REVIEW 3 cited by
Benchmarking Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with Explicit Visual Dependency
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to integrate visual and linguistic information, achieving near-human proficiency in tasks like object recognition, captioning, and visual question answering. However, current benchmarks typically focus on knowledge-centric evaluations that assess domain-specific expertise, often neglecting the core ability to reason about fundamental mathematical elements and visual concepts. We identify a gap in evaluating elementary-level math problems, which rely on explicit visual dependencies-requiring models to discern, integrate, and reason across multiple images while incorporating commonsense knowledge, all of which are crucial for advancing toward broader AGI capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce VCBENCH, a comprehensive benchmark for multimodal mathematical reasoning with explicit visual dependencies. VCBENCH includes 1,720 problems across six cognitive domains, featuring 6,697 images (averaging 3.9 per question) to ensure multi-image reasoning. We evaluate 26 state-of-the-art LVLMs on VCBENCH, revealing substantial performance disparities, with even the top models unable to exceed 50% accuracy. Our findings highlight the ongoing challenges in visual-mathematical integration and suggest avenues for future LVLM advancements. The project can be found at https://alibaba-damo-academy.github.io/VCBench/.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Representing Visual Evidence for Item Difficulty Prediction: Visual Textualization and Image-Native Modeling
Both visual interfaces, textualized diagrams and image-native VLM input, beat text-only difficulty prediction on point estimates, but their difference is not statistically reliable, and image-native gains depend on br...
-
MathReal: We Keep It Real! A Real Scene Benchmark for Evaluating Math Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models
A new benchmark of 2,000 K-12 math questions photographed in real scenes finds that multimodal LLMs perform significantly worse on authentic handheld images than on clean benchmarks.
-
Plane Geometry Problem Solving with Multi-modal Reasoning: A Survey
A survey of plane geometry problem solving that classifies methods into an encoder-decoder framework and analyzes hallucination and data leakage in current benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.