Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Satellite to GroundScape -- Large-scale Consistent Ground View Generation from Satellite Views

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A frozen diffusion model, guided by satellite layout and camera motion, generates consistent multi-view ground images.

desk verdict A solid engineering paper that extends satellite-to-ground synthesis to multi-view with a useful 100k-pair dataset; the photorealism and consistency claims are overreaching given the reported numbers and the shared-mesh confound. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15786 v1 pith:YLUS747T submitted 2025-04-22 cs.CV

Ningli Xu , Rongjun Qin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords cross-viewsynthesissatellite-to-groundgenerationlatentdiffusionmodelmulti-viewconsistencytemporaldenoisingconditionedurbanscenesatellite-grounddataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a frozen latent diffusion model can be turned into a satellite-to-ground scene generator that produces not just one but many neighboring ground views that agree with each other. The key idea is to condition the denoising process twice: once with high-level layout features extracted from the satellite appearance, and once with camera-motion features computed across a sequence of satellite-derived ground renders. The authors also release a large dataset of over 100,000 aligned satellite–perspective-pair images to train and benchmark such systems. They report that their two-module design outperforms existing satellite-to-ground and scene-video generators on perceptual metrics (LPIPS, FID, DreamSim) and temporal consistency (FVD).

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a pair of conditioning modules bolted onto a fixed latent diffusion model (Stable Diffusion v2-1). The first, satellite-guided denoising, uses a ControlNet-style U-Net $\mathcal{E}_{\mathrm{sat}}$ to extract high-level scene-layout features from the rendered ground-view satellite appearance $I_g$ and adds them as residuals in each layer of the denoiser, so a single view is faithful to the satellite layout. The second, satellite-temporal denoising, inflates the architecture with temporal layers after each spatial layer and feeds it a latent made by concatenating the duplicated initial view latent with the noise tensor, while a ResNet $\mathcal{E}_{\phi}$ injects camera-motion features from the sequence of satellite renders. Together they let the frozen model generate a temporally coherent sequence of ground views without any per-scene training.

What would settle it

Evaluate the method on a validation scene where a LiDAR-based ground truth shows height errors above 2 meters near building boundaries or dense trees, and compare the generated multi-view sequences there against the 'w/o temp' ablation: if FVD and LPIPS degrade to the same level, the temporal module is only as good as the geometry. A sharper test is to perturb the manual gravity alignment by a few degrees on a held-out scene and measure whether the generated views rotate or drift correspondingly, which would confirm that the claimed consistency is inherited from the mesh rather than learned by the denoising modules.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that multi-view consistency in satellite-to-ground generation does not require retraining or fine-tuning the diffusion model itself. Starting from a textured 3D mesh built from multi-view satellite images, the method renders the satellite appearance from each desired ground camera pose. A satellite-guided denoising network (ControlNet-style) injects the layout of that rendered image into every layer of a frozen Stable Diffusion model, producing a plausible first ground view. A second satellite-temporal denoising network then takes that first view, duplicates it across the desired number of views, concatenates it with noise in the latent domain, and injects camera-motion features extracted from the sequence of satellite renders, so the diffusion process generates the whole sequence in one pass. The paper claims this yields photorealistic ground views whose buildings, facades, and layouts stay consistent across neighboring viewpoints, and reports superior LPIPS, FID, DreamSim, and FVD numbers relative to Sat2Ground, GVG, and SceneScape on the new dataset.

