Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 96 references

Unveiling Fine Structure and Energy-driven Transition of Photoelectron Kikuchi Diffraction

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims to have observed and, with a fully relativistic one-step photoemission model, reproduced circular dichroism in Si(100) 1s photoelectron Kikuchi diffraction, with asymmetries up to 31%, and to match experimental bulk and…

desk verdict First Si 1s CDAD observation plus broad energy-dependent Kikuchi comparison is worth a careful referee; the validation is visual and partly tuned, so the robustness claims should be read with caution. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14758 v2 pith:KPFGX54D submitted 2025-04-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Trung-Phuc Vo , Olena Tkach , Aki Pulkkinen , Didier Sebilleau , Aimo Winkelmann , Olena Fedchenko , Yaryna Lytvynenko , Dmitry Vasilyev
show 3 more authors
Hans-Joachim Elmers Gerd Schonhense Jan Minar
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords photoelectrondiffractionKikuchione-stepphotoemissionmodelcirculardichroismhardX-raymultiplescatteringinelasticcore-levelspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a fully relativistic one-step photoemission model, built on multiple-scattering theory, can reproduce fine Kikuchi diffraction—the band-and-line patterns photoelectrons form by scattering inside a crystal on their way to the detector—from Si(100) and Ge(100) core levels in hard X-ray photoemission. It reports the first observation and simulation of circular dichroism in the angular distribution of Si(100) 1s photoelectrons, with asymmetries up to 31%. It also shows the same calculation tracks how the Kikuchi network changes with kinetic energy from 106 eV to 4174 eV, matching experimental bulk and near-surface features. If the claim holds, the model becomes a practical tool for separating diffraction artifacts from angle-resolved photoemission data and for emitter-site-specific structural studies, avoiding the cluster-size convergence problems of earlier methods.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the one-step photoemission model with a time-reversed LEED final state, evaluated through a fully relativistic multiple-scattering Green's-function formalism. The final state is expanded in partial waves up to lmax=4 and coupled across atomic layers by a truncated set of reciprocal lattice vectors G_hkl, with the truncation set between 45 and 193 depending on energy. Inelastic scattering enters through a complex inner potential V0i(E), whose imaginary part attenuates the photoelectron wave field and thus controls how much the Kikuchi bands blur. This machinery replaces cluster-based multiple-scattering calculations, avoiding cluster-size convergence problems and allowing site-specific core-level emission to be simulated at hard X-ray energies.

