

Interdisciplinary Integration of Remote Sensing -- A Review with Four Examples

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Remote sensing is a science of multidisciplinary integration, the paper argues by tracing its ties to ecology, mathematical morphology, machine learning, and electronics.

desk verdict A well-meaning but insubstantial review that restates a truism; the reference list is useful for newcomers, but there is nothing here that merits a referee's time. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14590 v1 pith:4LJONVY5 submitted 2025-04-20 cs.GR astro-ph.IMcs.SYeess.SYphysics.geo-ph

Zichen Jin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.GRastro-ph.IMcs.SYeess.SYphysics.geo-ph
keywords remotesensinginterdisciplinaryintegrationecologymathematicalmorphologymachinelearningelectronicsforestbiomassbiodiversitymonitoring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that remote sensing is not a self-contained field but a science and technology that grows by integrating other disciplines. It makes the case through four examples: ecology, which supplies the questions that remote sensing answers; mathematical morphology, which extracts geometric structure from images; machine learning, which classifies and identifies objects; and electronics, which converts optical signals into usable data. A sympathetic reader would care because the claim reframes where remote sensing research and training should sit: at the intersection of applied and basic sciences, not in a single silo.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the four worked examples, which together trace a functional chain: an optical signal is captured by a CCD or other sensor (electronics), processed with morphological operators (mathematical morphology), classified by supervised or unsupervised learning (machine learning), and finally interpreted for ecological or conservation decisions. The paper uses this sequence to argue that remote sensing necessarily lives at the junction of these disciplines, with each example section describing the tools and representative studies that show the integration in action.

What would settle it

If a systematic sample of the remote sensing literature showed that a substantial share of published work uses none of the four example disciplines—for instance, purely optical or purely telecommunication studies that never touch ecology, morphology, machine learning, or electronics—the claim that remote sensing is best characterized by these integrations would be weakened. The paper does not present such a survey.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that remote sensing is "certainly a science as well as a technology of multidisciplinary integration." The paper shows that every stage of a remote sensing mission draws on other fields: ecology and biodiversity research define the application goals; mathematical morphology supplies operators (erosion, dilation, opening, closing) used to detect roads, buildings, and other structures; machine learning provides the classifiers that label pixels and scenes; and electronics underpins both the image sensors that record signals and the satellite-borne integrated electronic systems that manage the spacecraft. The four examples are offered as the tip of the iceberg, indicating that the full list of integrated disciplines is far longer.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's general conclusion rests on the assumption that the four chosen disciplines—ecology, mathematical morphology, machine learning, and electronics—are representative enough of the full range of interdisciplinary integration in remote sensing, a selection it does not justify.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If remote sensing is inherently multidisciplinary, then remote sensing education and research programs should deliberately train students across ecology, image processing, machine learning, and electronics rather than treating remote sensing as a single-subject specialism.
  • Remote sensing missions depend critically on electronics for signal acquisition and on-board management, so advances in electronic integration directly improve data quality and mission capability.
  • Morphological operators provide a standard, structured-element-based toolkit for extracting geometric features (roads, rivers, building clusters) from high-resolution and SAR images.
  • Machine learning methods, especially convolutional neural networks, currently give the highest classification accuracies reported in the paper's survey, from about 90% to 97.57% on the cited datasets.
  • Ecological applications such as forest biomass estimation and biodiversity monitoring can be scaled globally because remote sensing supplies repeatable, non-contact observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The four examples imply a pipeline that is broader than the review states: a complete remote sensing mission also needs optics, color science, radio-frequency telecommunications, and high-performance computing, fields the introduction mentions but does not develop, so the paper's own examples could be extended along the same argument.
  • If the claim is right, the same integration pattern should appear in near-neighbor fields such as photogrammetry and geographical information systems, where similar borrowings from optics, statistics, and computer science are routine.
  • A testable extension would be to quantify the claim: a citation analysis of remote sensing publications across several decades could measure how much of the field's method base originates outside it; the paper's qualitative examples predict that outside disciplines supply both tools and problem templates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper is a short review arguing that remote sensing is inherently interdisciplinary. It states in Section 1 that remote sensing is 'certainly a science as well as a technology of multidisciplinary integration' and supports this with four chapters: ecology (forest biomass estimation, biodiversity monitoring), mathematical morphology (operators, road extraction), machine learning (supervised/unsupervised classification, CNN applications), and electronics (satellite-borne integrated electronic systems). The abstract and introduction explicitly identify these as 'the tip of the iceberg' of interdisciplinary connections, so the examples are framed as illustrative rather than exhaustive. No new methods or data are presented; the contribution is a synthesis of 46 references across four fields.

