Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Twists of trigonometric sigma models

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper builds a new class of integrable field theories, the $\mathbb{Z}_N$-twisted trigonometric sigma models, and shows that a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ outer automorphism twist produces genuinely new models with different symmetries.

desk verdict Genuinely new Z_N-twisted integrable sigma models with a real but checkable gap at the consistent-truncation step, and enough explicit machinery to justify a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18492 v3 pith:RHWUS6HI submitted 2025-04-25 hep-th

Rashad Hamidi , Ben Hoare This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th PACS 02.30.Ik11.10.Kk
keywords integrablesigmamodels4dChern-SimonstheoryZ_N-twistedtrigonometricprincipalchiralmodelouterautomorphismYang-Baxterdeformationetalambda
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a new class of two-dimensional integrable field theories, the $\mathbb{Z}_N$-twisted trigonometric $\sigma$ models, built from 4d Chern-Simons theory on a cylinder with a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ branch cut along its non-compact direction; passing through the cut applies a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ automorphism $\sigma$ of $\mathfrak{g}^{\mathbb{C}}$ to all algebra- and group-valued fields. The central structural claim is that because the branch points sit exactly at the simple poles at the ends of the cylinder, the twisted and untwisted models have the same number of degrees of freedom, in contrast to earlier branch-cut constructions that produced coset models with fewer degrees of freedom. The authors write explicit actions and Lax connections for the $\mathbb{Z}_N$-twisted $\eta$-model and $\lambda$-model, and for four further doubly-deformed $\mathbb{Z}_2$-twisted models. Their main new result is that when the twist is a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ outer automorphism of $\mathfrak{sl}(n;\mathbb{C})$, the twisted model has different global symmetries from the untwisted one, so these are genuinely new integrable $\sigma$ models rather than reparametrisations of known ones. This matters because integrable $\sigma$ models are the classical testing ground for exact scattering matrices and string-theory backgrounds, and the construction offers a systematic way to generate new ones.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the $\mathbb{Z}_N$-equivariance condition (2.28), imposed on all algebra- and group-valued fields of 4d Chern-Simons theory on the $N$-fold cover of the cylinder, $\varsigma: z \mapsto e^{2\pi i/N}z$, with a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ automorphism $\sigma$ of $\mathfrak{g}^{\mathbb{C}}$ (a Lie-algebra automorphism of order $N$, lifted to the group as $\hat{\sigma}$) encoding the branch cut. This single condition does three jobs: it fixes the distribution of poles and zeroes of the twist function to be $\mathbb{Z}_N$-equivariant; it restricts the fields at the fixed points $z = 0, \infty$ to the fixed-point subalgebra $\mathfrak{g}_0$ via the projector $P_0 = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{a\in\mathbb{Z}_N}\sigma^a$; and, combined with the eigenspace projectors $P_a$, it organises the Maurer-Cartan form into components $J^{(a)} = P_a j$ that enter the Lax connection. The Lax connection itself, whose zero-curvature equation reproduces the equations of motion, is what carries the integrability of the resulting $\sigma$ models.

What would settle it

Derive the equations of motion from the twisted actions (4.29) and (4.31) for general $N$ and check directly that they are equivalent to the zero-curvature equation of the constructed Lax connections, a check the paper reports only for the SU(2) backgrounds; a mismatch for general $N$ would falsify the integrability claim. For the inequivalence claim, compute the full classical symmetry group of the outer-automorphism-twisted SU(n) model: finding any additional continuous symmetry beyond $U(1)^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$ would reopen the possibility that the twisted model is equivalent to the untwisted one.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that imposing $\mathbb{Z}_N$-equivariance on the fields of the 4d Chern-Simons description, $\Phi(e^{2\pi i/N}z) = \sigma(\Phi(z))$ with $\sigma^N = 1$, is a consistent truncation that preserves the Lax connection, so the resulting two-dimensional actions are integrable deformations of the principal chiral model. The novelty is that the branch points coincide with the simple poles at $z = 0, \infty$, which is why the twisted theory keeps the full degree-of-freedom count of the untwisted one instead of losing degrees of freedom to a coset reduction. The paper then proves, by comparing symmetries, that twisting with a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ outer automorphism of $\mathfrak{sl}(n;\mathbb{C})$ gives models inequivalent to any untwisted model: the right-acting symmetry of the untwisted $\eta$-model is the Cartan torus $U(1)^{\operatorname{rank}\mathfrak{g}}$, while the twisted one keeps only $U(1)^{\operatorname{rank}\mathfrak{g}_0}$ with $\mathfrak{g}_0 = \mathfrak{so}(n)$. Since inequivalent models must have different symmetry groups, the twisted models are new integrable $\sigma$ models.