What would settle it

At a fixed kinetic energy (e.g., Si 1s at 4174 eV), recompute the total-intensity and dichroism maps while systematically increasing the number of reciprocal-lattice vectors beyond 193 and the angular-momentum cutoff beyond lmax=4. If the maps change substantively, or if the damping parameter V0i has to be re-adjusted to preserve the match, the claimed agreement is an artifact of the chosen truncations. A second check: measure the Si(100) 1s CDAD at intermediate photon energies and compare the predicted sign and positions of the asymmetry lobes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the one-step model reproduces experimentally observed Kikuchi patterns in core-level hard-X-ray photoelectron diffraction across a wide energy range, and that the same calculation captures circular dichroism in the angular distribution (CDAD) of Si 1s emission. For Si(100) 1s, the normalized difference between right- and left-circularly polarized intensities reaches 31%, and computed total-intensity and CDAD maps agree with measured diffractograms. The model also reproduces distinct bulk Si 2p patterns at 3180–3374 eV kinetic energy and more surface-sensitive Ge 3d patterns at 106–1036 eV, where the inelastic mean free path ranges from 0.5 to 2.2 nm. The imaginary part of the inner potential, V0i, is the parameter controlling broadening: increasing it from 1 eV to 5 eV blurs the computed pattern until it resembles the measured one. The paper concludes that the model accounts for the energy-driven transition from surface-sensitive to bulk Kikuchi networks and supports hard-X-ray PES investigations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the agreement between calculation and experiment is real and not produced by adjusting the numerical truncations and damping parameter to the displayed data for each energy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Core-level Kikuchi patterns can be simulated emitter-site-specifically at hard X-ray energies without cluster-size convergence issues, so the method can address buried interfaces and site-selective structure.
  • The energy-dependent transition between surface-sensitive and bulk networks gives a practical route to separate bulk from surface contributions in angle-resolved photoemission, cleaning up hard X-ray ARPES data.
  • Deep core levels such as Si 1s can be used for CDAD-based structural analysis, with predicted asymmetries up to 31% comparable to or larger than those of shallower levels.
  • Matching computed blur to measured patterns via V0i offers an empirical determination of inelastic attenuation in photoelectron diffraction.
  • The approach is positioned to extend to site-specific effects in alloys and to time-resolved photoemission after excitation, where inelastic electron-hole generation changes the diffraction features.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A systematic convergence study at one fixed energy, varying the number of reciprocal-lattice vectors and the angular-momentum cutoff while measuring pattern change, would show whether the hand-chosen parameters are sufficient or whether missing physics such as thermal motion is being absorbed into the damping parameter.
  • Because CDAD appears in a non-magnetic, non-chiral material, the same model should predict dichroic asymmetries in heavier 5d or 4f compounds where spin-orbit coupling is stronger, with emitter-site specificity isolating inequivalent lattice sites.
  • The strong energy dependence of the Kikuchi network implies that multi-energy diffractograms carry depth information; inverting the energy-driven pattern evolution could yield a depth-resolved structural probe by analogy with photoelectron holography.
  • If the damping parameter is made time-dependent, the model could simulate ultrafast pump-probe photoemission, where photoexcitation transiently changes the inelastic mean free path and alters the diffraction pattern.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a computational study of photoelectron Kikuchi diffraction in Ge(100) and Si(100) using the fully relativistic one-step photoemission model implemented in SPRKKR. The authors compute core-level diffractograms for Ge 2p3/2 and 3d and Si 1s and 2p3/2 over kinetic energies from 106 eV to 4174 eV, compare them with momentum-microscopy measurements, and analyze how the imaginary inner potential V0i broadens the patterns and how the G_hkl truncation controls fine structure. The main claims are (i) first observation and successful simulation of circular dichroism in the angular distribution (CDAD) of Si 1s, with asymmetries up to 31%, and (ii) that the one-step model reproduces both bulk and more surface-sensitive Kikuchi diffraction features across a wide energy range, including fine details that earlier cluster-based methods could not capture.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper would be a valuable methodological advance: it extends the validated application of the relativistic one-step model to hard-X-ray, emitter-site-specific Kikuchi diffraction, and it reports a new CDAD case for a deep core level. The use of a well-established formalism, the comparison with independent experimental data rather than synthetic inputs, the systematic discussion of inelastic broadening, and the broad energy range are genuine strengths. The main weakness is that the validation evidence is entirely qualitative: agreement is assessed by visual inspection, the numerical parameters controlling agreement are not fully reported, and no convergence criterion is given for the basis-set truncations. As a result, the current manuscript establishes plausibility rather than independent validation. No machine-checked proofs or public code repository are provided; the code availability statement is limited to 'upon request', so the reproducibility of the simulations rests on the completeness of the parameter reporting.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III B, Fig. 3; also Figs. 4–5] The central claim that the one-step model reproduces the experimental Kikuchi patterns is supported only by visual feature matching. The text uses qualitative statements such as 'quantitatively reasonable' (Fig. 3), 'near-perfect agreement' (Section III B), and 'match almost perfectly' (Section III C) without reporting any numerical similarity statistic. Because the paper's goal is to validate the robustness of the model, the authors should add a quantitative comparison, for example a 2D cross-correlation or a normalized R-factor between measured and computed patterns, together with line-profile comparisons for selected features. Without such a metric, the displayed agreement cannot be distinguished from a favorable visual reading of patterns that share the same overall symmetry, especially since the parameters V0i and G_hkl are chosen with reference to the displayed data.
  2. [Section III B, Figs. 2–3; Methods II A] The reciprocal-lattice truncation is not shown to be converged for the final comparisons. Fig. 2 demonstrates that increasing G_hkl from 45 to 145 materially changes the fine structure, but the Si 1s comparison in Fig. 3 is computed with 193 G_hkl, which is not included in the convergence sequence. Fig. 5 similarly uses 45, 69, 97, and 57 G_hkl without convergence evidence. The Methods paragraph acknowledges that 'systematic trial tests must be carefully taken into account' and that no single truncation works for all energies. The authors should either provide a convergence test per reported energy showing that the chosen G_hkl lies in a plateau of a pattern-similarity metric, or present a sensitivity analysis demonstrating that the claimed features do not depend on the truncation.
  3. [Section III A and Figs. 3–5] The imaginary inner potential V0i is the main broadening parameter and is reported only for Fig. 1. The text of Section III A shows that increasing V0i from 1 eV to 5 eV substantially changes the appearance of the diffractograms, yet the simulations shown in Figs. 3–5 do not state the V0i values used. Since the manuscript claims agreement in line broadening and contrast, the revision must report V0i(E) for every calculation, or provide an explicit energy-dependent V0i(E) curve, so that the comparison is reproducible and the role of this parameter in the agreement is transparent.
  4. [Abstract and Section III B] The central numerical claim of 'CDAD asymmetries up to 31%' is not substantiated in the text or figure captions. No value or location of the maximum A_CDAD is given, and it is not stated whether the 31% figure is experimental or calculated. The authors should report the maximum measured and computed A_CDAD values, their angular coordinates, and the associated uncertainties, and should clarify how the 31% is obtained from the data shown in Fig. 3(g,h).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II B] The phrase 'cut from a waver' should read 'cut from a wafer'.
  2. [Section III A and Fig. 1 caption] The text states that the polar angle for the azimuthal scan is 13.41 degrees, while the Fig. 1 caption gives 2.68 degrees for the same scans; please reconcile this inconsistency.
  3. [Section III A] The sentence 'IRCP and IRCP stand for the intensity of RCP and LCP light in turn' should read 'IRCP and ILCP'.
  4. [Section III B] The phrase 'Computational results are performed with 193 ⃗Ghkl' is awkward; a clearer wording would be 'Calculations were performed with 193 ⃗Ghkl vectors.'
  5. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption entry for EF inal = 1036 eV repeats '(e,f)'; it should refer to panels (g,h).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: first-principles Kikuchi/CDAD predictions are compared with independent experiment; hand-set broadening and truncation parameters are validation weaknesses, not constructed predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The calculated diffractograms and CDAD asymmetries are produced by the relativistic one-step photoemission model (Section II.A) using an LDA/ASA potential from the SPRKKR code; no experimental intensity map is fed back into the calculation as an input. The comparisons in Figs. 3-5 are made against independently measured momentum-microscopy data described in Section II.B. The only tunable physical parameter, V0i, is varied in Fig. 1 to illustrate inelastic broadening, and the paper explicitly notes that the main diffraction peak positions remain fixed with V0i: "Their fixed positions remain unchanged with respect to azimuthal angles, which means that they are not significantly altered by the inelastic scattering mechanism." Thus the geometric content of the patterns is not forced by this fit. The G_hkl truncation is a numerical convergence parameter rather than a fitted physical constant; the paper acknowledges that no single value works for all energies ("impossible to define a single global number of \vec{G}_{hkl}" and "systematic trial tests must be carefully taken into account"), which is a transparency and reproducibility weakness, not a circular reduction, because the final comparisons still target independent external data. The lmax=4 choice is carried over from Ref. [12] as a basis truncation, not as a uniqueness theorem or as a definition of the predicted pattern. The central CDAD result is a computed ratio of first-principles RCP/LCP intensities compared with separately measured RCP/LCP data, so the 31% asymmetry is not reconstructed from the target experiment. The remaining concerns are subjective visual matching and hand-selected broadening/truncation parameters, which affect the strength of the validation but do not make the claimed derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central simulation results rest on a standard multiple-scattering one-step formalism and LDA-ASA DFT potentials. No new physical entities are introduced. The main externally adjustable inputs are the imaginary inner potential V0i and the truncation parameters lmax and G_hkl; of these, V0i is varied directly against experimental appearance, while the pattern geometry itself is not fitted to the data.