Significance. If viewed as a research contribution, the paper is not novel in a technical sense: the central claim is an editorial assertion that is broadly accepted, and no falsifiable prediction or derivation is offered. Its value lies in being an accessible, well-organized synthesis that brings together literature from four areas and includes several Chinese-language sources that are seldom cited in English-language reviews. The concreteness of the named applications (forest biomass via LiDAR/SAR, elephant counting with WorldView-3/4 and deep learning, morphological road extraction, CCSDS on-board interfaces) makes the interdisciplinary integration vivid. Within the scope of a review or perspective, the central point is sound, and the explicit 'tip of the iceberg' caveat prevents the absence of a formal example-selection criterion from overgeneralizing the claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.1] The presentation of mathematical morphology is not precise enough to serve as the reference definition for the section. Erosion is described only as 'local correlation' between the structuring element and sub-images, and the notation E = D − S is never given a formal set-theoretic definition. The dilation identity D + S = (DC – S)C omits the standard requirement to use the reflected structuring element in the duality between erosion and dilation. Since this is the only theoretical introduction to mathematical morphology in the paper, the authors should either state the standard definitions from the cited foundational sources (e.g., Serra [20]) with correct notation, or avoid giving equations altogether and rely on citations to the standard literature.
  2. [Section 5] The 'electronics' example is misaligned with the motivation given in Section 1 and the abstract. The introduction and abstract cite the conversion of optical signals to electrical signals via CCD or other image sensors as the canonical electronics integration, but Section 5 discusses satellite-borne integrated electronic systems: avionics, mission management, on-board buses, and CCSDS/SOIS protocols. These are related topics but not the same connection. The authors should either add explicit material on sensor readout electronics and optical-to-electrical conversion, or revise Section 1 to describe the electronics example as covering satellite electronic systems more broadly. As written, the fourth example does not directly support the specific claim made in the introduction.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract] There is a typographical error in the abstract: 'bet ween' should be 'between'.
  2. [Section 3.3] In the sentence describing Ma Ronggui et al., 'Houg h linear transform' should read 'Hough linear transform'.
  3. [Section 5.2 (1)] The statement about CCSDS and SOIS is supported by reference [46], which is a paper on watermarking techniques for remote sensing images; this reference cannot support the claim about on-board interface services. A citation to a CCSDS/SOIS standard or an avionics paper is needed.
  4. [Section 4.2] The accuracy figures (95%, 90.16%, 97.57%, 95.36%, 87.74%) are reported without dataset sizes, evaluation protocols, or statistical context. Since several sources are theses or Chinese-language journals not readily accessible, the authors should at least state the test conditions or add a caveat that these numbers are as reported in the cited sources.
  5. [Section 3.2] The sentence beginning 'The unique role of mathematical morphology ...' makes a strong claim about the depth of research but provides no citation. A supporting reference, or an explicit pointer to the review literature cited in Section 3.3, should be added.
  6. [Section 4.1.2] The descriptions of K-Means and ISODATA are given without citations to standard textbooks or primary sources; adding a reference would make the review more useful to readers unfamiliar with these algorithms.
  7. [Section 2.3] The summary mentions that Turner et al. 'stated two categories of approaches, namely direct and indirect remote sensing approaches,' but does not explain what these categories are. Either add a brief explanation or remove the specific reference to the two categories.
  8. [Section 1] The wording 'remote sensing would inevitably integrate disciplines such as optics and color science' is stronger than necessary for an illustrative claim; using 'commonly' or 'naturally' would better match the cautious framing of the rest of the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a review whose central thesis is supported by external examples and no derivation or prediction reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This paper makes no quantitative derivation and no predictive claim that could be circular. The central claim, stated in Section 1, is that 'remote sensing is certainly a science as well as a technology of multidisciplinary integration,' and the supporting material is a survey of four application areas: ecology, mathematical morphology, machine learning, and electronics. There are no fitted parameters, no equations whose variables are defined in terms of the quantity being predicted, no uniqueness theorem imported from the author's own prior work, and no ansatz smuggled in through self-citation. The references cited are external works in the respective fields; nothing in the argument depends on a citation to the present author or to a result that already assumes the paper's conclusion. The paper itself explicitly limits the scope of its evidence, calling the examples 'only the tip of the iceberg' in the Abstract and Section 1, so the absence of a formal selection criterion is a stated limitation rather than a circular justification. Section 5.2(1) cites a watermarking paper [46] in support of a CCSDS/SOIS protocol point, but that is a citation relevance issue and not a circular step, because the claim about protocol standardization is not derived from the cited paper. In short, the paper is self-contained as a review: its examples illustrate an editorial thesis rather than being generated by the thesis, so there is no self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, self-citation-load-bearing, or renaming circularity. Score 0 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper makes no derivations and fits no parameters. Its central claim rests on the correctness of the cited literature and on standard background definitions from mathematical morphology and machine learning. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Accuracy and representativeness of the cited literature
    The paper's central claim rests on the correctness of the cited applications and results. The paper does not independently verify any of the quoted accuracy numbers or application summaries.
  • standard math Standard definitions of mathematical morphology (erosion, dilation, opening, closing)
    Section 3.1 invokes standard morphological operators as background knowledge without derivation.
  • standard math Standard definitions of machine learning classifiers (SVM, K-Means, ISODATA, CNN)
    Section 4 assumes the reader accepts the standard descriptions of these classification methods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interdisciplinary Integration of Remote Sensing -- A Review with Four Examples." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4LJONVY5