Load-bearing premise

Everything hangs on the claim that imposing the branch-cut matching rule (2.28) is a consistent truncation, meaning that the reduced theory still satisfies the same boundary and regularity conditions and still possesses the special zero-curvature structure that makes the models exactly solvable; the paper sketches the degree-of-freedom count but does not prove this, and if the truncation failed, the twisted models would not be integrable at all.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The twisted models come with explicit Lax connections, equations (4.25) and (4.28), so their equations of motion are equivalent to a zero-curvature equation, the standard signature of classical integrability.
  • Because the branch points are simple poles, the twisted and untwisted models have equal numbers of degrees of freedom, and for $\eta \to 0$ (with the coupling rescaled) the twisted $\eta$-model reduces to the principal chiral model for any $N$, so the twist is a deformation intrinsic to the trigonometric setup rather than an additional parameter.
  • For SU(2), where the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ automorphism is inner, the twisted models are equivalent to known ones: the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-twisted $\eta$-model matches the Yang-Baxter deformation and the YB-deformed twisted $\eta$-model matches the bi-Yang-Baxter deformation up to field redefinitions and closed B-fields, with the $\eta$- and $\lambda$-models related by T-duality on $G_0 = U(1)$.
  • For $\mathfrak{su}(n)$ with $n > 2$ twisted by the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ outer automorphism, the right-acting symmetry is $U(1)^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$ rather than $U(1)^{n-1}$, so the twisted and untwisted $\eta$-models cannot be equivalent and the twisted ones are genuinely new integrable sigma models.
  • The four doubly-deformed $\mathbb{Z}_2$-twisted models (YB-$\eta$, CC-$\eta$, YB-$\lambda$, CC-$\lambda$) have explicit Lax connections and, for SU(2), explicit metric and B-field backgrounds whose equations of motion the authors verified match the zero-curvature equations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves open whether the twisted models carry q-deformed symmetries; if its speculation is right, the outer-automorphism twistings should have quantum symmetries given by q-deformed twisted affine algebras, and the classical r-matrix computed from the Lax connection (4.25) would be a direct test.
  • The symmetry-counting argument points toward a classification: the genuinely new twisted $\eta$-models should be enumerated by the outer automorphisms of $\mathfrak{g}$, and scanning other real forms and automorphism types would reveal the full size of the new class.
  • In the SU(2)$\times$SU(2) example the twisted model's B-field is not closed while the untwisted one's is, which suggests non-closed B-field cohomology as a general diagnostic of inequivalence; computing it for the SU(n) outer-automorphism backgrounds would extend the paper's argument.
  • Because the construction is intrinsically trigonometric, an elliptic counterpart on a torus with $\mathbb{Z}_n\times\mathbb{Z}_n$-equivariance should degenerate to special cases of these twisted models, so comparing the two descriptions could show which features of the twisted models survive quantisation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a new class of two-dimensional integrable sigma models, dubbed Z_N-twisted trigonometric sigma models, starting from 4d Chern-Simons theory on a cylinder with a Z_N branch cut running along the non-compact direction. Fields are required to satisfy a Z_N-equivariance condition with respect to a Z_N automorphism of the Lie algebra. The authors derive actions and Lax connections for the Z_N-twisted eta- and lambda-models, and for the doubly-deformed YB-eta, CC-eta, YB-lambda, and CC-lambda models in the Z2 case. They compute explicit SU(2) backgrounds for these four deformed models and show that the Z2-twisted SU(2) models are equivalent to known untwisted models via field redefinitions, T-duality, and analytic continuation. The main novelty claim is that twisting by the Z2 outer automorphism of sl(n;C) produces models inequivalent to their untwisted counterparts, because the right-acting symmetry group is reduced from U(1)^{rank g} to U(1)^{rank g0}, with g0 = so(n). The paper also positions two previously known Z2-twisted models within the general construction and sketches several future directions.