free parameters (3)
  • V0i(E), imaginary part of final-state inner potential = 1, 3, and 5 eV scanned in Fig. 1; values for other simulations not given
    Controls inelastic attenuation and pattern broadening; higher values are described as resembling the experimental diffractogram, so it functions as a tunable parameter in the comparison.
  • lmax, angular momentum cutoff = 4
    Chosen for agreement with experiments from prior work (Ref. 12); the paper notes increasing lmax would refine fine features but would reduce clarity of the displayed structures.
  • G_hkl reciprocal lattice vector count = 45, 57, 69, 97, 145, 169, or 193 depending on energy
    Selected per energy to balance memory and runtime; the fine structure becomes richer as the count increases, and no convergence criterion is reported.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The one-step photoemission model with time-reversed LEED final states accurately describes core-level emission from bulk crystals from roughly 100 eV to several keV.
    This is the theoretical foundation invoked in Methods via Refs. 49 to 52; the paper adopts it without rederiving it or benchmarking against independent experiment beyond these comparisons.
  • domain assumption The LDA-ASA KKR ground state provides a sufficient electronic potential for scattering calculations.
    Methods state that LDA and ASA are used; the paper itself lists LDA and ASA as possible sources of deviation in Section III.C.
  • domain assumption The crystal is an ideal infinite periodic bulk at zero temperature with no thermal vibrations, roughness, or defects.
    Simulations are at 0 K and neglect Debye-Waller effects; the authors acknowledge thermal effects, sample imperfections, and surface roughness as causes of experimental-theoretical mismatch.
  • domain assumption Inelastic scattering in the final state is fully represented by a complex inner potential V0i.
    The paper models broadening through V0i in Section II.A and Fig. 1, and the summary states that only this inelastic mechanism was investigated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling Fine Structure and Energy-driven Transition of Photoelectron Kikuchi Diffraction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KPFGX54D

@misc{pith2026250414758,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling Fine Structure and Energy-driven Transition of Photoelectron Kikuchi Diffraction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KPFGX54D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14758}
}
read the original abstract

The intricate fine structure of Kikuchi diffraction plays a vital role in probing phase transformations and strain distributions in functional materials, particularly in electron microscopy. Beyond these applications, it also proves essential in photoemission spectroscopy (PES) at high photon energies, aiding in the disentanglement of complex angle-resolved PES data and enabling emitter-site-specific studies. However, the detection and analysis of these rich faint structures in photoelectron diffraction (PED), especially in the hard X-ray regime, remain highly challenging, with only a limited number of simulations successfully reproducing these patterns. The strong energy dependence of Kikuchi patterns further complicates their interpretation, necessitating advanced theoretical approaches. To enhance structural analysis, we present a comprehensive theoretical study of fine diffraction patterns and their evolution with energy by simulating core-level emissions from Ge(100) and Si(100). Using multiple-scattering theory and the fully relativistic one-step photoemission model, we simulate faint pattern networks for various core levels across different kinetic energies (106 eV - 4174 eV), avoiding cluster size convergence issues inherent in cluster-based methods. Broadening in patterns is discussed via the inelastic scattering treatment. For the first time, circular dichroism has been observed and successfully reproduced in the angular distribution of Si (100) 1s, revealing detailed features and asymmetries up to 31%. Notably, we successfully replicate experimental bulk and more "surface-sensitivity" diffraction features, further validating the robustness of our simulations. The results show remarkable agreement with the experimental data obtained using circularly polarized radiations, demonstrating the potential of this methodology for advancing high-energy PES investigations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14758 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a-c) Calculated and (d) measured total-intensity patterns of Ge(100) 2p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Calculated total-intensity patterns of Si(100) 1s at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of measured and calculated intensity and CDAD for Si 1s at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of measured and calculated total intensity pattern I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of measured and calculated total intensity patterns I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ambiguity of quasicrys- talline and cubic approximant symmetry in kikuchi diffraction patterns

    Grzegorz Cios, Aimo Winkelmann, Tomasz Tokarski, and Piotr Ba la. Ambiguity of quasicrys- talline and cubic approximant symmetry in kikuchi diffraction patterns. Communications Earth & Environment, 5(1):789, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    Perpendic- ular magnetic anisotropy induced by tetragonal distortion¡? format?¿ of feco alloy films grown on pd (001)

    Aimo Winkelmann, Marek Przybylski, Feng Luo, Yisheng Shi, and Jochen Barthel. Perpendic- ular magnetic anisotropy induced by tetragonal distortion¡? format?¿ of feco alloy films grown on pd (001). Physical review letters, 96(25):257205, 2006

    2006

  3. [3]

    Element-resolved kikuchi pattern measurements of non- centrosymmetric materials

    Maarten Vos and Aimo Winkelmann. Element-resolved kikuchi pattern measurements of non- centrosymmetric materials. Materials Characterization, 123:328–338, 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Characterizing deformed ultrafine-grained and nanocrystalline materials using transmission kikuchi diffraction in a scan- ning electron microscope

    Patrick W Trimby, Yang Cao, Zibin Chen, Shuang Han, Kevin J Hemker, Jianshe Lian, Xi- aozhou Liao, Paul Rottmann, Saritha Samudrala, Jingli Sun, et al. Characterizing deformed ultrafine-grained and nanocrystalline materials using transmission kikuchi diffraction in a scan- ning electron microscope. Acta materialia, 62:69–80, 2014

    2014

  5. [5]

    Transmission kikuchi diffraction and transmission electron forescatter imaging of electropolished and fib manufactured tem speci- mens

    Witold Zieli´ nski, Tomasz P loci´ nski, and KJ Kurzyd lowski. Transmission kikuchi diffraction and transmission electron forescatter imaging of electropolished and fib manufactured tem speci- mens. Materials Characterization, 104:42–48, 2015

    2015

  6. [6]

    Application of transmitted kikuchi diffraction in studying nano-oxide and ultrafine metallic grains

    Majid Abbasi, Dong-Ik Kim, Hwan-Uk Guim, Morteza Hosseini, Habib Danesh-Manesh, and Mehrdad Abbasi. Application of transmitted kikuchi diffraction in studying nano-oxide and ultrafine metallic grains. ACS nano, 9(11):10991–11002, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    Kikuchi ultrafast nanodiffraction in four-dimensional electron microscopy

    Aycan Yurtsever and Ahmed H Zewail. Kikuchi ultrafast nanodiffraction in four-dimensional electron microscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8):3152–3156, 2011

    2011

  8. [8]

    Observing (non) linear lattice dynamics in graphite by ultrafast kikuchi diffraction

    Wenxi Liang, Giovanni M Vanacore, and Ahmed H Zewail. Observing (non) linear lattice dynamics in graphite by ultrafast kikuchi diffraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(15):5491–5496, 2014

    2014

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    The diffraction of cathode rays by mica.(part iv.)

