REVIEW 1 cited by
Robotic Task Ambiguity Resolution via Natural Language Interaction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Language-conditioned policies have recently gained substantial adoption in robotics as they allow users to specify tasks using natural language, making them highly versatile. While much research has focused on improving the action prediction of language-conditioned policies, reasoning about task descriptions has been largely overlooked. Ambiguous task descriptions often lead to downstream policy failures due to misinterpretation by the robotic agent. To address this challenge, we introduce AmbResVLM, a novel method that grounds language goals in the observed scene and explicitly reasons about task ambiguity. We extensively evaluate its effectiveness in both simulated and real-world domains, demonstrating superior task ambiguity detection and resolution compared to recent state-of-the-art baselines. Finally, real robot experiments show that our model improves the performance of downstream robot policies, increasing the average success rate from 69.6% to 97.1%. We make the data, code, and trained models publicly available at https://ambres.cs.uni-freiburg.de.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond Single Models: Enhancing LLM Detection of Ambiguity in Requests through Debate
A leader-follower multi-agent debate protocol improves ambiguity detection for two of three tested LLMs, but the reported results lack error bars, a clear success metric, and contain internal numerical inconsistencies.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.