Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 47 references

A diagrammatic approach to correlation functions in superfluids

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives two coupled Dyson-like equations for the phonon and density-fluctuation propagators, and shows they give a recursive, arbitrary-order scheme for correlation functions in homogeneous and inhomogeneous superfluids.

desk verdict Correct Gaussian path integral and known acoustic-metric results, but the central radial-propagator Dyson equation (51) is inconsistent with the generating functional, so the arbitrary-order scheme needs a fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15648 v1 pith:LO6XQSDC submitted 2025-04-22 cond-mat.quant-gas hep-ph

Alessia Biondi , Maria Luisa Chiofalo , Massimo Mannarelli , Silvia Trabucco This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gashep-ph
keywords two-pointcorrelationfunctionssuperfluidseffectivefieldtheoryphononpropagatorDyson-likeequationsinhomogeneousbackgroundsacoustichorizonpathintegral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a path-integral, diagrammatic method for computing two-point correlation functions in weakly interacting superfluids, covering both the non-relativistic cold-atom case and the relativistic case relevant to compact stars. The central claim is that the full correlation functions of the phonon and of the radial density-fluctuation field satisfy two coupled Dyson-like equations, which can be expanded systematically in powers of momentum over the radial-field mass. In the low-energy (ultrasoft) limit this reproduces phonons propagating on an emergent acoustic metric; in the soft limit it captures the leading phonon corrections to density correlations. For inhomogeneous backgrounds, the same equations are combined with an epsilon expansion in the space-time modulation of the speed of sound, yielding a double expansion that the authors argue reaches arbitrary accuracy. The motivation is to compute the imprint of an acoustic horizon, and the Hawking-like phonon emission associated with it, on density-density correlations, a signal previously seen numerically and in cold-atom experiments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coupled pair of Dyson-like equations, Eq. (50) for the full phonon propagator $G$ and Eq. (51) for the full radial-field propagator $D$, with bare propagators $G_0$, $D_0$ and derivative vertices $\partial_L = (V^\mu/\rho_0)\partial_\mu$ that mix the two fields. The phonon-pole dominance rule, namely that leading momentum corrections come from phonon poles rather than radial-field poles, organizes the recursive momentum expansion; an epsilon expansion in the sound-speed modulation extends the same machinery to inhomogeneous backgrounds.

What would settle it

Evaluate the leading-order epsilon-corrected correlation functions for a smooth, small-amplitude sound-speed step in a transonic flow and compare them with a full numerical solution of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation; if the expansion does not reproduce the numerically and experimentally observed density-density correlation signal across the acoustic horizon at the claimed order, the arbitrary-accuracy claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the two-point functions of a weakly interacting superfluid can be organized as a closed pair of Dyson-like equations (Eqs. (50) and (51)): one for the full phonon propagator $G(x,y)$ and one for the full radial-field propagator $D(x,y)$, coupled through derivative vertices. These equations follow exactly at quadratic order once both fluctuations are integrated out of the Madelung-representation partition function. They can be solved recursively in the momentum expansion because of phonon-pole dominance: at each order the leading contributions come from phonon propagator poles, so that the phonon correlator at order $n$ determines the density-density correlator at order $n+1$, and so on. In the ultrasoft limit the infinite sum of equal-order diagrams produces the acoustic phonon propagator on an emergent relativistic acoustic metric; in the soft limit the leading density correlation is expressed through derivatives of the acoustic phonon propagator. When the sound speed is modulated, treating the modulation as a small perturbation $\epsilon$ converts the same two equations into a double expansion in momenta and $\epsilon$, which the authors present as the systematic route to the correlation functions of an inhomogeneous superfluid.