    Seishi KIKUCHI. The diffraction of cathode rays by mica.(part iv.). Proceedings of the Imperial Academy, 4(8):471–474, 1928

    1928

  2. [10]

    Kikuchi diffraction

    David B Williams, C Barry Carter, David B Williams, and C Barry Carter. Kikuchi diffraction. Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Textbook for Materials Science , pages 311–322, 2009. 17

    2009

  3. [11]

    Electron backscatter diffraction in materials science , volume 2

    Adam J Schwartz, Mukul Kumar, Brent L Adams, and David P Field. Electron backscatter diffraction in materials science , volume 2. Springer, 2009

    2009

  4. [12]

    Layered multiple scattering approach to hard x-ray photoelectron diffraction: Theory and application

    Trung-Phuc Vo, Olena Tkach, Sylvain Tricot, Didier Sebilleau, Jurgen Braun, Aki Pulkkinen, Aimo Winkelmann, Olena Fedchenko, Yaryna Lytvynenko, Dmitry Vasilyev, et al. Layered multiple scattering approach to hard x-ray photoelectron diffraction: Theory and application. arXiv p...

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    High-resolution hard-x-ray photoelectron diffrac- tion in a momentum microscope—the model case of graphite

    O Fedchenko, A Winkelmann, K Medjanik, S Babenkov, D Vasilyev, S Chernov, C Schlueter, A Gloskovskii, Yu Matveyev, W Drube, et al. High-resolution hard-x-ray photoelectron diffrac- tion in a momentum microscope—the model case of graphite. New Journal of Physics , 21(11): 113031, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Observation and simulation of hard x ray photoelectron diffraction to determine polarity of polycrystalline zinc oxide films with rotation domains

    Jesse R Williams, Igor P´ ıˇ s, Masaaki Kobata, Aimo Winkelmann, Tomohiro Matsushita, Yutaka Adachi, Naoki Ohashi, and Keisuke Kobayashi. Observation and simulation of hard x ray photoelectron diffraction to determine polarity of polycrystalline zinc oxide films with rotation ...

    2012

  7. [15]

    Circular dichroism in hard x-ray photo- electron diffraction observed by time-of-flight momentum microscopy

    O Tkach, T-P Vo, O Fedchenko, K Medjanik, Y Lytvynenko, S Babenkov, D Vasilyev, QL Nguyen, TRF Peixoto, A Gloskowskii, et al. Circular dichroism in hard x-ray photo- electron diffraction observed by time-of-flight momentum microscopy. Ultramicroscopy, 250: 113750, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Analyzing core level photoelectrons by diffraction and circular dichroism via means of first- principle scattering calculations

    Trung-Phuc Vo, Olena Tkach, Sylvain Tricot, Didier S´ ebilleau, Aimo Winkelmann, Olena Fed- chenko, Yaryna Lytvynenko, Dmitry Vasilyev, Hans-Joachim Elmers, Gerd Sch¨ onhense, et al. Analyzing core level photoelectrons by diffraction and circular dichroism via means of first- ...

    2024

  9. [17]

    Site-specific atomic order and band structure tailoring in the diluted magnetic semiconductor (in, ga, mn) as

    K Medjanik, O Fedchenko, O Yastrubchak, Janusz Sadowski, M Sawicki, L Gluba, D Vasilyev, S Babenkov, S Chernov, A Winkelmann, et al. Site-specific atomic order and band structure tailoring in the diluted magnetic semiconductor (in, ga, mn) as. Physical Review B , 103(7): 075107, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Simulation of high energy pho- toelectron diffraction using many-beam dynamical kikuchi-band theory

    Aimo Winkelmann, Bernd Schr¨ oter, and Wolfgang Richter. Simulation of high energy pho- toelectron diffraction using many-beam dynamical kikuchi-band theory. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 69(24):245417, 2004

    2004

  11. [19]

    Emitter-site specificity of hard x-ray photo- electron kikuchi-diffraction

    Olena Fedchenko, A Winkelmann, S Chernov, K Medjanik, S Babenkov, SY Agustsson, D Vasi- lyev, M Hoesch, HJ Elmers, and G Sch¨ onhense. Emitter-site specificity of hard x-ray photo- electron kikuchi-diffraction. New Journal of Physics , 22(10):103002, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Photoelectron diffraction and holography: present status and future prospects

    CS Fadley, S Thevuthasan, AP Kaduwela, C Westphal, YJ Kim, R Ynzunza, P Len, E Tober, F Zhang, Z Wang, et al. Photoelectron diffraction and holography: present status and future prospects. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena , 68:19–47, 1994. 18

    1994

  13. [21]

    Surface structural information from photoelectron diffraction

    DP Woodruff. Surface structural information from photoelectron diffraction. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 178:186–194, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    The study of the local atomic structure by means of x-ray photoelectron diffraction

    Carsten Westphal. The study of the local atomic structure by means of x-ray photoelectron diffraction. Surface Science Reports, 50(1-3):1–106, 2003

    2003

  15. [23]

    Photoelectron diffraction in the x-ray and ultraviolet regime: Sn-phthalocyanine on ag (111)

    Michael Greif, Luca Castiglioni, Ari P Seitsonen, Silvan Roth, J¨ urg Osterwalder, and Matthias Hengsberger. Photoelectron diffraction in the x-ray and ultraviolet regime: Sn-phthalocyanine on ag (111). Physical Review B, 87(8):085429, 2013

    2013

  16. [24]

    Photoelectron diffraction

    Charles S Fadley. Photoelectron diffraction. Physica Scripta, 1987(T17):39, 1987

    1987

  17. [25]

    Application of a novel multiple scattering approach to photoelectron diffraction and auger electron diffraction

    Ajith P Kaduwela, DJ Friedman, and CS Fadley. Application of a novel multiple scattering approach to photoelectron diffraction and auger electron diffraction. Journal of electron spec- troscopy and related phenomena, 57(3-4):223–278, 1991

