Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Does Your Blockchain Need Multidimensional Transaction Fees?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.15438 v1 pith:CUZFQK3A submitted 2025-04-21 cs.GT econ.TH

classification cs.GTecon.TH
keywords alphaadditionalmultidimensionalapproximationfeesthroughputblock-sizeblockchain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Blockchains have block-size limits to ensure the entire cluster can keep up with the tip of the chain. These block-size limits are usually single-dimensional, but richer multidimensional constraints allow for greater throughput. The potential for performance improvements from multidimensional resource pricing has been discussed in the literature, but exactly how big those performance improvements are remains unclear. In order to identify the magnitude of additional throughput that multi-dimensional transaction fees can unlock, we introduce the concept of an $\alpha$-approximation. A constraint set $C_1$ is $\alpha$-approximated by $C_2$ if every block feasible under $C_1$ is also feasible under $C_2$ once all resource capacities are scaled by a factor of $\alpha$ (e.g., $\alpha =2$ corresponds to doubling all available resources). We show that the $\alpha$-approximation of the optimal single-dimensional gas measure corresponds to the value of a specific zero-sum game. However, the more general problem of finding the optimal $k$-dimensional approximation is NP-complete. Quantifying the additional throughput that multi-dimensional fees can provide allows blockchain designers to make informed decisions about whether the additional capacity unlocked by multidimensional constraints is worth the additional complexity they add to the protocol.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. One-dimensional vs. Multi-dimensional Pricing in Blockchain Protocols

    cs.GT 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper argues multidimensional fee pricing beats one-dimensional pricing in stable states but is slower and harder in transitions; the welfare proof and the convergence proof both have invalid steps.

Pith tools