@misc{pith2026250414590,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interdisciplinary Integration of Remote Sensing -- A Review with Four Examples},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4LJONVY5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14590}
}
read the original abstract

As a high-level discipline, the development of remote sensing depends on the contribution of many other basic and applied disciplines and technologies. For example, due to the close relationship between remote sensing and photogrammetry, remote sensing would inevitably integrate disciplines such as optics and color science. Also, remote sensing integrates the knowledge of electronics in the conversion from optical signals to electrical signals via CCD (Charge-Coupled Device) or other image sensors. Moreover, when conducting object identification and classification with remote sensing data, mathematical morphology and other digital image processing technologies are used. These examples are only the tip of the iceberg of interdisciplinary integration of remote sensing. This work briefly reviews the interdisciplinary integration of remote sensing with four examples - ecology, mathematical morphology, machine learning, and electronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14590 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. The erosion based on the “correlation” using two structuring elements, (a) tower and (b) power line. D + S = (DC – S) C , D  S = (D − S) + S, D  S = (D + S) − S. The erosion is obtained by computing the local correlation between the structuring element S and all sub￾images of D; this operation can be considered as shape matching [22] and S carries the shape to be retrieved. S can be computed from a training set of… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [46]

    Scene Classification of Optical High -resolution Remote Sensing Images Using Vision Transformer and Graph Convolutional Network ,

    Wang Jia ’nan, Gao Yue, Shi Jun, and Liu Ziqi, “ Scene Classification of Optical High -resolution Remote Sensing Images Using Vision Transformer and Graph Convolutional Network ,” ACTA PHOTONICA SINICA, vol. 50, no. 11, p. 1128002, 2021, doi: 10.3788/gzxb20215011.1128002

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [20]

    Better together: Integrating and fusing multispectral and r adar satellite imagery to inform biodiversity monitoring, ecological research and conservation science,

    H. Schulte To Bühne and N. Pettorelli, “Better together: Integrating and fusing multispectral and r adar satellite imagery to inform biodiversity monitoring, ecological research and conservation science,” Methods Ecol Evol, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 849 – 865, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12942

    work page doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12942 2018

  3. [1]