    1991

  18. [26]

    X-ray photoelectron diffraction from adsorbate core levels in the energy range 500–10000 ev and with polarized radiation: a theoretical study

    KA Thompson and CS Fadley. X-ray photoelectron diffraction from adsorbate core levels in the energy range 500–10000 ev and with polarized radiation: a theoretical study. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena, 33(1):29–50, 1984

    1984

  19. [27]

    High-accuracy bulk electronic bandmapping with eliminated diffraction effects using hard x-ray photoelectron momentum microscopy

    S Babenkov, K Medjanik, D Vasilyev, S Chernov, C Schlueter, A Gloskovskii, Yu Matveyev, W Drube, B Sch¨ onhense, K Rossnagel, et al. High-accuracy bulk electronic bandmapping with eliminated diffraction effects using hard x-ray photoelectron momentum microscopy. Commu- nicatio...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Momentum-transfer model of valence-band photoelectron diffraction

    Gerd Sch¨ onhense, K Medjanik, S Babenkov, D Vasilyev, M Ellguth, O Fedchenko, S Cher- nov, B Sch¨ onhense, and H-J Elmers. Momentum-transfer model of valence-band photoelectron diffraction. Communications Physics, 3(1):45, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Probing bulk electronic structure with hard x-ray angle- resolved photoemission

    AX Gray, C Papp, Shigenori Ueda, B Balke, Y Yamashita, L Plucinski, J Min´ ar, J Braun, ER Ylvisaker, CM Schneider, et al. Probing bulk electronic structure with hard x-ray angle- resolved photoemission. Nature materials, 10(10):759–764, 2011

    2011

  22. [30]

    Bulk electronic structure of the dilute magnetic semiconductor ga1- x mn x as through hard x-ray angle-resolved photoemission

    AX Gray, Jan Minar, S Ueda, PR Stone, Y Yamashita, J Fujii, J Braun, L Plucinski, CM Schnei- der, G Panaccione, et al. Bulk electronic structure of the dilute magnetic semiconductor ga1- x mn x as through hard x-ray angle-resolved photoemission. Nature materials, 11(11):957–962, 2012

    2012

  23. [31]

    Hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a snapshot of the state-of-the-art in 2020

    Curran Kalha, Nathalie K Fernando, Prajna Bhatt, Fredrik OL Johansson, Andreas Lindblad, H˚ akan Rensmo, Le´ on Zendejas Medina, Rebecka Lindblad, Sebastian Siol, Lars PH Jeurgens, et al. Hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a snapshot of the state-of-the-art in 2020. Journa...

    2020

  24. [32]

    Elec- tronic structure of a graphene-like artificial crystal of ndnio3

    Arian Arab, Xiaoran Liu, Okan K¨ oksal, Weibing Yang, Ravini U Chandrasena, Srimanta Mid- dey, Mikhail Kareev, Siddharth Kumar, Marius-Adrian Husanu, Zhenzhong Yang, et al. Elec- tronic structure of a graphene-like artificial crystal of ndnio3. Nano letters, 19(11):8311–8317, 2019. 19

    2019

  25. [33]

    Momentum-resolved electronic structure at a buried interface from soft x-ray standing-wave angle-resolved photoemission

    AX Gray, J Min´ ar, L Plucinski, Mark Huijben, A Bostwick, E Rotenberg, S-H Yang, J Braun, A Winkelmann, G Conti, et al. Momentum-resolved electronic structure at a buried interface from soft x-ray standing-wave angle-resolved photoemission. Europhysics letters, 104(1):17004, 2013

    2013

  26. [34]

    X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Progress and perspectives

    Charles S Fadley. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Progress and perspectives. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 178:2–32, 2010

    2010

  27. [35]

    Some future perspectives in soft-and hard-x-ray pho- toemission

    Charles S Fadley and Slavomir Nemˇ s´ ak. Some future perspectives in soft-and hard-x-ray pho- toemission. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena , 195:409–422, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Influence of localized inelastic scattering on kikuchi bands in photoelectron diffraction patterns

    Aimo Winkelmann. Influence of localized inelastic scattering on kikuchi bands in photoelectron diffraction patterns. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena , 195:361–364, 2014

    2014

  29. [37]

    High-energy photoelectron diffraction: model calculations and future possibilities

    Aimo Winkelmann, Charles S Fadley, and F Javier Garcia de Abajo. High-energy photoelectron diffraction: model calculations and future possibilities. New Journal of Physics , 10(11):113002, 2008

    2008

  30. [38]

    Photoelectron diffraction and holographic reconstruction of graphite

    Fumihiko Matsui, Tomohiro Matsushita, and Hiroshi Daimon. Photoelectron diffraction and holographic reconstruction of graphite. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 81(11):114604, 2012

    2012

  31. [39]

    Energy dependence of interference phenomena in the forward-scattering regime of photoelectron diffraction

    Sylvain Tricot, Thomas Jaouen, D S´ ebilleau, and Philippe Schieffer. Energy dependence of interference phenomena in the forward-scattering regime of photoelectron diffraction. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 256:147176, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths

    Shigeo Tanuma, CJ Powell, and DR Penn. Calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths. ix. data for 41 elemental solids over the 50 ev to 30 kev range. Surface and interface analysis , 43(3):689–713, 2011

    2011

  33. [41]

    Strong circular dichroism in photoelectron diffraction from nonchiral, nonmagnetic material–direct observation of rotational motion of electrons

    Hiroshi Daimon, Takeshi Nakatani, Shin Imada, Shigemasa Suga, Yasushi Kagoshima, and Tsuneaki Miyahara. Strong circular dichroism in photoelectron diffraction from nonchiral, nonmagnetic material–direct observation of rotational motion of electrons. Japanese journal of applied...