Significance. If the construction is sound, the paper provides a broad and elegant framework that unifies and generalizes existing Z2-twisted sigma models, and it produces explicit Lax connections, actions, and SU(2) backgrounds for a new family of integrable deformations. The symmetry-based inequivalence argument in Sec. 6.2 is concrete and gives a sharp, checkable criterion for when twisting by an outer automorphism yields genuinely new models. The paper is clearly written and carefully connects to the established 4d Chern-Simons technology, which strongly suggests the overall picture is correct. However, the central claim that all Z_N-twisted trigonometric sigma models are integrable rests on an asserted consistent truncation that is not proven in general, and the only explicit integrability check is for N=2 SU(2). These gaps are fixable but need to be addressed before the paper can be accepted as a definitive construction of the general class.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.3, eq. (2.28)] The claim that imposing the Z_N-equivariance condition (2.28) is a consistent truncation preserving the Lax connection and hence integrability is asserted but not proven. In the 4d Chern-Simons derivation, the Lax connection is obtained by solving the bulk equations (2.12)-(2.13) together with the boundary conditions of Sec. 3; consistency of the truncation requires that the Z_N-equivariant subspace of fields is closed under these equations and that the boundary conditions at images of poles and zeroes are automatically satisfied once imposed on one sheet. The paper gives only a plausibility statement ('the twisting can be understood as a consistent truncation, guaranteeing the integrability of the twisted models') and a heuristic degree-of-freedom count. The only explicit verification is the N=2 SU(2) check in Sec. 5. Since the central claim that the Z_N-twisted trigonometric sigma models form a new class of integrable models rests directly on this step, the authors should either provide a general proof of consistency of the equivariant truncation or perform an explicit zero-curvature/EOM equivalence check for a non-trivial example with N>2 or with a higher-rank group.
  2. [Sec. 5, after eq. (5.18)] The statement that 'for each of these backgrounds we have checked that the equations of motion that follow from the sigma model are equivalent to the zero-curvature equation of the Lax connections (4.56) for all z' is a bare assertion with no indication of the computation. This check is the only direct evidence for the integrability of the newly constructed deformed models, and it is limited to the N=2 SU(2) case with specific R-matrices. The authors should include at least a representative computation (e.g., in an appendix) showing how the sigma-model equations of motion are equivalent to the zero-curvature condition for one of the four backgrounds, or provide a structural argument from the 4d Chern-Simons construction that makes such a check unnecessary for all cases covered by the truncation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.3, p. 9] There is a typo: 'It is also be useful to map the cylinder to a sphere' should read 'It is also useful to map the cylinder to a sphere'.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, DOF count] The degree-of-freedom count in Sec. 2.3 is presented as a sketch. Since the field content is later exhibited explicitly in Sec. 4.1, the count is convincing, but the text should clarify that the explicit construction in Sec. 4 confirms the sketch.
  3. [Sec. 6.2, Concluding sentence] The abstract and conclusion state that outer-automorphism-twisted models 'are new integrable sigma models', but the explicit inequivalence proof in Sec. 6.2 is given only for the Z2-twisted eta-model. The paper should either extend the symmetry comparison to the lambda-models (at least for the undeformed case) or explicitly restrict the novelty claim to the eta-model and its deformed relatives.
  4. [Sec. 5.1, eq. (5.21)] The field redefinition that maps the YB-deformed Z2-twisted SU(2) eta-model to the untwisted bi-Yang-Baxter model is stated in one line. Since this equivalence is used to conclude that the twisted SU(2) models are not new, it would be helpful to show the resulting B-field shift explicitly or to refer to a verifiable computation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the twisted models are derived from the 4d Chern-Simons construction with free deformation parameters, and the new-model claim is supported by an explicit symmetry comparison rather than by an input fitted to the conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce any claimed prediction to its own inputs. The models are constructed from the 4d Chern-Simons action (2.1) by imposing boundary conditions and solving for the Lax connection in terms of the edge modes; the Z_N-twisting is implemented by the equivariance condition (2.28), which restricts fields but does not by itself define the model's integrability. The parameters α, β, η, and λ are free deformation parameters, not values fitted to a target result. The equivalence statements for the SU(2) models are checked explicitly: for example, Eq. (5.21) gives the field redefinition that maps the Z_2-twisted background (5.11)-(5.12) to the untwisted background (5.19)-(5.20) up to a closed B-field. The inequivalence claim for the SU(n) outer-automorphism case follows from a symmetry computation in Sec. 6.2 comparing the right-acting symmetries U(1)^{rank g} and U(1)^{rank g0}, which is a logical consequence of the commuting conditions (6.12)-(6.14), not an imported uniqueness theorem. The self-citations that appear are reviews or auxiliary supporting references, and the load-bearing equivalence check is demonstrated directly in the paper rather than taken from a cited work. The main caveat is that Sec. 2.3 asserts, rather than fully proves, that imposing Z_N-equivariance is a consistent truncation preserving the Lax structure for general N and G; however, an unproven assumption is a correctness risk, not a circular step, since no fitted parameter or defined quantity is being repackaged as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or physical degrees of freedom are introduced. The Z_N branch cut and the N-fold cover are mathematical constructions rather than new physical entities. The ledger records the model parameters and the structural assumptions inherited from the 4d Chern-Simons framework.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha
    Parameter in the twisted twist functions (4.2) and (4.4), related to eta = (1/c0) tanh(N alpha/2) or lambda = e^{N alpha}. It labels the deformation and is not fitted to any data.
  • beta
    Parameter in eqs. (4.3) and (4.4) controlling the splitting of the double pole into a pair of simple poles, entering through chi = e^{2 beta}. It labels the additional YB/CC deformation and is not fitted.
  • h
    Overall normalisation of the twist function in eqs. (4.1)-(4.4), carrying the sigma-model coupling; treated as an input rather than fitted.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The 4d Chern-Simons action (2.1) with disorder defects and Lagrangian boundary conditions reduces to a 2d integrable sigma model with Lax connection L.
    Invoked throughout; the paper relies on the established procedure from refs. [8,11] rather than re-deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper Imposing Z_N-equivariance, eq. (2.28), is a consistent truncation that preserves the Lax equation and hence integrability.
    This is the paper's central construction, asserted in section 2.3 after eq. (2.28); if false, the models would not inherit integrability.
  • domain assumption The sigma-model action follows from substituting the Lax connection and levels into the general actions (3.38) and (3.39), including Wess-Zumino terms.
    The general form of the 2d action is taken from [8] and used to write the explicit models.
  • domain assumption The R-matrices used in eta-type boundary conditions satisfy the modified classical Yang-Baxter equation, eqs. (2.35) and (3.23), and commute with sigma.
    Needed for the Lagrangian subalgebra boundary conditions; for SU(n) the Drinfel'd-Jimbo R-matrix is chosen accordingly.
  • standard math The lift of sigma to the group, sigma-hat, exists with fixed subgroup G0 for the real forms considered.
    Used when imposing group-valued Z_N-equivariance in eq. (2.28) and for gauge fixings such as eqs. (3.26) and (3.29).
  • standard math The inversion formula for 2x2 matrices of non-commutative operators, eq. (4.48), is valid for the operators that appear.
    Used to solve eqs. (4.45) and (4.46) for the N = 2 deformed models.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twists of trigonometric sigma models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RHWUS6HI