Load-bearing premise

The double expansion assumes that the inhomogeneity is small and separable: only the speed of sound, equivalently the radial-field mass, varies to first order in epsilon, while the background density stays homogeneous and the healing length is treated as uniform; near a sonic horizon that assumption can fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the ultrasoft limit the density-density correlation function is insensitive to phonons and decays exponentially with distance on the scale of the healing length; it diverges as the radial-field mass vanishes, signalling the second-order phase transition.
  • The phonon two-point function computed at $n$th order in the momentum expansion determines the density-density correlation function at $(n+1)$th order, and vice versa, making the computation recursive.
  • The emergent acoustic metric is not put in by hand: it arises from summing an infinite series of equal-order Feynman diagrams in the phonon self-energy.
  • For inhomogeneous backgrounds, the same Dyson equations combined with the epsilon expansion determine how a modulated speed of sound changes the correlation functions, providing a route to the Hawking-radiation imprint on density-density correlations in a transonic flow.
  • Because the formalism is covariant and its non-relativistic limit matches the Gross-Pitaevskii model, the same equations apply both to cold-atom superfluids and to relativistic superfluids in compact stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same Dyson structure could be extended to higher-order correlation functions by restoring interaction vertices; the phonon-pole dominance rule would likely organize that expansion as well.
  • Editorial inference: the dimensional reduction in Appendix A makes the method directly applicable to quasi-1D elongated traps, so a concrete experimental test could be designed by measuring density-density correlations in an optical-box or Feshbach-tuned gas with a controlled sound-speed modulation.
  • Editorial inference: since the formalism is fully covariant, the same equations should transfer to relativistic superfluid interiors of neutron stars, where they could feed calculations of transport properties rather than directly observable correlations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a Gaussian effective field theory for the low-energy excitations of weakly interacting bosonic superfluids, using the Madelung representation and a relativistic U(1) Lagrangian. The authors integrate out the radial (density) fluctuations to obtain a generating functional W[J] for the phonon and radial two-point functions, and from it they derive a pair of coupled Dyson-like equations (Eqs. (50) and (51)). They evaluate the correlation functions in the ultrasoft and soft limits, recovering the acoustic-metric phonon propagator and the exponentially decaying density-density correlator with correlation length set by the inverse radial mass. They then propose a double expansion in momenta and in a small parameter ϵ that encodes spatial modulations of the speed of sound, claiming that this gives a recursive method to compute two-point functions to arbitrary order, with applications to analogue gravity and inhomogeneous superfluids.

