Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Robotic Task Ambiguity Resolution via Natural Language Interaction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.17748 v1 pith:TSBXQ7QG submitted 2025-04-24 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords taskambiguitylanguagepoliciesdescriptionsdownstreamlanguage-conditionednatural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language-conditioned policies have recently gained substantial adoption in robotics as they allow users to specify tasks using natural language, making them highly versatile. While much research has focused on improving the action prediction of language-conditioned policies, reasoning about task descriptions has been largely overlooked. Ambiguous task descriptions often lead to downstream policy failures due to misinterpretation by the robotic agent. To address this challenge, we introduce AmbResVLM, a novel method that grounds language goals in the observed scene and explicitly reasons about task ambiguity. We extensively evaluate its effectiveness in both simulated and real-world domains, demonstrating superior task ambiguity detection and resolution compared to recent state-of-the-art baselines. Finally, real robot experiments show that our model improves the performance of downstream robot policies, increasing the average success rate from 69.6% to 97.1%. We make the data, code, and trained models publicly available at https://ambres.cs.uni-freiburg.de.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Single Models: Enhancing LLM Detection of Ambiguity in Requests through Debate

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A leader-follower multi-agent debate protocol improves ambiguity detection for two of three tested LLMs, but the reported results lack error bars, a clear success metric, and contain internal numerical inconsistencies.

Pith tools