Load-bearing premise

The whole pipeline assumes the satellite-derived textured 3D mesh, manually aligned to gravity, is a faithful geometric and appearance prior for the ground scene; if that prior is inaccurate, both conditioning modules inherit the error and consistency collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Long walking or driving sequences can be generated from a single satellite image stack, since the temporal module produces any number of views up to the length it was trained for (the authors note degradation beyond roughly 15 views or 150 meters).
  • Because the base diffusion model stays frozen, the conditioning modules are lightweight and train in about two days on a single GPU, and swapping in a better base model may improve output without retraining the modules.
  • The released dataset, with over 25,000 panoramic and 100,000 perspective satellite–ground pairs plus depth and pose, gives future work a benchmark and training ground for consistent ground-view and video generation.
  • Unlike voxel- or NeRF-based scene generators, the approach needs no per-scene training and can be applied to a new city using only satellite imagery and an estimated mesh, as demonstrated on the HoliCity dataset.
  • By generating the whole view sequence in one denoising pass, the method avoids the error accumulation seen in autoregressive approaches like SceneScape.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to replace the manual gravity alignment with an automatic alignment step; the paper's own rebuttal indicates sensitivity to height errors near building boundaries, so an automatic pipeline would reveal how much consistency depends on the geometric prior.
  • The same two-module recipe may transfer to other cross-domain generation tasks where a cheap geometric proxy exists, such as map-to-street navigation or aerial-to-street generation for other cities, since neither module is specific to satellites.
  • Because the temporal module anchors on the first generated view, errors in that anchor propagate; one could test an inference-time strategy that re-anchors periodically or averages multiple anchor candidates to extend the reliable sequence length beyond the reported 15-view limit.
  • The authors attribute poor tree and car rendering to capture-date mismatch between satellite and ground data; a dataset that temporally matches these dynamic elements could directly test whether the residual inconsistency comes from the geometry prior or from the diffusion model's prior.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Sat2GroundScape, a pipeline for generating multiple mutually consistent ground-view images from satellite imagery. The method keeps a pre-trained latent diffusion model (Stable Diffusion v2-1) frozen and adds two trainable conditioning modules: satellite-guided denoising (a ControlNet-like encoder extracting layout features from a rendered satellite appearance) and satellite-temporal denoising (a temporal-spatial extension that conditions on the first generated view and satellite-derived camera-motion features). The authors also contribute a dataset of over 100,000 perspective and 25,000 panoramic satellite-ground pairs built from the 2019 Data Fusion Contest data and Google Street View. Experiments on the new dataset and a qualitative HoliCity study compare against Sat2Ground, SceneScape, and GVG, reporting improvements on LPIPS, FID, DreamSIM, and FVD, with an ablation isolating the two modules.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution to cross-view synthesis by addressing multi-view consistency, an issue that prior satellite-to-ground generators largely ignore. The frozen-LDM design with lightweight conditioning modules is a practical and computationally efficient approach. The dataset is a valuable resource for the community, and the ablation study gives evidence that both modules contribute to the reported gains. However, the evaluation has several limitations that affect the strength of the central claims: no error bars, qualitative-only generalization, an admitted degradation for long sequences, and a reliance on a manually aligned and approximate 3D mesh. The absolute metric values (e.g., FID 159.6, LPIPS 0.542) are also high, so the claim of 'high photorealism' should be framed as relative to baselines rather than absolute.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Tables 1 and 2] The quantitative evaluation reports single-run metrics without error bars or significance tests. The central claim that the method 'outperforms' baselines on perceptual and temporal metrics would be more convincing if the authors provided standard deviations across multiple random seeds or bootstrap confidence intervals, especially given that some metric differences (e.g., PSNR ranking) are small.
  2. [Sec. 4.4] The generalization experiment on HoliCity is evaluated only qualitatively. The claim of "superior generalizability" is not quantitatively supported; please provide metrics such as FID, LPIPS, and FVD on HoliCity, or explicitly state that generalization is demonstrated qualitatively and not measured.
  3. [Rebuttal Q5; Sec. 4.2 and Sec. 5] The authors acknowledge in the rebuttal that performance declines when the number of generated views exceeds 15 (150 meters). This is in tension with the "large-scale" claim in the title and abstract. The manuscript should include a limitations section that states this dependency explicitly, and the abstract and conclusions should be qualified to avoid overclaiming large-scale consistency.
  4. [Sec. 3.4 and Sec. 3.2] The method relies on a manually gravity-aligned textured 3D mesh reconstructed from satellite imagery. The robustness of the approach to inaccuracies in this mesh (e.g., height errors up to 2 m near building boundaries, poor modeling of trees and cars, as acknowledged in the rebuttal) is not analyzed. Please provide an evaluation of failure cases where the mesh is inaccurate, or an ablation that perturbs the mesh geometry, to assess the sensitivity of the conditioning modules to geometric errors.
  5. [Sec. 4.1 and Sec. 4.2] The consistency claim is supported only by FVD, a distribution-level video metric that does not directly measure whether buildings, objects, and layout are coherent across the generated views. Given that multi-view consistency is the central contribution, the paper would be strengthened by a direct consistency metric, such as semantic overlap, pose-warped reconstruction error, or correspondence accuracy between adjacent views.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'denosing' should be 'denoising'.
  2. [Table 2 caption] The caption says 'Abalative evaluation'; this should be 'Ablative evaluation'.
  3. [Sec. 3 (introduction to Sec. 3.2)] The phrase 'Additionally, Furthermore,' is a redundant and awkward transition; it should be cleaned up.
  4. [Eqs. (3) and (4)] The notation for the denoising step in Eq. (4) is ambiguous: z'_t includes the concatenated fixed initial latent z_init, and the DDIM update should leave z_init unchanged. Please clarify that only the noisy component is updated during denoising.
  5. [References [39]] Reference [39] is cited as both an arXiv preprint and an ECCV 2024 paper in the rebuttal; the reference list should be unified.
  6. [Overall] The manuscript does not contain a limitations section. The authors mention in the rebuttal (Q3) that they plan to add one; please include a discussion of the method's limitations, including mesh inaccuracies, sequence-length dependence, and lack of explicit lighting modeling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the pipeline is trained on held-out real ground imagery, and the rendered satellite appearance is a conditioning input rather than a fitted target.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an empirical conditional-generation pipeline. Satellite views are reconstructed into a textured mesh, rendered into ground-view satellite appearance I_g, and then used as conditioning for a frozen latent diffusion model via two learned modules (satellite-guided denoising, Eq. 2, and satellite-temporal denoising, Eqs. 3-5). The noise-prediction objective in Eq. 5 trains these modules against real ground-view latent features; no equation defines the output in terms of the output, and no fitted parameter is later renamed as a prediction. Quantitative evaluation in Table 1 compares generated images and sequences against real Google Street View frames on held-out 20 scenes, not against the model's own rendered inputs. The self-cited GVG [39] appears as a baseline and as a reconstruction recipe for the dataset, but it supplies no theorem or fitted constant that forces the reported gains; with or without GVG, the two conditioning modules must learn the satellite-to-ground mapping from data. The rebuttal's admitted limitations, such as height errors near building boundaries, poor tree and car modeling, and degraded performance when the sequence length exceeds 15 views, are accuracy and scalability caveats rather than circular definitions. The manual gravity alignment of the 3D model is a data-preprocessing step and does not make the predicted output equivalent to its input. Therefore, no circular step meets the required quoted-reduction standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, forces, or conserved quantities. The dataset is a data resource, not an invented entity.