@misc{pith2026250418492,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twists of trigonometric sigma models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RHWUS6HI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18492}
}
abstract

We introduce the $\mathbb{Z}_N$-twisted trigonometric sigma models, a new class of integrable deformations of the principal chiral model. Starting from 4d Chern-Simons theory on a cylinder, the models are constructed by introducing a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ branch cut running along the non-compact direction. As we pass through the branch cut we apply a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ automorphism to the algebra-valued and group-valued fields of the theory. Two instances of models in this class have appeared in the literature and we explain how these fit into our general construction. We generalise both to the case of $\mathbb{Z}_N$-twistings, and for each we construct two further deformations, leading to four doubly-deformed models. Mapping the cylinder to a sphere, a novel feature of the construction is that the branch points are at the simple poles corresponding to the ends of the cylinder. As a result, the untwisted and twisted models have the same number of degrees of freedom. While twisting does not always lead to inequivalent models, we show that if we use the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ outer automorphism of $\mathfrak{g}^{\mathbb{C}} = \mathfrak{sl}(n;\mathbb{C})$ to twist, then the untwisted and twisted models have different symmetries, hence the latter are new integrable sigma models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.18492 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Introducing a Z2 branch cut along the non-compact direction of the cylinder and taking the N-fold cover leads to a ZN -equivariant distribution of poles and zeroes on the cylinder as depicted here in the top two diagrams for N = 2. The bottom two diagrams show the same setup, but after mapping the cylinder to a sphere, drawn as C ∪ {∞}, with two simple poles. explicitly construct in the Z2 case. To summarise, the mo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Map between the cylinder and CP 1 = C ∪ {∞} with poles at 0 and ∞. The dotted line is mapped to the unit circle, while the dashed line is mapped to the horizontal axis. We consider two classes of reality conditions for which conjugation corresponds to reflection in these two lines. of conjugation on C ×, as we will explain shortly. It is worth noting that any twist function on CP1 that has at least two simple poles … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two examples of ZN -equivariant twist functions with (i) double poles and (ii) pairs of simple poles. Poles are denoted by crosses and zeroes by circles. Here we have taken N = 4 and the real line R to be the unit circle U. In the nomenclature of this paper, for Dirichlet boundary conditions at the double poles and η-type boundary conditions at the simple poles, these give the Z4-twisted undeformed η-model and the Z… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The configurations of poles and zeroes of the Z2-equivariant trigonometric 1-forms for, from the left, (i) the YB-η model with (c0, c) = (i, i), the (ii) CC-η model with (c0, c) = (i, 1), the (iii) YB-λ model with (c0, c) = (1, i) and (iv) the CC-λ model with (c0, c) =…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An example of a Z2-equivariant twist function where the 2d integrable sigma model would be a 2-field model. are tensor products of two G-invariant R-matrices, corresponding to the left-acting and right-acting symmetries, each with an infinite-dimensional Yangian symmet…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Yang-Baxter Sigma Model from Twistor Space