    For example, due to the close relationship between remote sensin g and photogrammetry, remote sensing would inevitably integrate disciplines such as optics and color science

    INTRODUCTION As a high-level discipline, the development of remote sensing depends on the contribution of many other basic and applied disciplines and technologies. For example, due to the close relationship between remote sensin g and photogrammetry, remote sensing would inevitably integrate disciplines such as optics and color science. Also, remote sens...

    work page

  4. [2]

    Remote sensing for forest and vegetation biomass estimation Forest biomass is closely related to the carbon sources and sinks of forest ecosystems

    INTERDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION OF REMOTE SENSING WITH ECOLOGY 2.1. Remote sensing for forest and vegetation biomass estimation Forest biomass is closely related to the carbon sources and sinks of forest ecosystems. Accurate estimation of forest biomass in large regions is of gr eat significance for studying the carbon cycle of terrestrial ecosystems. Remot...

    work page 2018

  5. [3]

    E = D − S

    INTERDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION OF REMOTE SENSING WITH MATHEMATICAL MORPHOLOGY 3.1. Introduction to mathematical morphology Mathematical morphology has been fully developed on binary images [20]. Mathematical morphology operators (erosion (−), dilation ( +), opening ( ), and closing ()) act at a local level. These operators are defined between the input i...

    work page 1993

  6. [4]

    INTERDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION OF REMOTE SENSING WITH MACHINE LEARNING 4.1. Remote sensing image classification and recognition method Remote sensing image classification and recognition is to use computer to analyze the spectral information and spatial information of various features in remote sensing image, and through feature screening, classify the ima...

    work page 2016

  7. [5]

    INTERDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION OF REMOTE SENSING WITH ELECTRONICS 5.1. Introduction to satellite borne integrated electronic system for remote sensing satellites According to recent research progress es, satellite borne integrated electronic system can be defined from the following aspects [41]. (1) Design and purpose : The satellite borne integrated elect...

    work page

  8. [6]

    Las er remote sensing,

    U. Panne, “Las er remote sensing,” Trac -Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 8 –9, pp. 491 –500, Oct. 1998, doi: 10.1016/s0165-9936(98)00054-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0165-9936(98)00054-5 1998

Show all 53 references
  1. [7]

    Mapping vegetation morphology types in a dry savanna ecosystem: Integrating hierarchical object -based image analysis with random forest,

    N. B. Mishra and K. A. Crews, “Mapping vegetation morphology types in a dry savanna ecosystem: Integrating hierarchical object -based image analysis with random forest,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1175 – 1198, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1080/01431161....

    2014

  2. [8]

    Relating spatial patterns of fractional land cover to savanna vegetation morphol ogy using multi -scale remote sensing in the central kalahari,

    N. B. Mishra, K. A. Crews, and G. S. Okin, “Relating spatial patterns of fractional land cover to savanna vegetation morphol ogy using multi -scale remote sensing in the central kalahari,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2082 –2104, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1080/01431161.2...

    2014

  3. [9]

    Forest Biomass Estimation Based on UAV Optical Remote Sensing,

    Li Bin and Liu Kening, “Forest Biomass Estimation Based on UAV Optical Remote Sensing,” FOREST ENGINEERING, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 83–92, 2022, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2022.05.011

    2022

  4. [10]

    Review on Development of Forest Biomass Remote Sensing Satellites,

    Cao Haiyi, Qiu Xinyi, and He Tao, “Review on Development of Forest Biomass Remote Sensing Satellites,” Acta Optica Sinica, vol. 42, no. 17, p. 1728001, 2022, doi: 10.3788/AOS202242.1728001

    2022

  5. [11]

    Applications in remote sensing to forest ecology and management,

    A. M. Lechner, G. M. Foody, and D. S. Boyd, “Applications in remote sensing to forest ecology and management,” One Earth, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 405–412, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.001

    2020 doi

  6. [12]

    A remote sensing approach to understanding patterns of secondary succession in tropical forest,