Significance. If the central equations were correct, the paper would provide a systematic and elegant diagrammatic scheme for two-point functions in inhomogeneous superfluids, going beyond the usual hydrodynamic approximation and connecting to the analogue-gravity program of R. Parentani. The derivation of the phonon Dyson equation (50) is exact, the resummation leading to the acoustic metric is physically transparent, and the explicit ultrasoft correlation functions (Eqs. (56)-(57)) match the expected Bessel-function decay. The paper is clearly written and the Feynman-diagram representation in Fig. 2 is helpful. However, the companion Dyson equation for the radial propagator, Eq. (51), is not obtained from W[J] and disagrees with the exact Gaussian result at second order; this is a load-bearing error for the claimed arbitrary-order recursion. The leading-order results and the phonon equation appear sound, but the central claim needs substantive revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (51)] Equation (51) is not a consequence of the generating functional W[J] derived in Eq. (48). Functional differentiation with respect to Jρ yields D(x,y) = D0(x,y) + [∂_x^L D0(x,·)] G(·,·) [∂_y^L D0(·,y)], with the bare propagator D0 on both sides of the phonon propagator, not the Dyson equation D = D0 + D0(∂∂G)D stated in Eq. (51). In momentum space, the exact inverse of the 2x2 Gaussian kernel in Eq. (27) gives D_exact = p²/[p²(p²−m̃²)−x] with x=(a·p)², whereas solving Eq. (51) with G from Eq. (50) gives D_51 = [p²(p²−m̃²)−x]/[(p²−m̃²)(p²(p²−m̃²)−2x)]. These agree to first order in x but differ at second order; for example, for p0=2, p=1, m̃=2, a·p=1 one obtains D_exact = −0.75 and D_51 = −0.8. Since the paper's central claim is that the coupled system (50)–(51) allows computation of correlation functions at any desired order, this inconsistency invalidates the recursive scheme for the radial propagator beyond leading order. The paper's own soft-limit result in Eq. (58) uses the correct D0-on-both-sides structure, indicating that Eq. (51) is a mis-stated resummation.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (67)–(68)] The first-order inhomogeneous corrections are derived from the incorrect Eq. (51) and therefore inherit its error. Varying the correct expression D = D0 + (∂_L D0)G(∂_L D0) with respect to the perturbation gives δD = D0I + (∂_L D0I)G(∂_L D0) + (∂_L D0)G(∂_L D0I) + (∂_L D0)G_I(∂_L D0), with D0 appearing on both sides of the phonon Green's functions. Instead, Eq. (68) mixes the full D on the right-hand side and is not a consistent first-order expansion in ϵ. The proposed double expansion in momenta and ϵ, advertised as delivering arbitrary accuracy for inhomogeneous superfluids, therefore lacks a valid foundation until Eq. (51) and the equations derived from it are corrected.
  3. [Secs. 2.2 and 5] The claimed applicability to sonic horizons is not supported by the stated assumptions. The perturbative scheme requires the space modulation to be small (ϵ≪1) and the background density ρ0 to be homogeneous (Sec. 2.2), and the paper explicitly neglects the spatial variation of the healing length. Near a sonic horizon the sound speed varies by an amount comparable to the flow velocity, so the small-modulation assumption fails, and the variation of ρ0 and of the healing length are physically important. The concluding statement that the method 'should allow to perturbatively determine the effect of the sonic horizon' on the density-density correlation function is therefore premature. This does not invalidate the method for small modulations, but the scope should be restated as restricted to weak inhomogeneities rather than as a general route to horizon physics.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Page 1] The manuscript still carries the label 'This article is a draft (not yet accepted!)'; this should be removed before submission.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (56)–(57)] The quantity D0(x,0) evaluated in Eq. (57) is the bare Green's function, not the physical correlation function ⟨ρ̃ρ̃⟩, which carries an additional factor of −i as used in Eq. (59); the text should distinguish the two consistently.
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (54)] The derivation of the acoustic-metric propagator Eq. (54) from the Dyson equation (50) is only sketched; since this is a known central result, the authors should show the resummation explicitly or provide a reference for the intermediate steps.
  4. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (52)] The notation p² is used both for the Lorentz-invariant combination p_μp^μ and for the spatial momentum squared; this is a source of confusion and should be disambiguated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the correlation-function equations are constructed from a Gaussian path integral, with self-citations providing background only.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the U(1) Lagrangian in the Madelung representation, integrates out the radial and phonon fields in the quadratic action, and obtains the generating functional W[J] in Eq. (48). The Dyson-like system (50)-(51) is presented as following from this W[J] by functional differentiation and as a recursive bookkeeping device; no quantity is fitted to data and no input is renamed as a prediction. The acoustic-metric propagator (54) and the exponential decay D0 ~ K0(|x| m-tilde) are benchmarked against standard external results ([38], [43], [44] and the explicit integral (56)-(57)), so the central claims do not reduce to self-citations. Self-citations ([17]-[21], [30], [45]) supply background, prior applications, and a gauge-transformation detail for Eq. (14), but none of these carries the central derivation. The skeptical concern that Eq. (51) does not follow from Eq. (48) is an internal-correctness issue, not a circularity; likewise, the approximation of small inhomogeneity in Sec. 2.2 and the limitation to quadratic order in Sec. 5 are stated assumptions, not conclusions identical to their premises. Accordingly no circular step meeting the required evidence standard was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The only new object is the organizational scheme itself (phonon-pole dominance and the coupled Dyson pair), not a new physical entity. The acoustic metric is imported from prior work [38,43,44]. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Zero-temperature limit; thermal fluctuations neglected.
    Sec. 2 opening: 'We consider a boson gas that is so cold that any temperature effect is negligible.'
  • domain assumption Mean-field approximation with spontaneous U(1) breaking and a single Nambu-Goldstone phonon.
    Sec. 2: 'We describe this system using the mean-field approximation and we assume that the global U(1) symmetry... is spontaneously broken...'
  • domain assumption Scale separation with c_s < 1 and three well-separated energy scales m̃/c_s, m̃, and m̃ c_s.
    Sec. 2.2 and Fig. 1: 'for c_s < 1, we can distinguish three energy scales...' This underpins the momentum expansion of Secs. 4.1 and 4.2.
  • ad hoc to paper Background density ρ0 is homogeneous and only the speed of sound (radial mass m̃) varies in space.
    Sec. 2.2: 'for simplicity we will assume that also in the relativistic case the only inhomogeneous background quantity is the speed of sound, or equivalently, the ρ̃ mass, while ρ0 is homogeneous.'
  • ad hoc to paper The space modulation of the background is small (proportional to ϵ), enabling perturbation theory.
    Sec. 4.3: 'where ϵ is a perturbative parameter...'; this is what makes the double expansion valid.
  • domain assumption In the ultrasoft limit the bare radial propagator can be approximated by a delta function divided by m̃².
    Sec. 4.1, Eq. (53): D0 = δ/m̃² for momenta k ≪ m̃; standard EFT decoupling of a massive mode.
  • standard math Standard Gaussian functional integration and iϵ Feynman propagator prescriptions.
    Sec. 3, Eqs. (26)-(56); no nonstandard mathematical tools are introduced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A diagrammatic approach to correlation functions in superfluids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LO6XQSDC