free parameters (4)
  • Camera step size between generated views = 10 meters
    Chosen for evaluation and dataset generation; the rebuttal shows consistency degrades when the total path exceeds 150m, so results are tied to this step size.
  • Number of generated views T = 5 for main comparison; up to 15 in ablations
    Sequence length is a hyperparameter; the rebuttal Q5 states performance declines for T greater than 15, which bounds the 'large-scale' claim.
  • Perspective camera field of view = 75 degrees
    Used to resample perspective images from panoramas; the rebuttal Q6 notes narrower FOV increases sensitivity to dynamic objects.
  • Learning rate for diffusion fine-tuning = 1e-5
    Standard training choice, not justified by analysis or sensitivity study.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The pre-trained Stable Diffusion v2-1 LDM provides a strong natural-image prior that can be steered by satellite-conditioned residuals.
    The method freezes epsilon_theta and relies on it to produce photorealistic ground views; if the prior cannot represent street-level scenes from a top-down condition, generation fails. Invoked in Sec. 3.2.
  • ad hoc to paper The satellite-derived 3D mesh and texture mapping produce a geometrically accurate ground-view appearance after manual gravity alignment.
    Sec. 3.4 describes manual adjustment; rebuttal admits height errors up to 2m and poor modeling of vegetation/cars. All conditioning depends on this mesh.
  • ad hoc to paper Satellite appearance alone carries sufficient high-frequency layout information for ground-view generation.
    Sec. 4.1 states this in contrast to GVG's appearance+edge conditioning, but no ablation compares appearance-only vs appearance+edge.
  • domain assumption FVD computed on generated sequences against real ground-view sequences is a valid proxy for multi-view consistency.
    FVD is a distributional video metric; the paper does not validate that reported FVD differences correspond to perceptible consistency improvements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Satellite to GroundScape -- Large-scale Consistent Ground View Generation from Satellite Views." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YLUS747T