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Twistor-space 6d Chern-Simons theory with Yang-Baxter boundary conditions yields a 4d integrable field theory whose symmetry reduction is the 2d Yang-Baxter sigma model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian

    K. Costello,“Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian”, arxiv:1303.2632. K. Costello,“Integrable lattice models from four-dimensional field theories”, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 88, 3 (2014) , arxiv:1308.0370

    arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Gauge Theory and Integrability, I

    K. Costello, E. Witten and M. Yamazaki,“Gauge Theory and Integrability, I”, ICCM Not. 06, 46 (2018) , arxiv:1709.09993. K. Costello, E. Witten and M. Yamazaki,“Gauge Theory and Integrability, II”, ICCM Not. 06, 120 (2018) , arxiv:1802.01579

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Gauge Theory And Integrability, III

    K. Costello and M. Yamazaki,“Gauge Theory And Integrability, III”, arxiv:1908.02289. 44

    arXiv 1908

  4. [4]

    Integrable deformations of sigma models

    B. Hoare,“Integrable deformations of sigma models”, J. Phys. A 55, 093001 (2022) , arxiv:2109.14284

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Four-dimensional Chern–Simons theory and integrable field theories

    S. Lacroix,“Four-dimensional Chern–Simons theory and integrable field theories”, J. Phys. A 55, 083001 (2022) , arxiv:2109.14278

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Hybrid classical integrability in squashed sigma models

    I. Kawaguchi and K. Yoshida,“Hybrid classical integrability in squashed sigma models”, Phys. Lett. B 705, 251 (2011) , arxiv:1107.3662. I. Kawaguchi, T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,“The classical origin of quantum affine algebra in squashed sigma models”, JHEP 1204, 115 (2012) , arxiv:1201.3058

    arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Relativistically Invariant Quasiclassical Limits of Integrable Two-dimensional Quantum Models

    I. V. Cherednik,“Relativistically Invariant Quasiclassical Limits of Integrable Two-dimensional Quantum Models”, Theor. Math. Phys. 47, 422 (1981)

    work page 1981

  8. [8]

    A unifying 2D action for integrableσ-models from 4D Chern–Simons theory

    F. Delduc, S. Lacroix, M. Magro and B. Vicedo,“A unifying 2D action for integrableσ-models from 4D Chern–Simons theory”, Lett. Math. Phys. 110, 1645 (2020) , arxiv:1909.13824

    arXiv 2020

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Integrable deformations of coupledσ-models

    C. Bassi and S. Lacroix,“Integrable deformations of coupledσ-models”, JHEP 2005, 059 (2020) , arxiv:1912.06157

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Homotopical Analysis of 4d Chern-Simons Theory and Integrable Field Theories

    M. Benini, A. Schenkel and B. Vicedo,“Homotopical Analysis of 4d Chern-Simons Theory and Integrable Field Theories”, Commun. Math. Phys. 389, 1417 (2022) , arxiv:2008.01829

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    IntegrableE-Models, 4d Chern-Simons Theory and Affine Gaudin Models. I. Lagrangian Aspects