@misc{pith2026250415648,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A diagrammatic approach to correlation functions in superfluids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LO6XQSDC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15648}
}
read the original abstract

Renaud Parentani has given a vast contribution to the development of gravitational analogue models as tools to explore various important aspects of general relativity and of quantum field theory in curved space-time. In these systems, two-point correlation functions are of the utmost importance for the characterization of processes taking place close to the acoustic horizon. In the present paper, dedicated to him, we present a study of path integral methods that allow to determine two-point correlation functions by a perturbative expansion, in a way that -- beyond its generality -- is especially suited to analyze these processes. Our results apply to non-relativistic superfluids, realizable in terrestrial experiments, as well as to relativistic superfluids, relevant for compact stellar objects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15648 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the scale separation between ultrasoft, soft and hard scales. Spatial momentum (bottom axis) and phonon energy (top axis) characterizing the different scales are reported in terms of the bare boson mass, m, the effective mass of the radial field fluctuation, m˜ , and the adiabatic speed of sound, cs , see the main text for more details. The ultrasoft theory is equivalent to the hydrodynam… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Feynman diagram representation of the Dyson-like equations (50) (top) and (51) (bottom). Thick double (solid or dashed) lines correspond to full propagators, while thin (solid or dashed) lines to bare propagators. The phonon propagators are represented by dashed lines, while ρ˜ propagators by solid lines. The vertices are the derivative operators defined in Eq. (28). where for the sake of notation we assume that the… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical physics. Pt.1, Pt.2, Pergamon Press, 1980

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    I. M. Khalatnikov, Introduction to the theory of superfluidity, 1965

    work page 1965

  3. [3]

    Bose-Einstein Condensation and Liquid Helium

    O. Penrose, L. Onsager, “Bose-Einstein Condensation and Liquid Helium”, Phys. Rev. 104 (1956), p. 576-584, https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.104.576

    doi:10.1103/physrev.104.576 1956

  4. [5]

    Effective Harmonic-Fluid Approach to Low-Energy Properties of One-Dimensional Quantum Fluids

    F . D. M. Haldane, “Effective Harmonic-Fluid Approach to Low-Energy Properties of One-Dimensional Quantum Fluids”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981), p. 1840-1843, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1840

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.47.1840 1981

  5. [6]

    Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases

    F . Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P . Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, “Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999), p. 463-512, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9806038. Alessia Biondi, Maria Luisa Chiofalo, Massimo Mannarelli and Silvia Trabucco 15

    arXiv 1999

  6. [7]

    Atomic Quantum Technologies for Quantum Matter and Fundamental Physics Applications

    J. Yago Malo, L. Lepori, L. Gentini, M. L. M. Chiofalo, “ Atomic Quantum Technologies for Quantum Matter and Fundamental Physics Applications”, Technologies 12 (2024), no. 5, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/12/5/64

    work page 2024

  7. [8]

    Sonic analog of black holes and the effects of high frequencies on black hole evaporation

    W . Unruh, “Sonic analog of black holes and the effects of high frequencies on black hole evaporation”, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995), p. 2827-2838, https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9409008

    arXiv 1995

  8. [9]

    A Primer for black hole quantum physics

    R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, P . Spindel, “A Primer for black hole quantum physics”, Phys. Rept. 260 (1995), p. 329-454, https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4345

    arXiv 1995

Show all 47 references
  1. [10]

    Computing the spectrum of black hole radiation in the presence of high frequency dispersion: An Analytical approach

    S. Corley, “Computing the spectrum of black hole radiation in the presence of high frequency dispersion: An Analytical approach”, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998), p. 6280-6291, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9710075

    1998 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Black hole radiation with high frequency dispersion

    H. Saida, M.-a. Sakagami, “Black hole radiation with high frequency dispersion”, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000), p. 084023, https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9905034

    2000 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Generalization of the model of Hawking radiation with modified high frequency dispersion relation

    Y. Himemoto, T . Tanaka, “Generalization of the model of Hawking radiation with modified high frequency dispersion relation”, in 9th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation and Relativistic Field Theories ...