@misc{pith2026250415786,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Satellite to GroundScape -- Large-scale Consistent Ground View Generation from Satellite Views},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YLUS747T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15786}
}
read the original abstract

Generating consistent ground-view images from satellite imagery is challenging, primarily due to the large discrepancies in viewing angles and resolution between satellite and ground-level domains. Previous efforts mainly concentrated on single-view generation, often resulting in inconsistencies across neighboring ground views. In this work, we propose a novel cross-view synthesis approach designed to overcome these challenges by ensuring consistency across ground-view images generated from satellite views. Our method, based on a fixed latent diffusion model, introduces two conditioning modules: satellite-guided denoising, which extracts high-level scene layout to guide the denoising process, and satellite-temporal denoising, which captures camera motion to maintain consistency across multiple generated views. We further contribute a large-scale satellite-ground dataset containing over 100,000 perspective pairs to facilitate extensive ground scene or video generation. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods on perceptual and temporal metrics, achieving high photorealism and consistency in multi-view outputs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15786 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Ground views generated by Sat2GroundScape. Using satellite views as input, Sat2GroundScape generates a sequence of ground views that exhibit photorealistic quality and maintain consistent ground appearances across different perspectives. and stable mapping between the satellite and ground do￾mains. The generated ground views must not only adhere to the scene layouts indicated by the satellite data but also maintain … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview pipeline of Sat2GroundScape. The satellite appearance is initially projected onto the ground level based on the estimated satellite geometry. Satellite-Guided Denoising is then introduced to guide the latent diffusion model (LDM) in generating individual ground views that preserve the original scene layouts. Satellite-Temporal Denoising is proposed to further ensure consistency across multiple generated vie… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sat2GroundScape dataset. Our dataset provides accurately aligned satellite and ground data, containing appearance, depth, and camera pose information, in both panoramic (over 25,000 pairs) and perspective formats (over 100,000 pairs). Each ground panorama is associated…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative baseline comparison on the Sat2GroundScape dataset. We present four-view outputs of our method alongside results from Sat2Ground [23], SceneScape [5], and GVG [39]. Our method consistently produces more photorealistic results than the baseline approaches. A…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative Ablation Study. In ”w/o temp-sat”, we show five independently generated ground views without either satellite or temporal conditioning, leading to random and unstruc￾tured outputs. In ”w/o sat”, with a randomly generated initial view, our satellite-temporal…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 3

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Stargan: Unified genera- tive adversarial networks for multi-domain image-to-image translation

    Yunjey Choi, Minje Choi, Munyoung Kim, Jung-Woo Ha, Sunghun Kim, and Jaegul Choo. Stargan: Unified genera- tive adversarial networks for multi-domain image-to-image translation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8789–8797,

  3. [3]

    Blender - a 3D modelling and rendering package

    Blender Online Community. Blender - a 3D modelling and rendering package. Blender Foundation, Stichting Blender Foundation, Amsterdam, 2018. 5

    2018

  4. [4]

    Streetscapes: Large-scale consistent street view generation using autore- gressive video diffusion

    Boyang Deng, Richard Tucker, Zhengqi Li, Leonidas Guibas, Noah Snavely, and Gordon Wetzstein. Streetscapes: Large-scale consistent street view generation using autore- gressive video diffusion. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Confer- ence Papers, pages 1–11, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Scenescape: text-driven consistent scene generation

    Rafail Fridman, Amit Abecasis, Yoni Kasten, and Tali Dekel. Scenescape: text-driven consistent scene generation. In Pro- ceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural In- formation Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY , USA, 2024. Curran Associates Inc. 3, 6, 7

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Dream- sim: Learning new dimensions of human visual similar- ity using synthetic data

    Stephanie Fu, Netanel Tamir, Shobhita Sundaram, Lucy Chai, Richard Zhang, Tali Dekel, and Phillip Isola. Dream- sim: Learning new dimensions of human visual similar- ity using synthetic data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09344 ,

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Magicdrive: Street view generation with diverse 3d geometry control

    Ruiyuan Gao, Kai Chen, Enze Xie, Lanqing Hong, Zhenguo Li, Dit-Yan Yeung, and Qiang Xu. Magicdrive: Street view generation with diverse 3d geometry control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02601, 2023. 3