    S. Lacroix and B. Vicedo,“IntegrableE-Models, 4d Chern-Simons Theory and Affine Gaudin Models. I. Lagrangian Aspects”, SIGMA 17, 058 (2021) , arxiv:2011.13809

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    On integrable field theories as dihedral affine Gaudin models

    B. Vicedo,“On integrable field theories as dihedral affine Gaudin models”, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2020, 4513 (2020) , arxiv:1701.04856. B. Vicedo,“4D Chern–Simons theory and affine Gaudin models”, Lett. Math. Phys. 111, 24 (2021) , arxiv:1908.07511

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Local charges in involution and hierarchies in integrable sigma-models

    S. Lacroix, M. Magro and B. Vicedo,“Local charges in involution and hierarchies in integrable sigma-models”, JHEP 1709, 117 (2017) , arxiv:1703.01951. S. Lacroix,“Integrable models with twist function and affine Gaudin models”, Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure, 2018, arxiv:1809.06811

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Lectures on classical Affine Gaudin models

    S. Lacroix,“Lectures on classical Affine Gaudin models”, arxiv:2312.13849

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality

    C. Klimčík,“Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality”, JHEP 0212, 051 (2002) , hep-th/0210095

    2002 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals

    K. Sfetsos,“Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals”, Nucl. Phys. B 880, 225 (2014) , arxiv:1312.4560

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model

    C. Klimčík,“On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model”, J. Math. Phys. 50, 043508 (2009) , arxiv:0802.3518

    2009 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Spacetimes forλ-deformations

    K. Sfetsos and D. C. Thompson,“Spacetimes forλ-deformations”, JHEP 1412, 164 (2014) , arxiv:1410.1886

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Generalised integrableλ - andη-deformations and their relation

    K. Sfetsos, K. Siampos and D. C. Thompson,“Generalised integrableλ - andη-deformations and their relation”, Nucl. Phys. B 899, 489 (2015) , arxiv:1506.05784

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Integrable deformations of theGk1×Gk2/Gk1+k2 coset CFTs

    K. Sfetsos and K. Siampos,“Integrable deformations of theGk1×Gk2/Gk1+k2 coset CFTs”, Nucl. Phys. B 927, 124 (2018) , arxiv:1710.02515

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Comments onη-deformed principal chiral model from 4D Chern-Simons theory

    O. Fukushima, J.-i. Sakamoto and K. Yoshida,“Comments onη-deformed principal chiral model from 4D Chern-Simons theory”, Nucl. Phys. B 957, 115080 (2020) , arxiv:2003.07309

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Comments onλ–deformed models from 4D Chern-Simons theory

    J. Tian,“Comments onλ–deformed models from 4D Chern-Simons theory”, arxiv:2005.14554

    2005 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Integrability of theλ-deformation of the PCM with spectators

    R. Borsato, G. Itsios, J. L. Miramontes and K. Siampos,“Integrability of theλ-deformation of the PCM with spectators”, JHEP 2503, 112 (2025) , arxiv:2407.20323

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Yang-Baxter deformations of the AdS5×S5 supercoset sigma model from 4D Chern-Simons theory

    O. Fukushima, J.-i. Sakamoto and K. Yoshida,“Yang-Baxter deformations of the AdS5×S5 supercoset sigma model from 4D Chern-Simons theory”, JHEP 2009, 100 (2020) , arxiv:2005.04950. 45 J. Tian, Y.-J. He and B. Chen,“λ-Deformed AdS5× S5 superstring from 4D Chern-Simons theory”, N...

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Integrability in gravity from Chern-Simons theory

    L. T. Cole and P. Weck,“Integrability in gravity from Chern-Simons theory”, JHEP 2410, 080 (2024) , arxiv:2407.08782

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Dualities and Discretizations of Integrable Quantum Field Theories from 4d Chern-Simons Theory

    M. Ashwinkumar, J.-i. Sakamoto and M. Yamazaki,“Dualities and Discretizations of Integrable Quantum Field Theories from 4d Chern-Simons Theory”, arxiv:2309.14412. L. T. Cole, R. A. Cullinan, B. Hoare, J. Liniado and D. C. Thompson,“Integrable deformations from twistor space”, ...