    1993

  34. [42]

    Circular dichroism in the angular distribution of core photoelectrons from si (001): A photoelectron- diffraction analysis

    AP Kaduwela, H Xiao, Suntharampillai Thevuthasan, CS Fadley, and MA Van Hove. Circular dichroism in the angular distribution of core photoelectrons from si (001): A photoelectron- diffraction analysis. Physical Review B, 52(20):14927, 1995

    1995

  35. [43]

    Photoelectron holography with improved image reconstruction

    Tomohiro Matsushita, Fumihiko Matsui, Hiroshi Daimon, and Kouichi Hayashi. Photoelectron holography with improved image reconstruction. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 178:195–220, 2010

    2010

  36. [44]

    Kikuchi-band analysis of x-ray photoelectron diffraction fine structure 20 of si (100) by precise angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

    Toshiharu Katayama, Hidekazu Yamamoto, Yoji Mashiko, Hiroshi Koyama, Satoru Kawazu, and Masataka Umeno. Kikuchi-band analysis of x-ray photoelectron diffraction fine structure 20 of si (100) by precise angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Japanese journal of applie...

    1999

  37. [45]

    Three-dimensional atomic-image reconstruction from a single-energy si (0 0 1) photoelectron hologram

    T Matsushita, A Agui, and A Yoshigoe. Three-dimensional atomic-image reconstruction from a single-energy si (0 0 1) photoelectron hologram. Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena, 144:1175–1177, 2005

    2005

  38. [46]

    Calculating condensed matter proper- ties using the kkr-green’s function method—recent developments and applications

    Hubert Ebert, Diemo Koedderitzsch, and Jan Minar. Calculating condensed matter proper- ties using the kkr-green’s function method—recent developments and applications. Reports on Progress in Physics, 74(9):096501, 2011

    2011

  39. [47]

    The munich spr-kkr package, version 8.5, 2022

    H Ebert et al. The munich spr-kkr package, version 8.5, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    R.W.G. Wyckoff. Crystal Structures. Number v. 1 in Crystal Structures. Interscience Publishers,

  41. [49]

    Correlation, temperature and disorder: Recent developments in the one-step description of angle-resolved photoemission

    J¨ urgen Braun, J´ an Min´ ar, and Hubert Ebert. Correlation, temperature and disorder: Recent developments in the one-step description of angle-resolved photoemission. Physics Reports, 740: 1–34, 2018

    2018

  42. [50]

    Low-energy electron diffraction

    John Brian Pendry. Low-energy electron diffraction. In Interaction of Atoms and Molecules with Solid Surfaces , pages 201–211. Springer, 1974

    1974

  43. [51]

    Theory of photoemission

    JB Pendry. Theory of photoemission. Surface Science, 57(2):679–705, 1976

    1976

  44. [52]

    Calculation of photoemission spectra for surfaces of solids

    JFL Hopkinson, JB Pendry, and DJ Titterington. Calculation of photoemission spectra for surfaces of solids. Computer Physics Communications , 19(1):69–92, 1980

    1980

  45. [53]

    Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy

    Juraj Krempask` y, LˇSmejkal, SW D’souza, M Hajlaoui, G Springholz, K Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F Alarab, PC Constantinou, V Strocov, D Usanov, et al. Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy. Nature, 626(7999):517–522, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    High-energy photoemission final states beyond the free-electron approximation

    Vladimir N Strocov, LL Lev, Fatima Alarab, Procopios Constantinou, X Wang, T Schmitt, TJZ Stock, L Nicola¨ ı, J Oˇ cen´ aˇ sek, and J Min´ ar. High-energy photoemission final states beyond the free-electron approximation. Nature Communications, 14(1):4827, 2023

    2023

  47. [55]

    Large magnetic gap at the dirac point in bi2te3/mnbi2te4 heterostructures

    Emile DL Rienks, Sebastian Wimmer, Jaime S´ anchez-Barriga, Ondˇ rej Caha, Partha Sarathi Mandal, et al. Large magnetic gap at the dirac point in bi2te3/mnbi2te4 heterostructures. Nature, 576(7787):423–428, 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    Emergence of a bandgap in nano-scale graphite: A computational and experimental study

    Sujinda Chaiyachad, Trung-Phuc Vo, Sirisak Singsen, Tanachat Eknapakul, Warakorn Jindata, Chutchawan Jaisuk, Patrick Le Fevre, Francois Bertran, Donghui Lu, Yaobo Huang, et al. Emergence of a bandgap in nano-scale graphite: A computational and experimental study. arXiv preprin...

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Entanglement and ma- nipulation of the magnetic and spin–orbit order in multiferroic rashba semiconductors

    J´ ulius Krempask` y, Stefan Muff, Federico Bisti, Mauro Fanciulli, Henrieta Volfov´ a, Andreas P Weber, Nicolas Pilet, Peter Warnicke, Hubert Ebert, J Braun, et al. Entanglement and ma- nipulation of the magnetic and spin–orbit order in multiferroic rashba semiconductors. Nat...

    2016

  50. [58]

    Operando imaging of all-electric spin texture manipulation in ferroelectric and multiferroic rashba semi- conductors

    Juraj Krempask` y, Stefan Muff, Jan Minar, Nicolas Pilet, Mauro Fanciulli, AP Weber, Ed- uardo B Guedes, Marco Caputo, Elisabeth M¨ uller, Valentine V Volobuev, et al. Operando imaging of all-electric spin texture manipulation in ferroelectric and multiferroic rashba semi- con...

    2018

  51. [59]

    Revealing hidden orbital pseudospin texture with time-reversal dichroism in photoelectron angular distributions

    Samuel Beaulieu, Jakub Schusser, Shuo Dong, Michael Sch¨ uler, Tommaso Pincelli, Maciej Dendzik, Julian Maklar, Alexander Neef, Hubert Ebert, Karol Hricovini, et al. Revealing hidden orbital pseudospin texture with time-reversal dichroism in photoelectron angular distributions...

    2020

  52. [60]

    Theoretical aspects of photoemission: New results

    G Borstel. Theoretical aspects of photoemission: New results. Applied Physics A , 38:193–204, 1985

    1985

  53. [61]

    Necessity of self-energy corrections in leed theory for xe (111): Comparison between theoretical and experimental spin-polarized leed data

    G Hilgers, M Potthoff, Norbert M¨ uller, Ulrich Heinzmann, L Haunert, J Braun, and G Borstel. Necessity of self-energy corrections in leed theory for xe (111): Comparison between theoretical and experimental spin-polarized leed data. Physical Review B, 52(20):14859, 1995

    1995

  54. [62]

    Medjanik, O

    K. Medjanik, O. Fedchenko, S. Chernov, D. Kutnyakhov, M. Ellguth, A. Oelsner, B. Sch¨ onhense, T. R. F. Peixoto, P. Lutz, C.-H. Min, F. Reinert, S. D¨ aster, Y. Acremann, J. Viefhaus, W. Wurth, H. J. Elmers, and G. Sch¨ onhense. Direct 3d mapping of the fermi surface and fermi...