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Skyeyes: Ground roaming using aerial view images

    Zhiyuan Gao, Wenbin Teng, Gonglin Chen, Jinsen Wu, Ningli Xu, Rongjun Qin, Andrew Feng, and Yajie Zhao. Skyeyes: Ground roaming using aerial view images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16685, 2024. 2

    arXiv 2024

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016. 5

    2016

  2. [10]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilib- rium

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilib- rium. Advances in neural information processing systems , 30, 2017. 7

    2017

  3. [11]

    Accurate and efficient stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual information

    Heiko Hirschmuller. Accurate and efficient stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual information. In 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’05), pages 807–814. IEEE, 2005. 4

    2005

  4. [12]

    Stereo processing by semiglobal match- ing and mutual information

    Heiko Hirschmuller. Stereo processing by semiglobal match- ing and mutual information. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 30(2):328–341, 2007. 5

    2007

  5. [13]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 2, 5

    2020

  6. [14]

    Image-to-image translation with conditional adver- sarial networks

    Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adver- sarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1125–1134,

  7. [15]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph., 42(4):139–1,

  8. [16]

    Auto-encoding variational bayes

    Diederik P Kingma. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013. 4

    2013 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Sat2vid: Street-view panoramic video synthesis from a single satellite image

    Zuoyue Li, Zhenqiang Li, Zhaopeng Cui, Rongjun Qin, Marc Pollefeys, and Martin R Oswald. Sat2vid: Street-view panoramic video synthesis from a single satellite image. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 12436–12445, 2021. 3

    2021

  10. [18]

    Zuoyue Li, Zhenqiang Li, Zhaopeng Cui, Marc Pollefeys, and Martin R. Oswald. Sat2scene: 3d urban scene genera- tion from satellite images with diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 7141–7150, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024

  11. [19]

    Large-scale semantic 3-d re- construction: Outcome of the 2019 ieee grss data fusion contest—part b

    Yanchao Lian, Tuo Feng, Jinliu Zhou, Meixia Jia, Aijin Li, Zhaoyang Wu, Licheng Jiao, Myron Brown, Gregory Hager, Naoto Yokoya, et al. Large-scale semantic 3-d re- construction: Outcome of the 2019 ieee grss data fusion contest—part b. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Ap- pl...

    2019

  12. [20]

    Infinicity: Infinite-scale city synthesis

    Chieh Hubert Lin, Hsin-Ying Lee, Willi Menapace, Menglei Chai, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Sergey Tulyakov. Infinicity: Infinite-scale city synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 22808–22818, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  13. [21]

    Large-scale and efficient tex- ture mapping algorithm via loopy belief propagation

    Xiao Ling and Rongjun Qin. Large-scale and efficient tex- ture mapping algorithm via loopy belief propagation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 61:1–11,

  14. [22]

    Lending orientation to neural networks for cross-view geo-localization

    Liu Liu and Hongdong Li. Lending orientation to neural networks for cross-view geo-localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5624–5633, 2019. 5

    2019

  15. [23]

    Geometry-aware satellite- to-ground image synthesis for urban areas

    Xiaohu Lu, Zuoyue Li, Zhaopeng Cui, Martin R Oswald, Marc Pollefeys, and Rongjun Qin. Geometry-aware satellite- to-ground image synthesis for urban areas. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 859–867, 2020. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7

    2020

  16. [24]

    Follow your pose: Pose- guided text-to-video generation using pose-free videos

    Yue Ma, Yingqing He, Xiaodong Cun, Xintao Wang, Siran Chen, Xiu Li, and Qifeng Chen. Follow your pose: Pose- guided text-to-video generation using pose-free videos. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, pages 4117–4125, 2024. 3

    2024

  17. [25]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. Communications of the ACM , 65(1):99–106, 2021. 2

    2021

  18. [26]

    Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8162–8171. PMLR,

  19. [27]

    Controlnext: Powerful and effi- cient control for image and video generation

    Bohao Peng, Jian Wang, Yuechen Zhang, Wenbo Li, Ming- Chang Yang, and Jiaya Jia. Controlnext: Powerful and effi- cient control for image and video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06070, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Sat2density: Faithful density learning from satellite-ground image pairs