    2024

  19. [27]

    New Integrable Canonical Structures in Two-dimensional Models

    J. M. Maillet,“New Integrable Canonical Structures in Two-dimensional Models”, Nucl. Phys. B 269, 54 (1986) . J. M. Maillet,“Kac-moody Algebra and Extended Yang-Baxter Relations in the O(N) Nonlinearσ Model”, Phys. Lett. B 162, 137 (1985)

    1986

  20. [28]

    Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions

    E. Witten,“Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions”, Commun. Math. Phys. 92, 455 (1984)

    1984

  21. [29]

    Bi-η and bi-λ deformations of Z4 permutation supercosets

    B. Hoare, N. Levine and F. K. Seibold,“Bi-η and bi-λ deformations of Z4 permutation supercosets”, JHEP 2304, 024 (2023) , arxiv:2212.08625

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    On Holomorphic factorization of WZW and coset models

    E. Witten,“On Holomorphic factorization of WZW and coset models”, Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 189 (1992) . J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill and S. Stanciu,“Gauged Wess-Zumino terms and equivariant cohomology”, Phys. Lett. B 341, 153 (1994) , hep-th/9407196

    1992 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation

    V. Drinfeld,“Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation”, Sov. Math. Dokl. 32, 254 (1985) . M. Jimbo,“A q-Difference Analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter Equation”, Lett. Math. Phys. 10, 63 (1985)

    1985

  24. [32]

    The integrable harmonic map problem versus Ricci flow

    S. L. Lukyanov,“The integrable harmonic map problem versus Ricci flow”, Nucl. Phys. B 865, 308 (2012) , arxiv:1205.3201

    2012 arXiv

  25. [33]

    On deformations ofAdSn x Sn supercosets

    B. Hoare, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin,“On deformations ofAdSn x Sn supercosets”, JHEP 1406, 002 (2014) , arxiv:1403.5517

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Towards a two-parameter q-deformation of AdS3×S3×M 4 superstrings

    B. Hoare,“Towards a two-parameter q-deformation of AdS3×S3×M 4 superstrings”, Nucl. Phys. B 891, 259 (2015) , arxiv:1411.1266

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Deformed integrableσ-models, classical R-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel’d doubles

    B. Vicedo,“Deformed integrableσ-models, classical R-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel’d doubles”, J. Phys. A 48, 355203 (2015) , arxiv:1504.06303

    2015 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Dual nonAbelian duality and the Drinfeld double

    C. Klimčík and P. Ševera,“Dual nonAbelian duality and the Drinfeld double”, Phys. Lett. B 351, 455 (1995) , hep-th/9502122. C. Klimčík,“Poisson-Lie T duality”, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 46, 116 (1996) , hep-th/9509095

    1995 arXiv

  29. [37]

    On integrable deformations of superstring sigma models related to AdSn×Sn supercosets

    B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin,“On integrable deformations of superstring sigma models related to AdSn×Sn supercosets”, Nucl. Phys. B 897, 448 (2015) , arxiv:1504.07213

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Multiparameter quantum groups and twisted quasitriangular Hopf algebras

    N. Reshetikhin,“Multiparameter quantum groups and twisted quasitriangular Hopf algebras”, Lett. Math. Phys. 20, 331 (1990)

    1990

  31. [39]

    Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations

    D. Osten and S. J. van Tongeren,“Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations”, Nucl. Phys. B 915, 184 (2017) , arxiv:1608.08504

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    On q-deformed symmetries as Poisson–Lie symmetries and application to Yang–Baxter type models

    F. Delduc, S. Lacroix, M. Magro and B. Vicedo,“On q-deformed symmetries as Poisson–Lie symmetries and application to Yang–Baxter type models”, J. Phys. A 49, 415402 (2016) , arxiv:1606.01712. 46 F. Delduc, T. Kameyama, M. Magro and B. Vicedo,“Affine q-deformed symmetry and the...