    2000

  4. [13]

    On the universality of the Hawking effect

    W . G. Unruh, R. Schutzhold, “On the universality of the Hawking effect”, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005), p. 024028, https: //arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0408009

    2005 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Analogue gravity

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, M. Visser, “Analogue gravity”, Living Rev. Rel. 8 (2005), p. 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/ 0505065

    2005

  6. [15]

    Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes, short distance and back-reaction effects

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, S. Fagnocchi, R. Parentani, “Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes, short distance and back-reaction effects”, Riv. Nuovo Cim.28 (2005), no. 3, p. 1-55, https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0601079

    2005 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Analogue simulation of gravitational waves in a 3+1 dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate

    D. Hartley, T . Bravo, D. Rätzel, R. Howl, I. Fuentes, “Analogue simulation of gravitational waves in a 3+1 dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate”, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 2, p. 025011, https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01140

    2018 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Hawking temperature and phonon emission in acoustic holes

    M. Mannarelli, D. Grasso, S. Trabucco, M. L. Chiofalo, “Hawking temperature and phonon emission in acoustic holes”, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 7, p. 076001, https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00019

    2021 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Phonon emission by acoustic black holes

    M. Mannarelli, D. Grasso, S. Trabucco, M. L. Chiofalo, “Phonon emission by acoustic black holes”, (2021), https: //arxiv.org/abs/2109.11831

    2021 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Dissipative processes at the acoustic horizon

    M. Luisa Chiofalo, D. Grasso, M. Mannarelli, S. Trabucco, “Dissipative processes at the acoustic horizon”, New J. Phys. 26 (2024), no. 5, p. 053021, https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.13790

    2024 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Gravitational waves and Black Hole perturbations in acoustic analogues

    C. Coviello, M. Luisa Chiofalo, D. Grasso, S. Liberati, M. Mannarelli, S. Trabucco, “Gravitational waves and Black Hole perturbations in acoustic analogues”, AVS Quantum Sci.7 (2025), no. 1, p. 014401, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00264

    2025 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Binary superfluids: low-energy properties and dissipative processes from spontaneous emission of massive phonons

    S. Trabucco, L. Lepori, M. L. Chiofalo, M. Mannarelli, “Binary superfluids: low-energy properties and dissipative processes from spontaneous emission of massive phonons”, (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10194

    2025 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Numerical observation of Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes in atomic Bose–Einstein condensates

    I. Carusotto, S. Fagnocchi, A. Recati, R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, “Numerical observation of Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes in atomic Bose–Einstein condensates”, New J. Phys. 10 (2008), p. 103001, https://arxiv.org/abs/ 0803.0507

    2008 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole

    J. Steinhauer, “Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole”, Nature Physics 12 (2016), p. 959–965

    2016

  15. [24]

    Observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole

    J. R. Muñoz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V . I. Kolobov, J. Steinhauer, “Observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole”, Nature 569 (2019), no. 7758, p. 688-691, https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00913

    2019 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Retarded Green Functions and Modified Dispersion Relations

    D. Arteaga, R. Parentani, E. Verdaguer, “Retarded Green Functions and Modified Dispersion Relations”, Int. J. Theor . Phys. 44 (2005), p. 1665-1689

    2005

  17. [26]

    Black/White hole radiation from dispersive theories

    J. Macher, R. Parentani, “Black/White hole radiation from dispersive theories”, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009), p. 124008, https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.2224

    2009 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Hawking radiation in dispersive theories, the two regimes

    S. Finazzi, R. Parentani, “Hawking radiation in dispersive theories, the two regimes”, Physical Review D 85 (2012), no. 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.124027

    2012 doi

  19. [28]

    Phonon spectrum and correlations in a transonic flow of an atomic Bose gas

    F . Michel, J.-F . Coupechoux, R. Parentani, “Phonon spectrum and correlations in a transonic flow of an atomic Bose gas”, Physical Review D 94 (2016), no. 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084027

    2016 doi

  20. [29]

    S. L. Shapiro, S. A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact objects, 1983

    1983

  21. [30]