    E. Chraibi, H. Arnold, S. Luque, A. Deacon, A. E. Magurran, and J. -B. Feret, “A remote sensing approach to understanding patterns of secondary succession in tropical forest,” Remote Sensing, vol. 13, no. 11, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs13112148

    2021 doi

  7. [13]

    UAV data as alternative to field sampling to map woody invasive species based on combined sentinel-1 and sentinel-2 data,

    T. Kattenborn, J. Lopatin, M. Fö rster, A. C. Braun, and F. E. Fassnacht, “UAV data as alternative to field sampling to map woody invasive species based on combined sentinel-1 and sentinel-2 data,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 227, pp. 61–73, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.r...

    2019 doi

  8. [14]

    Using very‐high‐resolution satellite imagery and deep learning to detect and count african elephants in heterogeneous landscapes,

    I. Duporge, O. Is upova, S. Reece, D. W. Macdonald, and T. Wang, “Using very‐high‐resolution satellite imagery and deep learning to detect and count african elephants in heterogeneous landscapes,” Remote Sens Ecol Conserv, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 369–381, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1002/rse2.195

    2021 doi

  9. [15]

    Imaging, screening and remote sensing of photosynthetic activity and stress responses,

    K. Kohzuma, K. Sonoike, and K. Hikosaka, “Imaging, screening and remote sensing of photosynthetic activity and stress responses,” J. Plant Res., vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 649 –651, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10265-021-01324-1

    2021 doi

  10. [16]

    Application of spectral diversity in plant diversity monitoring and assessment ,

    Tian J. -Y. et al., “ Application of spectral diversity in plant diversity monitoring and assessment ,” Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1129 –1150, 2022, doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0077

    2022

  11. [17]

    Application of hyperspectral remote sensing in field of medicinal plants monitoring research,

    Zhang Xiaobo, Guo Lanping, Huang Luqi, Zhu Shoudong, and Ma Weifeng, “Application of hyperspectral remote sensing in field of medicinal plants monitoring research,” China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica , vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1280 –1284, 2013, doi: 10.4268/cjcmm20130903

    2013 doi

  12. [18]

    Advances in the Research on Hyperspectral Remote Sensing in Biodiversity and Conservation ,

    He Cheng, Feng Zhongke, Yuan Jinjun, Wang Jia, Gong Yinxi, and Dong Zhihai , “ Advances in the Research on Hyperspectral Remote Sensing in Biodiversity and Conservation ,” Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis , vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1628 –1632, 2012, doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(...

    2012 doi

  13. [19]

    Turner et al

    have been ci ted thousands of times by scientists from around the world who are involved in remote sensing of EBC. Turner et al. stated two categories of approaches, namely direct and indirect remote sensing approaches

  14. [21]

    Remote sensing image segmentation of ulan buh desert based on mathematical morphology,

    F. Li, H. Wang, W. Jia, and Z. Liu, “Remote sensing image segmentation of ulan buh desert based on mathematical morphology,” presented at the International Conference on Computational Materials Science (CMS 2011), in Advanced Materials Research, vol. 268 –270. Apr. 2011, pp. 1...

    2011 doi

  15. [22]

    Remote sensing of ecology, biodiversity and conservation: A review from the perspective of remote sensing specialists,

    K. Wang, S. E. Franklin, X. Guo, and M. Cattet, “Remote sensing of ecology, biodiversity and conservation: A review from the perspective of remote sensing specialists,” Sens., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 9647–9667, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.3390/s101109647

    2010 doi

  16. [23]

    Priorities for big biodiversity data,

    P. J. Stephenson et al., “Priorities for big biodiversity data,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 124 – 125, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1002/fee.1473

    2017 doi

  17. [24]

    Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space,

    A. K. Skidmore et al., “Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space,” Nature Ecology & Evolution, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 896–906, May 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01451-x

    2021 doi

  18. [25]

    From space to species: Ecological applications for remote sensing,

    J. T. Kerr and M. Ostrovsky, “From space to species: Ecological applications for remote sensing,” Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 299 –305, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00071-5

    2003 doi

  19. [26]

    Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation,

    W. Turner, S. Spector, N. Gardiner, M. Fladeland, E. Sterling, and M. Steininger, “Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation,” Trends Ecol. Evol., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 306–314, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00070-3

    2003 doi

  20. [27]

    Serra, Image analysis and mathematical morphology, vol

    J. Serra, Image analysis and mathematical morphology, vol. 1. London: Academic Press Inc., 1982

    1982

  21. [28]

    Road extraction techniques from remote sensing images: A re view,

    I. Kahraman, I. R. Karas, and A. E. Akay, “Road extraction techniques from remote sensing images: A re view,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. XLII -4/W9, pp. 339–342, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.5194/isprs -archives-XLII-4-W9-339- 2018

    2018 doi

  22. [29]

    Decomposition of gray-scale morphological structuring elements,

    F. Yeong-Chyang Shih and O. R. Mitchell, “Decomposition of gray-scale morphological structuring elements,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 195 –203, Jan. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0031-3203(91)90061-9

    1991 doi

  23. [30]

    Imag e analysis using mathematical morphology,

    R. M. Haralick, S. R. Sternberg, and X. Zhuang, “Imag e analysis using mathematical morphology,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-9, no. 4, pp. 532–550, Jul. 1987, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1987.4767941

    1987

  24. [31]

    classified the road detection methods into five categories: template mat ching-based methods, knowledge -based methods, object -oriented methods, deep learning methods, and mathematical morphology methods. Since the 1980s, many scholars have gradually used mathematical morphol...

  25. [32]

    Integrated fuzzy clustering,

    V. Di Gesú, “Integrated fuzzy clustering,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 293–308, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.1016/0165- 0114(94)90185-6

    1994 doi

  26. [33]

    Directional mathematical morphology for the detection of the road network in very high resolution remote sensing images,

    S. Valero, J. Chanussot, J. A. Benediktsson, H. Talbot, and B. Waske, “Directional mathematical morphology for the detection of the road network in very high resolution remote sensing images,” in 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Cairo, Egypt:...

    2009

  27. [34]

    Extraction of Bridge over Water fr om High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Based on Spectral Characteristics of Ground Objects ,

    Chen Chao , Qin Qiming , Chen Li , Wang Jinliang , Liu Mingchao, and Wen Qi , “ Extraction of Bridge over Water fr om High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Based on Spectral Characteristics of Ground Objects ,” Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 718–722, 2013

    2013

  28. [35]

    Application of remote- sensing technology to the relation of submarine pipelines and coastal morphology,

    Y. Yuksel, D. Maktav, and S. Kapdasli, “Application of remote- sensing technology to the relation of submarine pipelines and coastal morphology,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 77 –83, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0273-1223(95)00572-5

    1995 doi

  29. [36]

    Development and prospect of road extraction method for optical remote sensing image ,

    Dai J. et al., “ Development and prospect of road extraction method for optical remote sensing image ,” Journal of Remote Sensing (Chinese), vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 804 –823, 2020, doi: 10.11834/jrs.20208360

    2020 doi

  30. [37]

    Road extraction from high-resolution satellite images based on multiple descriptors,

    J. Dai, T. Zhu, Y. Wang, R. Ma, and X. Fang, “Road extraction from high-resolution satellite images based on multiple descriptors,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sensing, vol. 13, pp. 227–240, 2020, doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2955277

    2020

  31. [38]

    Lane -level road extraction from high -resolution optical satellite images,

    J. Dai, T. Zhu, Y. Zhang, R. Ma, and W. Li, “Lane -level road extraction from high -resolution optical satellite images,” Remote Sensing, vol. 11, no. 22, p. 2672, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3390/rs11222672

    2019 doi

  32. [39]

    Advanced directional mathematical morphology for the detection of the road network in very high resolution remote sensing images,

    S. Valero, J. Chanussot, J. A. Benediktsson, H. Talbot, and B. Waske, “Advanced directional mathematical morphology for the detection of the road network in very high resolution remote sensing images,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1120–1127, Jul. 2010, doi...