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Yang Baxter and Anisotropic Sigma and Lambda Models, Cyclic RG and Exact S-Matrices

    C. Appadu, T. J. Hollowood, D. Price and D. C. Thompson,“Yang Baxter and Anisotropic Sigma and Lambda Models, Cyclic RG and Exact S-Matrices”, JHEP 1709, 035 (2017) , arxiv:1706.05322

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Poisson-Lie T duality and loop groups of Drinfeld doubles

    C. Klimčík and P. Ševera,“Poisson-Lie T duality and loop groups of Drinfeld doubles”, Phys. Lett. B 372, 65 (1996) , hep-th/9512040. C. Klimčík and P. Ševera,“NonAbelian momentum winding exchange”, Phys. Lett. B 383, 281 (1996) , hep-th/9605212

    1996 arXiv

  35. [43]

    η and λ deformations as E -models

    C. Klimčík,“η and λ deformations as E -models”, Nucl. Phys. B 900, 259 (2015) , arxiv:1508.05832

    2015 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Dressing cosets and multi-parametric integrable deformations

    C. Klimčík,“Dressing cosets and multi-parametric integrable deformations”, JHEP 1907, 176 (2019) , arxiv:1903.00439. J. Liniado and B. Vicedo,“Integrable DegenerateE-Models from 4d Chern–Simons Theory”, Annales Henri Poincare 24, 3421 (2023) , arxiv:2301.09583

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Exact factorized S matrix of the chiral field in two-dimensions

    P. Wiegmann,“Exact factorized S matrix of the chiral field in two-dimensions”, Phys. Lett. B 142, 173 (1984) . E. Ogievetsky, N. Reshetikhin and P. Wiegmann,“The principal chiral field in two-dimension and classical Lie algebra”. E. Ogievetsky, N. Reshetikhin and P. Wiegmann,“...

    1984

  38. [46]

    Quantum r Matrix for the Generalized Toda System

    M. Jimbo,“Quantum r Matrix for the Generalized Toda System”, Commun. Math. Phys. 102, 537 (1986)

    1986

  39. [47]

    Nonlinear Models in Two Epsilon Dimensions

    D. Friedan,“Nonlinear Models in Two Epsilon Dimensions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1057 (1980) . E. Braaten, T. L. Curtright and C. K. Zachos,“Torsion and Geometrostasis in Nonlinear Sigma Models”, Nucl. Phys. B 260, 630 (1985) , [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 266, 748–748 (1986)]

    1980

  40. [48]

    Lax formulation for harmonic maps to a moduli of bundles

    R. Derryberry,“Lax formulation for harmonic maps to a moduli of bundles”, arxiv:2106.09781. S. Lacroix and A. Wallberg,“Geometry of the spectral parameter and renormalisation of integrable sigma-models”, JHEP 2405, 108 (2024) , arxiv:2401.13741

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Classical Yang–Baxter Equation, Lagrangian Multiforms and Ultralocal Integrable Hierarchies

    V. Caudrelier, M. Stoppato and B. Vicedo,“Classical Yang–Baxter Equation, Lagrangian Multiforms and Ultralocal Integrable Hierarchies”, Commun. Math. Phys. 405, 12 (2024) , arxiv:2201.08286

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Yang–Baxter deformations of the principal chiral model plus Wess–Zumino term

    B. Hoare and S. Lacroix,“Yang–Baxter deformations of the principal chiral model plus Wess–Zumino term”, J. Phys. A 53, 505401 (2020) , arxiv:2009.00341

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Integrable Coupledσ Models

    F. Delduc, S. Lacroix, M. Magro and B. Vicedo,“Integrable Coupledσ Models”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 041601 (2019) , arxiv:1811.12316

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    New integrable coset sigma models

    G. Arutyunov, C. Bassi and S. Lacroix,“New integrable coset sigma models”, JHEP 2103, 062 (2021) , arxiv:2010.05573

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    On classicalq-deformations of integrable sigma-models

    F. Delduc, M. Magro and B. Vicedo,“On classicalq-deformations of integrable sigma-models”, JHEP 1311, 192 (2013) , arxiv:1308.3581

    2013 arXiv

  46. [54]

    An elliptic integrable deformation of the Principal Chiral Model

    S. Lacroix and A. Wallberg,“An elliptic integrable deformation of the Principal Chiral Model”, JHEP 2405, 006 (2024) , arxiv:2311.09301

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Supergravity backgrounds of theη-deformed AdS2×S2×T 6 and AdS5×S5 superstrings

    B. Hoare and F. K. Seibold,“Supergravity backgrounds of theη-deformed AdS2×S2×T 6 and AdS5×S5 superstrings”, JHEP 1901, 125 (2019) , arxiv:1811.07841. F. K. Seibold,“Two-parameter integrable deformations of theAdS3×S3×T 4 superstring”, JHEP 1910, 049 (2019) , arxiv:1907.05430

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Complex Semisimple Lie Algebras

    J.-P. Serre,“Complex Semisimple Lie Algebras”, Springer, 1987, New York. 47

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.