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    Schlueter, A

    C. Schlueter, A. Gloskovskii, K. Ederer, I. Schostak, S. Piec, I. Sarkar, Yu. Matveyev, P. L¨ omker, M. Sing, R. Claessen, C. Wiemann, C. M. Schneider, K. Medjanik, G. Sch¨ onhense, P. Amann, A. Nilsson, and W. Drube. The new dedicated HAXPES beamline p22 at PETRAIII. In AIP C...

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    Medjanik, S

    K. Medjanik, S. V. Babenkov, S. Chernov, D. Vasilyev, B. Sch¨ onhense, C. Schlueter, A. Gloskovskii, Yu. Matveyev, W. Drube, H. J. Elmers, and G. Sch¨ onhense. Progress in HAX- PES performance combining full-field momentum-imaging with time-of-flight recording.Journal of Synch...

    1996 doi

  57. [66]

    Circular dichroism in the angular distribution of photoelectrons from oriented co molecules

    C Westphal, J Bansmann, M Getzlaff, and G Sch¨ onhense. Circular dichroism in the angular distribution of photoelectrons from oriented co molecules. Physical review letters , 63(2):151, 1989. 22

    1989

  58. [67]

    Circular dichroism and spin polarization in photoemission from adsorbates and non-magnetic solids

    Gerd Sch¨ onhense. Circular dichroism and spin polarization in photoemission from adsorbates and non-magnetic solids. Physica Scripta, 1990(T31):255, 1990

    1990

  59. [68]

    Circular dichroism in photoemission from oriented molecules at surfaces

    C Westphal, J Bansmann, M Getzlaff, G Sch¨ onhense, NA Cherepkov, M Braunstem, V McKoy, and RL Dubs. Circular dichroism in photoemission from oriented molecules at surfaces. Surface science, 253(1-3):205–219, 1991

    1991

  60. [69]

    Ori- entation and substrate interaction of adsorbed co and no molecules probed by circular dichroism in the angular distribution of photoelectrons

    C Westphal, F Fegel, J Bansmann, M Getzlaff, G Sch¨ onhense, JA Stephens, and V McKoy. Ori- entation and substrate interaction of adsorbed co and no molecules probed by circular dichroism in the angular distribution of photoelectrons. Physical Review B, 50(23):17534, 1994

    1994

  61. [70]

    The solid surface as origin of circular dichroism in the angular distribution of photoelectrons from spherical states of adsorbates

    GH Fecher. The solid surface as origin of circular dichroism in the angular distribution of photoelectrons from spherical states of adsorbates. Europhysics Letters, 29(8):605, 1995

    1995

  62. [71]

    Circular dichroism in photoemission from surfaces

    G Sch¨ onhense, C Westphal, J Bansmann, M Getzlaff, J Noffke, and L Fritsche. Circular dichroism in photoemission from surfaces. Surface science, 251:132–135, 1991

    1991

  63. [72]

    Circular dichroism in photoemission from nonmagnetic, low-z solids: a conspicuous effect of the photon spin

    G Sch¨ onhense, C Westphal, J Bansmann, and M Getzlaff. Circular dichroism in photoemission from nonmagnetic, low-z solids: a conspicuous effect of the photon spin. Europhysics Letters, 17(8):727, 1992

    1992

  64. [73]

    Origin of spin-polarized photocurrents in the topological surface states of bi 2 se 3

    AS Ketterl, Sebastian Otto, M Bastian, Beatrice Andres, Cornelius Gahl, Jan Min´ ar, Hubert Ebert, J¨ urgen Braun, Oleg Evgenievich Tereshchenko, Konstantin A Kokh, et al. Origin of spin-polarized photocurrents in the topological surface states of bi 2 se 3. Physical Review B ...

    2018

  65. [74]

    Bi ultra-thin crystalline films on inas (1 1 1) a and b substrates: A combined core-level and valence-band angle-resolved and dichroic photoemission study

    L Nicola¨ ı, JM Mariot, U Djukic, W Wang, O Heckmann, MC Richter, J Kanski, M Leandersson, T Balasubramanian, Janusz Sadowski, et al. Bi ultra-thin crystalline films on inas (1 1 1) a and b substrates: A combined core-level and valence-band angle-resolved and dichroic photoemi...

    2019

  66. [75]

    Structure analysis using time-of- flight momentum microscopy with hard x-rays: status and prospects

    Olena Fedchenko, Aimo Winkelmann, and Gerd Sch¨ onhense. Structure analysis using time-of- flight momentum microscopy with hard x-rays: status and prospects. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 91(9):091006, 2022

    2022

  67. [76]

    Zur systematik der r¨ ontgenreflexe eines raumgitters

    W Kossel. Zur systematik der r¨ ontgenreflexe eines raumgitters. Annalen der Physik , 417(6): 512–526, 1936

    1936

  68. [77]

    Structure of materials: an introduction to crystallog- raphy, diffraction and symmetry

    Marc De Graef and Michael E McHenry. Structure of materials: an introduction to crystallog- raphy, diffraction and symmetry . Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  69. [78]

    Constraints on the effective electron energy spectrum in backscatter kikuchi diffraction

    Aimo Winkelmann, T Ben Britton, and Gert Nolze. Constraints on the effective electron energy spectrum in backscatter kikuchi diffraction. Physical review B, 99(6):064115, 2019

    2019

  70. [79]

    Digital direct electron imaging of energy-filtered electron backscatter diffraction patterns

    S Vespucci, A Winkelmann, G Naresh-Kumar, KP Mingard, D Maneuski, PR Edwards, AP Day, V O’Shea, and C Trager-Cowan. Digital direct electron imaging of energy-filtered electron backscatter diffraction patterns. Physical Review B, 92(20):205301, 2015. 23

    2015

  71. [80]

