Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Advertising Spillovers in Mobile Apps: Evidence from Ad Shutoffs and Store Rankings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.16151 v2 pith:UWJ2KXMS submitted 2025-04-22 econ.GN q-fin.EC

Advertising Spillovers in Mobile Apps: Evidence from Ad Shutoffs and Store Rankings

classification econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords installsorganicadvertisingpaidmobilerankingsdatainstall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Using advertising campaign data from a large US-based mobile game developer, the authors study a global advertising shutoff in the context of mobile app install ads. Contrary to prior studies in search advertising, which reveal a major over-attribution problem where paid advertising takes credit for organic traffic that would have occurred otherwise, this study shows the opposite: paid ads generate positive spillovers to organic installs. Event study analysis shows that the shutoff decreased organic installs by 20-30%. Fixed-effects panel models estimated on longer-term data find that every $100 spent is associated with 32 paid installs and 2.2 organic installs, highly consistent with the event study estimates. Further analysis strongly suggests that this positive paid-to-organic spillover operates through a ranking mechanism: paid installs boost app store category rankings, thereby increasing organic visibility. Combining campaign and ranking data, the authors find that (1) ad spend has a statistically and economically significant relationship with store rankings; and (2) the relationship between organic installs and ad spend disappears once these rankings are factored in, indicating that they absorb the relationship. These findings demonstrate that mobile app install ads are more effective than paid install metrics alone indicate, implying that developers may systematically underinvest in marketing.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Attributed, But Not Incremental: Cannibalization-Corrected Attribution for Large-Scale Advertising

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces a framework that converts sparse incrementality experiment lifts into daily attribution corrections under structural constraints, reducing calibration error and measured cannibalization rate by ~15pp in Tik...