    2010 doi

  33. [40]

    Extracting roads based on retinex and improved canny operator with shape criteria in vague and unevenly illuminated aerial images,

    M. Ronggui, W. Weixing, and L. Sheng, “Extracting roads based on retinex and improved canny operator with shape criteria in vague and unevenly illuminated aerial images,” J. Appl. Remote Sens, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 063610, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1117/1.JRS.6.063610

    2012 doi

  34. [41]

    Remote Sensing Image Detection of Rural Buildings Based on Deep Learning Algorithm ,

    Chen Wenkang , “Remote Sensing Image Detection of Rural Buildings Based on Deep Learning Algorithm ,” Surveying and Mapping, ISSN: 1674-5019, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 227–230, 2016

    2016

  35. [42]

    Convolutional Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification ,

    Zhao Mandan , Ren Zhiquan , Wu Gaochang , and Hao Xiangyang, “ Convolutional Neural Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification ,” Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 501 –507, 2017, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6338.2017.05.013

    2017

  36. [43]

    The Application of Deep Learning in Dimensionality Reduction And Classification of Hyperspectral Image,

    Jianhua Luo, “ The Application of Deep Learning in Dimensionality Reduction And Classification of Hyperspectral Image,” Master, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China , 2018. [Online]. A vailable: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=2C6ioF1tvgXfqMzU...

    2018

  37. [44]

    Deep Learning Based UAV Remote Sensing Image Water Body Identification,

    Du Jing, “Deep Learning Based UAV Remote Sensing Image Water Body Identification,” JIANGXI SCIENCE, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 158-161+170, 2017, doi: 10.13990/j.issn1001-3679.2017.01.031

    2017

  38. [45]

    Greenfield Information Extraction for Scene Classification Based on Convolutional Neural Network,

    Zhu Yuanjie, Jiang Miaojun, Li Xiaotian, and Wang Xiaopo, “Greenfield Information Extraction for Scene Classification Based on Convolutional Neural Network, ” Beijing Surveying and Mapping, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1780 –1784, 2020, doi: 10.19580/j.cnki.1007-3000.2020.12.025

    2020

  39. [47]

    Remote sensing vegetation detection method based on the deep convolutional neural network ,

    Xu Shanshan , Lyu Jingyan, and Chen Fangyuan, “ Remote sensing vegetation detection method based on the deep convolutional neural network ,” Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 185 –193, 2022, doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009059

    2022

  40. [48]

    Research on Integrated Avionics for Remote Sensing Satellite,

    Zhenxing Liu, “Research on Integrated Avionics for Remote Sensing Satellite,” Doctorate, University of Science and Technology of China, 2021. doi: 10.27517/d.cnki.gzkju.2021.000782

    2021

  41. [49]

    The simulation and verification platform for micro -satellite integrated electronic systems,

    L. Jiang and P. Xu, “The simulation and verification platform for micro -satellite integrated electronic systems,” in 2018 Eighth International Conference on Instrumentation & Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC), Harbin, China: IEEE, Jul. 2018, pp. 1434–14...

    2018

  42. [50]

    A n experimental study on the transient thermal response of an electronic equipment box for UAV remote sensing applications,

    G. Tanda, “A n experimental study on the transient thermal response of an electronic equipment box for UAV remote sensing applications,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1599, no. 1, p. 012037, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1599/1/012037

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    Reliability Theory and Practice for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,

    L. Xing and B. W. Johnson, “Reliability Theory and Practice for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 3548–3566, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3218491

    2023

  44. [52]

    A robust control method for load electronic sy stem of autonomous remote sensing satellite in -orbit,

    Haibin Liu, Wenqiang Ji, and Junjie Hou, “A robust control method for load electronic sy stem of autonomous remote sensing satellite in -orbit,” in 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo Transportation Electrification Asia -Pacific (ITEC Asia -Pacific), Beijing, China: IEEE, Aug. 2014,...

    2014

  45. [53]

    Watermarking techniques for electronic delivery of remote sensing images,

    F. Bartolini, “Watermarking techniques for electronic delivery of remote sensing images,” Opt. Eng, vol. 41, no. 9, p. 2111, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1117/1.1496787

    2002 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.