    Many-beam dynamical simulation of electron backscatter diffraction patterns

    Aimo Winkelmann, Carol Trager-Cowan, Francis Sweeney, Austin P Day, and Peter Parbrook. Many-beam dynamical simulation of electron backscatter diffraction patterns. Ultramicroscopy, 107(4-5):414–421, 2007

    2007

  72. [81]

    Inelastic photoelectron diffraction

    GS Herman and CS Fadley. Inelastic photoelectron diffraction. Physical Review B, 43(8):6792, 1991

    1991

  73. [82]

    Simulation of kinematic kikuchi diffraction patterns from atomistic structures

    Adam D Herron, Shawn P Coleman, Khanh Q Dang, Douglas E Spearot, and Eric R Homer. Simulation of kinematic kikuchi diffraction patterns from atomistic structures. MethodsX, 5: 1187–1203, 2018

    2018

  74. [83]

    Band map- ping in higher-energy x-ray photoemission: Phonon effects and comparison to one-step theory

    L Plucinski, J Min´ ar, BC Sell, J Braun, H Ebert, CM Schneider, and CS Fadley. Band map- ping in higher-energy x-ray photoemission: Phonon effects and comparison to one-step theory. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 78(3):035108, 2008

    2008

  75. [84]

    Band mapping in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: An experimental and theoretical study of w (110) with 1.25 kev excitation

    C Papp, L Plucinski, J Minar, J Braun, H Ebert, CM Schneider, and CS Fadley. Band mapping in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: An experimental and theoretical study of w (110) with 1.25 kev excitation. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 84(4):045433, 2011

    2011

  76. [85]

    Exploring the xps limit in soft and hard x-ray angle-resolved photoe- mission using a temperature-dependent one-step theory

    J Braun, J Min´ ar, S Mankovsky, VN Strocov, NB Brookes, L Plucinski, CM Schneider, CS Fadley, and H Ebert. Exploring the xps limit in soft and hard x-ray angle-resolved photoe- mission using a temperature-dependent one-step theory. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Mater...

    2013

  77. [86]

    Principles of depth-resolved kikuchi pattern simulation for electron backscatter diffraction

    Aimo Winkelmann. Principles of depth-resolved kikuchi pattern simulation for electron backscatter diffraction. Journal of Microscopy, 239(1):32–45, 2010

    2010

  78. [87]

    Electron energy loss and diffraction of backscattered electrons from silicon

    Aimo Winkelmann, Koceila Aizel, and Maarten Vos. Electron energy loss and diffraction of backscattered electrons from silicon. New Journal of Physics , 12(5):053001, 2010

    2010

  79. [88]

    Atomic and solid-state effects in the angle resolved photoemission cross section from an adsorbate: 4d levels of c (2 × 2) te on ni

    IT McGovern, W Eberhardt, and EW Plummer. Atomic and solid-state effects in the angle resolved photoemission cross section from an adsorbate: 4d levels of c (2 × 2) te on ni. Solid State Communications, 32(11):963–966, 1979

    1979

  80. [89]

    On the importance of atomic effects in photoemission from the te adsorbed on ni

    G¨ oran Wendin. On the importance of atomic effects in photoemission from the te adsorbed on ni. Solid State Communications , 38(3):197–200, 1981

    1981

  81. [90]

    Putting error bars on density functional theory

    Simuck F Yuk, Irmak Sargin, Noah Meyer, Jaron T Krogel, Scott P Beckman, and Valentino R Cooper. Putting error bars on density functional theory. Scientific Reports, 14(1):20219, 2024

    2024

  82. [91]

    Multiple-scattering formalism for correlated systems: A kkr-dmft approach

    Jan Minar, Liviu Chioncel, Alexander Perlov, Hubertus Ebert, MI Katsnelson, and AI Licht- enstein. Multiple-scattering formalism for correlated systems: A kkr-dmft approach. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 72(4):045125, 2005

    2005

  83. [92]

    Elastic strain at pseudomorphic semiconductor heterojunctions studied by x-ray photoelectron diffraction: Ge/si (001) and si/ge (001)

    SA Chambers and VA Loebs. Elastic strain at pseudomorphic semiconductor heterojunctions studied by x-ray photoelectron diffraction: Ge/si (001) and si/ge (001). Physical Review B, 42 (8):5109, 1990. 24

    1990

  84. [93]

    Hybrid photoelectron momentum microscope at the soft x-ray beamline i09 of the diamond light source

    Matthias Schmitt, Deepnarayan Biswas, Olena Tkach, Olena Fedchenko, Jieyi Liu, Hans- Joachim Elmers, Michael Sing, Ralph Claessen, Tien-Lin Lee, and Gerd Sch¨ onhense. Hybrid photoelectron momentum microscope at the soft x-ray beamline i09 of the diamond light source. arXiv pr...

    2024 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Ultrafast electronic linewidth broadening in the c 1 s core level of graphene

    Davide Curcio, Sahar Pakdel, Klara Volckaert, Jill A Miwa, Søren Ulstrup, Nicola Lanat` a, Marco Bianchi, Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Federico Pressacco, G¨ unter Brenner, et al. Ultrafast electronic linewidth broadening in the c 1 s core level of graphene. Physical Review B, 104(16): ...

    2021

  86. [95]

    Access to phases of coherent phonon excitations by femtosecond ultraviolet photoelectron diffraction

    Michael Greif, Lamia Kasmi, Luca Castiglioni, Matteo Lucchini, Lukas Gallmann, Ursula Keller, J¨ urg Osterwalder, and Matthias Hengsberger. Access to phases of coherent phonon excitations by femtosecond ultraviolet photoelectron diffraction. Physical Review B, 94(5):054309, 2016

    2016

  87. [96]

    Time-resolved x-ray photoelectron diffraction using an angle-resolved time-of- flight electron analyzer

    Artoni Kevin R Ang, Yuichiro Fukatsu, Koji Kimura, Yuta Yamamoto, Takahiro Yonezawa, Hirokazu Nitta, Antoine Fleurence, Susumu Yamamoto, Iwao Matsuda, Yukiko Yamada- Takamura, et al. Time-resolved x-ray photoelectron diffraction using an angle-resolved time-of- flight electron...

    2020

  88. [1963]

    URL https://books.google.cz/books?id=40uGpwAACAAJ

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.