    Ming Qian, Jincheng Xiong, Gui-Song Xia, and Nan Xue. Sat2density: Faithful density learning from satellite-ground image pairs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14672, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Cross-view image synthesis using conditional gans

    Krishna Regmi and Ali Borji. Cross-view image synthesis using conditional gans. In Proceedings of the IEEE con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3501–3510, 2018. 2

    2018

  22. [30]

    Cascaded cross mlp- mixer gans for cross-view image translation

    Bin Ren, Hao Tang, and Nicu Sebe. Cascaded cross mlp- mixer gans for cross-view image translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.10183, 2021. 1, 2

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2, 3, 4, 5

    2022

  24. [32]

    Stylegan-v: A continuous video generator with the price, image quality and perks of stylegan2

    Ivan Skorokhodov, Sergey Tulyakov, and Mohamed Elho- seiny. Stylegan-v: A continuous video generator with the price, image quality and perks of stylegan2. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3626–3636, 2022. 7

    2022

  25. [33]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020. 2, 4

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Mvdiffusion: enabling holistic multi- view image generation with correspondence-aware diffusion

    Shitao Tang, Fuyang Zhang, Jiacheng Chen, Peng Wang, and Yasutaka Furukawa. Mvdiffusion: enabling holistic multi- view image generation with correspondence-aware diffusion. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neu- ral Information Processing Systems , Red Hoo...

  27. [35]

    Fvd: A new metric for video generation

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Rapha¨el Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. Fvd: A new metric for video generation. 2019. 7

    2019

  28. [36]

    Wide-area image geolocalization with aerial reference im- agery

    Scott Workman, Richard Souvenir, and Nathan Jacobs. Wide-area image geolocalization with aerial reference im- agery. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vi- sion (ICCV), pages 1–9, 2015. Acceptance rate: 30.3%. 5

    2015

  29. [37]

    Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation

    Jay Zhangjie Wu, Yixiao Ge, Xintao Wang, Stan Weixian Lei, Yuchao Gu, Yufei Shi, Wynne Hsu, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Mike Zheng Shou. Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference...

    2023

  30. [38]

    Cross-view panorama image synthesis

    Songsong Wu, Hao Tang, Xiao-Yuan Jing, Haifeng Zhao, Jianjun Qian, Nicu Sebe, and Yan Yan. Cross-view panorama image synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2022. 1, 2

    2022

  31. [39]

    Geospecific view generation– geometry-context aware high-resolution ground view infer- ence from satellite views

    Ningli Xu and Rongjun Qin. Geospecific view generation– geometry-context aware high-resolution ground view infer- ence from satellite views. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08061,

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Multi-tiling neural radiance field (nerf)—geometric assessment on large-scale aerial datasets

    Ningli Xu, Rongjun Qin, Debao Huang, and Fabio Remondino. Multi-tiling neural radiance field (nerf)—geometric assessment on large-scale aerial datasets. The Photogrammetric Record. 1

  33. [41]

    Videogpt: Video generation using vq-vae and trans- formers

    Wilson Yan, Yunzhi Zhang, Pieter Abbeel, and Aravind Srinivas. Videogpt: Video generation using vq-vae and trans- formers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10157, 2021. 7

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 2, 4, 5

    2023

  35. [43]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 586–595, 2018. 7

    2018

  36. [44]

    Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation

    Yabo Zhang, Yuxiang Wei, Dongsheng Jiang, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Qi Tian. Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13077, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Holicity: A city-scale data platform for learning holistic 3d structures

    Yichao Zhou, Jingwei Huang, Xili Dai, Shichen Liu, Linjie Luo, Zhili Chen, and Yi Ma. Holicity: A city-scale data platform for learning holistic 3d structures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.03286, 2020. 7, 8

    2008 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle- consistent adversarial networks

    Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A Efros. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle- consistent adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages 2223– 2232, 2017. 2

    2017

  39. [47]

    Vigor: Cross- view image geo-localization beyond one-to-one retrieval

    Sijie Zhu, Taojiannan Yang, and Chen Chen. Vigor: Cross- view image geo-localization beyond one-to-one retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 3640–3649, 2021. 5 CVPR #8390 CVPR #8390 CVPR 2025 Submission #8390. ...

    2021 arXiv

  40. [2024]

    Curran Associates Inc. 3

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.