    Glitches in Rotating Supersolids

    E. Poli, T . Bland, S. J. M. White, M. J. Mark, F . Ferlaino, S. Trabucco, M. Mannarelli, “Glitches in Rotating Supersolids”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), no. 22, p. 223401, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09698

    2023 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Effective Field Theory

    H. Georgi, “Effective Field Theory”, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 43 (1993), no. Volume 43, 1993, p. 209-252, https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ns.43.120193.001233

    1993

  23. [32]

    Introduction to chiral perturbation theory

    S. Scherer, “Introduction to chiral perturbation theory”, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 27 (2003), p. 277, https://arxiv.org/abs/ hep-ph/0210398

    2003 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Abrikosov, L

    A. Abrikosov, L. Gorkov, I. Dzyaloshinski, R. Silverman,Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics, Dover Books on Physics, Dover Publications, 2012, https://books.google.it/books?id=JYTCAgAAQBAJ

    2012

  25. [34]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena; 4th ed

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena; 4th ed. , International series of monographs on physics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002, https://cds.cern.ch/record/572813

    2002

  26. [35]

    On How to Count Goldstone Bosons

    H. B. Nielsen, S. Chadha, “On How to Count Goldstone Bosons”, Nucl. Phys. B 105 (1976), p. 445-453. 16 Alessia Biondi, Maria Luisa Chiofalo, Massimo Mannarelli and Silvia Trabucco

    1976

  27. [36]

    Low-energy quantum effective action for relativistic superfluids

    D. T . Son, “Low-energy quantum effective action for relativistic superfluids”, (2002), https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/ 0204199

    2002

  28. [37]

    General coordinate invariance and conformal invariance in nonrelativistic physics: Unitary Fermi gas

    D. Son, M. Wingate, “General coordinate invariance and conformal invariance in nonrelativistic physics: Unitary Fermi gas”, Annals of Physics 321 (2006), no. 1, p. 197–224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2005.11.001

    2006 doi

  29. [38]

    Transport theory for cold relativistic superfluids from an analogue model of gravity

    M. Mannarelli, C. Manuel, “Transport theory for cold relativistic superfluids from an analogue model of gravity”, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008), p. 103014, https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.0321

    2008 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Quantum gases in optical boxes

    N. Navon, R. Smith, Z. Hadzibabic, “Quantum gases in optical boxes”, Nat. Phys. 17 (2021), p. 1334–1341

    2021

  31. [40]

    Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts

    U. Fano, “Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts”, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961), p. 1866-1878, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.124.1866

    1961 doi

  32. [41]

    Unified theory of nuclear reactions

    H. Feshbach, “Unified theory of nuclear reactions”, Annals of Physics 5 (1958), no. 4, p. 357-390, https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491658900071

    1958

  33. [42]

    Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P . Julienne, E. Tiesinga, “Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010), p. 1225-1286, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1225

    2010 doi

  34. [43]

    Relativistic acoustic geometry

    N. Bilic, “Relativistic acoustic geometry”, Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999), p. 3953-3964, https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/ 9908002

    1999

  35. [44]

    Acoustic geometry for general relativistic barotropic irrotational fluid flow

    M. Visser, C. Molina-Paris, “Acoustic geometry for general relativistic barotropic irrotational fluid flow”, New J. Phys. 12 (2010), p. 095014, https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1310

    2010 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Effective-Field Theories of Analogue Gravity

    A. Biondi, “Effective-Field Theories of Analogue Gravity”, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08833, https://arxiv.org/ abs/2504.08833

    2025 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Beyond the Adiabatic Local Density Approximation

    G. Vignale, C. A. Ullrich, S. Conti, “Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Beyond the Adiabatic Local Density Approximation”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997), p. 4878-4881, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4878

    1997 doi

  38. [47]

    Time-dependent density-functional theory for superfluids

    M. L. Chiofalo, M. P . Tosi, “Time-dependent density-functional theory for superfluids”,Europhysics Letters 53 (2001), no. 2, p. 162, https://dx.doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2001-00131-8

    2001 doi

  39. [48]

    Time-dependent linear response of an inhomogeneous Bose superfluid: micro- scopic theory and connection to current-density functional theory

    M. Chiofalo, A. Minguzzi, M. Tosi, “Time-dependent linear response of an inhomogeneous Bose superfluid: micro- scopic theory and connection to current-density functional theory”, Physica B: Condensed Matter 254 (1998), no. 3, p. 188-201, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a...

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.